Title: Capital Structure and Value
1Capital Structure and Value
- Optimal capital structure is the mix of debt and
equity that maximizes the value of the firm or
minimizes the weighted average cost of capital - Miller Modigliani
- If markets are perfect capital structure does not
affect value - Investors can accomplish any desired debt and
equity mix by themselves - Weighted average cost of capital is constant
2Financial Leverage, EPS, and ROE
- Current Proposed
- Assets 5,000,000 5,000,000
- Debt 0 2,500,000
- Equity 5,000,000 2,500,000
- Debt/Equity ratio 0 1
- Share price 10 10
- Shares outstanding 500,000 250,000
- Interest rate n/a 10
3Financial Leverage, EPS, and ROE
- EPS and ROE under current capital structure
- Recession Expected Expansion
- EBIT 300,000 650,000 800,000
- Interest 0 0
0 - Net income 300,000 650,000 800,000
- EPS 0.60 1.30 1.60
- ROE 6 13 16
4Financial Leverage, EPS, and ROE
- EPS and ROE under proposed capital structure
- Recession Expected Expansion
- EBIT 300,000 650,000 800,000
- Interest 250,000 250,000 250,000
- Net income 50,000 400,000 550,000
- EPS 0.20 1.60 2.20
- ROE 2 16 22
5Homemade Leverage and ROE
- Firm does not adopt proposed capital
structureInvestor put up 500 and borrows 500
at 10 to buy 100 shares - Investors return on her investment will be,
- Recession Expected
Expansion - EPS of un-levered firm 0.60
1.30 1.60 - Earnings for 100 shares 60.00
130.00 160.00 - less interest on 500 at 10 -50.00
-50.00 -50.00 - Net earnings
10.00 80.00 110.00 - ROE
10/500 80/500 110/500
2 16 22
6Homemade Leverage and ROE
- Firm adopts proposed capital structureInvestor
puts up 500, 250 in stock and 250 in bonds at
10 - Investors return on her investment will be,
-
Recession Expected Expansion - EPS of levered firm 0.20
1.60 2.20 - Earnings for 25 shares 5.00
40.00 55.00 - plus interest on 250 at 10 25.00
25.00 25.00 - Net earnings
30.00 65.00 80.00 - ROE
30/500 65/500 80/500
6
13 16 - Note Remember we assume a world where there are
no market imperfections such as taxes and
transaction costs.
7The Miller Modigliani (MM) Propositions
- Financial leverage and firm value Proposition I
- Since investors can costlessly replicate the
financing decisions of the firm (homemade
leverage), in the absence of taxes and other
market imperfections, the value of the firm is
unaffected by its capital structure. - Implications
- There is no magic in finance - you cant get
something for nothing. - Capital restructurings dont create value, in and
of themselves. (Why is the last part of the
statement so important?)
8The MM Propositions
- The cost of equity and financial leverage
Proposition II - Because of Proposition I, the WACC must be
constant. - With no taxes,
- WACC RA (E/V) x RE (D/V) x RD
- where RA is the return on the firms assets
- Solve for RE to get MM Proposition II
- RE RA (RA - RD) x (D/E)
- Cost of equity has two parts
- 1. RA and business risk
- 2. D/E and financial risk
9The CAPM, the SML, and Proposition II
10The MM Propositions
11Introduction of Taxes
- Interest is taxed as the income of the lender,
but equity income is taxed as corporate income
and income of the shareholder - By borrowing corporations create interest tax
shield because interest expense of corporations
reduces taxable income - This leads to a firm that is almost entirely
financed with debt
12Debt, Taxes, and Firm Value
- The interest tax shield and firm value
- For simplicity (1) perpetual cash flows (2) no
depreciation (3) no fixed asset or NWC spending - A firm is considering going from zero debt to
400 at 10 - Firm U Firm L (un-levered) (levered)
- EBIT 200 200
- Interest 0 40
- Tax (40) 80 64
- Net income 120 96
-
- Tax saving 16 0.40 x 0.10 x 400 TC x
RD x D
13Debt, Taxes, and Firm Value
- Whats the link between debt and firm value?
