Title: Ohio Oncology Meeting
1Ohio Oncology Meeting
- Healthcare Reform and the Impact on the Practice
of Oncology - Ted Okon
- Executive Director
- November 9, 2009
- Sandusky, Ohio
2Summary
- We will get health care reform legislation
- It is not a pretty process but the president and
his party faces Armageddon if it does not pass - Health care reform has the potential to
fundamentally and severely change cancer care
like never before - There are immediate impacts as well as impacts
around the corner - This is now all about the 2010 elections
Politics, politics, politics - It is essential that OHIO practices be as unified
and involved as possible!!!
3Status of Reform Legislation
- House approved health care reform bill (220-215)
- Passed by 3 votes 39 Democrats voted against 1
GOP for - Kucinich Boccieri only OH Dems voting no
- The two Senate committees have passed bills
- Senate leadership is working on merging two bills
- Merged Senate bill may not come up for a vote
till right before/after Thanksgiving - Next Steps Till Christmas (or beyond)
- Senate votes on its bill
- Conference Committee to merge Senate and House
bills - Vote on one final bill
- Send to the president for signing
4Beliefs Shaping the Debate
- The US healthcare system is more driven by profit
than patient best interests - Physicians and hospitals over-diagnose/treat
based on churning revenue - Care is uncoordinated
- Regional differences in cost/outcomes
unacceptable - Governments role is to supervise/manage the
health care system - Must read The Cost Conundrum (The New Yorker)
by Gawande
5House Health Care Reform Legislation H.R. 3962
- 1,990 pages of law 400,000 words
- Cost over 1 trillion
- Increases coverage from 83 to 96
- Provides subsidies in 2013 to extend coverage
- Mandates individuals to purchase coverage
- Bans insurers from denying coverage
- However, estimated penalties of 167 billion over
10 years to individuals and businesses not
purchasing insurance - Establishes insurance exchanges for individuals
and small businesses - Creates a government-run public plan
- Crackdown on insurer unjustified premium
increases - Eliminates insurers antitrust exemption
6House Health Care Reform Legislation (continued)
- Expands Medicaid up to 150 of the FPL.
- Pushes Part B towards bundling of services, care
coordination, and greater empowerment of CMS to
make payment changes - How it is paid for
- 460 billion in new income taxes on individuals
- 400 billion in Medicare Medicaid cuts
- 13 billion in limiting contributions to FSAs
- Industry fees and other taxes
7Lessons from H.R. 3962
- Do or Die for Democrats to pass health care
reform - Big issues of contention
- Public plan
- Abortion
- Illegal immigrant health care coverage
- Pelosi last minute deal on abortion sealed the
vote - Pro-abortion did not block the vote but livid
- Democrat no votes came from moderate-conservativ
e districts 2010 most vulnerable list - This was in reaction to Tuesday night and a
preview of 2010 - Sets up Who will blink? scenario in the Senate
and House moderates or liberals?
8Senate Bill Best Guess
- Not yet finalized but indications of how it will
differ from House bill - Almost everyone must obtain coverage through
employer, on their own, or through the government - Employers not required to provide insurance but
business with 50 employees must pay a fee if
government subsidizes - Tax credits for certain individuals and small
businesses - No denial of coverage
- Creates state/regional co-ops and public plan
(???) - Initiatives to fundamentally transform the Part B
payment system - Initiatives to bundle care and force coordination
- Providers with top 10 highest costs docked a 5
penalty - Greater Medicare control in independent (?)
entity - Paid for by taxes and fees
- Individuals who do not purchase insurance
- Premium insurance plans
- Insurance companies, drug companies, and device
manufacturers
9Public Plan The Great Debate
- Government needs to offer a public insurance
plan - Concept is to provide a low cost option that will
keep private insurers honest - Will act as a magnet forcing private insurers to
decrease costs in order to compete - Accordingly, will force insurers to lower
provider payments - Liberals want a strong public plan based on
Medicare rates 5 - This will eventually lead to government control
or simply a one-payer system - Moderates want a public plan where HHS negotiates
rates with providers or no plan at all - Topic of great debate in the House and Senate
10The Doc Fix Political Hot Potato
- Senate attempted to pull the doc fix out of
health care reform - Voted on S. 1776 to zero out the 21.5 cut and
repeal the SGR (but no replacement) - 53-47 vote could not overcome a filibuster
- House has taken the same approach H.R. 3961
- Update for 2010 would be increase in the MEI
- In 2011, creates separate growth rates and
conversion factors for EM/Preventive Services
and all other services - Would only include MD services in the growth
rates - Cost of 210 billion over 10 years
11Impacts on Oncology
- Current Impacts
- 2010 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule
- Cuts to drug administration, consult codes, and
imaging - Audits and changing payment rules
- Around the Corner Impacts
- Greater risk sharing on oncology providers
- Payments based on the oncologist reducing costs
- Making the primary care physician the medical
home - Making oncology providers a spoke in accountable
care organizations (ACOs) - Government coming between the oncologist and the
patient - Stripping services such as imaging out of the
practice
122010 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule
- Averted severe cuts in 2010 but cuts phased in
over 4 years - Drug administration payments cut 5 in 2010 19
by 2013 - Elimination of consultation codes 1 cut in
2010 - EM payments increased by 5 in 2010
- Payment reductions to diagnostic imaging
- 38 phased in over 4 years
- Averted major payment reductions to therapeutic
radiation - Overall 21.5 cut in all physician services
payments unless Congress acts - Even then, fixing this may likely reduce drug
administration payments
13Do Not Minimize These
- RAC audits
- MIC audits
- Changes to incident to rule restricting use of
non-physician services - Comparative Effectiveness Research
- Additional imaging cuts/restrictions the next
AWP?
