P1246341514UGgwn - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 41
About This Presentation
Title:

P1246341514UGgwn

Description:

Typically ten agencies, together with the White House Office, make up the EOP. ... with the president and his White House staff rather than with each other. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:56
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 42
Provided by: Laurie
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: P1246341514UGgwn


1
The Modern Presidency maximizing power within
constitutional constraints
The Logic of American Politics
Chapter Seven The Presidency
2
Presidential Expectations
  • Today the American people expect a lot from the
    president
  • These expectations often surpass actual
    constitutionally-based power
  • For example, presidents receive blame or praise
    based on the state of the economy
  • And, in a crisis, everyone looks to the president

3
Two Presidencies?
  • Founders designed a presidency that gave the
    executive enough resources for coordinating
    national responses during emergencies but not
    enough to usurp the Constitution.
  • Withheld some executive powers giving Congress a
    say over the authority the president was given.
  • Result Leadership gravitates to presidents
    during crisis, but then dissipates quickly as the
    crisis recedes.

4
Emergence of the Modern Presidency
  • As government expanded during the 20th century so
    did the workload of the president.
  • With additional responsibilities, the chief
    executive gained additional discretion.
  • Presidents have gradually discovered a number of
    tools for maximizing their power within
    constitutional constraints.

5
Emergence of the Institutional Presidency
  • A modest beginning
  • By the early 1800s the number of staff working in
    and around the WH was less than a dozen.
  • When FDR became president there were about 50
    staff members. (Including maintenance,
    switchboard, mailroom)

6
Emergence of the Institutional Presidency
  • In 1937 the Presidents Committee on
    Administrative Management (Brownlow Committee)
    concluded that the president needs help.
  • Much like a CEO of a business, the president
    found himself in need of the tools to carry out
    the business of the nation.

7
Emergence of the Institutional Presidency
  • The Brownlow report, however, ignored the fact
    that the Constitution withholds the kind of
    authority the presidency would need to command
    the federal bureaucracy if it were a business.

8
Emergence of the Institutional Presidency
  • Congress initially ignored the reports
    recommendations
  • Two years later though it agreed to most of the
    proposals and the Executive Office of the
    President was born.

9
Executive Office of the President
  • Typically ten agencies, together with the White
    House Office, make up the EOP.
  • They work primarily with the president and his
    White House staff rather than with each other.
  • They perform classic staff functions
  • Gathering information (e.g., National Security
    Council)
  • Maintaining the organization of the Executive
    Office itself (e.g., Office of the VP)

10
The OMB
  • The Office of Management and Budget is one of the
    most important agencies in the EOP
  • It is responsible for
  • creation of the annual federal budget
  • monitoring agency performance
  • compiling recommendations from the departments on
    bills under consideration in Congress
  • administering central clearance.

11
White House Office
  • The WHO has grown in numbers and in complexity.
  • With that has come increased structure.
  • Today the chief of staff heads up the WHO and
    relatively clear lines of authority flow from
    that position.
  • Specialists have replaced generalists.

12
Modern Presidents As Administrators
  • As the obligations of government grew, oversight
    of the executive (such as cabinet level agencies)
    began to tax Congresss time and resources and
    its ability to do its work.
  • Congress found its interests served by delegating
    administrative duties and policy discretion to
    the White House

13
Delegation
  • Some of the presidents increased power comes
    from Congress.
  • Sometimes Congress does this strategically to
    gain political advantage.
  • When would they do this?
  • When they agree on the goals of a bill but
    disagree on its specifics. Thus they make the
    language vague and the executive branch has great
    leeway in how it implements the law. This also
    puts blame for unpopular policies on the
    executive rather than Congress.
  • Example Congress delegated to
  • the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
  • discretion to establish rules for
  • classifying species as endangered
  • and threatened.

14
Budgeting Power
  • The formulation and presentation of the annual
    budget to Congress is one of the presidents most
    important clerical tasks today.
  • Authority comes from the delegation of duty from
    Congress -- 1921 Budgeting Accounting Act.
  • Until the 1920s, agencies sent their budget
    requests directly to the House Appropriations
    committee.

15
Budgeting
  • The presidents annual budget, submitted to
    Congress on the first Monday in February, takes
    months of work. Why?
  • Assembling and negotiating requests from
    agencies.
  • Bringing them into conformity with WH policy
    goals.
  • Sometimes sails through other years replaced
    with congressional budget.
  • Provides Congress with valuable information.
  • Represents the presidents opening bid on how
    much will be spent for what and where the money
    will come from.

16
Presidential Assertions of Authority
  • Presidents have also tried to pull authority into
    the White House.
  • Theodore Roosevelt issued an executive order
    (1902) prohibiting all federal employees from
    communicating with Congress either directly or
    indirectly, individually or through associations
    or to attempt to influence in their own interest
    any other legislation.

17
Presidential Assertions of Authority
  • Taft extended the rule to cover any congressional
    action. Even information requests were denied
    unless authorized by department head.
  • Congress rejected these efforts to centralize
    power and passed legislation to block it.
  • Free flow of information was protected.

18
Presidential Assertions of Authority
  • 1939 FDR managed to take more control of the
    bureaucracy by issuing an order that all
    department communications to Congress that could
    affect future budgets first be cleared as
    consistent with the presidents policy by the
    Bureau of the Budget (todays OMB). (central
    clearance)
  • Remains in effect today

19
Presidential Assertions of Authority
  • President Reagan issued an executive order in
    1980 instructing all federal agencies to submit
    any new regulations or rules to OMB for a
    cost-benefit analysis.
  • Impact curbed the number of new rules.
  • This clearance process was relaxed after Congress
    responded negatively.
  • The Lesson Presidents can assert authority, but
    they cannot overreach. Congress can step in and
    take back power.

