Title: The Globalized Knowledge Economy: risks
1 The Globalized Knowledge Economy risks
opportunitiesCERAM- International Workshop
January 8-12, 2008
- Michel Henry Bouchet
- Glob_at_l Finance Center
2What is the Knowledge Economy?What is
Globalization?What is the Globalized Knowledge
Economy?
3What is the Knowledge Economy?
- An economy whose growth momentum and competitive
advantage are driven by dynamic investment in
intellectual capital and innovative RD, with
deep structural, institutional and organizational
implications.
4The 5 features of the Knowledge Economy
- 3 key factors of production labour physical
and human capital (scientific knowledge,
technology, education, training, life-long
learning) - Economic growth is driven by the accumulation of
knowledge (new growth momentum in the 1990s) - Corporate revolution in the 1980s with NTIC
facilitator of knowledge creation and sharing in
innovative societies - Rapid rise in innovation-led productivity since
the 1980s (services industry) - RD-driven competition between countries and
between companies Intellectual capital is a
growing firm's source of competitive advantage - Macroeconomic transformation rising share of
services in countries GDP (72 in OECD) - The rising role of intellectual capital has deep
institutionnal and organizational implications in
modern societies
5What is Globalization all about?
- Stage of capitalist development where
market-based and profit-oriented forces prevail
in almost every production and exchange of goods
and services worldwide
6Who coined the term Globalization?
- Theodore Levitt (1925-2006) former profesor at
Harvard Business School (1983) - Globalization involves the change in technology
and social behavior that allows MNCs to sell the
same products worldwide under global brands
7Marxist approach to economic development
- 1848 The capitalist economic system is
doomed to become worldwide in its never-ending
struggle to increase the rate of profit under the
pressure of competition
8 Globalization is an endeavor that can spread
worldwide the values of freedom and civil contact
the antithesis of terrorism!.
Alan
GreenspanGlobalization, like the telephone, is
both a blessing and a curseGlobalization is like
a giant wave that can either capsize nations or
carry them forward on its crest J. Stiglitz
9The flat world by Thomas Friedman (2006)
- As the world goes flat, and the dynamics of
collaboration and exchanges gets stronger and
stronger, the gap between cultures that have the
will, the way and the focus to adopt and adapt
this dynamics and those that do not, will get
larger and larger. - How outward is a countrys culture, i.e. open to
foreign influence and ideas? How well does it
glocalize ? - How inward is the culture, i.e., is there a sense
of national solidarity and identity, and to what
extent the elites focus on long-term sustainable
development?
10General Colin Powell on Globalization (2000)
- There is no point in being for or against
globalization. Like the weather, it is just
there! - One should concentrate on how to live with it,
maximize its benefits, and minimize its cost! -
11 Globalization is a threat for France and for
the French people
Sondages CSA-Challenges 12/2005 et Eurobaromètre
2006 et mai 2007
12The 4 prerequisites of Globalization
- Sharp increase in productivity (1850 industrial
revolution) - Economic and trade liberalization (1960 trade
openness) - Technological progress in NTIC (1980-90)
reduction in transaction costs - Keen competition for market shares and profits
shareholder pressure for wealth maximization - responsiveness revolution
- Premium on competitiveness and flexibility
13Marked acceleration of productivity economic
take-off
1850 Industrial revolution
Source R. Lucas
14 The Prerequisites to Globalization Population,
Productivity and Income annual growth rates
15Emerging Globalization
16Technological Innovation Cycles
Genetics ?
Internet
Computers
Aeronautics Transportation
Chemistry Automobile
Electricity Telephone Radio
Steam Engine
1870
1950
1980
1990
2020
1800
1900
17Cost of a 3-Minute Telephone Call NY-
London (Constant 1990, U.S. )
0.30
18Number of years for mass-access (50 million
people market)
19Measuring Globalization?
- How much global is the global economy?
- Globalization should not be taken for granted
- Trend, threshold or ideology?
20Global trade indexXGS/GDP
16140/51500
31
26
20
12
5
IMF/WEO 2007
21 Trade openness ratio (XM/GDP)
Brazil 24 India 20
22Globalization Index The Top 20 /62
- 1. Singapore
- 2. Ireland
- 3. Switzerland
- 4. US
- 5. Netherlands
- 6. Canada
- 7. Denmark
- 8. Sweden
- 9. Austria
- 10. Finland
- 11. New Zealand
- 12. UK
- 13. Australia
- 14. Norway
- 15. Czech Rep.
