SMT Detector Efficiencies - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

SMT Detector Efficiencies

Description:

Closest-cluster mode / keep all hits. 2d hits, 1d hits, CFT ... Keep tally. For each detector entry in SmtNtuple5: If clstat = 0 or 1, add a cross, add a hit ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:40
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: wwwd0
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: SMT Detector Efficiencies


1
SMT Detector Efficiencies
Simon Dean
University of Manchester
Monday 18th November 2002
2
Simon Dean - SMT Detector Efficiencies
Monday 18th November 2002
Topics
  • SmtNtuple5
  • 2d Hit Efficiencies
  • 1d hit efficiencies
  • High Occupancies

This Talk
http//www-d0.fnal.gov/sdean/talks/SMTefficiencie
s.ppt
Quality Plots
http//www-d0.fnal.gov/run2_offline_software/silic
on/Si_qualitygraphs
3
Simon Dean - SMT Detector Efficiencies
Monday 18th November 2002
SmtNtuple5
  • Hep-Tuple produced by smttrack_reco
  • One entry per track
  • Array of crossed detectors
  • Closest-cluster mode / keep all hits
  • 2d hits, 1d hits, CFT hits

Semantics
Cluster Contiguous set of fired strips
exceeding thresholds for individual and group
ADC counts 1d Hit Position of
centre of cluster in local coordinates. p-side or
n-side. 2d Hit Point reconstructed from
related p-side and n-side 1d hits. Global
coordinates.
4
Simon Dean - SMT Detector Efficiencies
Monday 18th November 2002
2d Hit Efficiencies
Crude Variable clstat - cluster status
  • 0 if track crosses surface, hit exists, this is
    the hit
  • 1 if track crosses surface, hit exists, this is
    not the hit
  • 2 if track crosses surface, hit does not exist.

Keep tally For each detector entry in SmtNtuple5
  • If clstat 0 or 1, add a cross, add a hit
  • If clstat 2, just add a cross
  • Efficiency per detector is hits / crosses
  • Binomial error

5
Simon Dean - SMT Detector Efficiencies
Monday 18th November 2002
2d Hit Efficiencies
Very general efficiency, tracking and hardware
6
Simon Dean - SMT Detector Efficiencies
Monday 18th November 2002
1d Hit Efficiencies
Try to isolate hardware efficiencies Start by
finding tracking resolutions
  • Use a 'no hit' track at each surface
  • Find difference in position of hit and track
  • Fit gaussian constant

7
Simon Dean - SMT Detector Efficiencies
Monday 18th November 2002
1d Hit Efficiencies
Variable xstat - crossing status
xstat0
xstat1
xstat2
Require xstat 0
8
Simon Dean - SMT Detector Efficiencies
Monday 18th November 2002
1d Hit Efficiencies
  • Require every track has pT gt 5GeV
  • Look for closest 1d hit (p-side, n-side)
  • Count as hit if within 5 sigma of track
  • Efficiency is hits / crosses

9
Simon Dean - SMT Detector Efficiencies
Monday 18th November 2002
Occupancy Efficiency
Only 2d so far... Occupancy cut if gt 30 of
strips fired During unpacking each event
  • Output detector serial no and number of dropped
    chips
  • Efficiency 1 - (n_dropped_chips) / (chips
    events)

1d Hit Efficiencies soon
10
Simon Dean - SMT Detector Efficiencies
Monday 18th November 2002
To do.....
1d occupancy efficiencies
11
Simon Dean - SMT Detector Efficiencies
Monday 18th November 2002
SmtNtuple5
12
Simon Dean - SMT Detector Efficiencies
Monday 18th November 2002
and now for something completely different.......
13
Simon Dean - SMT Detector Efficiencies
Monday 18th November 2002
Offline Data Quality Plots Comparison
Compare runs 152645 and 153982 Run 152645 is 'bad'
  • 1.9 hours long
  • Shifter note - 'major HV problem'
  • Taken late April

Run 153982 is 'good'
  • gt2 hours long
  • 'physics' run type
  • Evaluation of 'good' from SMT and CFT.
  • Overall run evaluation also 'good'
  • Taken mid-May

14
Simon Dean - SMT Detector Efficiencies
Monday 18th November 2002
Offline Data Quality Plots Comparison
15
Simon Dean - SMT Detector Efficiencies
Monday 18th November 2002
Offline Data Quality Plots Comparison
16
Simon Dean - SMT Detector Efficiencies
Monday 18th November 2002
Offline Data Quality Plots Comparison
17
Simon Dean - SMT Detector Efficiencies
Monday 18th November 2002
Offline Data Quality Plots Comparison
18
Simon Dean - SMT Detector Efficiencies
Monday 18th November 2002
Offline Data Quality Plots Comparison
19
Simon Dean - SMT Detector Efficiencies
Monday 18th November 2002
Offline Data Quality Plots Comparison
20
Simon Dean - SMT Detector Efficiencies
Monday 18th November 2002
Offline Data Quality Plots Comparison
21
Simon Dean - SMT Detector Efficiencies
Monday 18th November 2002
Offline Data Quality Plots Comparison
22
Simon Dean - SMT Detector Efficiencies
Monday 18th November 2002
Offline Data Quality Plots Comparison
23
Simon Dean - SMT Detector Efficiencies
Monday 18th November 2002
Offline Data Quality Plots Comparison
24
Simon Dean - SMT Detector Efficiencies
Monday 18th November 2002
Offline Data Quality Plots Comparison
25
Simon Dean - SMT Detector Efficiencies
Monday 18th November 2002
Offline Data Quality Plots Comparison
26
Simon Dean - SMT Detector Efficiencies
Monday 18th November 2002
Offline Data Quality Plots Comparison
27
Simon Dean - SMT Detector Efficiencies
Monday 18th November 2002
Offline Data Quality Plots Comparison
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com