20
Modern Presidents As Legislators
  • Presidents can recommend laws.
  • Today, Congress gives these proposals serious
    consideration.
  • 90 percent of presidents initiatives are
    considered by some congressional committee or
    subcommittee.
  • But that doesnt necessarily mean the president
    gets what he wants

21
Modern Presidents As Legislators
  • In assembling support for their legislation,
    presidents begin with their party allies in
    Congress. They cultivate this support by
  • advocating spending on programs and public works
    for a district or state
  • appointing a members congressional aide as an
    agency head, and
  • visiting a lawmakers district to generate
    support for the the next reelection campaign.
  • These fellow partisans do what they can to
    support their leader.

22
Modern Presidents As Legislators
  • During George W. Bushs first year, his fellow
    Republicans in the House supported him 86 percent
    of the time, and in the Senate -- 94 percent of
    the time.

23
Modern Presidents as Legislators
  • Members of the opposing party lack incentives to
    cooperate with the president.
  • They have a stake in defeating his
    administration, not helping it carry out policy
    objectives.

24
Unified versus Divided Control of Government
  • When presidents find their party in majority
    control of the House and Senate, they have
    excellent prospects for passing their legislative
    agenda.
  • Examples New Deal and Great Society.
  • However, during divided government (when the
    presidents opposition party controls either or
    both legislative chambers), the president
    confronts majorities with different preferences.
  • Gridlock often results.

25
Unified versus Divided Control of Government
  • During the past half century, unified party
    control has occurred less frequently than divided
    government.
  • How do presidents deal with this situation?
  • pull decisions into the White House
  • carefully screen appointees to federal agencies
  • utilize the veto
  • go public (engaging in intensive public relations
    to promote their policies to voters).

26
Veto Bargaining
  • The veto allows presidents to block legislation
    they dislike (unless 2/3 of both chambers vote to
    override it).
  • The threat of a veto can also serve as a powerful
    tool.
  • Presidents can use the threat to manipulate
    Congresss expectations about the likely result
    of alternative legislative packages, helping
    shape legislation

27
Veto Bargaining
  • How much influence the veto offers the president
    over public policy often depends on how close the
    presidents priorities are to the status quo
    compared to those of Congress.

28
The Veto Game
  • Scenario 1 The president and Congress have
    sharply different policy preferences

Congress Status Quo President
President Status Quo Congress
In this scenario, vetoes are likely.
29
The Veto Game
  • Scenario 2 Congress favors a more drastic change
    in policy than does the president.

Status Quo President Congress
Outcome Congress will have to make enough
concessions to the president so that their
proposal is equally or more attractive to him
than the status quo.
30
The Veto Game
  • Scenario 3 The president favors a more drastic
    change in policy than does Congress.

Status Quo Congress President
Outcome The president will approve Congress
ideal policy because he prefers it to the status
quo.
31
Maximizing Power through Informal Means
  • Bargaining and persuasion
  • Richard Neustadts Presidential Power and the
    Modern Presidents excerpted in essay 7-1
  • Going public
  • Samuel Kernells Going Public excerpted in essay
    7-2

32
Bargaining and Persuasion - Neustadt
  • The authority of the president doesnt match
    expectations for his performance
  • Constitution guarantees the president little more
    than a role as the chief clerk of the government
    but they have an opportunity to be a real leader

33
Bargaining and Persuasion - Neustadt
  • The key to presidential success lies in
    persuasion
  • The ability to persuade depends on bargaining
  • The essence of a Presidents persuasive task,
    with congressmen and everybody else, is to induce
    them to believe that what he wants of them is
    what their own appraisal of their own
    responsibilities requires them to do is in their
    interest, not his.

34
Bargaining and Persuasion - Neustadt
  • Additional keys to successful bargaining and
    persuasion
  • Reputation
  • Prestige

35
Going Public - Kernell
  • Presidents and members of Congress share
    constituencies.
  • Going public allows presidents to try and
    bypass bargaining with Congress and attempt to
    coerce members of Congress to comply with his
    wishes by appealing directly to their
    constituents.
  • If the president can win the publics backing for
    himself and his policies, opponents in Congress
    may go along because they do not want to offend
    voters.

36
Going Public
  • Today, presidents spend a great deal of their
    time, energy, and staff taking their message to
    the American people.
  • Going on prime-time television.
  • Public speeches, travel.

37
Going Public
  • Mass communication has both expanded and eroded
    the presidents command of the air waves.
  • The president has more venues for getting his
    message out but people also have more options to
    avoid it.

38
Limitations to Going Public
  • An inherently risky strategy
  • In a weak position to bargain if going public
    fails
  • But when successful, presidents can win big.

39
Bargaining versus Going Public
  • Which tool is more effective may depend in part
    on whether the government is unified or divided.

40
Presidents As Strategic Actors
  • While today the president has more authority and
    responsibility than the Founders would have
    imagined, they still often find themselves
    lacking the power to satisfy expectations for
    their performance.
  • The demands of the job often outnumber the
    resources.

41
Presidents As Strategic Actors
  • How presidents utilize their resources, such as
    the veto, to deal with an opposition Congress,
    can make all the difference between success and
    failure.
  • So can their savvy in using bargaining and going
    public to help advance their causes.
  • Framers mandated that presidents be leaders yet
    gave the the tools to be no more than clerks.
  • Over the years, presidents have found ways to
    maximize their power within Constitutional
    constraints.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com