- 16. Croatia
- 17. Israel
- 18. France
- 19. Malaysia
- 20. Slovenia
- 52. Russia
- 54. China
- 62. Iran
ATKearney
23The 7 deadly sins of Globalization?
- 1. Triumph of Flows vs Stocks
- 2. Volatility Spill-over effect
- 3. Digital divide
- 4. Wealth gap
- 5. Capital concentration
- 6. Markets versus nation-states
- 7. The challenge of global regulation
241. The triumph of Flows vs Stocks
- The overwhelming supremacy of cross-border
transactions - what gets value is what is traded
25? GDP and Global Trade
(p) IMF
IMF/WEO 07
26Discrepancy between growing financial flows vs
real output
- Total daily FX transactions US3200 billion 20
times worth the daily underlying production of
goods and services. - Total world official reserves
- Destabilizing speculation ex. oil trading (one
physical barrel gives rise to 5 to 7 financial
barrel transactions) - Private capital puts profits before people
- Capital is both smart and coward risk-aversion!
27Hedge Funds
- 6000 hedge funds
- US1300 billion of assets (twice Belgiums GNP)
- 25 anual growth rate over the last ten years
- LTCM lost 1.8 billion in 1998 after borrowing
50 times its equity capital! - Calperss investment fund 135 billion (it
decided to pull out of 12 EMCs in 2003)
28Hedge Funds Assets
US billion
Around 10,000 hedge funds manage close to US1700
billion
29The overwhelming supremacy of Finance over the
real economy
In US billion
400 of GDP
Source IMF/2007
302. Volatility Spill-over effect
Trade and financial liberalization (current
capital accounts) increases vulnerability to
exogenous shocks and crisis contamination
31Globalization Rising volatility?
- Why has volatility risen so much since the
1970s-80s? - sharp increase in worldwide inflation that
followed the oil shocks - poor monetary and fiscal policy responses,
following the end of the Bretton Woods agreements - global deregulation and liberalization of
financial markets and capital flows - rapid spread of NTIC
32Long-term trend in bond and stock return
volatilities
Source BIS 2006
33Evolution of Euro- LIBOR
34Evolution in Gold Price
Afghan crisis
Koweit crisis
Iraq crisis
Asian crisis
Kippour crisis
35Brent Oil Price in US/barrel
363. The Knowledge Societyand the digital divide
37How many people are online throughout the world?
Source Nua Internet
38The Knowledge Society
39Digital divide RD Distribution
85
404. Wealth Gap
41Globalizations impact?
- Globalization, still, tends to widen the gap
between rich and poor , skilled and
unskilled , mobile and immobile , adaptive
and passive . - As globalization has broadened the range of the
market economy worldwide, it has sharply
increased the ratio of global labour/capital with
the integration of emerging economies fall of
the share of total wages in national income and
surge in the share of profits - Everyone wins but those who hold capital win
much more than those who earn wages in return for
their work
Fed. Reserve Bank of Kansas, 2006 Symposium
42Declining share of wages in the G10 countries
value added
- Higher labour productivity
- Integration of emerging market economies in the
global production process has doubled the supply
of active workers! - Increased international labour mobility and
rising labour competition - Offshoring has curtailed the bargaining power of
unskilled workers in the OECD - BUT inflation is lower, hence higher real wages
Source BIS 76th annual report 2006
43Bridging the divide?
- Link between globalization, inequality and
poverty? Modern technology and economic
liberalization have not made the poor poorer. But
globalization has helped make the rich countries
richer. - Result growing global inequality and a
concentration of extreme poverty in the countries
that have not jumped on to the growth ladder and
stay on it. - Rich countries have failed to give the poor the
technical, financial and institutional assistance
as well as market access they need.
44Global economic divide GDP
150 countries 48
30 countries 52
Source FMI 2007
45Regional shares of global GDP in ppp
160 countries
Source FMI/2007
46GLOBAL GDP DISTRIBUTION
52 of global GDP
47Share in GDP, trade and population
Source IMF/WEO
48Globalisation Income Divergence(GDP per capita
in 1990 000s)
49Source R. Lucas
50Taking off? (US-PIB per capita)
OCDE-2007
51The BRICs catch up process
Goldman Sachs 2007
52How rich is China?
