Title: Credit Portfolio Management
1Credit Portfolio Management
- Solvay Business School
- December 15, 2003
2Content
I. Introduction II. Driving forces for
developing Credit Portfolio Management
(CPM) III. The CPM function IV. Credit
derivatives - The most broadly used instruments
by CPM Appendix The Credit Derivatives Market
Evolution
3I. Introduction
4Introduction
- A Banks capital is used as a cushion to insure
depositors against massive losses on the asset
side that would hit not only the equity but also
the depositors - A minimum capital level is required to avoid bank
runs where all the depositors ask to withdraw
their money - At the same time, shareholders would like to
minimise the capital size in order to increase
their return gt there is a need to optimise the
capital - In a word, Credit Portfolio Managements mission
is to manage the risk capital in the credit
(loans) portfolio while increasing the return,
thereby improving the return/risk profile of the
Bank
Assets
Liabilities
Cash and Government Bonds
Capital
Loans
Deposits
I. Introduction
5II. Driving forces for CPM
6External forces
- Credit downturn
- Recent precipitous declines in the Corporate
world are a serious threat to commercial banks
and uncertainty over future still reigns - Advances in the measurement and management of
credit risks - Revolution in the science of credit risk
measurement (widespread adoption of risk rating,
expected loss, economic capital methodologies)
and development of sophisticated credit portfolio
models - Increasing liquidity in the credit markets
- The take-off of credit derivatives has been
creating new possibilities for risk
transformation through innovative structures
II. Driving forces for CPM
7External forces
- Divergence of economic capital and regulatory
capital - In current BIS capital rules, risk weighting is
still a function of the nature of the issuer and
not a function of the credit quality of the
issuer. - This divergence between economic and regulatory
capital creates real economic costs for
commercial Banks and have an adverse impact on
shareholder value and competitiveness as banks - Avoid economic transactions that use regulatory
capital inefficiently (A) - Enter uneconomic transactions that use regulatory
capital efficiently (B)
B
A
II. Driving forces for CPM
8Internal forces
- Creation of shareholder value
- Across the whole European banking industry, the
return required by shareholders is increasing.
ROE targets increasingly difficult to meet with a
buy-and-hold credit portfolio - Need for active management of the credit
portfolio - Passively managed loan portfolios naturally
deteriorate (a bank loan never trades above par
value, unlike bonds) - Dynamics of credit quality
- Wrong to believe that a rigorous credit approval
process when a loan is first granted can hold
good through the life of that loan credit
quality is dynamic
II. Driving forces for CPM
9Effects
- Banks should be ready to act much quicker when
the quality of a borrower starts to deteriorate - Portfolio management tools such as selling,
hedging or securitising should be used to reduce
exposures before there is a significant fall in
the secondary market price - In recent years, many leading banks have
appointed specialist portfolio managers to take
responsibility for their loan books - Empowerment of portfolio managers to enforce the
discipline is the key success factor
II. Driving forces for CPM
10III. The CPM function
11With or without CPM
Without CPM
With CPM
- A Bank can only originate assets where it has
client relationships - Without management of the portfolio this leads to
concentrations (either at a name, asset class,
industry or geography level), leaving ING with
all its eggs in one basket
- ING actively manages the portfolio, reducing risk
in certain areas where it has (valuable) client
business - The risks ING takes are now less concentrated and
as spread out as possible - CPM achieves this through concrete steps
described below, in line with its mandate
III. The CPM function
12CPMs objectives
- Manage credit risk economic capital
- Maintain economic capital constant across
business cycles by managing volatility of losses
and concentration - Improve return/risk profile (Sharpe ratio, ROE,
) of the reference credit portfolio - Support business growth (by releasing limits on
key commercial relationships) transfer pricing
involved
III. The CPM function
13A. Manage Economic Capital
- Economic Capital is a function of the Unexpected
Loss (Standard Deviation of Losses) and of
Retained Risk EC RR x UL x 7 - Economic Capital allows to cover the losses in
99.95 of the cases, which is the minimum
required to obtain a Aa Credit Rating for the
Bank (currently A (SP) - Aa3(Moodys))
III. The CPM function
14A. Manage Economic Capital
Evolution of Losses
Distribution of Losses
Losses
Time
III. The CPM function
15A. Manage Economic Capital
Losses
Time
- The objective is to maintain economic capital
constant across business cycles - The key word is DIVERSIFICATION - diversification
of the underlying portfolio reduces the
volatility of the losses and, thereby, economic
capital
III. The CPM function
16B. Improve Return/ Risk Profile
Return
Assets performing above average
Efficient Frontier
Assets performing below average
Risk
- The objective is to increase the return/risk
profile of the credit portfolio - This can be achieved by increasing the return or
reducing the risk of underperforming assets
III. The CPM function
17C. Support Business growth
- The objective is to help the Business to grow
even if limits on the best clients are fully
used. - This can be done via hedging excesses of limits
- The cost of hedging has to be compensated by
returns on the loan and non-credit incomes
(return on assets)
III. The CPM function
18In practice
1
2
3
III. The CPM function
19Instruments at our disposal
Out of, and into CPMs own Budget
Out of Businesses Budget
III. The CPM function
20IV. Credit derivatives
21Todays fastest growing derivatives market
20.7
23.5
Source British Bankers Association (2002)
IV. Credit Derivatives
22Instruments
Source British Bankers Association (2002)
IV. Credit Derivatives
23 Instruments
- Various instruments are used by Credit Portfolio
