COMP 323: Research Administration for Scientists - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

COMP 323: Research Administration for Scientists

Description:

White House Office. Office of. Management & Budget (OMB) Office of the. Vice President ... White House. OMB. Budget Request. The Budget Process. Department of ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:70
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 65
Provided by: wei8
Learn more at: http://www.cs.unc.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: COMP 323: Research Administration for Scientists


1
COMP 323 Research Administration for Scientists
  • Introduction and Overview
  • History of Research Funding in US
  • Overview of Federal Budget Process
  • Overview of Federal Research Budget
  • January 18, 2006

2
Email quigg_at_cs.unc.edu
Web page http//www.cs.unc.edu/quigg/
3
When did the federal government
become involved in
funding university research?
4
History External Support for University
Research in U.S.
  • Before WWII
  • Mainly internal sources

Agriculture
  • Notable exception
  • Morrill Act of 1862 Land-Grant Colleges
  • 30,000 acres of federal land/congressional
    representative to each State

5
History External Support for University
Research in U.S.
  • Sold to provide a perpetual endowment fund for
  • at least one college where the leading object
    shall be, without excluding other scientific and
    classical studies and including military
    tactics, to teach such branches of learning as
    are related to agriculture and the mechanic
    arts
  • Kentucky (50/acre) Cornell (5.50/acre)

6
History External Support for University
Research in U.S.
  • Second Morrill Act of 1890
  • In order to get , State had to show that race
    was not a criterion for admission to land-grant
    institution or
  • Designate a separate land-grant college for
    blacks
  • 1890 land-grants created all over the
    then- segregated South

7
(No Transcript)
8
(No Transcript)
9
History External Support for University
Research in U.S.
  • Hatch Act of 1887 Agriculture Experiment
    Station
  • Annual appropriation State match required
  • Smith-Lever Act of 1914 Cooperative
    Extension Service
  • Annual appropriation State match required

10
History External Support for University
Research in U.S.
  • During WWII
  • University scientists mobilized to apply
    expertise to war effort
  • National Defense Research Council
  • Formed by FDR in June, 1940
  • Forum for bringing university/industry/
    government scientists together
  • 18 month head-start on Pearl Harbor

11
History External Support for University
Research in U.S.
  • Office of Scientific Research and Defense
    (OSRD)
  • May 1941
  • Dr. Vannevar Bush, Director
  • Mission to explore a possible government role
    to encourage future scientific progress.
  • Civilian, not military, control

12
History External Support for University
Research in U.S.
  • OSRD contracted work to other institutions
  • Carnegie Institute of Technology Large Rocket
    Lab
  • MIT Radiation Lab
  • Western Electric and Bell Labs Sound
    Amplification
  • Emphasis on concentrated, massive rapid
    development
  • Production from model to field e.g., Japanese
    torpedo jammer developed in one week

13
History External Support for University
Research in U.S.
  • Three critical secret projects pivotal to
    allied victory in WWII
  • Atomic bomb (Manhattan project)
  • Radar
  • 1935 NRL ship radar
  • 1942 MIT high-frequency, narrow-beam,
    high-resolution
  • Manufactured by Sperry, Westinghouse, Philco
    (for aircraft)

14
History External Support for University
Research in U.S.
  • Proximity (variable time) fuze
  • Prior to WWII timed fuze or contact fuze
  • Neither effective against highly maneuverable
    airplanes
  • Section T Applied Physics Lab at Johns
    Hopkins University assigned task of developing
    proximity fuze for Navys 5 guns

15
History External Support for University
Research in U.S.
  • Theory
  • Fuze contains miniature radio
    transmitter-receiver
  • Sends out signal
  • When signal reflected back from target reaches
    a certain frequency (caused by proximity to
    target) a circuit closes firing a small charge
    which detonates projectile

16
History External Support for University
Research in U.S.
  • Problems
  • Components tiny glass vacuum tubes
  • Force of 20,000 gs when fired (2800 ft./sec.
    muzzle velocity)
  • 25,000 revolutions/minute through rifling
    grooves
  • Moisture
  • Self-destruct feature for dudes

17
History External Support for University
Research in U.S.
  • Importance to war effort
  • James V. Forrestal, Secretary of the Navy
    said, The proximity fuze has helped me blaze
    the trail to Japan. Without the protection this
    ingenious device has given the surface ships of
    the fleet, our westward push could not have been
    so swift and the cost in men and ships would
    have been immeasurably greater
  • Prime Minister, Winston S. Churchill was
    quoted with These so- called proximity fuzes,
    made in the United States.., proved potent
    against the small unmanned aircraft (V-1) with
    which we were assailed in 1944.
  • And Commanding General of the Third Army,
    George S. Patton said, The funny fuze won the
    Battle of the Bulge for us. I think that when
    all armies get this shell we will have to devise
    some new method of warfare.