14Drivers of Oncology Impacts
- Fundamental lack of understanding of what is
involved in providing cancer care - A belief that specialists drive up the cost of
care so put PCPs in the driver seat medical
home, gatekeeper, etc. - Integrated medical practices are driven by
profits versus patient quality of care and
convenience - Take special note, if you have in-house imaging
and radiation - Rapidly escalating costs of cancer care are
excessive - Focus on costs rather than quality, outcomes by
policy makers - Policy makers with little/no experience in
medicine
15What Oncology Needs to Do
- Educate policy markers on the complexity and
trends in cancer care - Provide objective data
- Provide success stories
- Provide solutions in leading, rather than be led
by policy makers - Fight reimbursement cuts in order to keep the
cancer care delivery system viable - Generate more positive press
- Become more politically engaged and active!!!
16COA Position
- US has the best documented cancer care in the
world - We are in the first stage of crisis due to
reimbursement cuts - We are entering the second stage of crisis as we
lose oncologists to demand - By 2020, short an oncologist for every 1 in 4
cancer patients - Healthcare reform has to correct the problems,
not exacerbate them - As President Obama says, Fix what is broken and
build on what works
Source US Cancer Care Is Number One, National
Center for Policy Analysis, Brief Analysis No.
596, October 11, 2007.
17What COA is Doing
- Providing data and educating policy makers
- Components of Care and Oral Oncolytics Studies
- Providing legislative solutions
- H.R. 3675 and H.R. 1392/S. 1221
- Fighting Medicare cuts with data and political
support - Creating greater information sharing and unity
among practices - Generating more positive and illuminating
press/PR - Making community oncology stronger politically
18Collecting Data
- Components of Care Study
- Created a committee comprised of all functional
disciplines within community oncology - Identified the clinical and operational
components of delivering cancer care - Fielded a survey to quantify the components of
care - Preliminary results
- Medicare only covers 55 of cancer care costs
- Oral Oncolytics Study
- Identified barriers to use of oral cancer agents
- Shaping policy in concert with care delivery
19Educating
- Over 300 meetings with congressional members and
staff - Hill Education Series on Cancer Care
- First initiative was Off Label Cancer Drug Use
Compendia in conjunction with ACCC and US
Oncology - Next is Components of Care Medicare Fee
Schedule - Inviting all House legislative and health staff
- November 18th
- Ongoing outreach to CMS/HHS, MedPAC, and others
20Oncology Legislative Solutions
- H.R. 3675 National Quality Cancer Care
Demonstration Project Act of 2009 - National demonstration program on treatment
planning and follow-up care planning - Developed by a task force of practicing medical
oncologists - Open to all oncology nationwide
- Provides 300 million in annual funding
- Summary provision is in Senate Finance bill
- H.R. 1392/S. 1221 (Prompt pay solution bill)
- Important for any payment system based on ASP
- Adds 2 back to drug reimbursement based on ASP
- Defense against additional drug reimbursement
cuts - Provision was in House Energy Commerce bill
21Fighting Medicare Cuts
- Congressional staff arranged HHS/CMS meeting for
oncology practice administrators - 15 administrators presented data and stories,
highlighting impact on patients and their care - Outreach to the White House on the impact of
planned Medicare cuts - Letters from Representatives and Senators to HHS
Secretary to forestall implementation of Medicare
payment cuts - 113 Representatives signed onto one letter to HHS
Secretary
22House Letter to HHS Secretary
23Information Sharing and Unifying Oncology
- COA website at www.communityoncology.org
- News, education, resources, and action items
- COA Administrators Network
- Run by and for oncology
practice administrators - Goals of networking practices
and enhancing information
sharing - A unified oncology is a
stronger oncology! - Need a state representative from MO!!!
24Oncology Public Relations
- Articles in major papers NYT, WSJ, WP
- WSJ War on Specialists
- OpEds by oncologists in papers around the country
- TV stories/appearances FOX, local outlets
- OncologySTAT policy updates
- Social networking
- COA YouTube Channel
- COA on Facebook
- OncologyCOA, TedOkonCOA, PatrickCobbCOA
25Increased Political Action
Source Center for Responsive Politics
26What Ohio Can Do NOW
- Pull Ohio together in one massive outreach to the
congressional delegation House and Senate - Call attention to the Medicare cuts
- Outreach to House members/staff on 11/18 Hill
briefing - Follow-up after briefing
- Specific unified outreach to Senator Brown on
cuts and prompt pay issue - Come to DC as a group for Hill visits
- Reach out to your media OpEds, letters,
interviews - Oncologists and clinical providers Help us to
develop proactive solutions for oncology - Administrators get involved with your fellow
administrators through CAN - Help build the political clout of oncology
through COA PAC
27Support COA
- Become involved with COA individually and
practice - Contribute to COA!!!
- Funds go towards advocacy, studies, and public
relations - Contribute to COA PAC!!!
- Oncology needs to strengthen politically
- Join a COA working committee
- Join the Administrators Network team
- Help bring community oncology together
28Thank you!
- Ted Okon
- tokon_at_COAcancer.org
- 203-715-0300 (cell)
- www.communityoncology.org