Title: Setting the Agenda for Urban Parks
1INTERNATIONALURBAN PARKSWORKSHOPSetting the
Agenda for Urban Parks Dublin, September 2007
2The Power of International Action Plans
A Case Study Parks Victoria the IUCN Neil
McCarthy Member, World Commission on Protected
Areas Chair, Parks Forum Trustee, Centre for
Economic Development of Australia General
Manager, Parks Marine, Parks Victoria
3Title?
- Setting the Scene
- IUCN WCPA
- World Parks Congresses
- Durban Accord 2003
- Management Effectiveness Task Force
- The Impact on a Park Agency
- Benefits
4Setting the Scene
5Title
CONSERVATION
RECREATION
Parks open space
PROTECTED AREAS
URBANPARKS
6- Vision
- To influence, encourage and assist societies
throughout the world to conserve the integrity
and diversity of nature and to ensure that any
use of natural resources is equitable and
ecologically sustainable. - Purpose
- Continue to improve scientific understanding of
what natural ecosystems provide to humans. - Seek to ensure this knowledge is used in
practical ways by bringing together scientists,
policy makers, business leaders and NGOs to
impact the way the world values and uses nature. - Founded in October 1948
- 1,000 staff located in 62 countries (70 from
developing countries). HQ in Gland, Switzerland. - 1,000 member organizations
- World Conservation Congress (General Assembly)
meets every 4 years - Total operating revenue 2005 100.2m Swiss Francs
7Commissions
8CONSERVATION
RECREATION
Parks open space
PROTECTED AREAS
URBANPARKS
9- Vision
- To promote the establishment and effective
management of a world-wide representative network
of terrestrial and marine protected areas, as an
integral contribution to the IUCN mission . - Objectives
- To help governments and others plan protected
areas and integrate them into all sectors,
through provision of strategic advice to policy
makers - To strengthen capacity and effectiveness of
protected areas managers, through provision of
guidance, tools and information and a vehicle for
networking - To increase investment in protected areas, by
persuading public and corporate donors of their
value and - To enhance WCPA's capacity to implement its
programme, including through co-operation with
IUCN members and partners
10Profile
- 1300 Members worldwide
- Managers of protected areas
- Experts in the fields of interest
- Academic specialists
- NGO officials
- Ex-officio members from partner organisations
- Membership process is by nomination
- 29 staff in 6 offices worldwide
- World Parks Congress every 10 years
- 3000 delegates from around the world
- Durban Accord 2003 Call for global commitment
and action
11ProgramHighlights
- Protected Area Management Categories
- speaking a common language
- classification according to objectives
- Promoting / prioritising action / raising
standards - Guidelines and standards
- Protected area management
- Conserving biological diversity
- World Heritage List
- Identify protect heritage sites of
outstanding universal value - Under contract from UNESCO
- Capacity Building / Awareness / Education
- PALNet on-line protected area learning network
- Conferences Management of visitors in
recreational and protected areas
12World Parks Congresses
13World Parks Congresses
- IUCN, with leadership and support from the World
Commission on Protected Areas (WCPA) stages World
Park Congresses (WPC) every 10 years for the
benefit of the conservation community and the
world at large. -
- The Congress brings together the largest global
assembly of protected area specialists, managers
and experts to focus on the state of the planet's
protected areas, the challenges they face and the
opportunities before them. - The WPCA acts as a catalyst for global protected
area action and recommends future directions for
these special places on earth.
14The World Parks Congresses have been held in
- Seattle, USA, 1962
- Yellowstone, USA, 1972 Theme "National Parks - A
Heritage for a Better World" - Bali, Indonesia, 1982 Theme "Parks for
Development" - Caracas, Venezuela, 1992 Theme "Parks for Life"
- Durbin, South Africa, 2003 Theme Benefits
Beyond Boundaries
15First World Congress - Seattle (USA) 1962
- The purpose
- to establish a more effective international
understanding of national parks and to encourage
further development of the national park movement
on a worldwide scale. Issues discussed
included - the effects of humans on wildlife
- species extinction
- the religious significance and aesthetic meaning
of certain parks and wilderness - international supervision of boundary parks
- the economic benefits of tourism
- the role of national parks in scientific studies
and - the practical problems of park management.
- The overall consensus was that national parks
were of international significance.
