PROPOSED GROUND WATER RULE - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

PROPOSED GROUND WATER RULE

Description:

AWWARF study is the most comprehensive. 448 wells sampled in 35 States ... Analyses of AWWARF study data indicate viral pathogens are detected in 4% 31% of ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:73
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: epa88
Learn more at: https://www.epa.gov
Category:
Tags: ground | proposed | rule | water | study | time

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: PROPOSED GROUND WATER RULE


1
PROPOSED GROUND WATER RULE
  • US EPA
  • Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water

2
OVERVIEW
  • Rule Development Background
  • SDWA Mandate
  • Public Health Risks
  • Baseline Information
  • Number and Size of Systems
  • Location of Systems
  • Existing State Requirements
  • Regulatory Approach
  • Rule Development Process
  • Guiding Principles
  • Applicability
  • Regulatory Provisions

3
RULE DEVELOPMENT BACKGROUNDSDWA MANDATE
  • Subsection 1412(b)(8) of the Safe Drinking Water
    Act (SDWA)
  • ...promulgate national primary drinking water
    regulations requiring disinfection as a treatment
    technique for all public water systems, including
    surface water systems and, as necessary, ground
    water systems.
  • and
  • (as part of the regulations) promulgate
    criteriato determine whether disinfection shall
    be required as a treatment technique for any
    public water system served by ground water.

4
RULE DEVELOPMENT BACKGROUNDPUBLIC HEALTH RISKS
  • CDC Outbreak Data 19711996
  • 318 of 371 outbreaks associated with ground water
    systems
  • Of those 318 microbial outbreaks
  • 86 were associated with source water
  • 11 were associated with the distribution system
  • 3 were of unknown cause
  • Of those involving source water, just under half
    were systems practicing disinfection

5
RULE DEVELOPMENT BACKGROUNDPUBLIC HEALTH RISKS
(cont.)
  • Occurrence Studies
  • 13 Independent studies
  • AWWARF study is the most comprehensive
  • 448 wells sampled in 35 States
  • Hydrogeologically representative
  • Analyses of AWWARF study data indicate viral
    pathogens are detected in 431 of wells

6
BASELINE INFORMATIONNUMBER AND SIZE OF SYSTEMS
157,000 total ground water systems
CWSCommunity Water System NTNCNon-Transient
Non-Community TNCTransient Non-Community
Percent Disinfecting
CWS 68
NTNC 28
TNC 18
Note disinfecting systems may not be achieving
4-log inactivation of viruses
7
BASELINE INFORMATIONNUMBER AND SIZE OF SYSTEMS
(cont.)
100
90
System Size byPopulation Served
80
70
gt10K
3.3K-10K
60
1K-3.3K
50
500-1K
40
101-500
lt100
30
20
10
0
Percent of Population
Percent of Systems
8
BASELINE INFORMATIONLOCATION OF SYSTEMS
4 states with fewer than 500 systems 10 states
with 5001,000 systems 31 states with 1,0018,000
systems 5 states with more than 8,000 systems
9
BASELINE INFORMATIONEXISTING STATE REQUIREMENTS
  • Disinfection
  • 5 States require across-the-board
  • 49 States require some disinfection. Almost all
    others require under certain conditions
  • Sanitary Surveys
  • 49 States require under TCR rule
  • GAO Study suggests not sufficient
  • Well Construction and Siting
  • 48 States have well construction standards and 47
    have minimum setback distances from microbial
    sources

10
REGULATORY APPROACH RULE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS
  • Workgroup Process established April 1997
  • SBREFA Consultations
  • Stakeholder Meetings
  • ASDWA Early Involvement Meetings
  • Draft Ground Water Rule Preamble

11
REGULATORY APPROACHREGULATORY PROVISIONS
Source Water Monitoring
Compliance monitoring
Sanitary Survey
Corrective Actions
Sewer Line
Sensitivity Assessments
12
REGULATORY PROVISIONSRULE APPLICABILITY
  • The Ground Water Rule applies to
  • PWS that use ground water as the only source
  • The ground water sources for mixed source PWSs
    which do not receive treatment in compliance with
    Subpart H
  • The Ground Water Rule does not apply to
  • Systems using ground water under the direct
    influence of surface water (GWUDI) as a source
  • Private wells

13
REGULATORY PROVISIONSSANITARY SURVEYS
  • Purpose
  • A comprehensive examination of a water system to
    identify potential sources of contamination
  • Scope
  • All ground water systems
  • Frequency
  • Every 3 years for CWS 5 years for NCWS

14
REGULATORY PROVISIONSSANITARY SURVEYS
(continued)
  • Eight Elements of a Sanitary Survey
  • Source
  • Treatment
  • Distribution system integrity
  • Finished water storage
  • Pumps, pump facilities, and control
  • Monitoring, reporting, and data verification
  • Water system management and operations
  • Water system operator compliance with State
    requirements

