Title: Biology 265 EVOLUTION
1Biology 265EVOLUTION
2Overview
- Molecular biology, polymorphism, and neutral
evolution - Non-Darwinian evolution?
- Chance processes in population genetics
- Drift
- Founder effects
- Gene flow
- Mutation
31960s Protein electrophoresis revealed high
levels of variation
- Drosophila pseudoobscura
- 12 loci heterozygous per individual
- 30 loci polymorphic per population
4Explanations
- Lewontin and Hubby (1966)
- Neutral?
- Mutation-selection balance?
- Heterozygous advantage (selection)?
5Non-Darwinian evolution
6Rubbish!
- It puts too much emphasis on natural selection as
the only mechanism of Darwinian evolution
7Charles Darwin(1859)
- Variations neither useful nor injurious would
not be affected by natural selection - They would be left a fluctuating element
8Selectionists vs. neutralists
- Fairer description of debate within evolutionary
biology
9Neutral evolution is important
- True, Darwin probably did not consider neutral
fluctuations to be that significant - Indeed they do not lead to adaptation
- However, the neutral theory of molecular
evolution (Kimura, 1983) is important - Describes how evolution occurs through random
processes associated with selectively neutral
molecules
10Evolutionary forces
- Natural selection - adapts population to
environment - Mutation - random low frequency neutral,
harmful or beneficial source of new genes - Gene flow - migration and interbreeding
- Genetic drift - Bottlenecks and founder effect
- Nonrandom mating - assortative mating,
inbreeding, sexual selection
11Null hypothesisHardy-Weinberg ratio
- Ratio of genotype frequencies that evolve when
- no selection
- random mating
- infinitely large populations
- no migration (gene flow)
12Relax H-W AssumptionsImportance of Sampling
- Assume no selection, no gene flow, and random
mating - But allow population size to be limited (not
infinite) - Each generation is a random sample of the
previous generation
13Sampling gametes
- Sperm A or sperm a?
- From a heterozygous Aa male there is an equal
probability that A or a sperm will fertilize the
egg - Assuming no fitness differences
14Reproductive success can be random
- Genes for malaria resistance wont protect you
from lightning strikes - Death is not always a function of being well
adapted, chance also is important - Similarly, mating success is not always due to
ones inherent attractiveness or charm - Right place at the right time...
15Soft selection
- Not all survival and reproduction is due to
selection
16Sampling leads to drift
- Frequency of alleles with same fitness will
change at random over time - genetic drift - Alleles can go extinct or become fixed (100) in
a population through genetic drift - Alleles can be substituted without selection
17(No Transcript)
18Consequences of genetic drift
- With genetic drift as the only force in operation
- the probability of a given allele eventually
reaching a frequency of 1 (i.e. becoming fixed)
is its frequency in the population. - For example, allele A with a frequency of 0.8 has
an 80 chance of becoming the only allele present
in the population
19Population size and drift
- Small populations vary more in allele frequencies
due to sampling effects from one generation to
the next - variance in frequency of an allele with frequency
depends on population size, N - Smaller N more variance, more drift
20Flip a coin
- Observe 10 sets of 20 coin tosses
- and 10 sets of 4000 coin tosses
- On average all sets would have 50 heads and
tails - But it is more likely to flip 12 heads 8 tails
in the small population - than 2400 heads 1600 tails in the large
population
21Effective population size
- Count adults in field N
- For population genetics, N has been correctly
measured when the chance of drawing 2 copies of
the same gene is (1/2N)2 - In natural populations it is more likely than
this that one will get the same gene - Population geneticists use Ne to indicate the
(usually smaller) effective population size
22Some factors causing Ne
Sex ratio (Wright, 1932). If one sex is less
common, the rarer sex dominates the change in
gene frequencies - fewer individuals contribute
to next generation Inbreeding. Geographic subdivision, assortative,
non-random mating. Population fluctuations. Bottlenecks reduce Ne
(average population size over many generations is
the harmonic mean) 23Inbreeding
- More likely to inherit the same gene (homozygous)
if parents are close relatives - Mutations are usually recessive and harmful
- Homozygous recessives most likely to occur as a
result of inbreeding - Inherited diseases are more common in the
offspring of cousins than they are in the human
population as a whole
24Bottlenecks
