Art and Strategy of Negotiation Substantive and Relationship Outcomes - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 41
About This Presentation
Title:

Art and Strategy of Negotiation Substantive and Relationship Outcomes

Description:

Abraham Lincoln. 32. SBS Model Emphasizes Con't ... Influenced by an individual's personal characteristics and accomplishments. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1078
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 42
Provided by: JohnB8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Art and Strategy of Negotiation Substantive and Relationship Outcomes


1
Art and Strategy of Negotiation--Substantive and
Relationship Outcomes
  • MGT 5374 Negotiation Conflict Management
  • Section 002
  • September 8, 2005
  • John D. Blair, PhD
  • Georgie G. William B. Snyder Professor in
    Management

2
The Nature of Negotiation
  • Negotiation is something that everyone does,
    almost daily
  • Process involving interested parties who
  • Resolve disputes
  • Identify courses of action
  • Engage in bargaining for win/lose outcomes--or
  • Engage in bargaining for win/win outcomes
  • Involve individuals or groups
  • Is pervasive throughout ones life

3
Negotiations
  • Negotiations occur for several reasons
  • To agree on how to share or divide a limited
    resource
  • To create something new that neither party could
    attain on his or her own
  • To resolve a problem or dispute between the
    parties

4
What is Included in Negotiation?
  • Many people treat bargaining and negotiation as
    distinctive phenomena
  • Bargaining describes the competitive, win-lose
    situation
  • Negotiation refers to win-win situations such
    as those that occur when parties try to find a
    mutually acceptable solution to a complex
    conflict
  • We will use Negotiation to include both kinds of
    situations.

5
Negotiation Style or Strategy ?
  • People who are only good with hammers see every
    problem as a nail. -- Abraham Maslow

6
Changing Nature of Business Today
  • Intensifying competition
  • Increased knowledge expertise among business
    people
  • Changing expectations
  • Various Descriptors
  • Strategic Alliances/Partnerships
  • Relationship Marketing
  • Characterized by
  • Closer and more integrated ties between
    organizations
  • Collaborative 2-way communication
  • More business with fewer suppliers

7
Skills Necessary for business
  • Key skills will be the ability to win friends
    and influence people at a personal level, the
    ability to structure partnerships, and the
    ability to negotiate and to find compromises.
    Business will be much more about finding the
    right people in the right places and negotiating
    the right deals.
  • Charles Handy 2002

8
Characteristics of a Skilled Negotiator
  • Mindfulness alert to subtle changes or
    differences
  • Active and effective listener
  • Keen observer
  • Always prepared
  • Versatile and flexible in their communication
    style (See Reardon)
  • Versatile and flexible in their negotiation
    strategy (See SBS Model)

9
Understand the Context
  • If you don't know where you're going, you'll end
    up somewhere else. -- Yogi Berra

10
Savage, Blair and Sorenson (SBS) Model Emphasizes
  • Negotiation made up of discrete episodes
  • Negotiation may have 1 to 100 episodes
  • Episodes occur within changing context impacted
    by each prior episode
  • Substantive outcomes of negotiation matter
  • But relationship outcomes of negotiation matter,
    as well

11
Savage, Blair and Sorenson (SBS) Model
12
Characteristics of aNegotiation Situation
  • There are two or more parties
  • There is a conflict of needs and desires between
    two or more parties
  • Parties negotiate because they think they can get
    a better deal than by simply accepting what the
    other side offers them
  • Parties expect a give and take process

13
Characteristics of aNegotiation Situation Cont.
  • Parties search for agreement rather than
  • Fight openly
  • Capitulate
  • Break off contact permanently
  • Take their dispute to a third party
  • Successful negotiation involves
  • Management of tangibles (e.g., the price or the
    terms of agreement)
  • Resolution of intangibles (the underlying
    psychological motivations) such as winning,
    losing, saving face

14
Interdependence
  • In negotiation, parties need each other to
    achieve their preferred outcomes or objectives
  • This mutual dependency is called interdependence
  • Interdependent goals are an important aspect of
    negotiation
  • Win-lose I win, you lose
  • Win-win Opportunities for both parties to gain

15
Interdependence
  • Interdependent parties are characterized by
    interlocking goals
  • Having interdependent goals does not mean that
    everyone wants or needs exactly the same thing
  • A mix of convergent and conflicting goals
    characterizes many interdependent relationships

16
Types of InterdependenceAffect Outcomes
  • Interdependence and the structure of the
    situation shape processes and outcomes
  • Zero-sum or distributive one winner
  • Non-zero-sum or integrative mutual gains
    situation

17
Value Claiming and Value Creation
  • Opportunities to win or share resources
  • Claiming value result of zero-sum or
    distributive situations where the object is to
    gain largest piece of resource
  • Creating value result of non-zero-sum or
    integrative situation where object is to have
    both parties do well
  • SBS Model focuses both on zero-sum and
    non-zero-sum situations.

