Title: Chapter 7 Performance Appraisal INP3004MAN3360 Dr. Steve
1Chapter 7Performance AppraisalINP3004/MAN3360
Dr. Steve
2Performance Appraisals
- How do performance appraisals benefit the
organization?
- Help orgs make decisions about promotions and
firing
- Provide feedback to employees that serves to
motivate or convince poor workers to leave
- Improve commitment and satisfaction
- Provide documentation in case an employee sues
for wrongful termination
3Performance AppraisalDevelopment and Applications
Job Analysis
Criterion Development
Performance Appraisal
4Performance AppraisalApplications
- Personnel Training Determine employees
strengths weaknesses to determine need for
training
- Diagnostic tool to help employee improve
- Determining Wages Determine who should get a
raise and how much
- This issue may interfere with employee
development, employees may become defensive to
protect salary
- Possible solution intermediate appraisals for
diagnosis, and year end for wage determination
- Placement Use P.A. data to re-assign workers to
tasks they are best suited for
5Performance AppraisalApplications (continued)
- Promotion Typically based on performance
(P.A.), seniority, and available opening
- Good P.A. needed to legally defend choice of
employee for promotion
- Discharge Organization that fires an employee
may be asked to defend appraisal system
- Should demonstrate firing was last alternative
- Personnel research Provides database for
determining level of performance expected
- Establish criteria for training and selection
validities
6Performance Appraisal Systems
- Performance Appraisal Systems should
- Be relevant to the job
- Not be used to assess non-observable behavior
- Not be overly vague
- Not show adverse impact
- Use job analysis for establishing criteria
- Show construct validity
- Be used by supervisors trained in its proper use
- Provide employees opportunity to appeal
evaluation and opportunity to improve before
discharge
7Performance Appraisal Employee Data
Objective Data
Personnel Data
Judgmental Data
8Performance Appraisal Employee Data
- Objective data
- Ex cars sold, time to completion, efficiency,
etc
- Problem Criterion contamination
- Conceptual Criteria
- Salesmanship
- Criterion Deficiency
- total revenue
- profit
- markup
- repeat customers
- time spent on customer.
- Actual Criteria
- cars sold/month
-
- Criterion Contamination
- Geographic region worker is assigned
9Performance Appraisal Employee Data
- Personnel data
- Absenteeism - of days missed from work
- How well does absences discriminate good from bad
employee?
- Are unexcused absences more harmful than
excused?
- Voluntary (requested time off) vs Involuntary
(medical)
- Turnover how long employee stays on job
- Voluntary (quit) vs Involuntary (discharged)
- Why appraise length of time workers stay?
- May be a reflection of management, procedures,
pay, etc
- Accidents cost to the company in terms of
damage and time off work
- Typically used for truckers, machinists,
production workers, etc.
- Problem Criterion Deficiency
- Appear to be only measures of poor performance
10Performance Appraisal Employee Data
- Judgmental data subjective ratings
- Majority of performance appraisal systems
- Can be used in any type of job
- May be correlated with other measures (objective
or personnel)
- Problem Rater must be skilled at identifying
relevant behaviors
11Performance Appraisal Methods
- Graphic Rating Scales rate worker on number of
different dimensions by checking a box, circling
a , Likert scale, etc.
- Examples
X
X
12Performance Appraisal Methods
- Graphic Rating Scales (continued)
- Common Problems
- Halo Errors Overall impression of worker biases
individual ratings
- Leniency Errors Particularly hard grader
(negative) or easy grader (positive)
- Central Tendency Errors Tendency to select the
mid point of scale particularly when unsure
13Performance Appraisal Methods
- Rank-Order rank all employees from best to
worst on performance (ordinal scale)
- Ex
- Sally
- Charlie
- Lucy
- Linus
- PigPen
- Problems
- Employee rankings are relative to each other
rather than a standard.
