Title: ch17 1
1BUFN 722
2Overview
- This chapter explores the problem of liquidity
risk faced to a greater or lesser extent by all
FIs. Methods of measuring liquidity risk, and its
consequences are discussed. The chapter also
discusses the regulatory mechanisms put in place
to control liquidity risk.
3Causes of Liquidity Risk
- Asset side
- May result from loan commitments- when OBS
commitments are exercised - Traditional approach reserve asset management.
- Alternative liability management.
4Causes of Liquidity Risk
- Liability side
- when depositors or insurance policyholders seek
to cash in or withdraw their financial claims - Reliance on demand deposits
- Core deposits
- deposits that provide a relatively stable,
long-term funding source to a bank - Need to be able to predict the distribution of
net deposit drains. - the amount by which cash withdrawals exceed
additions a net cash outflow
5Liability Management
- Managed by
- purchased liquidity management
- stored liquidity management
- Purchased liquidity
- Federal funds market or repo market.
- Issue additional fixed-maturity CDs, notes,
and/or bonds - Managing the liability side preserves asset side
of balance sheet. - Borrowed funds likely at higher rates than
interest paid on deposits. - Deposits are insured
- Regulatory concerns growth of wholesale funds
6Liability Management
- Alternative Stored Liquidity Management
- Liquidate assets.
- can use or sell off some of its assets (such as
T-bills) - May be forced to liquidate assets too rapidly
- Fire-sale price
- the price received for an asset that has to be
liquidated (sold) immediately - utilize its stored liquidity (i.e., cash in
vault) - In absence of reserve requirements, banks tend to
hold reserves. E.g. In U.K. reserves 1 or
more. Downside opportunity cost of reserves. - Decreases size of balance sheet
- Requires holding excess non-interest-bearing
assets - Combine purchased and stored liquidity management
7Asset Side Liquidity Risk
- Risk from loan commitments and other credit
lines - met either by borrowing funds or
- by running down reserves
- Current levels of loan commitments are
dangerously high according to regulators
8 Measuring Liquidity Exposure
- Net liquidity statement shows sources and uses
of liquidity. - Sources (i) Cash type assets, (ii) maximum
amount of borrowed funds available, (iii) excess
cash reserves - Uses include borrowed or money market funds
already utilized, and any amounts already
borrowed from the Fed.
9Other Measures
- Peer group comparisons usual ratios include
borrowed funds/total assets, loan
commitments/assets etc. - a comparison of its key ratios and balance sheet
features with those for banks of a similar size
and geographic location - Liquidity index weighted sum of fire sale
price P to fair market price, P, where the
portfolio weights are the percent of the
portfolio value formed by the individual assets.
I S wi(Pi /Pi) measures the potential losses
an FI could suffer from a sudden or fire-sale
disposal of assets compared to the amount it
would receive at a fair market value established
under normal market conditions
10Calculation of the Liquidity Index
N
I ? (wi)(Pi / Pi)
i 1 where wi Percentage of each
asset in the FIs portfolio ? wi 1
11Measuring Liquidity Risk
- Financing gap and the financing requirement
- Financing gap Average loans - Average deposits
or, - financing gap liquid assets financing
requirement. - The gap can be used in peer group comparisons or
examined for trends within an individual FI. - Example of excessive financing requirement
Continental Illinois, 1984.
12Financing Gap and the Financing Requirement
- Financing gap
- the difference between a banks average loans and
average (core) deposits - if the financing gap is positive, the bank must
fund it by using its cash and liquid assets
and/or borrowing funds in the money market - Financing requirement
- the financing gap plus a banks liquid assets
- the larger a banks financing gap and liquid
asset holdings, the higher the amount of funds it
needs to borrow on the money markets and the
greater is its exposure to liquidity problems
13BIS Approach
- Maturity ladder/Scenario Analysis
- For each maturity, assess all cash inflows versus
outflows - Daily and cumulative net funding requirements can
be determined in this manner - Must also evaluate what if scenarios in this
framework
14Liquidity Planning
- Allows managers to make important borrowing
priority decisions - Components of a liquidity plan
- delineation of managerial details and
responsibilities - detailed list of fund providers most likely to
withdraw and the pattern of fund withdrawals - identification of the size of potential deposit
and fund withdrawals over various time horizons
in the future - sets internal limits on separate subsidiaries and
branches borrowing and bounds for acceptable risk
premiums to pay - details a sequencing of assets for disposal
15Liquidity Planning
- Important to know which types of depositors are
likely to withdraw first in a crisis. - Composition of the depositor base will affect
the severity of funding shortfalls. - Allow for seasonal effects.
- Delineate managerial responsibilities clearly.
16Deposit Drains and Bank Run Liquidity Risk
- Deposit drains may occur for a variety of reasons
- concerns about a banks solvency
- failure of a related bank
- sudden changes in investor preferences
- Bank run
- a sudden and unexpected increase in deposit
withdrawals from a bank - Bank panic
- a systemic or contagious run on the deposits of
the banking industry as a whole
17Bank Runs
- Can arise due to concern about banks solvency.
- Failure of a related FI.
- Sudden changes in investor preferences.
- Demand deposits are first come first served.
Depositors place in line matters. - Bank panic systemic or contagious bank run.
18Alleviating Bank Runs
- Regulatory measures to reduce likelihood of bank
runs - FDIC
- Discount window
- Not without economic costs.
19Deposit Insurance and Discount Window
- Deposits insured for 100,000
- Federal Reserve provides a discount window
facility to meet banks short-term nonpermanent
liquidity needs - loans made by discounting short-term high-quality
securities such as T-bills and bankers
acceptances with central bank - leads to increased monitoring from the Federal
Reserve which acts as a disincentive for banks to
use for cheap funding
20Liquidity Risk for Other FIs
- Life Cos. Hold reserves to offset policy
cancellations. The pattern is normally
predictable. - An example First Capital in California, 1991.
- CA regulators placed limits on ability to
surrender policies. - Problem is less severe for PC insurers since
assets tend to be shorter term and more liquid.
21Liquidity Risk and Insurance Companies
- Early cancellation of a life insurance policy
results in the insurer having to pay the
surrender value - the amount that an insurance policyholder
receives when cashing in a policy early - when premium income is insufficient to meet
surrenders, the insurer can sell liquid assets
such as government bonds - Property-Casualty
- PC insurers have greater need for liquidity due
to uncertainty so tend to hold shorter term
assets - Guarantee Programs for Life and PC Insurance Co.
22Mutual Funds
- Open-end mutual funds must stand ready to buy
back issued shares from investors at their
current market price or net asset value - Net asset value (NAV) of the fund is market
value. - The incentive for runs is not like the situation
faced by banks. - If a mutual fund is closed and liquidated, the
assets would be distributed on a pro rata basis - Asset losses will be shared on a pro rata basis
so there is no advantage to being first in line.
23Pertinent Websites
- For further information on the BIS maturity
ladder approach, visit - Bank for International Settlements www.bis.org
- For information about the Federal Reserve Bank,
visit - Federal Reserve Bank www.federalreserve.gov
- FDIC www.fdic.gov
- Thrift Supervision www.ots.treas.gov