Title: U.S. Endangered Species Act 1973
1U.S. Endangered Species Act(1973)
- Protects species identified as endangered or
threatened with extinction - Attempts to protect the habitat on which they
depend - Administered primarily by the Fish and Wildlife
Service (U.S. Department of the Interior) - The National Marine Fisheries Service (U.S.
Department of Commerce) administers the ESA for
certain marine species
1
2General Statistics for Endangered Species
- How many species in the United States are listed
as threatened or endangered? - 607 U.S. animal species are listed
- 744 U.S. plant species are listed.
- How many species in the United States are
proposed for listing as threatened or endangered?
- 4 U.S. animal species are currently proposed for
listing. - 0 U.S. plant species are currently proposed for
listing.
2
3General Statistics for Endangered Species
- How many listed species have designated critical
habitat? - 493 U.S. species have designated critical habitat
- How many candidate species are there?
- 138 animal species are candidates for listing
- 140 plant species are candidates for listing
- How many habitat conservation plans (HCPs) have
been approved? - 883 habitat conservation plans have been approved
(727 current, 156 expired) - How many listed species have approved recovery
plans? - 1116 species have approved recovery plans
3
4ESA History Evolution
- 1966 Endangered Species Preservation Act
- Listed only native animal species as endangered
and provided limited means for the protection of
listed species - The Departments of Interior, Agriculture, and
Defense were to seek to protect listed species
and to preserve the habitats of such species - Land acquisition for protection of endangered
species was also authorized
4
5ESA History Evolution
- 1969 Endangered Species Conservation Act
- Provided additional protection to species in
danger of "worldwide extinction" - Prohibited the importation and sale of such
species within the U.S. - Called for an international ministerial meeting
to adopt a convention on the conservation of
endangered species. - A 1973 conference in Washington led to the
signing of the Convention on International Trade
in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora
(CITES), which restricted international commerce
in plant and animal species believed to be
actually or potentially harmed by trade.
5
6How the ESA Works
- Species of plants and animals (both vertebrate
and invertebrate) are listed as either
endangered or threatened according to
assessments of the risk of their extinction - Powerful legal tools are available to aid the
recovery of the species and to protect its habitat
6
7ESA Listing
- As of September 25, 2006, a total of 1,879
species of animals and plants had been listed as
either endangered or threatened - 1,311 of these occur in the United States and its
territories - Of the U.S. species, 1,070 were covered by
recovery plans
7
8What is an endangered species?
- An endangered species is defined as any species
which is in danger of extinction throughout all
or a significant portion of its range....
8
9What is a threatened species?
- A threatened species is defined as any species
which is likely to become an endangered species
within the foreseeable future throughout all or a
significant portion of its range.
9
10Which Animals? Plants? Organisms?
- The protection of the ESA extends to all species
and subspecies of animals, not just birds and
mammals - More limited protection is available for plant
species under the ESA - There is currently no protection afforded under
the ESA for organisms (e.g., Eubacteria, Archaea,
viruses) considered neither animal nor plant.
10
11Basis for Listings
- The ESA defines species as a species, a
subspecies, or, for vertebrates only a
population - This allows some flexibility as to how to provide
different levels of protection to less than a
whole species - Solely on the basis of the best scientific and
commercial data available - Commercial data refers to trade data, and is
not meant to make economic considerations a part
of the listing decision
11
12- Observers have compared the decision of whether
to list a species to diagnosing whether a patient
has cancer - The diagnosis should be a strictly scientific
decision, but other factors can be considered in
deciding how to treat the cancer
12
13ESA Surrogacy
- The ESA is often a surrogate in quarrels whose
primary focus is the allocation of scarce or
diminishing lands or resources - There can be economic interests on the various
sides of some vanishing species issues - Other laws often lack the strict substantive
provisions that Congress included in the ESA - Examples the Tellico Dam and the snail darter
Northwest timber harvest and the spotted owl
coal-methane extraction in northern states and
the sage grouse
13
14Has ESA Been Effective?
- The answer to this question depends very much on
the choice of measurement - 17 species have been delisted due to recovery
- 9 species have become extinct since their listing
- 16 have been delisted due to improved data
14
15How Many Species Have Stabilized or Increased
their Populations?