15
REGULATORY PROVISIONSSANITARY SURVEYS
(continued)
  • States must identify significant deficiencies
  • State must have corrective action authority
  • Systems must fix significant deficiencies or
    apply treatment

16
REGULATORY PROVISIONSHYDROGEOLOGIC SENSITIVITY
ASSESSMENT
  • Purpose
  • To identify sensitive sources that will be
    required to perform routine monitoring
  • Scope
  • Non-disinfecting ground water systems
  • Frequency
  • One-time assessment

17
REGULATORY PROVISIONSHYDROGEOLOGIC SENSITIVITY
ASSESSMENT (continued)
  • Two key components of a hydrogeologic
    assessment
  • State determines whether a systems wells are
    located in a sensitive aquifer type (karst,
    gravel, or fractured bed rock)
  • State determines whether a hydrogeologic barrier
    is present that protects wells in a sensitive
    aquifer type
  • States may use information collected through the
    SWAPP for the hydrogeologic sensitivity
    assessment

18
REGULATORY PROVISIONSSOURCE WATER MONITORING
  • Two types of source water monitoring
    requirements
  • Routine source water monitoring
  • Triggered source water monitoring

19
REGULATORY PROVISIONSROUTINE SOURCE WATER
MONITORING
  • Purpose
  • To determine if a sensitive source has fecal
    contamination
  • Scope
  • Hydrogeologically sensitive sources
  • Frequency
  • Monthly for at least one year
  • Begin 1 month after being notified that source is
    sensitive

20
REGULATORY PROVISIONSTRIGGERED SOURCE WATER
MONITORING
  • Purpose
  • To determine if a TC positive sample is caused by
    source water contamination
  • Scope
  • Systems that do not disinfect
  • Frequency
  • Triggered by a total coliform positive sample
  • Must sample source water within 24 hours

21
REGULATORY PROVISIONSSOURCE WATER MONITORING
METHODS
  • Fecal indicator analytical methods -- specified
    by the State
  • E. coli
  • Coliliert test
  • Colisure test
  • MI agar
  • m-ColiBlue24 test
  • EColite test
  • Enterococci
  • Multiple tube technique
  • Membrane filter technique
  • Enterolert
  • Coliphage
  • EPA method 1601
  • EPA method 1602

22
REGULATORY PROVISIONSCORRECTIVE ACTION
  • Purpose
  • To protect public health by eliminating or
    preventing exposure to pathogens
  • Scope
  • Systems with significant defects
  • Systems with source water which tests positive
    for fecal indicators
  • Frequency
  • Corrective actions must be completed within 90
    days or on a State approved schedule

23
REGULATORY PROVISIONSCORRECTIVE ACTION
(continued)
  • Corrective action approaches include
  • Correct the significant deficiency
  • Eliminate the source of contamination
  • Provide an alternative source of water
  • Provide treatment that reliably achieves 4-log
    inactivation or removal of viruses

24
REGULATORY PROVISIONSCOMPLIANCE MONITORING
  • Purpose
  • Ensures reliable disinfection treatment (4-log
    inactivation or removal of viruses)
  • Scope
  • Systems that notify the State that they currently
    achieve 4-log inactivation
  • Systems that select disinfection as a corrective
    action
  • Frequency
  • Continuously for systems serving 3,300 or more
    people
  • Daily for systems serving 3,300 or fewer people

25
REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
  • To facilitate EPAs ability to respond to
    individual comments
  • Indicate what you support as well as what you
    disagree with
  • Cite, when possible, the paragraphs or sections
    in the proposal or supporting documents you are
    commenting on
  • Use a separate paragraph for each issue discussed
  • Please describe any assumptions you have used and
    provide copies of any technical data to support
    your comments

26
REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
  • Public comments on the Rule should be sent to
  • By regular mail to
  • EPAs Drinking Water Docket W-98-23
  • 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
  • Washington, DC 20460
  • or via e-mail to ow-docket_at_epa.gov
  • The public comment period ends August 9, 2000

27
SCHEDULE
  • May 10, 2000 Proposed Rule
  • 90 day public comment period ending August 9,
    2000
  • Fall 2000 Final Rule
  • Fall 2003 Effective date of the Rule

28
FOR MORE INFORMATION
  • Website http//www.epa.gov/safewater/gwr.html
  • EPAs Safe Drinking Water Hotline
  • 1-800-426-4791
  • - Eric Burneson, burneson.eric_at_epa.gov or
    202-260-1445
  • - Tracy Bone, bone.tracy_at_epa.gov or 202-260-2954

29
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com