- Populations may go through a bottleneck in size
- Out of many individuals, only a few contribute to
the next generation - A special type of bottleneck is the reduction in
population size associated with colonization -
founder effect
25Founder effect
- The establishment of a new population by a few
original founders (in an extreme case, by a
single fertilized female) that carry only a small
fraction of the total genetic variation of the
parental population. (Mayr, 1963)
26Founder effect Example 1. Afrikaners
- Mainly descended from one shipload of Dutch
immigrants to South Africa in 1652 - Carried some rare genes by chance
- these are now more common among Afrikaners than
Dutch - e.g. dominant gene causing porphyria variegata (a
severe reaction to barbiturate anesthetics)
27Example 2. Amish
- Small group of Germans began the Amish community
in Pennsylvania - 1 possessed an allele for polydactylism (more
than five fingers or toes on a limb). - After 200 years of reproductive isolation
- the number of cases among the Amish population
- exceeds the number of cases occurring in the
entire worlds population
28Gene flow
- When an individual or group of individuals
migrate to (or from) one population to (or from)
another and interbreed with its members - Depends not only on the number of migrants but on
their reproductive success in the new population
29Migration is not gene flow
- The arctic tern, Sterna paradiseae, migrates
annually from one polar region to the other and
back again - but it breeds only in a restricted locality
within the Arctic Circle
30Gene flow affects allele frequencies
- Assume that the frequency of allele A is 0.4 on
the mainland but only 0.2 in Hawaii. - The effect of immigration to Hawaii will depend
on the genetic contribution of immigrants - measured by m, the coefficient of replacement or
rate of gene flow - Change in the frequency of A in the island
population is given by the equation
31- Change in frequency of A -m(p - pm)
- p frequency of allele A on the islandpm
frequency of allele A among the immigrantsm
coefficient of replacement - Thus, if m is equal to ten percent, then
- Change in frequency -0.1(0.2 - 0.4) 0.02
- So the new frequency among the island population
equals - 0.2 0.02 0.22
32Gene flow homogenizes
- When p pm, an equilibrium will be established
- the change in frequency 0
- The mainland and island populations will have
become genetically identical - Assuming no drift
33Drift - gene flow equilibrium
- Gene flow homogenizes populations
- But drift causes them to diverge
- Initially, founder effects can lead to
unpredictable levels of genetic similarity among
ancestral and derived populations - With time, an equilibrium is reached and the
genetic distance among populations remains
constant
34Wrights rule of thumb
- Only 1 individual need be exchanged each
generation to prevent the fixation of different
alleles in two populations
35Eve and Extinction is for good
- With time, all the genes in a population will be
descended from a single gene like all humans are
descended from Eve - Rate of fixation is independent of population
size - 2N genes at each locus (2 per individual)
- some genes fail to reproduce by chance and
extinction is final - each gene has 1 in 2N chance of being the sole
survivor (1/2N)
36US Open for coin flipping
- Knock-out tournament not tennis, coin flipping.
- First to throw heads wins.
- Eventually, only a single champion left!
- All down to chance (drift) not skill (selection)
37Rate of neutral evolution neutral mutation rate
- Any gene, even a new one, has 1/2N ( its
frequency in the population) chance of being
fixed - Rate at which new neutral mutations arise u
- At each locus 2N genes, so number of neutral
genes arising per generation 2N u - Rate of neutral evolution is therefore
- 1/2N x 2Nu u
38Mutation rates
- Mutations are not all neutral
- Observed rates of molecular evolution vary
- They differ among genes and even within regions
of the same gene - Some parts of protein more conserved because they
have structure-dependent function
39Mutation rates in hemoglobin
Number of amino acid changes per 109 years
(Kimura 1983)
40Synonymous mutations
- Mutations in non protein coding regions
- or mutations in a codon that do not change the
amino acid - genetic code is degenerate (more codons possible
than needed for amino acids) - synonymous sites evolve more rapidly
41(No Transcript)
42What maintains genetic variation in nature?
- Most populations are mosaics, not one large,
freely interbreeding unit (panmictic). Hence
drift and gene flow operate. - Selection pressures can vary from place to place
and year to year due to different environmental
conditions. - Heterozygous advantage