FOUR FORCES OF NATURE (S4) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

FOUR FORCES OF NATURE (S4)

Description:

... pushes them apart (like charges repel) while the gravitational force pulls them ... so the protons (or electrons) are repelled from each other, not attracted. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:422
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: char90
Learn more at: http://www.chara.gsu.edu
Category:
Tags: forces | four | nature | repelled

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: FOUR FORCES OF NATURE (S4)


1
FOUR FORCES OF NATURE (S4)
  • In declining order of strength, on nuclear scales
    we have the fundamental things that hold
    everything together (or apart)
  • STRONG (NUCLEAR) FORCE a range of 10-15m it
    controls reactions like 3He 3He ? 4He p p.
    The STRONG force holds together the nuclei of
    atoms, even though the protons in them repel each
    other, via
  • ELECTROMAGNETIC FORCE, with infinite range

With q1 and q2 the charges, K a constant, and d
the distance between them
2
Forces of Nature, 2
  • 3. the WEAK FORCE, also with a range of 10-15 m
    it controls reactions like p p ? d
    e neutrino. the weak force only acts in
    reactions that include LEPTONS These light
    particles are electrons (e), positrons (e ),
    neutrinos (?), and anti-neutrinos (There are
    also muon and tau families of LEPTONS, but we
    will not worry about them more in this course.)
  • 4. the GRAVITATIONAL FORCE, also with an infinite
    range

3
Comparing the Four Forces
  • If you put two protons (or electrons) 1 cm apart
    the STRONG and WEAK forces have no role to
    play (their ranges are too short), but the
    ELECTROMAGNETIC and GRAVITATIONAL forces act in
    opposite directions
  • the EM force pushes them apart (like charges
    repel) while the gravitational force pulls them
    together (all particles attract all others via
    gravity).
  • The EM force is about 1043 times as strong as
    gravity, so the protons (or electrons) are
    repelled from each other, not attracted.
  • Since both forces have infinite ranges and 1/d2
    fall-offs, this ratio is true everywhere d
    gt10-15 m.
  • Inside a nucleus the strong force is about 100
    times more powerful than the EM force, which is
    about 1000 times stronger than the weak force.

4
Gravity vs. Electromagnetism
  • The EM force does hold together molecules, cells,
    people and mountains -- it rules the human
    scale.
  • BUT gravity dominates to hold together planets,
    stars, binary systems, galaxies and the universe!
    How can weaker gravity win out over stronger
    electricity?
  • Most objects are electrically neutral -- they
    have nearly equal numbers of protons () and
    electrons (-) so the net charge is essentially
    zero. But all particles have "positive" mass, so
    gravity is always attractive and can't be
    cancelled.
  • Small moons like Mars' Phobos and Deimos are
    irregularly shaped objects the size of cities on
    earth -- EM still wins over gravity. But big
    moons like ours are pretty much spherical --
    above a few hundred km in radius, gravity wins
    over EM forces.

5
MAIN SEQUENCE STARS, Red Giants and White Dwarfs
  • Stars are powered by fusion reactions.
  • When a fuel is exhausted the stars structure
    changes dramatically, producing
  • Post-Main Sequence Evolution

6
ENERGY GENERATION
  • Key to all MS stars power
  • conversion of 4 protons (1H nuclei) into 1 alpha
    particle (4He nucleus)
  • with the emission of energy in the form of
  • gamma-ray photons,
  • neutrinos,
  • positrons (or electrons)
  • and fast moving baryons (protons).

7
Stellar Mass and Fusion
  • The mass of a main sequence star determines its
    core pressure and temperature
  • Stars of higher mass have higher core temperature
    and more rapid fusion, making those stars both
    more luminous and shorter-lived
  • Stars of lower mass have cooler cores and slower
    fusion rates, giving them smaller luminosities
    and longer lifetimes

8
Fusion on MS p-p chain
9
The Proton Proton Chains
  • The ppI chain is dominant in lower mass stars
    (like the Sun)
  • Eq 1) p p ? d e ?
  • Eq 2) d p ? 3He ?
  • Eq 3) 3He 3He ? 4He p p
  • We saw all of these when talking about the
    Sun --so this is a review.
  • But at higher temperatures or at later times,
    particularly for stars which have less metals
    (mainly CNO) than the sun, and when there is
  • more 4He around and
  • less 1H (or p) left, other reactions are
    important

10
Other pp-chains Eqns (1) (2) always there
  • ppII chain
  • instead of Eq (3)
  • (4) 3He 4He ? 7Be ?
  • (5) 7Be e- ? 7Li ?
  • (6) 7Li p ? 4He 4He
  • Net effect 4 p ? 4He
  • This dominates if Tgt1.6x107K
  • ppIII chain
  • Eqs (1) (2) and (4), but then, in lieu of (5)
  • (7) 7Be p ? 8B ?
  • (8) 8B ? 8Be e ? (this was the first
    solar neutrino detected)
  • (9) 8Be ? 4He 4He
  • Net effect 4 p ? 4He
  • This dominates if Tgt2.5x107K

11
Balancing Nuclear Reactions
  • Balance baryons (protonsneutrons)
  • Balance charge (protons and positrons vs
    electrons)
  • Balance lepton number (electrons and neutrinos vs
    positrons and anti-neutrinos)
  • Balance energy and momentum (with photons if
    only one particle on the right hand side)

12
NEUTRINOS FROM STARSExtra Material Review from
Ch. 14
  • NEUTRINOS (or ghost particles) are of very low
    mass (long thought to be zero)
  • and are electrically neutral (neutrinolittle
    neutral one)
  • They barely interact with matter trillions pass
    through your body every minute, but maybe only
    one reacts with you in your whole lifetime!
  • The first experiment to detect neutrinos from the
    Sun was led by Raymond Davis (co-winner of 2002
    Nobel Prize in Physics) using a large tank of
    cleaning fluid deep in the Homestake Silver Mine
    in South Dakota.
  • The neutrinos would occasionally react with a
    Chlorine nucleus to make an Argon nucleus that
    could be pumped out of the tank and whose
    radioactive decay could be measured.

