NARA - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

NARA

Description:

Update on the ERPWG. Mark Giguere, Lead IT (Policy & Planning) Office of Records Services Washington D.C. National Archives & Records Administration ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:69
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: markgi7
Learn more at: https://www.archives.gov
Category:
Tags: nara | acrobat | adobe

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: NARA


1
NARA You Update on the ERPWG
  • Mark Giguere, Lead IT (Policy Planning)
  • Office of Records Services Washington D.C.
  • National Archives Records Administration

2
EGov Act of 2002
  • EGovernment Act of 2002 (Public Law 107-347, 44
    U.S.C. Ch. 36) into law on December 17, 2002.
  • Via budget guidance, OMB can further drive the
    utilization, interoperability and security of IT
    investments to
  • advocates a more citizen-focused approach to
    current government-wide IT policies and programs
  • establishes an Office of Electronic Government in
    the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to
    improve Federal management of information
    resources
  • formalizes the establishment of a Chief
    Information Officers (CIO) Council
  • permanently reauthorizes and amends agency
    information security requirements through the
    Federal Information Security Management Act
    (FISMA)
  • protects the confidentiality of certain types of
    data through the Confidential Information
    Protection and Statistical Efficiency Act
    (CIPSEA) and
  • supports activities that OMB and the executive
    branch are already pursuing under the Presidents
    Management Agendas Expanding Electronic
    Government initiative.

3
ICGI
  • Section 207 of the Act requires the Director of
    the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to
    establish the Interagency Committee on Government
    Information (ICGI). The ICGI was
  • Pursuant to section 207 of the Act, the ICGI
    will
  • consult with interested communities
  • conduct studies and submit recommendations to the
    Director of OMB and the Archivist of the National
    Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and
    share effective practices for access to,
    dissemination of, and retention of Federal
    information.

4
ICGI
  • Executive Committee
  • Karen Hogan (co-chair)
  • Glenn Schlarman (co-chair)
  • Dan Costello/Kim Nelson (OMB)
  • Keith Thurston (GSA)
  • Lew Bellardo (NARA)
  • Bev Godwin (GSA)

5
ICGIs WG
  • Categorization of Information (Christian)
  • Web standards (Godwin)
  • Public Domain Directory
  • Web Content Standards
  • Electronic Records Policy (Kurtz)

6
ERPWG
  • Goal Develop recommendations and a timetable
    for implementation of those to the Archivist of
    the United States and the OMB Director for
    policies and procedures ensuring effective
    management of electronic records (Internet-based
    and otherwise).

7
ERPWG Objectives
  • Identify barriers to effective management of
    Government information on the Internet and other
    electronic records.
  • Identify common characteristics of temporary and
    permanent records generated by lines of business
    LOBs/sub-functions of the FEA Business
    Reference Model BRM (v. 2).
  • Identify interim, realistic and useful tools for
    the creation and management of these records.
  • Identify longer term solutions compatible with
    the Electronic Records Archives.
  • Develop recommendations for ICGI to present to
    the Director of OMB and the Archivist

8
Where were at?
  • BARRIERS REPORT
  • Gathered via substantial internal-to-Govt/external
    -to-Govt input
  • 4 major barriers identified
  • Records and information are not managed as agency
    business assets
  • Records management is not viewed as critical to
    agency mission
  • Marginal support for records management has led
    to a lack of training
  • Records management and information technology
    disciplines are poorly integrated within
  • Public comment on report ended 8/1/04
  • Identified barriers will feed ERPWGs ultimate
    recommendations to OMB Director/Archivist

9
Where were at (cont.)
  • COMMON CHARACTERISTICS
  • Identification of basal set of RM metadata for
    GII and OER
  • 8 characteristics identified
  • Association to series, creator, date, date type,
    identifier, LOB code, restrictions/rights, title,
    vital records indicator
  • Metadata being coordinated with CGI and Web
    standards WGs
  • Being made ISO 11179 (data dictionary standard)-
    compliant

10
Where were at? (cont.)
  • ERM Toolkit
  • Internet portal managed by NARA with ERPWG
    involvement
  • Initially, ERM guidance tools that are proven as
    useful in agencies or are planned or under
    development to meet an identified ERM need
  • Best practices, guidance, process models, lessons
    learned, tips and techniques, policies, etc.
  • Metadata about tools collected, used to organize
    tools, share knowledge, provide user-friendly
    views
  • Process to allow future focus on
    identifying/adding tools
  • Identify and evaluate tools, manage toolkit data,
    facilitate expansion
  • Project team approach multi-agency team to
    develop, establish and manage ERM toolkit in FY
    05

11
Where were at? (cont.)
  • ERM Toolkit
  • Adopted from the proposed directions articulated
    in the ERPWG Barriers Report
  • Toolkit will share tools proven to help agencies
  • Manage records as business assets
  • Incorporate records management requirements in
    planning/re(design) of systems
  • Overcome marginal support for records management
    in agencies
  • Promote integration of RM and IT

12
Where were at? (cont.)
  • ERM Toolkit
  • ERM tools
  • Documents, interactive guidance products, web
    sites, etc.
  • Best practices, guidance, process models,
    policies and directives, tips and techniques,
    training programs, lessons learned, speeches,
    presentations, etc.
  • Agency users
  • General population, records officers/records
    management staff, CIOs, IT, business process
    owners/data owners, web content managers/web
    masters, legal staff
  • ERM activities
  • Traditional records management activities
  • Other agency activities - integrating records
    management
  • Enterprise architecture planning, security
    certification and accreditation, capital planning
    and investment control, systems development
    lifecycle

13
Where were at? (cont.)
  • ERM Toolkit
  • Internet portal managed and hosted by NARA with
    assistance of interagency group (e.g., ERPWG)
  • User-friendly, flexible, expandable,
    self-validating
  • Static versions to be created for promotion
    purposes
  • Linked from key customer web sites
  • Database populated with information about tools
    (i.e., metadata) used to organize and display
    tools
  • Tools summarized for ease of selection
  • Fixed views by User group, ERM activity
  • Search capability (metadata, full-text,
    combination)
  • Sort by metadata fields
  • Tools maintained in agencies - linked to toolkit,
    or contact information provided
  • Ongoing evaluation process for adding/removing
    tools
  • E-mail feedback mechanisms

14
Where were at? (cont.)
  • ERM Toolkit
  • Developed as a project during FY-05
  • Establish project team, tasks, milestones,
    project schedule
  • Establish back-end processes and procedures that
    support future focus on identifying and adding
    tools.
  • Identifying tools
  • Evaluating and accepting tools
  • Describing and organizing tools
  • Maintaining tools
  • Managing user feedback, continuous improvement
  • Managing toolkit records
  • Establish initial version of toolkit portal with
    a limited set of tools
  • Used to promote the toolkit and as an incentive
    for agencies to contribute tools

15
Where were at? (cont.)
  • ERM Toolkit
  • ICGI review
  • Agency review and comment
  • ICGI approval
  • Initiate ERM toolkit project

16
Where were at (cont.)
  • RECOMMENDATIONS TO OMB DIRECTOR/ARCHIVIST
  • Draft recommendations due to ICGI Sept 30
  • Process begun on August 25th
  • Will address a limited number of high impact
    recommendations to address identified barriers
  • Including recommended timetable for adoption

17
After that?
  • Toolkit population
  • Implementing ICGI recommendations
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com