- Until recently, China had never participated in
the careful price surveys needed to convert
accurately its gross domestic product into PPP
dollars. China has repeatedly raised the prices
of food, housing, healthcare and a range of other
non-traded goods and services. These reforms
should have lowered the PPP adjustment. - 2007 new, more accurate ADB statistics
describing a smaller, poorer China and India. PPP
adjustments affect poverty measures because the
World Bank's dollar-a-day poverty line is a PPP
dollar poverty line. - Reducing PPP consumption estimates drops large
numbers of additional households below the
poverty line. For China, the number is likely
more than 500m. - China's economy is smaller and poorer than
established estimates say. China's economy turns
out to be 40 per cent smaller than previously
stated. This more accurate picture of China
clarifies why Beijing concentrates so heavily on
domestic priorities such as growth, public
investment, pollution control and poverty
reduction. .
5330 OECD
160 EMCs
54Source IMF
55Unequal rise in life expectancy
56The poorest countries 5 of world population
- 1980
- ETHIOPIA
- TANZANIA
- BHUTAN
- BANGLADESH
- YEMEN
- MOZAMBIQUE
- CHAD
- MALAWI
- LAOS
- VIETNAM
- 2005
- SIERRA LEONE
- ETHIOPIA
- TANZANIA
- CONGO (DEM. REP.)
- BURUNDI
- YEMEN
- MALAWI
- MALI
- RWANDA
- NIGER
- NIGERIA
Residents of poorest countries experienced almost
no real income growth during 1980-2000! 80 years
of income growth needed for 10 increase.
Meanwhile, the rich are getting richer!
57Stubborn world poverty
of population
2,71 billion
2,74 billion
1,22 billion
1,1 billion
585. Bigger Better? Capital concentration and
eroding competition...
- What constrains companies in their endless quest
for profits is not governments but market
competition
59Global MAs 1990-2007 (in US billion)
60The most Global Companies
61Worldwide corporate Giants
- General Electric
- Microsoft
- Exxon/Mobil
- Pfizer
- Citigroup
- Wal-Mart
- Intel
- BP
- HSBC
- IBM
- Toyota
- Coca Cola
- Bank of America
- Royal/Dutch Shell
- General Motors
- Ford Motors
- Total/Fina
- The 100 largest international companies comprise
6 million employees outside their country of
origin and generate 2100 billion of turnover!
62Global Company
- Largest private corporation on the planet (after
Exxon) - 2006 sales 345 billion
- Objective to double sales within five years!
- 33 of Canadas GDP
- 100 x Argentinas GDP
- 130 x Polands GDP
- 2 x Thailands GDP
- 7 x Moroccos GDP
- 26 x Tanzanias GDP
63Nationality Breakdown of 500 Largest MNCs
worldwide
Fortune/07-2000
646. Government groveling to Big Business the
dictatorship of ratings
- Globalization rates and ranks nations like any
private business according to market-based
principles of openness and efficiency - The nation-state is no longer the deciding
economic agent!
65World Bank Doing business in 2007
- 7 criteria
- 145 countries
- New company creation employment procedure
company registration financing mobilization
investment protection contract enforcement
liquidation. - 3 days to set up a company in Canada vs 12 days
in New Zealand and 52 in Slovakia and 153 in
Mozambique
66World Bank Doing Business in 2007
- Singapore
- New Zealand
- USA
- Canada
- HK
- UK
- Denmark
- Australa
- Norway
- 11. Japan
- 21. Germany
- 35. France (44 en 2006)
- 39. Spain
- 93. China
- 96. Russia
- 121. Brazil
- 134. India
- 171. RDC
The ranking does not take into consideration the
macroeconomic framework nor organized crime
67Economic Freedom Rating/Fraser Institute 2007
- Hongkong
- Singapore
- New Zealand
- Switzerland
- US
- Ireland
- UK
- Canada
- Iceland
- Luxembourg
- Australia
- Austria
- Estonia
- Finland
- Netherland
- 20. Chile
- 24. France
- 30. Spain
- 35. Korea
- 45. Italy
- 60. Mexico
- 60. Thailand
- 83. Indonesia
- 88. Brazil
- 95. China
- 102. Russia
- 124. Algeria
- 126. Venezuela
- 130. Zimbabwe
68World Economic Forum competitiveness ranking
- The Global Competitiveness Report, which examines
the growth prospects of 80 countries, remains the
most up-to-date and comprehensive data source
available on the comparative strengths and
weaknesses of leading economies of the world. - Countries in The Global Competitiveness Report
are ranked by the Growth Competitiveness Index
(GCI) (GCI Rankings) and the Microeconomic
Competitiveness Index (MICI) (MICI Rankings),
which combined encapsulate the relative strengths
and weaknesses of growth within each economy.
