The Ethics and Politics of Social Research - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

The Ethics and Politics of Social Research

Description:

But, there are no universally-agreed standards of right and wrong. There is no universal set of ... Project Camelot. What is vs. what should be research ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:164
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: N226
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Ethics and Politics of Social Research


1
Chapter 3
  • The Ethics and Politics of Social Research

2
Ethics and Morality in Research
  • Ethics a theory or system of moral values
    (Merriam-Webster online)
  • Issues of right and wrong
  • But, there are no universally-agreed standards of
    right and wrong
  • There is no universal set of cultural norms
  • What is culture?
  • Behaviors/beliefs/values that result from the
    unique way groups solve problems
  • Due to what?

3
Research and Ethics
  • General agreement on whats ethical in research
  • Voluntary participation. Reasons?
  • No one should be forced to participate
  • Participation is an interruption, requires time
    and energy
  • Participation requires the disclosure of
    information (often revealed to strangers)
  • Generalizability is threatened either way

4
Whats Ethical in Research?
  • No harm to participants
  • Not just physical. How else?
  • Revealing sensitive information
  • You may reveal information about a participant
    that they didnt know
  • Informed consent is necessary
  • A signed statement indicating an honest
    understanding of the risks, and their willingness
    to participate anyway
  • Not easy to accomplish
  • Ethical concerns create validity and
    generalizability risks

5
Whats Ethical in Research?
  • Anonymity
  • When no one, including the researcher, can tie
    specific data to named individuals
  • Some data collection methods can never be
    anonymous interview, case study in the field
    etc.
  • Confidentiality
  • The researcher can identify a participants
    responses, but promises not to do so
  • Never say your research is anonymous if you
    mean confidential
  • Particularly to the participant
  • If youre the participant, ask

6
Whats Ethical in Research?
  • Deception issues
  • Are the participants aware that theyre
    participants?
  • Are the participants aware of your role as a
    researcher?
  • Are the participants aware of the exact nature of
    your research? Deception here is not as
    dangerous, and often useful
  • Deception is sometimes necessary, but can be
    harmful
  • Reasons for deception must be compelling
  • Debriefing is a common technique to mitigate the
    problems of deception

7
Whats Ethical in Research?
  • Ethical analysis and reporting
  • We must reveal limitations and problems with our
    research
  • We must report negative findings that occur in
    our research or in the literature
  • No significance is as important as significance
  • Dont recreate history after your analysis

8
IRBs
  • Institutional Review Boards
  • Reviews research proposals involving humans so
    they can guarantee the rights and interests are
    protected
  • Federally-funded research must comply with laws
    concerning research ethics
  • Goal minimize risks to participants
  • Initial impetus was medical experimentation
  • Social research is usually exempt, but most
    universities use the process with all research
  • See page 69 for exemption rules

9
Ethics Boards
  • Professional Codes of Ethics
  • Most professional associations have formal codes
    of conduct that describe acceptable and
    unacceptable professional behavior
  • See example Code of Conduct on page 72
  • Compare IA and IC with IIB1 or IIC1
  • Remember that legal, ethical and moral are
    different concepts

10
Examples
  • Trouble in the Tearoom example
  • What happened?
  • Researcher collected license numbers, tracked
    down unwilling and unknowing participants
  • Researcher hid his role from subjects
  • Some condemned the methodology, some defended it.
    Why?
  • Ends justify the means
  • No other way

11
Examples
  • Milgram studies
  • What was the study about?
  • 26 of the 40 subjects continued administering
    shocks even after they screamed, kicked the
    walls, and finally went silent
  • Obedience and compliance issues
  • Following orders as an ethical defense for
    unethical behavior

12
Intersubjectivity
  • An answer to the threat posed by insufficient
    objectivity
  • Subjective views of disparate researchers should
    arrive at similar conclusions if methodologies
    are sound
  • Not all researchers agree that research should be
    objective
  • Studying society and its ills without a
    commitment to making society more humane has been
    called irresponsible

13
Politics and Research Ethics
  • Race research
  • Separate but equal issue and segregation
  • Colemans integration studies (p76) and Jensons
    IQ studies
  • Gender research
  • Differences between sexes, representation,
    compensation issues
  • Sexual orientation research
  • Nature vs. nurture, rights issues

14
Politics and Research Ethics
  • Politics and the Census
  • Project Camelot
  • What is vs. what should be research
  • Research supporting popular beliefs receive less
    rigorous criticism

15
Politics in Perspective
  • Four issues to keep in mind
  • Science is not untouched by politics.
  • Science does proceed in the midst of political
    controversy.
  • But politicized research is useless
  • Awareness of ideologies enriches the study and
    practice of social research methods.
  • Careful, honest research does not demand that we
    abandon our personal values, or remove ourselves
    from the political conversation
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com