Title: PROPOSED GROUND WATER RULE
1PROPOSED GROUND WATER RULE
- US EPA
- Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water
2OVERVIEW
- Rule Development Background
- SDWA Mandate
- Public Health Risks
- Baseline Information
- Number and Size of Systems
- Location of Systems
- Existing State Requirements
- Regulatory Approach
- Rule Development Process
- Guiding Principles
- Applicability
- Regulatory Provisions
3RULE DEVELOPMENT BACKGROUNDSDWA MANDATE
- Subsection 1412(b)(8) of the Safe Drinking Water
Act (SDWA) - ...promulgate national primary drinking water
regulations requiring disinfection as a treatment
technique for all public water systems, including
surface water systems and, as necessary, ground
water systems. - and
- (as part of the regulations) promulgate
criteriato determine whether disinfection shall
be required as a treatment technique for any
public water system served by ground water.
4RULE DEVELOPMENT BACKGROUNDPUBLIC HEALTH RISKS
- CDC Outbreak Data 19711996
- 318 of 371 outbreaks associated with ground water
systems - Of those 318 microbial outbreaks
- 86 were associated with source water
- 11 were associated with the distribution system
- 3 were of unknown cause
- Of those involving source water, just under half
were systems practicing disinfection
5RULE DEVELOPMENT BACKGROUNDPUBLIC HEALTH RISKS
(cont.)
- Occurrence Studies
- 13 Independent studies
- AWWARF study is the most comprehensive
- 448 wells sampled in 35 States
- Hydrogeologically representative
- Analyses of AWWARF study data indicate viral
pathogens are detected in 431 of wells
6BASELINE INFORMATIONNUMBER AND SIZE OF SYSTEMS
157,000 total ground water systems
CWSCommunity Water System NTNCNon-Transient
Non-Community TNCTransient Non-Community
Percent Disinfecting
CWS 68
NTNC 28
TNC 18
Note disinfecting systems may not be achieving
4-log inactivation of viruses
7BASELINE INFORMATIONNUMBER AND SIZE OF SYSTEMS
(cont.)
100
90
System Size byPopulation Served
80
70
gt10K
3.3K-10K
60
1K-3.3K
50
500-1K
40
101-500
lt100
30
20
10
0
Percent of Population
Percent of Systems
8BASELINE INFORMATIONLOCATION OF SYSTEMS
4 states with fewer than 500 systems 10 states
with 5001,000 systems 31 states with 1,0018,000
systems 5 states with more than 8,000 systems
9BASELINE INFORMATIONEXISTING STATE REQUIREMENTS
- Disinfection
- 5 States require across-the-board
- 49 States require some disinfection. Almost all
others require under certain conditions - Sanitary Surveys
- 49 States require under TCR rule
- GAO Study suggests not sufficient
- Well Construction and Siting
- 48 States have well construction standards and 47
have minimum setback distances from microbial
sources
10REGULATORY APPROACH RULE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS
- Workgroup Process established April 1997
- SBREFA Consultations
- Stakeholder Meetings
- ASDWA Early Involvement Meetings
- Draft Ground Water Rule Preamble
11REGULATORY APPROACHREGULATORY PROVISIONS
Source Water Monitoring
Compliance monitoring
Sanitary Survey
Corrective Actions
Sewer Line
Sensitivity Assessments
12REGULATORY PROVISIONSRULE APPLICABILITY
- The Ground Water Rule applies to
- PWS that use ground water as the only source
- The ground water sources for mixed source PWSs
which do not receive treatment in compliance with
Subpart H - The Ground Water Rule does not apply to
- Systems using ground water under the direct
influence of surface water (GWUDI) as a source - Private wells
13REGULATORY PROVISIONSSANITARY SURVEYS
- Purpose
- A comprehensive examination of a water system to
identify potential sources of contamination - Scope
- All ground water systems
- Frequency
- Every 3 years for CWS 5 years for NCWS
14REGULATORY PROVISIONSSANITARY SURVEYS
(continued)
- Eight Elements of a Sanitary Survey
- Source
- Treatment
- Distribution system integrity
- Finished water storage
- Pumps, pump facilities, and control
- Monitoring, reporting, and data verification
- Water system management and operations
- Water system operator compliance with State
requirements
15REGULATORY PROVISIONSSANITARY SURVEYS
(continued)
- States must identify significant deficiencies
