DESIRE II - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

DESIRE II

Description:

When you are thinking about extending your mesh with a top-level cache: choose a model ... carrot or stick? Keep your service in sync with bandwidth upgrades ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:41
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: tonv6
Category:
Tags: desire | carrot | damn | top

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: DESIRE II


1
DESIRE II
  • 2nd Web Cache Managers Workshop
  • Budapest, 2-3 March 2000
  • http//www.desire.org/

2
Cost Benefit Analysis - take 2
  • TOP-LEVEL CACHES
  • dos donts
  • Ton.Verschuren_at_SURFnet.NL

3
Contents
  • Ways to add a top-level cache to your mesh
  • Case 1 SURFnet
  • Case 2 JAnet
  • Conclusions

4
Extending your mesh with a TL-cache
  • 3 models
  • 2nd-level cache
  • 2nd-level cache with billing for international
    traffic
  • combination of 1st-level and 2nd-level cache

5
Pros of TL-caches
  • increased (national) hit rate
  • routing options for web traffic (DiffServ,
    CAR/WFQ, or dedicated link)
  • access control charging possible
  • identify sites that could benefit greatly from
    mirroring(and other monitoring options)
  • give the right example for your customers

6
Cons of TL-caches
  • could be single-point-of-failure
  • huge (distributed) system
  • who pays?

7
TL-cache rule of thumb
  • Is a TL-cache efficient for you?
  • Can it attract enough traffic?
  • Is the hit rate high enough?
  • Caching mesh cost-benefit analysis from Desire
    1http//www.surfnet.nl/innovatie/desire1/deliver
    /WP4/D4-2.html

8
Case 1 SURFnet
  • Model 2nd-level cache only

9
Case 1 SURFnet (contd)
  • Data from 4Q98
  • External connectivity

10
Case 1 SURFnet (contd)
  • Cost of bandwidth
  • Ratio NL Europe USA 1 11
    15
  • Usage pattern
  • Ratio NL Europe USA 1 2
    3
  • Savings formula
  • S(r) H C(r) / Tr route (NL, EU, US)H
    volume of hits (in bits)C cost of route
    (bandwidth only)T period in seconds

11
Case 1 SURFnet (contd)
  • Savings of the TL-cache in 4Q98

12
Case 1 SURFnet (contd)
  • Reduction ltlt 1
  • Conclusion exit top-level cache
  • Why are the results so bad?
  • 35 clients is just too few!
  • DisclaimerThere are lies, damn lies, and
    statistics.

13
Case 1 SURFnet (contd)
14
Case 2 JAnet
  • Model 2nd-level cache
  • And charging for transatlantic traffic between
    6-1 hrs!except when via JAnet cache.

15
Case 2 JAnet (contd)
16
Case 2 Janet (contd)
  • 160 1st-level caches connected
  • JWCS 1.5 TB storage (40 machines in 2 locations)
  • combined 1st-level caches 6 TB storage
  • 500 GB per day thruput 100 GB from US 25 of
    all US web traffic!
  • Hit rate 25-30 overall mesh 50-60
  • Charging ? 30 / GB
  • Saving ? 1000 per day (? 400,000 per year)
  • Costs less than savings!
  • See http//wwwcache.ja.net/

17
Conclusions
  • When you are thinking about extending your mesh
    with a top-level cache
  • choose a model
  • ensure you have enough 1st-level caches
  • carrot or stick?
  • Keep your service in sync with bandwidth upgrades
  • Decide what intercache communication to use.
  • Evaluate your service periodically.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com