- Most species are listed only once they are very
depleted - Median population of 407 animals for endangered
vertebrates - 41 of listed species have improved or stabilized
their population levels - Other species (e.g., red wolves and California
condors) might not exist at all without ESA
protection, even though the species are still rare
15
16Leading Causes of Extinction
- Until recent decades, the focus of the extinction
debate was on losses due to over-exploitation,
generally through hunting, trapping, or fishing - Passenger pigeons, tigers, wolves
- During the 20th century, a shift of focus and
probably of fact occurred The vast majority of
species, including those for which direct taking
was probably an early factor in their decline,
are generally also at risk due to habitat loss - tall-grass prairie, fresh and salt water
wetlands, old growth forests of most types,
free-flowing rivers, coral reefs, undisturbed
sandy beaches
16
17Introduction of Non-Native, Invasive Species
- Another high-ranking factor in the demise of many
species - The gradual homogenization of the worlds flora
and fauna has led to a demise of many species - Disease vectors or parasites
- Avian malaria in Hawaii, or Asian long-horned
beetles in North America - Predators
- Brown tree snakes in Guam and Hawaii
- Competitors
- Barred owls in the Pacific Northwest
17
18Non-Native Species
- The introduction of non-native species is now the
second greatest threat to native species. - Habitat loss is the most common reason species
are endangered and threatened. - http//www.fws.gov/endangered/kids/html/303.html
19Continuing Impact of DDT
- The decline of bird species such as the brown
pelican alerted us to the harmful effects of
pesticides - Birds were poisoned by DDT when they ate fish
from poisoned waterways. This caused pelicans to
lay thin shelled eggs that often broke before the
chick hatched. - In 1972, the Environmental Protection Agency
banned the use of DDT. - However, DDT is still legal in other countries,
and many migratory bird are still exposed to the
harmful effects of DDT and other pesticides when
outside the U.S.
20Is Extinction Normal?
- Geological evidence shows that the vast majority
of species that have ever lived on Earth are now
extinct - If there are 20 million species now, background
levels would be about 2 to 20 species extinctions
per year - Common estimates of current extinction rates
range from 100 to 10,000 times such background
rates
20
21Take or Taking
- The term take under the ESA means to harass,
harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap,
capture, or collect, or to attempt to engage in
any such conduct - Taking is prohibited
- Controversy over the extent to which the
prohibition on taking may include habitat
modification - A 1995 Supreme Court decision (Sweet Home) held
that the inclusion of significant habitat
modification was a reasonable interpretation of
the term harm
21
22Penalties Prohibitions
- Threatened or Endangered
- The prohibitions and penalties of the ESA apply
primarily to those species listed as endangered - The Secretary may promulgate special regulations
to address the plight of species listed as
threatened - Protections and recovery measures for a
particular threatened species can be tailored to
particular situations, as was done, for example,
with respect to the northern spotted owl - Another regulation also affords threatened
species for which a special rule has not been
promulgated the same protections as endangered
species
22
23Penalties
- Those who knowingly break the law through acts of
importing or exporting, taking, possessing,
selling, delivering, carrying, transporting, or
shippingessentially trafficking endangered
species without permission from the Secretary - Any act of knowingly taking (which includes
harming, wounding, or killing) an endangered
species is also subject to the same penalty - Maximum fine of up to 50,000, or imprisonment
for one year, or both - Civil penalties of up to 25,000 per violation
- As your violation history accumulates, you are
subject to larger fines and penalties
24Excusal from Penalties
- No penalty may be imposed if it can be shown by a
preponderance of the evidence that the defendant
committed an act based on a good faith belief
that he was acting to protect himself or herself
or any other individual from bodily harm from any
endangered species or threatened species. - The law also eliminates criminal penalties for
accidentally killing listed species during
farming and ranching activities.
