Globalization and tax competition - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

Globalization and tax competition

Description:

How does globalization affect pre-tax income inequality? ... The process of globalization is different today. ... winner takes all society. In some markets we ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:35
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: aca88
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Globalization and tax competition


1
Globalization and tax competition
  • Alexander W. Cappelen
  • Econ 4620

2
Plan
  • What is globalization?
  • How does globalization affect pre-tax income
    inequality?
  • How does globalization affect redistributive
    policy?
  • Possible solutions.

3
Globalization
  • What is globalization?
  • Economic integration
  • Increased international mobility of capital,
    commodities/services and people.
  • But globalization also has other, social and
    cultural dimensions.
  • Two types of causes
  • Technological and social changes
  • Reduced costs of transportation and communication
  • Lower social barriers and increased language
    skills.
  • Political reforms
  • Reduction in import tariffs and other barriers to
    trade.
  • Increased number of market economies.

4
What is new about the current globalization
process?
  • Globalization is not new phenomenon.
  • According to some measures the world was equally
    integrated before the first world war.
  • The process of globalization is different today.
  • It is primarily capital, not labour that has
    experienced increased international mobility.
  • The composition of trade has changed
  • Intraindustri trade
  • The size to the welfare state and the average tax
    levels have increased.

5
Globalization and development
  • Globalization creates a potential for growth and
    development.
  • Increased trade and international investments
    give new countries access to
  • New technology
  • New products
  • New markets
  • New information

6
What are the consequences of globalization?
  • As a result of economic integration the world has
  • Experienced a unique growth in international
    trade
  • Increased economic growth
  • Reduced national autonomy
  • The growth has not been equally distributed
  • Increased inequality?
  • Nationally?
  • Internationally?

7
Increased pre-tax inequality
  • There is considerable evidence that income
    inequality has increased in the developed
    countries
  • Globalization can create increased pre-tax
    inequality in at least three ways
  • Equalization of international factor prices.
  • The way level of unskilled workers might fall
    while the wage level of the high skilled might
    increase as a result of trade with less developed
    countries.
  • However, the major part of international trade
    takes place between rich industrialized countries.

8
Cont.
  • Reduced power for the labor unions.
  • Firms can move their production to other
    countries and this increases their bargaining
    power with respect to the labor unions.
  • The winner takes all society
  • In some markets we have winner. When markets
    are integrated several national winners are
    replaced by one international winner.

9
Globalization and redistribution
  • Globalization will also reduce the governments
    ability finance welfare services and redistribute
    income.
  • Economic integration and increased mobility makes
    it easier for mobile tax bases to move to another
    country.
  • This gives rise to so-called tax competition
    between countries.
  • A race to the bottom
  • Cross-border shopping and capital taxation

10
A simple model
  • Consider an economy which produces a homogenous
    output using capital K and labor L, according to
    the linearly homogenous production function f(K,
    L).
  • We have that
  • fK r
  • fL w
  • The aggregate supplies of labor and capital are
    constant. Ensures that factor prices are constant.

11
Cont.
  • The labor supply, X, of an individual is a
    product of two stochastically independent random
    variables D1 and D2. Where D1 describes inborn
    characteristics and D2 captures factors later in
    life that explain variations in wages, e.g.
    promotion and health risks.
  • X D1D2
  • EX ED1 ED2 1

12
Cont.
  • Private insurance can first be made at the
    beginning of adult life, i.e. after D1 is known.
  • Individuals also face another risk C in addition
    to the wage risk
  • All individuals have assets K that are invested
    with a return equal to r.
  • Before taxation and insurance a persons income
    is given by
  • Y D1D2w C rK

13
Cont.
  • The risk C can be insured in the private market
    and we will assume everybody buys this insurance.
  • However, it is impossible to get a private
    insurance for D1 and (consequently) D2
  • Since people are assumed to be risk averse the
    government can improve welfare by introducing a
    tax financed insurance.
  • One justification for the welfare state.
  • The government budget constraint is
  • T wt

14
Cont.
  • Net income after distribution is
  • Y D1D2w(1-t) T EC rK
  • The mean and the standard deviation of Y are
    given by
  • Y w EC rK
  • SY (1-t)w S(D1D2)w
  • By redistributing income, the state can improve
    total welfare. Optimal tax is t 1

15
Tax competition
  • Assume a world with n identical countries where
    goods, capital and people can move freely and
    without any migration cost. We then have that (by
    the factor price equalization mechanism)
  • ri rj r
  • wi wj w
  • Since people can move we also have that
  • D1D2w(1-tj) Tj D1D2w(1-tj) Tj

16
Cont.
  • Which, because Tj wtj, is equivalent to
  • tj(w - D1D2w) ti(w - D1D2w)
  • or
  • tj ti
  • The tax rate in all countries thus have to be the
    same in all countries.
  • The equal tax will be zero due to tax competition
    between countries
  • A country will have incentive to reduce its tax
    levels in a situation of equal taxes.
  • The welfare state does not survive international
    mobility.

17
Tax externalities
  • In general, increased mobility makes tax
    jurisdictions become more interdependent and this
    interdependence gives rise to both negative and
    positive tax externalities.
  • Tax policy in one country might affect the
    welfare of other countries
  • Directly trough the prices faced by foreigners
  • Indirectly through the effect on foreign
    governments tax revenues.
  • Tax externalities introduce a gap between the
    marginal cost of public funds that is borne by
    the taxing country and the marginal cost of funds
    that would be faced if the countries cooperated.

18
A positive tax externality
  • Mobility generally makes it easier for tax bases
    to escape taxation by moving to another
    jurisdiction.
  • The migration of tax subjects or tax objects
  • Through a shift in production or sale from
    domestic firms or markets to foreign firms or
    markets.
  • This situation is often referred to as tax
    competition since each jurisdiction will have an
    incentive to lower its tax rate in order to
    attract mobile tax bases.
  • Conversely, an increase in one country's tax rate
    will result in an increase in other countries tax
    revenues a positive indirect tax externality.

19
Double taxation and tax exporting
  • Tax exporting and double taxation, can also be
    viewed as international tax externalities.
  • Tax exporting refers to the possibility that the
    tax policy in one country affects the prices
    faced by non-nationals. This can be viewed as a
    negative direct tax externality because it shifts
    some of the tax burden onto foreigners.
  • Double taxation arise when two countries can tax
    the same tax base. This is also a negative tax
    externality and might result in overtaxation.
  • These effects might counteract the tax
    competition effect.

20
Political economy issues
  • Some economists have argued that the public
    sector has a tendency to overexpand,
  • Due to the self-interests of politicians and
    bureaucrats who benefits from large budgets.
  • If this is correct then tax competition might
    improves welfare, because the size of government
    would be excessive in the absence of this
    competition.

21
International cooperation
  • One way to avoid the problems described in this
    lecture is to introduce an international tax
    authority
  • Secure international harmonization of taxes
  • E.g. a minimum tax on alcohol in the EU
  • The mobility of the tax base is not only
    determined by factors that is outside the control
    of the governments. National governments can
    affect the possibility to move commodities and
    factors of production in and out of the country
    trough direct regulation or other unilaterally
    measures.

22
Cont.
  • The distribution of tax base entitlements is
    closely related to the problems of tax
    externalities
  • By defining tax rights in such a way as to make
    it more costly to escape taxation by moving
    capital to another jurisdiction, these problems
    can be reduced. The attraction of the residency
    principle lies in the fact that people are less
    mobile than capital.
  • The home country principle removes this problem
    completely in the model studied earlier.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com