- Difficult with large number of workers
14Performance Appraisal Methods
- Paired Comparison compare each employee to
every other employee
- Example
Lucy 3 PigPen 2 Linus 3 Charlie - 0
Sally 2
- Problem comparisons n(n-1) / 2
15Performance Appraisal Methods
- Forced Distribution Use normal curve to place
workers into categories of performance
- Useful when large number of workers
- Forces distribution to be normal, so that most
workers are average
Problem No reason to believe distribution to be
normal
Poor performers are weeded out
16Performance AppraisalMethods using Specified
Behaviors
- Critical Incidents Those behaviors that are
particularly important for doing the job
- Supervisor keeps a running list of employees
critical incidents as they relate to various
job-related behaviors such as job knowledge,
decision making, leadership, etc. - Used mainly as a diagnostic tool
- Examples
- Failed to complete report
- Decision to use fluorescent bulbs instead of
incandescent saved company 600 on years
electric bill
17Performance AppraisalMethods using Specified
Behaviors
- Weighted Checklists Takes critical incidents
and weights each one according to importance
- SMEs list of critical incidents from good to bad
for completing the job.
- Supervisor then uses scale to identify behaviors
worker engaged in, then computes score
18Weighted Checklist
- Position Secretary
- Critical Incident Scale Value
- - Knows the difference between correcting the
6.5
- grammar in the bosss letter and correcting
writing style
- Knows various postal rates and mails material in
4.2
- a cost-efficient manner
- Knows what typing is to be done on plain vs.
company letterhead 3.1
- Keeps a running count on the use of office
supplies 2.5
- Opens all mail whether or not it is marked
confidential -1.9
- Confuses priorities on typing that needs
immediate attention -3.8
- and projects that have no established deadlines
- Files away correspondence so that it can rarely
be found for -5.2
- later reference
- Leaves many mistakes in typing from failing to
proofread the -7.1
- typed copy
19Behaviorally Anchored Rating ScalesBARS
- BARS Rating scale which uses specific behaviors
as anchor points
- Five step development process
- Create list of critical incidents
- Group incidents into meaningful dimensions
- Sort incidents (assess goodness of fit in groups)
and discard inconsistent ones
- Rate remaining incidents on representativeness of
the dimension (those with low inter-rater
agreement are discarded)
- Incidents are placed on scale according to their
rating
20Behaviorally Anchored Rating ScalesBARS Example
21Behavioral-Observation ScalesBOS
- BOS Supervisor rates employee on frequency of
how often each critical incident occurs
22Performance AppraisalsOther Factors
- Rater Training try to minimize errors such as
leniency, halo, central tendency, etc.
- Perhaps videotaped performance with known rating
(est by SMEs) and have rater match ratings to
expert opinion
- Rater Motivation provide motivation for giving
accurate ratings
- Are supervisors rewards tied to performance of
subordinate ratees?
-
23Performance AppraisalRater Motivation
24Other Types of Appraisals
- Self Assessment appraise oneself on how well
you think you are doing.
- Likely positive leniency
- People generally acknowledge their weaknesses
when not tied to monetary considerations
- Can help diagnose training needs
- Peer Assessment evaluate co-workers
- Peer Nomination nominate specified of top
coworkers
- Peer Ratings rate co-workers on various
dimensions
- Peer Rankings rank co-workers from top to bottom
25Performance Appraisal Follow-Up
- Post-appraisal interview with subordinate to
discuss evaluation
- Identify both strengths and weaknesses
- Set goals for improvement (motivate)
- Factors affecting motivation of appraisal
- Does employee agree with assessment?
- Does employee approve and accept the goals?
26Performance Appraisal Acceptance
- Seven things that contribute to employee
acceptance of their evaluations as fair
- Was input solicited from employee and used in
appraisal?
- Was there 2-way communication in feedback
interview?
- Was there opportunity for employee to challenge
evaluation?
- Was rater well-acquainted with employees work?
- Are performance standards applied uniformly?
- Are ratings based on actual performance (not
personality)?
- Are salary promotion decisions based on ratings?
27Top 10 Military Performance Appraisal Comments
- Got a full 6-pack, but lacks the plastic thingy
to hold it all together
- This man is depriving a village somewhere of an
idiot
- He has the wisdom of youth and the energy of old
age
- Wheel is turning but the hamster is dead
- Was left on the tilt-whirl too long as a baby
- If he were any more stupid, hed have to be
watered twice a week
- She sets low personal standards and consistently
fails to achieve them
- So dense, light bends around him
- Got into the gene pool while the lifeguard wasnt
watching
- A prime candidate for natural de-selection