25Listings
- Species may be listed on the initiative of the
appropriate Secretary or by petition from an
individual, group, or state agency - The Secretary must decide whether to list the
species based only on the best available
scientific and commercial information, after an
extensive series of procedural steps to ensure
public participation and the collection of
relevant information. - The Secretary is expressly forbidden to consider
the economic effects that listing may have on the
area where the species occurs - But economic considerations may be considered in
later stages
25
26Delisting and Downlisting
- The same as the processes for listing
- The determination to delist, downlist, or uplist
a species must be made solely on the basis of
the best scientific and commercial data
available - Without reference to possible economic or other
impacts
26
27Critical Habitat
- The Secretary must also designate critical
habitat - Either where the species is found or, if it is
not found there, where there are features
essential to its conservation - Supposed to be determined within one year of the
listing, but - As of September 25, 2006, critical habitat had
been designated for 476 listed species
27
28Designating Critical Habitat
- Economic factors expressly are a part of
designating critical habitat for species - The Secretary to the maximum extent prudent and
determinable is to designate the critical
habitat of the species - FWS has designated critical habitat for 162 of
the 1,262 listed domestic species - FWS has a longstanding disaffection for this
provision of the law, viewing its conservation
benefit to be low compared to its cost - FWS is sued frequently for its failure to
designate critical habitat and consistently loses
such suits
28
29Public Misunderstandings re Critical Habitat v.
Takings
- Avoiding adverse modification of critical habitat
is an express obligation only for federal
agencies and actions, BUT it is frequently
misunderstood by the public as the major
restriction on a private landowners authority to
manage land. - The bulk of any restrictions on use of private
land come primarily from the ESAs prohibition on
taking of listed species - Only occasionally are they due to any additional
strictures resulting from designated critical
habitat
29
30Is Private Land Affected If Designed to be
Critical Habit?
- Private land is only affected by critical habitat
designation if some federal action (e.g.,
license, loan, permit) is involved - Federal agencies must avoid destruction or
adverse modification of critical habitat, either
through their direct action or activities that
they approve or fund
30
31Recovery Plans
- The appropriate Secretary must develop recovery
plans for the conservation and survival of listed
species - Recovery plans are not binding on federal
agencies or others - Recovery plans had been completed for 1,070 U.S.
species (as of September 25, 2006)
31
32Consultation
- If federal actions or actions of non-federal
parties that require a federal approval, permit,
or funding might affect a listed species, the
federal action agencies must complete a
biological assessment. - Action includes any activity authorized,
funded, or carried out by a federal agency,
including permits and licenses
32
33Actions Requiring ES Protection
- If the appropriate Secretary finds that an action
would jeopardize a species or adversely modify
critical habitat, the Secretary must suggest
reasonable and prudent alternatives that would
avoid harm to the species. - If no reasonable and prudent alternatives can be
devised to avoid the jeopardy, the agency has
three choices - (1) choose not to proceed with the action, or
- (2) proceed with the action at the risk of
penalties, or - (3) apply for a formal exemption for the action
33
34Exemptions
- An exemption allows the action to go forward
without penalties - A high-level Endangered Species Committee of six
specified federal officials and a representative
of each affected state (commonly called the God
Squad) decides whether to allow the action to
proceed despite future harm to a species - At least five votes are required to pass an
exemption - The Committee must grant an exemption if the
Secretary of Defense determines that an exemption
is necessary for national security - The President may determine whether to exempt a
project for the repair or replacement of
facilities in declared disaster areas
34
35Few Exemptions
- There have only been six instances to date in
which the exemption process was initiated. - Of these six, one was granted, one was partially
granted, one was denied, and three were dropped. - Graylocks Dam and migrating whooping cranes
(granted exemption) - Tellico Dam and the snail darter (denied
exemption) - BLM timber sales in Oregon and the northern
spotted owl (granted exemption for 13 of the
sales)
35
36Allowance for an Incidental Take
- For actions without a federal nexus, such as a
loan or permit, the Secretary may issue permits
to allow incidental take of species for
otherwise lawful actions. - The applicant for an incidental take permit must
submit a habitat conservation plan (HCP) that
shows the likely impact, the steps to minimize
and mitigate the impact, the funding for the
mitigation, the alternatives that were considered
and rejected, and any other measures that the
Secretary may require.
36
37Habitat Conservation Plans
- n 1982, Congress amended the ESA to enhance the
permitting provisions of the act to provide
landowners with incentives to participate in
endangered species conservation. - By preparing "conservation plans" that meet
statutory criteria, private landowners can obtain
"incidental take permits" that allow otherwise
prohibited impacts to endangered, threatened and
other species covered in the permitting
documents.