13
The Solar Neutrino Problem
  • That first experiment was sensitive only to the
    high energy Boron-8 neutrino (Eq 8)
  • They found only about 1/3 of the predicted rate.
  • All tests of the experiment showed it was good
    and so models for a different type of Sun with a
    cooler core (and thus fewer neutrinos) were
    proposed.
  • Later experiments (Kamiokande, GALEX, SAGE, SNO)
    were sensitive to the other, more numerous,
    neutrinos including (Eq 1).
  • All experiments agreed that the detected
    neutrinos were fewer than predicted
  • Were solar models very wrong? Too hot? Fast core
    rotation? Strong magnetic pressure?

14
Solution Neutrinos have Mass
  • It is very small, but not zero
  • Then some of the ELECTRON NEUTRINOS (produced in
    all the reactions above) are converted to other
    "flavors" of neutrinos muon neutrinos or tau
    neutrinos.
  • Direct measurements in the late 1990's showed
    neutrinos do indeed have tiny masses --
  • but despite their huge number, they contribute
    not too much matter to the total in the universe
  • since their masses are less than 0.00001 of that
    of an electron (the lightest regular particle).
  • END OF EXTRA MATERIAL

15
Alternative Nuclear ReactionsThe CNO Bi-Cycle
  • This is a complicated network of reactions
    involving isotopes of Carbon, Nitrogen and Oxygen
    (and Fluorine) that eventually adds 4 protons to
    a C or O nucleus which finally also gives off an
    alpha particle.
  • BUT IT STILL YIELDS THE SAME NET REACTION
  • 4 protons ? 1 4He nucleus, plus energy
  • Here 12C or 16O acts like a catalyst in chemical
    reactions
  • The CNO bi-cycle dominates energy production in
  • -Pop I stars (i.e., those with compositions
    similar to the Sun's -- roughly 2 "metals")
  • -which are also more massive than about 1.5
    M?
  • -i.e., O, B, A, F0-F5 spectral classes.

16
CNO Cycle vs p-p Chain
17
Hydrostatic Equilibrium on MS
18
Sources of Pressure
  • Hydrostatic equilibrium holds on the MS
  • that is to say, pressure balances gravity,
    essentially perfectly, at every point inside the
    star.
  • Most stars, those up to 10 M?, are mainly
    supported by THERMAL or GAS PRESSURE
  • Pgas ?? T, with ? the density and T the
    temperature.
  • RADIATION PRESSURE is very important in the most
    massive, hottest stars
  • (above about 10 M?)
  • Prad ? T4

19
Energy Transport
  • The internal structures of stars depend upon
    their masses and the temperatures go up for
    higher mass stars.
  • This means different energy transport mechanisms
    dominate in different parts of different stars.
  • For stars lt 0.5 M? (M stars) the entire star is
    convective.
  • For stars like the sun (between 0.5 and 2 M? )
    the interior is radiative and the outer layer is
    convective.
  • For stars between 2 and 5 M? there is a complex
    structure convective core, radiative middle
    zone, convective envelope.
  • Stars more massive than 5 M? are convective at
    the centers and radiative in their envelopes.

20
X-rays and Mass Loss on MS
  • Stellar chromospheres and coronae are produced in
    low mass stars by the convective outer layers
    these can yield X-rays.
  • Hot stars can also produce X-rays from powerful
    winds, driven by very strong radiation pressure
    in their outer layers.
  • Stars of above 20 M? lose appreciable fractions
    of their masses during their short life times.
  • The winds of these massive stars are driven by
    radiation pressure
  • winds of lower mass stars are driven by energy
    from their convective outer layers.

21
On the MS Things Change SLOWLY
  • Fusion depletes H and increases He, mainly in the
    core
  • Only slight adjustments in temperature, density
    and pressure are required to retain hydrostatic
    equilibrium for millions, billions or trillions
    of years

22
Hydrostatic Equilibrium at Different Times
Pressure Gravity Adjust
23
STELLAR LIFETIMES
  • The amount of fuel is proportional to the star's
    mass, so you might think more massive stars live
    longer.
  • BUT the rate at which it is burned is
    proportional to the star's luminosity.
  • AND more massive stars are hotter in the core,
    meaning their nuclear reactions go much faster
    and they are more luminous.
  • This explains the MASS-LUMINOSITY relation for MS
    stars. Specifically we have, as you will
  • RECALL L ? M3.5 --- on the MS (only).
  • So the lifetime, t ? (amount of fuel / burn
    rate)
  • Main Sequence Lifetime Applet

24
Lifetimes in Math
  • Thats ? the proportionality. As an equation ?
  • Example you know the Sun lives 1.0x1010yr, so
    how long does a 5 M? star live?

So a 5M? star lives less than 200 million years!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com