69Davos-WEF 2007 Competitiveness Index
70Davos-WEF 2007 Competitiveness Index of EMCs
- Thailand 38
- China 57
- Mexico 58
- Russia 62
- Brazil 66
- Vietnam 77
- Venezuela 88
- Pakistan 91
- Bolivia 97
- Nigeria 101
- Cambodia 103
- Paraguay 106
- Cameroon 108
- Zimbabwe 119
- Ethiopia 120
- Angola 125
71IMD Criteria
- Over 300 competitiveness criteria are selected.
72IMD 2007 Competitiveness Index
- 1. USA
- 2. Singapore
- 3. HK
- 3. Luxembourg
- 4. Denmark
- 5. Switzerland
- 15. China
- 16. Germany
- 20. UK
- 24. Japan
- 26. Chile
- 27. India
- 28. France
- 29. Korea
- 30. Spain
- 33. Thailand
- 35. Hungary
- 38. Colombia
- 43. Russia
- 44. Romania
- 47. Mexico
- 55. Venezuela
BEST
737. Market forces crowding out the state
- Is the State doomed to death given the challenge
of free-market forces and transnational flows?
74Shrinking role from key actor to facilitator
- End of the monopoly position of the State, as
- guardian of national security end of
bipolarity and cold war - provider of information Internet
- main economic driving force in growth and
development economic liberalization - main employer provider of public services
privatization - deciding agent in economic policy issues
caught between market forces and the IFIs
guidance
75Worldwide privatisation operations
76 Washington Neoliberal Consensus One size
fits all!
- Trade Financial liberalization Floating
exchange rates Macroeconomic stabilization
Minimum government intervention - Governments are bypassed by market forces and
under the control of regional and international
organizations
77Washington Consensus Ten rule of sustainable
market-economic developmentJohn Williamson (IIE
1990)
- Fiscal discipline
- A redirection of public expenditure priorities
toward fields offering both high economic returns
and the potential to improve income distribution,
such as primary health care, primary education,
and infrastructure - Tax reform (to lower marginal rates and broaden
the tax base) - Interest rate liberalization
- A competitive exchange rate
- Trade liberalization
- Liberalization of inflows of foreign direct
investment - Privatization
- Deregulation (to abolish barriers to entry and
exit) - Secure property rights
78International financial regulation
- BIS (1933) Cooke Committee for international
regulation - Bretton Woods Institutions (1944) IMF and World
Bank - OECD (1961)
- IIF (1983)
- G7 G10 G24
- IOSCO (International organization for securities)
- IAS (International accounting standards)
- Financial Action Task Force
79Conclusion Is there an alternative to
neoliberalism?
Can a different form of globalization be planned?
With what goals and what mechanisms of
regulation? How to improve the legitimacy,
transparency and democracy of IFIs? How to
promote global ethics?
80Royal Dutch Shell/Global Scenarios to 2025
- Challenge of a globalising, deregulated,
market-centric world - TINA There Is No Alternative to increasing
globalisation, the onrush of new technology and
market liberalisation - Dilemma balancing efficiency/social cohesion
justice/ security? - Continuous challenge of established authorities
coupled with shrinking power but new role of the
state - New challenges (9/11 Enron) Terrorism,
insecurity, distrust - New emphasis on transparency, regulation,
disclosure and good governance - 3 Scenarios
- Market-centric, state-centric or society-centric
world?
81Alternative to neoliberalism? YesAlternative to
Globalization? No! (short of a systemic crisis,
a meteorite-driven mass extinction or a nuclear
war)
Paradox Capitalist model enjoys a worldwide
supremacy while it faces a major legitimacy
challenge
82First level the Lula approach
- Globalization requires strong global institutions
to represent the civil society and give a voice
to those who have none (better transparency,
bigger voice to LDCs, enhanced involvement of
NGOs) - global economic governance of the 2002 UN
Monterrey Conference
83Second level the Mike Moores approach The
voice of NGOs and militant pressure groups to
meet the challenge of the global market!
Porto Alegre, Oxfam, Jubilee 2000 for debt
forgiveness The lack of concern about global
poverty, the environment, governance and
democracy are a matter of values.
84Third level Enhanced role of the civil society
for sustainable development
- Ethics-driven consumption (coffee, cocoa,
clothes) and ethical investing - environment-oriented investment
- socially-responsible investment
- governance-based portfolio management (Calpers,
Malongo, NGO Max Havelaar and its ethics charter) - Values matter!