38HCP
- A person may apply for an HCP (Habitat
Conservation Plans) if they know they want to
develop an area that already has endangered
species present. - They are required to apply through the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service and are required to minimize
and fully mitigate the impacts to the species
39HCPs
- Each conservation plan must specify
- the impacts to species that will occur
- the steps taken to minimize and mitigate the
incidental take - the funding available
- alternative actions that were considered but not
taken - and other necessary and appropriate measures.
40HCPs
- After review of a proposed conservation plan, FWS
or NOAA Fisheries may issue an incidental take
permit upon making the statutorily required
"findings," including a determination that the
incidental taking "will not appreciably reduce
the likelihood of the survival and recovery of
the species in the wild."
41No Surprises Assurances
- Assurances given to private landowners that if
"unforeseen circumstances" arise, FWS or NOAA
Fisheries will not require the commitment of
land, water or financial compensation or
additional restrictions on the use of land,
water, or other natural resources beyond the
levels otherwise agreed to in the conservation
plan, without the consent of the private
landowner.
42Citizen Suits and the ESA
- The citizen suit provisions have been a driving
force in the ESAs history, and often have been
used to force reluctant agencies to provide for
species conservation that might otherwise have
been neglected.
42
43Effectiveness of the ESA
- 41 species have been delisted
- sixteen due to recovery
- nine due to extinction (seven of which were
extinct prior to being listed) - nine due to changes in taxonomic classification
- five due to discovery of new populations
- one due to an error in the listing rule
- one due to an amendment to the Endangered Species
Act specifically requiring the species delisting
Delisting Report http//ecos.fws.gov/tess_public
/DelistingReport.do
44Effectiveness
- Twenty-three other species have been downlisted
from "endangered" to "threatened" status. - Few species have become extinct while listed
under the Endangered Species Act - 93 of listed species have had their population
sizes increase or remain stable since being
listed as threatened or endangered.
45Listed Species Which Increased In Population Size
- Bald Eagle (increased from 417 to 9,250 pairs
between 1963 and 2006) - Whooping Crane (increased from 54 to 436 birds
between 1967 and 2003) - Peregrine Falcon (increased from 324 to 1,700
pairs between 1975 and 2000) - Gray Wolf (populations increased dramatically in
the Northern Rockies, Southwest, and Great Lakes)
- Gray Whale (increased from 13,095 to 26,635
whales between 1968 and 1998) - Grizzly bear (increased from about 271 to over
580 bears in the Yellowstone area between 1975
and 2005). - Californias Southern Sea Otter (increased from
1,789 in 1976 to 2,735 in 2005) - San Clemente Indian Paintbrush (increased from
500 plants in 1979 to more than 3,500 in 1997) - Florida's Red Wolf (increased from 17 in 1980 to
257 in 2003) - Florida's Key Deer (increased from 200 in 1971 to
750 in 2001) - Hawaiian Goose (increased from 400 birds in 1980
to 1,275 in 2003) - Virginia Big-Eared Bat (increased from 3,500 in
1979 to 18,442 in 2004)
46Updates on the ESA
- The Bald Eagle was removed from the federal list
of threatened and endangered species on June
28th, 2007. - The eagles health will be monitored closely for
the next five years, and it can be restored to
the list of threatened species if necessary. - It will also continue to enjoy the protections
provided by an older law, The Bald and Golden
Eagle Protection Act. - There were 417 breeding pairs in the continental
United States in 1967, after a long decline
blamed variously on illegal hunting, habitat
destruction and the pesticide DDT, which was
banned in 1972. Forty years later, according to
government figures, that number has grown to
nearly 10,000.
47- The Grizzly bear (Yellowstone, "Northern
Grizzly") was removed March 22nd, 2007.
48- Florida manatee recommended upgrading of ESA
status from endangered to threatened (April 10,
2007) - This switch could mean changes in boating and
development restrictions that were established to
protect manatees. - In 2007 the manatee census recorded 2,812 in
Florida water. In 1991, the surveys first year,
1,267 manatees were counted.
49References
- Congressional Research Report RL31654, The
Endangered Species Act A Primer (updated
September 27, 2006) - U.S. Fish Wildlife Service, History and
Evolution of the Endangered Species Act of 1973
(updated October, 1996) - USFWS Summary of Listed Species
- Marine and Anadromous ESA Species
49