16Second World Congress Yellowstone (USA) 1972
- This coincided with the centennial of
Yellowstone. - By 1972 the nations of the world could count more
than 1,200 national parks or equivalent reserves - Issues discussed at the conference included
- the effects of tourism on protected areas
- broad aspects of park planning and management
- special, social scientific and environmental
problems within national parks in wet tropical,
arid, and mountain regions - controversial aspects of wildlife management in
protected areas - the social, scientific and environmental problems
of marine, island, polar and sub-polar protected
areas - the problems associated with communicating park
values to visitors and engendering environmental
awareness - improving international training opportunities
- opportunities to expand and improve the global
park system and - the needs and benefits of public support for
national parks and equivalent reserves.
17Third World Congress - Bali (Indonesia) 1982
- Focused on the role of protected areas in
sustaining society. - The attendance was some 350 PA professionals
- Ten major areas of concern were recognised by the
congress - The inadequacy of the existing worldwide network
of terrestrial PAs. - The global need for more marine, coastal and
freshwater PAs. - The ecological and managerial quality of existing
PAs needed to be improved. - A system of consistent categories of PAs was
noted as crucial to balance conservation and
development needs. - PAs should be linked with sustainable development
as nature conservation is not accomplished only
by the setting aside of specially protected
natural areas. - Capacity to manage PAs must be developed.
- Economic tools such as cost-benefit analysis are
needed to support and promote the true value of
PAs. - Monitoring is vital to ensure that PAs can meet
the needs of society and that they are
effectively managed. - International cooperation mechanisms must be
promoted. - A global programme on PAs must be developed using
the IUCN network.
18IVth World Congress Caracas (Venezuela) 1992
- WPCA, Caracas was the largest of all the
congresses attracting 2,500 participants -
- The major messages coming from the congress
included - The relationship between people and PAs is too
often ignored - Conserving biodiversity
- Conservation on a regional scale
- Funding for PAs
- Building a stronger constituency for
conservation - The goal of the "Caracas Action Plan" was to
extend the PA network to cover at least 10 of
each major biome by the Year 2000.
19Vth World Congress Durban, South Africa 2003
- The challenge before the 2003 Congress was to
demonstrate how protected areas are relevant to
the broader economic, social and environmental
agenda for humankind in the 21st Century. The
theme of the Congress responded to this
challenge "Benefits Beyond Boundaries". It
captured the opportunities for protected areas in
the next millennium and the range of meanings or
interpretations implicit within the terms
"benefits" and "boundaries" provided the
flexibility to explore a wide variety of relevant
sub-themes for the Congress.
20Durban Accord 2003
21Durban Accord 2003
- Key Outputs
- Congress recommendations
- 80 page document containing the key
recommendations from each of the Congress Streams - Durban Accord
- 38 page document outlining the key directions and
actions for the next ten years - 186 Actions at International, Regional, National
and Agency level
22Durban Accord -Management Effectiveness
- A key IUCN WCPA objective
- To strengthen capacity and effectiveness of
protected areas managers, through provision of
guidance, tools and information and a vehicle for
networking
23Durban Accord -Management Effectiveness
- Durban Accord
- Outcome 4 There are effectively managed
protected areas, with reliable reporting on their
management - International Action
- Assess globally, through the CBD process, the
effectiveness of protected area management and
associated compliance mechanisms.. - National Action
- Establish quantifiable, verifiable and sustained
monitoring and evaluation systems to chart the
state of protected areas and their key
attributes, as developed by WCPA
24Durban Accord -Management Effectiveness
- Protected Area Authority Action
- Support the implementation of monitoring and
evaluation systems, consistent with the WCPA
framework for assessing management effectiveness,
that are sustainable and resource-efficient, and
that engage other institutions and local
communities. Use the results to improve all
aspects of management and to ensure that these
results are made available to all relevant
constituencies.
25Management Effectiveness Task Force
26Management Effectiveness Task Force
- WCPA established Task Force
- Management Effectiveness Task Force
- Chaired by a WCPA Vice-Chair
- Representatives from all continents
- Priorities include Strengthening
- Protected Area Management Effectiveness,
- Protected Area Management Categories,
- Integration of Conservation Science (including
traditional knowledge) in management decisions,
Tools and Mechanisms, and - Setting and Maintaining Protected Area standards
27Management Effectiveness Task Force
- Management effectiveness as a priority
- Many protected areas around the world are not
effectively managed. - In response, management effectiveness will
continue as a priority with a focus on improving
on and learning from past approaches. - New protocols are needed to evaluate the efficacy
and effectiveness of management in relation to
the IUCN Protected Areas Management Categories,
and to take on board the increased recognition of
cultural and spiritual factors in the effective
management of protected areas. - Information arising from the assessment
management effectiveness must be better applied
to on ground management actions and also to guide
donor support for protected area investment.