- Since interest creates a tax deduction,
borrowing creates a tax shield. Its value is
added to the value of the firm. - MM Proposition I (with taxes)
- PV(tax saving) (0.40) x (10) x (400) / 0.10
160 - (TC x RD x D)/RD TC x D
- VL VU TC x D
14Debt, Taxes, and Firm Value
15Debt, Taxes, and Firm Value
16Differential Tax Rates on Debt and Equity Income
- Above conclusions assume that the tax rate on
equity and debt income is the same - Value of the firm with differential tax rate is
the present value total cash flows (TCF) to
investors - TCF I (1 Tp) (NOI I) (1 Tc) (1 Tg)
- I interest expense
- Tp personal tax rate on interest income
- Tc corporate tax rate
- Tg personal tax rate on equity income
- TCF increases with additional debt if
- (1 Tp) gt (1 Tc) (1 Tg)
17Tax Clientele Effect
- Tax rates of investors vary causing preference
toward debt or equity - If all companies have the same tax rate but
investors experience different tax rates,
companies as a group would maximize value by
issuing enough debt to accommodate those investor
for whom - (1 Tp) gt (1 Tc) (1 Tg) holds
- Differential Tax Rates Among Corporations
- High tax rate of a corporation increases benefits
of debt financing
18Bankruptcy Costs
- As the D/E ratio increases, the probability of
bankruptcy increases likelihood of operating
income shortage to cover interest expense on the
debt - This increased probability will increase the
expected bankruptcy costs - At some point, the additional value of the
interest tax shield will be offset by the
expected bankruptcy cost - At this point, the value of the firm will start
to decrease and the WACC will start to increase
as more debt is added
19Bankruptcy Costs
- Bankruptcy Costs
- Direct costs legal and administrative fees
- Legal costs
- Indirect costs
- Lost sales of products requiring future service
- Loss of best employees
- Low employee morale
- Inability of credit purchases
- Higher financing costs and restrictions
- As the amount of debt increases, the probability
of bankruptcy and therefore expected costs of
bankruptcy increases, reducing firm value
20Debt, Taxes, Bankruptcy, and Firm Value
21Debt, Taxes, Bankruptcy, and Firm Value
22Agency Costs
- Agency costs of debt
- Managers can increase shareholders wealth at the
expense of creditors by taking risky projects - If level of debt is low, risks are also low.
High debt level requires monitoring by creditors,
increasing agency costs even further - Agency costs of equity
- Managers self fulfilling prophecies,
conservatism or over-optimism in investment
decisions - Higher debt level prevents managers from value
reducing activities
23Information Signaling
- Managers convey their private information to the
investors by changing capital structure - High debt levels reflect managers information on
improved future prospects of the company - Firms with bad news cannot replicate because they
wont have resources to support high debt level
24Additional Considerations
- Unequal costs of borrowing
- Higher risk of personal borrowing
- Institutional restrictions on leverage
25Capital Structure with Informed Investors
- Study the market response to determine optimal
capital structure - Study the relationship between different capital
structures and the weighted average cost of
capital - Information from market participants
- Investment bankers
- Bond ratings and wacc
- Security analysts
- Disequilibrium
26Capital Structure with Uninformed Investors
- If investors are not well-informed, managers
should consider future profitability, earnings
variability and bankruptcy risk - Pro forma analysis of alternative capital
structures - Risk analysis
- Ratio measures
- Break-even point is the sales level below which
the company has a loss - Crossover point is the sales or EBIT level at
which the company would earn the same EPS with
two different capital structures - Debt capacity analysis
27Empirical Evidence
- Bankruptcy costs are important in determining
optimal capital structure - The more the physical assets the more the debt
level in capital structure - Announcement of equity issues cause negative
abnormal returns - Announcement of debt for equity exchange
increases stock value - Announcement of equity for debt exchange
decreases stock value - Abnormal price drops following leverage
decreasing capital structure exchanges are
positively related to unexpected earnings
decreases - Stock repurchases via tender offers result in
sharp price increases - If a firm becomes a takeover target, it increases
debt level - Harris and Raviv (1991), The Theory of Capital
Structure, JOF.
28Modigliani and Miller Summary
- I. The No-Tax Case
- A. Proposition I The value of the firm levered
equals the value of the firm un-levered VL VU - B. Implications of Proposition I
- 1. A firms capital structure is irrelevant.
- 2. A firms WACC is the same no matter what mix
of debt and equity is used. - C. Proposition II The cost of equity, RE, is
- RE RA (RA - RD) D/E
- where RA is the WACC, RD is the cost of debt, and
D/E is the debt/equity ratio. - D. Implications of Proposition II
- 1. The cost of equity rises as the firm increases
its use of debt financing. - 2. Equity risk depends on the risk of firm
operations (business risk) and the degree of
financial leverage (financial risk).
29Modigliani and Miller Summary
- II. The Tax Case
- A. Proposition I with Taxes The value of the
firm levered equals the value of the firm
un-levered plus the present value of the interest
tax shield - VL VU Tc D
- where Tc is the corporate tax rate and D is the
amount of debt. - B. Implications of Proposition I with taxes
- 1. Debt financing is highly advantageous, and,
in the extreme, a firms optimal capital
structure is 100 percent debt. - 2. A firms WACC decreases as the firm relies
more heavily on debt.