CHAPTER 13 Capital Structure and Leverage

1 / 32
About This Presentation
Title:

CHAPTER 13 Capital Structure and Leverage

Description:

Financial risk is the additional risk concentrated on ... ksL = cost of equity of levered firm. ksU = cost of equity of unlevered firm. kd = cost of debt ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:607
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: christo423

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: CHAPTER 13 Capital Structure and Leverage


1
CHAPTER 13Capital Structure and Leverage
  • Capital structure theory

2
What is financial leverage?Financial risk?
  • Financial leverage is the use of debt and
    preferred stock.
  • Financial risk is the additional risk
    concentrated on common stockholders as a result
    of financial leverage.

3
Capital Structure
  • Capital structure refers to the long-term sources
    of capital equity and debt
  • Theories deal with the relationship between
    capital structure and the value of the firm under
    various assumptions.
  • Two types of firms
  • Unlevered firm (U) firm that has no debt in
    capital structure
  • Levered firm (L) firm that has some debt in
    capital structure
  • Why do we observe different capital structures in
    the real world?

4
Capital Structure Theory
  • 1. Modigliani and Miller (MM) Without Tax
  • In a perfect capital market, the value of the
    levered firm is equal to the value of the
    unlevered firm.
  • VL VU
  • A perfect capital market (PCM) is where
  • market for securities is perfectly competitive
  • Investors have equal access to all relevant
    Information
  • firms and investors can borrow/lend at the same
    rate.
  • no transaction costs
  • no taxes
  • no costs of financial distress

5
  • Rationale behind MM theory
  • The value of a firm is its expected cash flows
    discounted at the WACC.
  • Unlevered Firm
  • All cash flows belong to shareholders.
  • The value of the firm is the expected cash flows
    to shareholders discounted at the required rate
    of return of equity.
  • Required rate of return of equity WACC

6
  • Rationale behind MM theory
  • Levered Firm
  • Cash flows belong to both shareholders and
    bondholders. But total cash flows remain the
    same.
  • The value of the firm is total of the cash flows
    to shareholders and bondholders discounted at the
    WACC.
  • The cost of debt is less than the cost of
    equity.
  • Financing partly through debt, has the effect of
    reducing firms overall cost of capital (WACC).

7
  • However, debt increases risk to shareholders
    required return of equity rises. This has the
    effect of increasing WACC.
  • The benefit of debt due to lower cost of debt is
    exactly offset by the increase in the required
    return of equity, leaving the WACC unchanged.
  • Since WACC does not change (given the same amount
    of cash flows), the value of the firm does not
    change either.
  • Leverage has no impact on value in a PCM.

8
MM Arbitrage Proof
  • Value of U D/ ks
  • Value of L D/ ks I/ kd
  • D paid to Ls stockholders are reduced by the
    amount of I paid on the debt
  • ks is higher for L because of the additional
    leverage-induced risk
  • The values of U and L are identical due to
    arbitrage

9
MM without Tax Example
  • Information on two firms identical in all
    respects except for the capital structures is
    given below

10
MM without Tax Example
  • Create income statements of two firms

11
MM without Tax Example
  • Value of the unlevered firm
  • where ksU WACC

ksU cost of equity of unlevered firm
12
MM without Tax Example
  • Value of the levered firm

Where,
ksL cost of equity of levered firm
ksU cost of equity of unlevered firm
kd cost of debt B market value of debt S
market value of equity
13
MM without Tax Example
  • Value of the levered firm

14
MM without Tax
  • The overall cost of capital is independent of the
    capital structure
  • The firms value is independent of the capital
    structure

15
  • If leverage increases, the cost of equity (ks),
    increases to exactly offset the benefits of more
    debt financing ( kd ), leaving the cost of
    capital ( ka ) constant

16
2. MM with Tax
  • Now, relax the no-tax assumption assume the
    existence of corporate income taxes (T).
  • Interest on debt is tax deductible.
  • Value of tax savings is a gain from the use of
    leverage.
  • Gain from leverage (Tax Shield) TB
  • Value of levered firm is equal to value of
    unlevered firm plus present value of the tax
    shield.