28Management Effectiveness Task Force
- Certification as a priority
- Certification may open new opportunities,
benefits and incentives for protected areas
management at national and international levels.
WCPA aims to explore this possibility with the
full involvement of protected areas agencies and
key PAs stakeholders. Indicators of management
quality to assess the potential application of
methods for certification of protected areas at
national and international levels will be
reviewed and applied, as appropriate
29Management Effectiveness Task Force
- Global meetings
- Melbourne 2003
- Durbin 2003
- Publications
30Management Effectiveness Task Force
31State of the Parks
32Parks Victoria
Profile
- Management of 4.1 million hectares of parks
reserves - 17 of State of Victoria
- 70 of Victorian coastline
- 73.5 million visitors per year
- 40 million to terrestrial parks and reserves
- 2.7 million to marine national parks
sanctuaries - 30.8 million to piers, jetties, bays
- Over 1,000 employees at 120 workcentres
- 75 in regional Victoria
- over half trained in emergency wildfire response
- Annual Budget of 158m
- Capital program of nearly 20m per year
- Parks Reserves Trust 60m per year
- Earned revenue growth through commercial program
33(No Transcript)
34State of the Parks 2005Expanded
35Purpose of SoP
- To report on outcomes of Parks Victorias
management of the parks network by identifying
long-term trends in response to 10 year
directions outlined in the Corporate Plan - To report on all of Parks Victoria's Key Output
Groups natural values management, cultural
values management, visitor services and wildfire
and other emergency management, and be released
every five years.
36Background
- Initial SoP report produced in 2000. First in
Australia. - Changes from SoP 2000 and second edition
- Links to State of the Environment and State of
The Forests - Fits within long-term reporting within PV Output
Model - Strong focus on management effectiveness
- Based on world best-practice models (PSR, WCPA)
- Framework reviewed and endorsed by experts in
State of reports, and PVs independent
Environment Committee
37What is SoP based on?
- Use of both quantitative and qualitative data
- corporate databases (e.g. EIS, AMS)
- statewide datasets (e.g. Flora Information
System) - commissioned reports such as statewide risk
assessments asset condition reports - monitoring programs
- staff questionnaire (400 parks 250 staff)
- Review of framework by leading Science Panel
38Management Effectiveness Cycle
39(No Transcript)
40ROLE of SoP in Management
41SCOPE of State of the Parks
42Benefits beyond Boundaries
43How does SoP fit in?
- International / national context
- use of SoP reporting to improve park management
report to community - based on world best-practice models (e.g. WCPA)
44(No Transcript)
45- initial SoP report produced in 2000 (1st in
Australia) - links to Whole of Government (State of the
Environment State of the Forests)
46How does SoP evaluate effectiveness?
- outlines medium-long term management objectives
for each of NVM, CVM, Recreation etc - establishes a framework of indicators measures
- for the parks network
- summarises trends and activities over a five year
reporting period - where possible reports on trends and outcomes
(e.g. visitor satisfaction trends, impact of
rabbits) - highlights information gaps
- summarises progress against management objectives
47Benefits in Australia New Zealand
- Major Commonwealth, NSW Parks, Parks Victoria,
Parks Forum and University of Queensland State
of Parks linkage research to establish the
ongoing benchmarks and standards for Parks - Precursor for the international benchmark and
certification system - Innovative management decision making
- Levels of Service
- Levels of Protection
- Governance Park Risk Management system
- Park Business Excellence Framework Peer Review
- Major funding decisions by Government
- 3 year 100m Infrastructure redevelopment
- First actual landscape scale baseline data for
climate change impact
48Benefits Beyond our Shores
- Ability to report on the STATE of the key
biodiversity assets in Australia as required
under International Treaties through the IUCN
WCPA
49Questions ? ?
50INTERNATIONALURBAN PARKSWORKSHOPSetting the
Agenda for Urban Parks Sponsored by