18
History External Support for University
Research in U.S.
  • Bushs final report The Endless Frontier
  • Two principles for expanding R D in U.S.
    Universities
  • Federal government as patron of science
  • Government support should ensure a free rein of
    investigation by scientists into topics and
    methods of their choice

19
History External Support for University
Research in U.S.
  • This report lead to the establishment of
    National Science Foundation (NSF) in 1950
  • Independent government agency
  • National Science Board
  • 24 members plus director
  • Appointed by President

20
Overview of Federal Budget Process
21
Executive Office of the President (EXOP) White
House Office
Office of Management Budget (OMB)
Office of the Vice President (OVP)
Presidents Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board
(PFIAB)
National Security Council (NSC)
Office of Policy Development (OPD)
US Trade Representative (USTR)
Council of Economic Advisors (CEA)
Office of Administration (OA)
Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP)
Primarily career staff
Council of Environmental Quality (CEQ)
Office of Science Technology Policy (OSTP)
Political
Mix of detailees, career, political
22
The Budget Process
23
The Budget Process
Guidance
24
The Budget Process
25
The Budget Process
Budget Request
26
The Budget Process
Passback
Budget Request
27
The Budget Process
Appeal
Passback
Budget Request
28
The Budget Process
Presidents Budget Request
29
The Budget Process
  • Budget Resolution
  • 302(b) Allocation
  • Subcommittee Markup
  • Committee Markup
  • Floor Vote
  • Conference

30
The Budget Process
SAPs
Hearings
  • Budget Resolution
  • 302(b) Allocation
  • Subcommittee Markup
  • Committee Markup
  • Floor Vote
  • Conference

31
(No Transcript)
32
The Budget Process
Bills
33
The Budget Process
Apportionment

34
The DOE/SC Budget Cycle
35
Overview of Federal Budget
36
Government Spending as a Share of GDP, 2000
37
Outlays as a Percent of GDP
Between 1966 and 1999, spending on Social
Security, Medicare and Medicaid, and interest as
a percentage of GDP grew, while spending on
defense fell.
38
Total Government Surplus or Deficit as a Percent
of GDP
39
The National Debt Is 8.1 Trillion!
40
U.S. NATIONAL DEBT CLOCK The Outstanding Public
Debt as of 17 Jan 2006 at 063553 PM GMT is
The estimated population of the United States is
298,275,804so each citizen's share of this debt
is 27,431.22.
41
Composition of Federal Revenues
42
The Federal Government Dollar--Where It Goes
43
(No Transcript)
44
(No Transcript)
45
Historical RD Priorities(obligations, in 1996
constant dollars)
46
FY 2002 Proposed RD Budget (98 Billion BA)
Total includes additions resulting from Defense
Budget Amendment
47
05p2
48
actrnd03
49
aclifp03
50
(No Transcript)
51
(No Transcript)
52
Earmarks to Universities CollegesIncreasing
and Undermining Competitive, Merit-Based Efforts
in Some Fields
53
Further Information
  • OMB website
  • www.whitehouse.gov/omb
  • Presidents budget
  • w3.access.gpo.gov/usbudget
  • AAAS Science Policy Programs
  • www.aaas.org/spp/
  • DOEs Office of Science
  • www.er.doe.gov
  • NSF Science Resources Studies
  • www.nsf.gov/sbe/srs/fedfunds/start.htm

54
(No Transcript)
55
(No Transcript)
56
(No Transcript)
57
(No Transcript)
58
(No Transcript)
59
05pf1
60
Awards in Millions at UNC-CH
61
Sponsored awards vs state appropriations at UNC-CH
62
Research Dollars vs Staffing at UNC-CH
63
Remember
64
Reading Assignments for Next Week The
Art of Grantsmanship by Jacob Kraicer
http//www.utoronto.ca/cip/sa_ArtGt.pdf
Zen in the Art of Grantsmanship
http//www.mindspring.com/bozartmt/zen_in.htm
l
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com