HOW NOT TO PLAY PING PONG WITH YOUR CLIENTS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

HOW NOT TO PLAY PING PONG WITH YOUR CLIENTS

Description:

1. HOW NOT TO PLAY PING PONG WITH YOUR CLIENTS ... much 'Referral Ping Pong' Referrers' 'scatter ... No more client Ping Pong' as no barriers to service access ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:59
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: rcpsy
Category:
Tags: clients | how | not | ping | play | pong | with | your | ping | pong

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: HOW NOT TO PLAY PING PONG WITH YOUR CLIENTS


1
HOW NOT TO PLAY PING PONG WITH YOUR CLIENTS
  • Yvonne Gilles-Jones Clinical Nurse
    Specialist/Referrals Coordinator CAMHS Tier 3
  • Jane Ware Consultant Clinical Psychologist CAMHS
    Tier 2 3
  • Kent Medway NHS Social Care Partnership Trust

2
OVERVIEW OF PRESENTATION
  • CONTEXT OF SERVICE
  • historical
  • service configuration
  • NEW SERVICE
  • rationale
  • provision
  • POINTS FOR REFLECTION

3
Current Service Arrangements
  • Tier 3 historically provided by Mental Health
    Trust
  • 11.8 WTE multidisciplinary
  • Tier 2 provided by PCT
  • 3.3 WTE therapeutic staff

4
Tier 2 CAMHS
  • Tier 2 provision began in Maidstone in 2003 when
    the Multi-Agency Interface Project MMAIP was
    set up
  • This led to
  • The development of a multi-agency single point
    assessment team (MMASPAT) linked to the local
    school cluster to provide a rapid response to
    schools who identified concerns for pupils
    emotional well-being and mental health
  • The development of an Early Intervention and
    Prevention Tier 2 CAMH Service

5
Multi-agency Single Point Assessment Team
Composition
  • CAMHS Lead Nurse
  • Consultant Clinical Psychologist CAMHS T2 3
  • Social Worker (with children and families
    background)
  • Senior Family Liaison Officer
  • Behaviour Specialist Teacher/Educational
    Psychologist
  • Joint Commissioning Officer (KCC)
  • Associate Specialist in Community Paediatrics
  • Referrals Administrator
  • CAMHS Tier 3 Clinical Nurse Specialist

6
Driving Forces for 2.5 clinic
  • Desire to provide a seamless service for clients
    when CAMHS T2 T3 in different NHS Trusts
  • Too much Referral Ping Pong
  • Referrers scatter gun approach
  • Wrong referrals had led to clients double
    waiting to receive appropriate intervention
  • Clients/referrers did not understand different
    tiers they just wanted to be seen
  • Demand capacity issues
  • Duplication of paper work administrative time
  • Information systems that could not talk to each
    other

7
Aim of the new service To provide a seamless
CAMHS Tier 2/3 interface despite the two
services being provided by different NHS
Trusts.
8
New Service summary
  • Commenced February 2008
  • Staffing - 7.5 hours per week of
  • Clinical Nurse Specialist from
    existing T3 staffing
  • T2 Consultant Clinical Psychologist
    new funding by T3.
  • Activity
  • Joint paper screening of all Tier 3 referrals
  • Both clinicians attend at Tier 2 single point
    multi-agency assessment team meetings (joint
    screen of all T2 referrals)
  • Joint in depth assessment for those referrals
    where it is not clear which service can most
    appropriately meet the clients needs. Followed
    by direct access to treatment in appropriate
    service without further assessment.
  • Continued monitoring of a small number of clients
    where it remains unclear which service is
    required.

9
Service objectives
  • To ensure CAMHS Tier 2 and Tier 3 referrals are
    directed to the most appropriate service at the
    point of referral.
  • To reduce the numbers of cases that may be
    sitting inappropriately on a waiting list and by
    doing so improve health outcomes.
  •  To ensure the maximum use of limited CAMHS
    resources.
  •  To reduce administrative resources required in
    transferring families from one service to
    another.

10
Service objectives continued
  • To promote successful working between child
    health, mental health and education via the
    virtual integration of Tiers 2 and 3.
  •  To help provide more accurate demand and
    capacity data, which will provide evidence for
    the deployment of resources and service
    development.
  • To identify the number of referrals, which do not
    meet, either Tier 2 or Tier 3 criteria, and the
    consequent gaps in service, to inform future
    commissioning discussions and planning.

11
Evidence / Outcomes
  • Since February 2008
  • No clients assessed by other Tier 3 staff
    sent to other service
  • No more client Ping Pong as no barriers to
    service access
  • Referrers report satisfaction with new provision
  • Word has spread outside of Maidstone!
  • Service users accessing appropriate support
    faster
  • Far more accurate demand data available for both
    services

12
Issues / Concerns
  • Funding currently temporary, need to secure
    permanent funding.
  • Implementation of CAF and impact on single point
    assessment team.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com