Integrated Operation and economy - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

Integrated Operation and economy

Description:

Keynote Presentation, Julian Pickering, BP. WITSML SIG Team ... Need: Active wellbore update date. Better quality check of data before delivered to Hydro ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:73
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: origin9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Integrated Operation and economy


1
Integrated Operation and economy
  • NPD and OLF has calculated the value of IO on the
    Norwegian shelf to be 40 billion USD
  • Statoils anticipated IO-potential is more than
    50 of the above
  • External review of the Integrated Operations
    efforts on one of our major fields calculates the
    value created to close to 1 billion USD, with a
    further potential of 0,7 \- 0,4 billion USD

2
Overal use of WITSML in Statoil
  • Statoil have transferred information from 300
    wells with the use of WITSML (and stopped
    counting)
  • Incorporate all wells operated by Statoil in the
    Norwegian sector
  • Incorporate a growing amount of wells
    internationally (Iran, Venezuela, Angola etc.)

3
Current situation from our IT real time support
centre in Statoil
  • Period 1/6-06 to 31/8-06
  • WITSML 29 wells
  • 85 191 m WITSML stream
  • 255 571 ft WITSML stream
  • PROBLEMS with the start of 50 of these
    streams due to lack of automation

4
Challenges with real-time WITSML stream
  • Still many manual operations to set up and
    maintain the real-time stream
  • WITSML not properly supporting automation
  • Applications is not properly supporting real-time
    data
  • Some of the products in the data stream are not
    built to support multiple well streams (up to 20
    simultaneous wells)
  • Manual work needed to handle dialects of WITSML
    and multiple versions in use

5
Good things about the real-time WITSML stream
  • It does its job of transporting data to the end
    users in the operations centres in Statoil
  • The users are getting used to the use of
    real-time data due to every well being
    transferred in real-time (it drives habits)
  • It is one of the cornerstones in harvesting the
    overall value of Integrated Operations

6
Public Seminar, October 19 Agenda
  • Welcome and Introductions, POSC
  • Keynote Presentation, Julian Pickering, BP
  • WITSML SIG Team Reports
  • Oil Companies
  • BP
  • Hydro, Lars-Olav Grovik
  • Statoil
  • Software and Supplier Companies
  • Paradigm
  • Schlumberger
  • SDC Geologix
  • Sense Intellifield
  • Baker Hughes
  • Halliburton
  • INT
  • Petrolink
  • Merrick Systems

7
Real Time Data
  • Challenges - Operation and Support

8
Overview
  • Since October 2005
  • Grane, OSC, OSE, Troll, Njord, Fram Vest
  • 20 wells, 62 wellbores
  • Service companies
  • Baker
  • Halliburton
  • End users
  • RMS
  • GeoFrame
  • DrillWorks/Predict
  • Bore
  • Morning Status Check
  • Daily before 0800

9
Onshore Processing Center Bringing it All
Together
10
Onshore Processing Center West Venture at
Sandsli
11
Right Time Data
  • Update speed
  • lt 5 mins is accepable
  • Operational Support
  • (not Operational Control)
  • Drilling and Well Operations
  • WITSML
  • WITSML
  • Well
  • Wellbore
  • Trajectory
  • Trajectory Station
  • Log
  • Rig
  • Realtime
  • bhaRun

12
Current WITSML Status
  • Generally 10 15 parallel drilling operations
    are active at any time all using WITSML.
  • WITSML has been in operations for nearly 3 years.
    In total, 87 wells drilled with WITSML so far.
  • 2004 and 2005 36 wells
  • 2006 already 51 wells

13
Service Companies WITSML Data Deliveries
  • Stable deliveries most of the time
  • Still some erroneous data
  • Wrong wellbore
  • Data too deep
  • Missing data
  • Re-load of data
  • Conclusion This will always happen ? We need
    better data management tools
  • Issues with the WITSML delivered from service
    companies
  • SiteCom in Hydro based on active wellbore flag
  • Do we read the same data over and over again from
    the service companies?
  • Append mode versus overwrite mode
  • Conclusion The goal is automated data transfer
    with as few re-reads as possible

14
Challenges, Real Time Data in Hydro
  • Continuos stable delivery from service companies
  • Need Active wellbore update date
  • Better quality check of data before delivered to
    Hydro
  • If wrong data, need to do full refresh of all
    data on SiteCom and end user applications
  • New WITSML data types
  • Amount of data for time logs/curves
  • When will service companies be able to deliver
    new data types?
  • Update speed from service companies
  • Transfer all data only once
  • Error recovery speed
  • Errors will happen, important to recovery quickly
  • WITSML Version 1.3 deployment to replace WITSML
    Version 1.2
  • 2007/2008

15
Thank You ???????
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com