Achieving Quality through UserLed Services - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

Achieving Quality through UserLed Services

Description:

... Finland, 24-27 June. Brief history of the 'quality' concept ... necessity of changes after Berlin wall collapse; I. Brief history of the 'quality' concept ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:81
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: Jul104
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Achieving Quality through UserLed Services


1
Achieving Quality through User-Led Services
  • Speech of Dana Migaliova
  • Action in Europe 2009, Tampere, Finland, 24-27
    June

2
Brief history of the quality concept
  • Differences between East European and West
    European countries
  • conditions and environment created for socially
    unprotected citizens in West European countries
  • bringing people with disabilities to big
    institutions in the Eastern block countries
  • necessity of changes after Berlin wall collapse

3
I. Brief history of the quality concept
  • Projects on quality evaluation and experience
    the biggest lesson for East European
    organizations, common objective to create united
    Europe.
  • Quality indicators of evaluation methods input
    indicators these are easily measured standards,
    like square meters, number of staff persons, etc
  • Negative side of input indicators not good in
    connection to the resulting quality of life of
    users
  • 1988 - Inclusion International developed Quality
    Evaluation guidelines. It is important that
    various aspects of social and community
    integration be explored in evaluation of quality
    of life.

4
II. A switch from input to output indicators
  • A switch from input to output related indicators
    was made in 2003.
  • Important event - Achieving Quality, a
    brochure published by Inclusion Europe. We can
    read in the brochure that the quality of life
    experienced by disabled people is determined by
    the kind of their support services.
  • Some support processes that contribute to
    positive quality-of-life outcomes
  • Person-centeredness
  • Full participation in society
  • Dignity and respect
  • Choice and control
  • Relations
  • Independence and development.
  • The best evaluation method is the method done by
    users themselves.

5
III. Services are provided for people!
  • Choice of the services depend upon the users.
  • October 2007- publication of position paper of
    the High Level Group on disability Quality of
    social services of general interests.
  • Point 4.5 of this paper states key principles for
    quality of social services to people with
    disabilities
  • Participation
  • Involvement in the service team
  • Engagement in self assessment and feedback.
  • Nothing about us, without us must be the
    guideline principle for services to disabled
    people.

6
IV. The position paper of Inclusion Europe
  • Service providers should ensure
  • democratic representation of users in the
    management of services for disabled people
  • effective control by users of the key aspects of
    service provision.
  • Position paper User councils in special services
    for people with intellectual disabilities.
  • Inclusion Europe clealy states the existence
    of such representation and control is an
    indispensable indicator of service quality.

7
Representation and control of the users how to
achieve quality through User-led services
  • Ways to ensure the representation and control of
    the users
  • Personal budgets
  • User Councils
  • User involvement in the evaluation of services
    quality
  • 1. Personal budgets or direct payment programs
  • usually delivered the mainstream of society,
  • do not require specialised settings.

8
Representation and control of the users how to
achieve quality through User-led services
  • 2. User Council
  • It is creation of an elected body of user
    representatives
  • Minimum conditions for the work of User Councils
    are set up in Position paper.
  • Examples of good practices
  • Mencap in the UK works with people with a
    learning disability to change laws and services,
    challenge prejudice and directly support
    thousands of people to live their lives as they
    choose.
  • The Keyring Living Support Networks, Ireland.
    Publication Recruitment Guidelines
    explanation on participation in recruitment, how
    to lead interviews and how to involve service
    users.

9
Representation and control of the users how to
achieve quality through User-led services
  • Self-advocating in Portugal self-advocates
    attend Faculty of Human Kinetics at Lisbon
    University to give lectures about self-advocacy
    to students of special education.
  • The main topics of lectures life experience,
    difficulties in being heard.
  • Results change of viewpoints of the students on
    people with disabilities, getting information
    about the people with disabilities they cannot
    learn from the books.
  • Me Itse ry, the Finnish Self-Advocacy Society of
    Persons with Learning Disabilities, Finland.
  • Development of A Guide for Individual Service
    Planning.

10
Representation and control of the users how to
achieve quality through User-led services
  • Examples of good practices illustrate
  • how important user participation is,
  • how strong the impact on the services and
    professionals can be.
  • To read position paper and the brochure User
    Council in disability services Recommendations
    for good practice go visit the website of
    Inclusion Europe www.inclusion-europe.org

11
Representation
and control of the users how to achieve quality
through User-led services
  • 3. User involvement in the evaluation of services
    quality the third way to ensure democratic
    representation and control by users of the
    services.
  • Concrete example of promotion user involvement in
    evaluation is European project the Inclusion
    Europe is leading.
  • NUEVA is a new evaluation model developed in
    Austria by association Atempo.
  • NUEVA
  • measures the quality of managed residential
    opportunities
  • describes them by means of a quality profile
  • evaluation process carry out people with learning
    difficulties and special needs.

12
Representation and control of the users how to
achieve quality through User-led services
  • NUEVA project duration 2 years
  • NUEVA Trainees 24 trainees
  • NUEVAs criteria and questions prepared on the
    basis of their own experience as users of managed
    accommodation.
  • NUEVA participative observation method for people
    with severe disabilities or complex needs.
  • NUEVA image form of question in the
    questionnaire, and every choice of answer.
  • NUEVA Catalogue presentation of evaluation
    results.

13
Representation and control of the users how
to achieve quality through User-led services
  • NUEVA offers managed residential opportunity
    providers new possibilities to optimize what they
    offer in various areas
  • quality of management and accounting
  • internal and external criterion
  • Marketing
  • target-group oriented consumer information.
  • NUEVA Support of social service planning by means
    of comparison through analysis. Public services
    can act as the basis for quality control.

14
Representation and control of the users how to
achieve quality through User-led services
  • Decision of European Commission to finance
    transfer of the project in other countries. The
    title of the project UNIQ Users Network
    Improve Quality.
  • Main steps of UNIQ project
  • Introduction to NUEVA model 1 week training of
    people with mental disabilities in Austria.
  • NUEVA team travel in 3 participating countries
    training with evaluators, live-testing in some
    services.
  • NUEVA partners organize 6 quality Circle Meetings
    with users, professionals, service providers,
    decision-makers
  • Work on Concept of quality, definition of
    criteria to a questionnaire.

15
Conclusions
  • Participation in delivery of social service and
    quality evaluation.
  • Use of the main criterion of service evaluation -
    quality of life.
  • Alternative communication tools to evaluate
    quality of services, support of a personal
    assistant.
  • Make conditions for direct transfer of
    information about themselves, their experience,
    feelings, expectations to specialists.
  • Seek dialogue with a person, not about a person.
  • Talk, look and find common solutions.
  • Focus on good state of a person, satisfaction,
    positive feelings, suitable conditions,
    environment created not only take, but also give.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com