18
Value Claiming and Value Creation
  • Most actual negotiations are a combination of
    claiming and creating value processes
  • Negotiators must be able to recognize situations
    that require more of one approach than the other
  • Negotiators must be versatile in their comfort
    and use of both major strategic approaches
  • Negotiator perceptions of situations tend to be
    biased toward seeing problems as more
    distributive/ competitive than they really are

19
Key to Relationships?
20
Usefulness of Theory and Research for
Understanding Negotiation within Relationships
  • Most current negotiation theory is based on
    trans-actional research. Only recently have
    researchers (such as in the SBS Model) begun to
    examine negotiations in a relationship context
  • Negotiating within relationships takes place over
    time
  • Negotiation is often not a way to discuss an
    issue, but a way to learn more about the other
    party and increase interdependence
  • Resolution of simple distributive issues has
    implications for the future

21
Usefulness of Theory and Research for
Understanding Negotiation within Relationships
Cont
  • Distributive issues within relationships can be
    emotionally hot
  • Negotiating within relationships may never end
  • Parties may defer negotiations over tough issues
    in order to start on the right foot
  • Attempting to anticipate the future and negotiate
    everything up front is often impossible
  • Issues on which parties truly disagree may never
    go away

22
Usefulness of Theory and Research for
Understanding Negotiation within Relationships
Cont
  • In many negotiations, the other person is the
    focal problem.
  • In some negotiations, relationship preservation
    is the overarching negotiation goal, and parties
    may make concessions on substantive issues to
    preserve or enhance the relationship

23
Forms of Relationships
  • Four fundamental relationship forms
  • 1. Communal sharing
  • 2. Authority ranking
  • 3. Equality matching
  • 4. Market pricing

24
Communal Sharing Relationships
  • 1. Communal sharing
  • A relation of unity, community, collective
    identity, and kindness, typically enacted among
    close kin
  • Such relationships are found in
  • Families
  • Clubs
  • Fraternal organizations
  • Neighborhoods

25
Authority Ranking Relationships
  • 2. Authority ranking
  • A relationship of asymmetric differences,
    commonly exhibited in a hierarchical ordering of
    status and precedence
  • Examples include
  • Subordinates to bosses
  • Soldiers to their commander
  • Negotiators to their constituents

26
Equality Matching Relationships
  • 3. Equality matching
  • A one-to-one correspondence relationship in which
    people are distinct but equal, as manifested in
    balanced reciprocity (or tit-for-tat revenge)
  • Examples include
  • College roommates

27
Market Pricing Relationships
  • 4. Market pricing
  • Based on metrics of valuation by which people
    compare different commodities and calculate
    exchange and cost/benefit ratios
  • Examples can be drawn from all kinds of
    buyerseller transactions

28
Four Key Dimensions of Relationships
29
SBS Model Emphasizes Cont
  • Subordinative strategies are not necessarily a
    reflection of weakness and may be most valuable
    when party is strong
  • Avoiding negotiating can actually be a strategy
    and is probably underused.

30
SBS ModelUnilateral Strategies
31
Interactive Strategy
  • I don't like that man. I'm going to have to get
    to know him better. -- Abraham Lincoln

32
SBS Model Emphasizes Cont
  • Your strategy must be adapted to the anticipated
    strategy of the other party
  • Be prepared with a back up or secondary strategy,
    if your primary one is not working

33
SBS ModelInteractive Strategies
34
First Key Element in Managing Negotiations within
Relationships
  • Reputation
  • Perceptual and highly subjective in nature
  • An individual can have a number of different,
    even conflicting, reputations
  • Influenced by an individuals personal
    characteristics and accomplishments.
  • Develops over time once developed, is hard to
    change.
  • Negative reputations are difficult to repair

35
Second Key Element in Managing Negotiations
within Relationships
  • Trust
  • An individuals belief in and willingness to act
    on the words, actions and decisions of another
  • Three things that contribute to trust
  • Individuals chronic disposition toward trust
  • Situation factors
  • History of the relationship between the parties

36
Trust and Honesty Dilemmas
  • Dilemma of honesty
  • Concern about how much of the truth to tell the
    other party
  • Dilemma of trust
  • Concern about how much negotiators should believe
    what the other party tells them

37
Types of Trust
  • Two different types of trust
  • Calculus-based trust
  • Individual will do what they say because they are
    rewarded for keeping their word or they fear the
    consequences of not doing what they say
  • Identification-based trust
  • Identification with the others desires and
    intentions. Trust exists because the parties
    effectively understand and appreciate each
    others wants mutual understanding is developed
    to the point that each can effectively act for
    the other.

38
Third Key Element in Managing Negotiations within
Relationships
  • Justice
  • Can take several forms
  • Distributive justice
  • The distribution of outcomes
  • Procedural justice
  • The process of determining outcomes
  • Interactional justice
  • How parties treat each other in one-to-one
    relationships
  • Systemic justice
  • How organizations appear to treat groups of
    individuals

39
Observe Other Partys Tactics
  • You can observe a lot by just watching. Yogi
    Berra

40
SBS Model Emphasizes Cont
  • Negotiations go through relatively predictable
    phases
  • Be aware of where you are in the negotiation
    process
  • Also be aware of whether you have gone backwards
    during a specific episode
  • Be sure your tactics are consistent with your
    strategy
  • Observe the tactics reflected in the behavior of
    others to determine what strategy they are
    followingdo not need to read their minds.

41
SBS ModelTactics and Phases
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com