Managers, mainly in unfunded format - The most commonly used are
- The Credit Default Swap (CDS)
- The synthetic securitisation (CDO and the like)
IV. Credit Derivatives
24The Credit Default Swap
- A Credit Default Swap synthetically transfers the
credit risk of a reference asset between two
counterparties - The protection buyer (ING in this case) pays a
fixed perdiodic fee (usually expressed in basis
points per annum on the notional amount) to the
counterparty - The protection seller makes no payment unless
some specified credit event relating to the
reference entity (underlying asset) occurs during
the life of the transaction, in which case the
protection seller is obligated to make a payment
via the settlement process
IV. Credit Derivatives
25The Credit Default Swap
- ING can also sell protection to a counterparty
through a CDS - ING receives the periodic fee payments
- In case of Credit Event, ING would have to pay
the contingent payment through the settlement
process - Same as the previous situation but ING takes an
opposite position
IV. Credit Derivatives
26The Credit Default Swap
- A Credit Event triggers the Credit Default Swap
and leads to the settlement of the transaction - Three Credit Events are currently the market
standard - Bankruptcy the Reference Entity has filed for
protection under Chapter 11 or an equivalent
bankruptcy legislation - Failure to Pay the Reference Entity has failed
to pay any interest or principal of one of its
obligation (loan, bond,) - Restructuring One or more obligations of the
Reference Entity have been restructured (maturity
extension, coupon reduction, change in ranking,)
after a deterioration of its creditworthiness
IV. Credit Derivatives
27The Credit Default Swap
Cash Settlement
Physical Settlement
- The Physical Settlement is the most commonly used
- The Buyer of Protection delivers to the Seller an
Obligation of the Reference Entity - The Seller pays to the Buyer the par Value of the
Obligation - The Seller has then received an asset paid at
100 with a value lower than 100
- The Cash Settlement is less commonly used by the
market - The Buyer of Protection calculates the remaining
(market) price of an Obligation of the Reference
Entity - (100 - remaining price) is considered as the
loss given default on the Reference Entity. It
has to be paid by the Seller (taking into account
the notional of the transaction) to the Buyer
IV. Credit Derivatives
28The securitisation
- What is a securitisation?
- Process of transferring risks associated with a
pool of assets from one party to another - Risks are capped at the level of first loss and
other enhancements - Risk can be tranched to meet investor appetite
- Risk can be physically transferred or
synthetically transferred
IV. Credit Derivatives
29 The cash securitisation
IV. Credit Derivatives
30 The synthetic securitisation
IV. Credit Derivatives
31Examples of CPM transactionsDisinvestment -
Single name hedge
- Suppose that Renault SA represents a big
concentration in INGs credit portfolio and,
therefore, is a good candidate for disinvestment - CPM buys protection on Renault SA for an amount
of say, 20 mln, with a maturity of 3 years - CPM pays 55 bps (0.55) per annum to its
counterparty in exchange for the protection - The risk on Renault SA (up to 20 mln) is
effectively transferred to the counterparty - In terms of risk, Renault SA has been disinvested
(even though it remains on the Balance Sheet)
Credit Risk on Renault SA
IV. Credit Derivatives
32Examples of CPM transactionsDisinvestment -
Synthetic securitisation
Asset Backed Commercial Paper
Credit Default Swap
2 Credit Default Swaps
Conduit
Liabilities
Assets
Reference Portfolio of 100 weighted assets
ING 1,5 bln Reference Portfolio of 100
weighted assets
ABCP Investors
0 weighted assets
ABCP
ABCP (A-1/P-1)
Super Senior
Credit Default Swap (0 Risk Weighted)
Invested ABCP proceeds
SPV
Liabilities
Assets
0 weighted assets
Notes
Note Principaland Interest
Bonds A1
Invested Notes proceeds
A2
Rated Notes
Junior Credit Default Swap (0 Risk Weighted)
A3
A4
Collateral
Retained First Loss
Not rated
Deposit/Repo Arrangements
IV. Credit Derivatives
Long Term Credit Linked Notes
33Examples of CPM transactionsRe-investment -
Synthetic securitisation
- Synthetic CDO transactions are composed of 70/80
underlying companies rated at least Baa2/BBB - The usual average rating of the underlying
companies is A2/A - The Aa3/AA- rated Apple transactions represent a
good way to re-invest into diversification while
minimising Event Risk - Recent Variations
- Index of Credits (900 names, industry hedging on
ING concentrations, fixed recovery rate,) - Management allowing for substitutions (subject to
specific constraints) - CDO made of tranches of underlying CDOs
Super Senior Tranche
Senior Tranche
AA/AA- implied rated Mezzanine Tranche
Equity
Pool of 70/80 companies originated by counterparty
IV. Credit Derivatives
34Appendix The Credit Derivatives Market Evolution
35Todays fastest growing derivatives market
20.7
23.5
Source British Bankers Association (2002)
Appendix
36Credit Derivatives Market Evolution
Source British Bankers Association (2002)
Appendix
37Credit Derivatives Market Evolution
Risk Transfer
Insurance Cos
Banks
Source British Bankers Association (2002)
Appendix
38Credit Derivatives Market Evolution
Source British Bankers Association (2002)
Appendix
39Credit Derivatives Market Evolution
- Growth has, again, surpassed expectations
- Obvious risk transfer from banks to insurance
companies - Portfolio transactions popularity has increased
- Reference entities nature has changed
Appendix
40Credit Derivatives Market Evolution
- Credit default swaps
- Market share has actually increased to 45 in
2001 - 43 expected market share in 2004
- Portfolio transactions
- Not even included in the 1997/1998 Survey
- 22 market share in 2001
- 26 expected market share in 2004
- No other instrument accounts for more than 8 of
the market in 2001
Appendix
41Credit Derivatives Market Evolution
Source British Bankers Association (2002)
Appendix
42Credit Derivatives Market Evolution
Source British Bankers Association (2000)
Appendix
43Credit Portfolio Management
- Solvay Business School
- December 15, 2003