- State must have corrective action authority
- Systems must fix significant deficiencies or
apply treatment
16REGULATORY PROVISIONSHYDROGEOLOGIC SENSITIVITY
ASSESSMENT
- Purpose
- To identify sensitive sources that will be
required to perform routine monitoring - Scope
- Non-disinfecting ground water systems
- Frequency
- One-time assessment
17REGULATORY PROVISIONSHYDROGEOLOGIC SENSITIVITY
ASSESSMENT (continued)
- Two key components of a hydrogeologic
assessment - State determines whether a systems wells are
located in a sensitive aquifer type (karst,
gravel, or fractured bed rock) - State determines whether a hydrogeologic barrier
is present that protects wells in a sensitive
aquifer type - States may use information collected through the
SWAPP for the hydrogeologic sensitivity
assessment
18REGULATORY PROVISIONSSOURCE WATER MONITORING
- Two types of source water monitoring
requirements - Routine source water monitoring
- Triggered source water monitoring
19REGULATORY PROVISIONSROUTINE SOURCE WATER
MONITORING
- Purpose
- To determine if a sensitive source has fecal
contamination - Scope
- Hydrogeologically sensitive sources
- Frequency
- Monthly for at least one year
- Begin 1 month after being notified that source is
sensitive
20REGULATORY PROVISIONSTRIGGERED SOURCE WATER
MONITORING
- Purpose
- To determine if a TC positive sample is caused by
source water contamination - Scope
- Systems that do not disinfect
- Frequency
- Triggered by a total coliform positive sample
- Must sample source water within 24 hours
21REGULATORY PROVISIONSSOURCE WATER MONITORING
METHODS
- Fecal indicator analytical methods -- specified
by the State - E. coli
- Coliliert test
- Colisure test
- MI agar
- m-ColiBlue24 test
- EColite test
- Enterococci
- Multiple tube technique
- Membrane filter technique
- Enterolert
- Coliphage
- EPA method 1601
- EPA method 1602
22REGULATORY PROVISIONSCORRECTIVE ACTION
- Purpose
- To protect public health by eliminating or
preventing exposure to pathogens - Scope
- Systems with significant defects
- Systems with source water which tests positive
for fecal indicators - Frequency
- Corrective actions must be completed within 90
days or on a State approved schedule
23REGULATORY PROVISIONSCORRECTIVE ACTION
(continued)
- Corrective action approaches include
- Correct the significant deficiency
- Eliminate the source of contamination
- Provide an alternative source of water
- Provide treatment that reliably achieves 4-log
inactivation or removal of viruses
24REGULATORY PROVISIONSCOMPLIANCE MONITORING
- Purpose
- Ensures reliable disinfection treatment (4-log
inactivation or removal of viruses) - Scope
- Systems that notify the State that they currently
achieve 4-log inactivation - Systems that select disinfection as a corrective
action - Frequency
- Continuously for systems serving 3,300 or more
people - Daily for systems serving 3,300 or fewer people
25REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
- To facilitate EPAs ability to respond to
individual comments - Indicate what you support as well as what you
disagree with - Cite, when possible, the paragraphs or sections
in the proposal or supporting documents you are
commenting on - Use a separate paragraph for each issue discussed
- Please describe any assumptions you have used and
provide copies of any technical data to support
your comments
26REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
- Public comments on the Rule should be sent to
- By regular mail to
- EPAs Drinking Water Docket W-98-23
- 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
- Washington, DC 20460
-
- or via e-mail to ow-docket_at_epa.gov
- The public comment period ends August 9, 2000
27SCHEDULE
- May 10, 2000 Proposed Rule
- 90 day public comment period ending August 9,
2000 - Fall 2000 Final Rule
- Fall 2003 Effective date of the Rule
28FOR MORE INFORMATION
- Website http//www.epa.gov/safewater/gwr.html
- EPAs Safe Drinking Water Hotline
- 1-800-426-4791
- - Eric Burneson, burneson.eric_at_epa.gov or
202-260-1445 - - Tracy Bone, bone.tracy_at_epa.gov or 202-260-2954
29(No Transcript)