17
What Happens with Taxes ?
  • Same two equations
  • VU D/ks VL D/ks I/kd
  • D distributed to Us stockholders are reduced by
    the taxes paid on operating income and the value
    of U drops
  • Since I is tax deductible, L realizes a tax
    savings
  • PV of tax shield value of debt ( B ) tax rate
    (T)

18
MM with Tax Example
  • Recreate income statements of two firms assuming
    T40

19
MM with Tax Example
  • Value of the unlevered firm
  • where ksU WACC

ksU cost of equity of unlevered firm
20
MM with Tax Example
  • Value of the levered firm

or
Where,
ksL cost of equity of levered firm
ksU cost of equity of unlevered firm
kd cost of debt B market value of debt S
market value of equity
21
MM with Tax Example
  • Value of the levered firm

or
22
VL VU Value of Tax Shield
VL
MktValue of Firm
PV of Tax Shield
VU
Debt
23
MM with Tax
The cost of capital decreases with the amount of
debt Firm maximizes its value by choosing a capit
al structure that is all debt.
24
3. Trade-Off Model
  • Cost of Financial Distress
  • Higher leverage increases the potential for
    firms financial distress and financial distress
    costs.
  • Financial distress costs
  • Direct costs
  • Lenders may demand higher interest rates
  • Legal and administrative costs of reorganization
    / liquidation
  • If forced to liquidate, assets may have to be
    sold for less than market value
  • Indirect costs
  • Lenders may decline to lend at all forcing the
    firm to forgo some investments
  • Loss of customers and suppliers

25
Agency costs
  • Costs arising from conflicts between SH and BH,
    when the firm is facing financial distress /
    bankruptcy.
  • Issuance of more debt by the firm, increasing the
    risks of bondholders.
  • Taking on high-risk projects
  • Value increase is captured by SH, while value
    decrease is detrimental to BH
  • Milking the property
  • Payment of dividends to SH.
  • These conflicts lead to loss of efficiency and
    higher interest costs.
  • After some level of debt, financial distress and
    agency costs tend to increase with the level of
    debt.

26

Capital Structure Theory
  • Benefit of leverage Higher leverage leads to
    larger tax savings.
  • Costs of Leverage Higher leverage leads to
    higher financial distress costs and agency
    costs.
  • There is a tradeoff between tax savings, and
    costs of financial distress and agency.
  • The optimal capital structure for a firm is a
    tradeoff between benefit of debt (tax savings)
    and costs of debt (financial distress and agency
    costs).

27
Optimal Debt Ratio
28
Least Cost of Capital Structure is Optimal
29
  • What is the annual tax shield to a firm that has
    total assets of 80 million and a net worth of
    55 million, if the average interest rate on debt
    is 8.5, the average return on equity is 14, and
    the marginal tax rate is 35?

30
  • The management of Graphicopy is trying to
    determine how much debt they should have in their
    capital structure. If they sell 500,000 in
    perpetual bonds with a 9 percent coupon, what
    would be the present value of the tax shield?
    Assume the marginal tax rate is 35.

31
  • Calculate the market value of a firm with total
    assets of 60 million and a net worth of 35
    million. The firm's cost of equity is 15 and the
    cost of perpetual debt is 8. The firm has a
    perpetual net operating income (EBIT) of 4.5
    million and a marginal tax rate of 35.

32
  • RoTek has a capital structure of 300,000 in
    equity and 300,000 in perpetual debt. The firm's
    cost of equity is 14 percent and its cost of debt
    is 9 percent. If the firm has an expected,
    perpetual net operating income of 120,000 and a
    marginal tax rate of 40 percent, what is the
    market value of RoTek? Assume all net income is
    paid out as dividends.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)