Title: Fi8000 Capital Asset Pricing Model
1Fi8000Capital AssetPricing Model Market
Efficiency
2Today
- The Capital Asset Pricing Model
- Market Efficiency
3The Capital Asset Pricing Model
- Sharp (1968), Black (1969) and
- Lintner (1970)
- A model that tells us the fair (risk-adjusted)
expected return for every individual asset - A market equilibrium model
4The Capital Asset Pricing Model(CAPM) Outline
- The assumptions of the model
- The market equilibrium SML equation
- The two components of risk
- Systematic (non-diversifiable)
- Non-systematic (diversifiable)
- Beta as a measure of systematic risk
- The returns and the prices of risky assets
5The Capital Asset Pricing Model(CAPM)
Assumptions
- There are many investors each investor is a
price taker - All investors plan for one identical holding
period - All risky assets are publicly traded
- All investors are risk-averse and Mean-Variance
optimizers - Homogeneous expectations - all investors have the
same information and interpret it the same way
6The CAPM Assumptions
- The perfect market assumption
- There are no taxes or transaction costs or
information costs - There are no frictions
- Stocks can be bought and sold in any quantity
(even fractions) - There is one risk-free asset and all investors
can borrow or lend at that rate
7The CAPM Market Equilibrium
- The market portfolio (m) is on the efficient
frontier and on the CML. It is the Mean-Variance
optimal portfolio of risky assets. - All the investors will invest in the same
portfolio of risky assets m - the market
portfolio. - The proportion of each asset in the market
portfolio is simply the assets market value
divided by the total wealth (market value of all
assets).
8The Market Portfolioin the µ-s Plane
The Capital Market Line µp rf(µm-rf) / smsp
µ
m
rf
s
9The CAPM Market Equilibrium
- The risk preferences of the investors will result
in their capital allocation between the market
portfolio and the risk-free asset i.e. the
location of their portfolio on the Capital Market
Line (CML). - (The mutual fund theorem)
10Passive Investment Strategiesin the µ-s Plane
The CML µp rf (µm-rf) / smsp
µ
m
p
q
rf
s
11The CAPM Market Equilibrium
- The risk premium of each risky assets will be
proportional to the risk premium of the market
portfolio and to the beta coefficient of the
risky asset
12The Capital Asset Pricing ModelThe Security
Market Line (SML)
µ
The SML µi rf µm-rfßi
q
m
p
rf
ß
13What is Beta?
- Beta is a measure of risk
- Beta measures how sensitive are the returns of
asset i to the returns of the market portfolio - Beta is the slope (coefficient) in the regression
of asset is return (risk premium) on the
markets return (market risk premium) - Beta is a relative measure of risk
- Beta lt 1 defensive asset
- Beta 1 neutral asset
- Beta gt 1 aggressive asset
14Beta
Ri-rf
ßi
Rm-rf
15Calculating Beta
16The CAPM Market EquilibriumOutline of the Proof
- The risk-free asset is on the SML
- Calculate the beta of the risk-free asset
- The market portfolio is on the SML
- Calculate the beta of the market portfolio
- Any M-V efficient portfolio p is on the SML
- Calculate the beta of an efficient portfolio
- Any risky asset i is on the SML
17The Benefits of Diversification
sp
Diversifiable Risk
Systematic Risk
np
18The Risk
- The risk of any risky asset has two components
- sD - The diversifiable (non-systematic,
idiosyncratic, firm-specific) risk can be
eliminated by adding assets to the portfolio - sND - The systematic (non-diversifiable, market)
risk can not be eliminated through
diversification - According to the CAPM, investors are compensated
only for the systematic component of the total
asset risk (sND).
19The Components of Riskin the µ-s Plane
The CML
µ
m
p
i
rf
s
sND
sD
s
20The CAPM Market Equilibrium
- Find beta in the following planes
- Ri-Rm or (Ri-rf) (Rm-rf)
- µ-s (the CML)
- µ-ß (the SML)
21The CAPM Market Equilibrium
µ
SML
Underpriced return is too high
m
Overpriced return is too low
rf
ß
22The Return and the Current PriceInversely
Related
- A and B are two risky stocks. An analyst found
that they have the following parameters - µA15 and ßA0.5 µB22 and ßB2.
- The risk-free rate is rf10 and the expected
return of the market portfolio is µm18. - Relative to the CAPM equilibrium prices, which
stock is underpriced and which is overpriced?
23Project Valuation Example 1
- Firm XYZ usually invests in projects with a risk
level of ß0.8. It is considering an investment
in a new project which is expected to produce a
CF of 12.6M a year from now, and this CF is
expected to grow at a constant rate of 2 per
year forever. This CF is only an expectation and
the firms economist estimates its Std to be
3M. - What is the present value of the CFs of this
project, if the expected annual return of the
market portfolio is 12, the annual return of
money market instruments is 4 and the market is
in equilibrium (CAPM)? - (k 10.4 PV 150M)
24Project Valuation Example 2
- Joseph is looking for a treasure ship in the
Mediterranean sea. He plans to keep looking for a
year, and at the end of that year the value of
his firm will be determined by the outcome of his
quest. The probability of finding the 25M
treasure is only 10 but he is more likely to end
up with a smaller catch of only 5M. - Obviously, the outcome of Josephs quest is
independent of any macroeconomic risks, but we
know that the expected annual return of the
market portfolio is 14, its Std is 22 and the
annual return of money market instruments is 6.
What is the value of Josephs firm if the market
is in equilibrium (CPAM)? - (PV 6.604M)
25CAPM Review
- Under strict assumptions, the CAPM results in a
prescription for a fair return (price) The fair
expected return on an asset depends on the market
risk premium and on beta. - Stocks with high betas have higher return, but
there is no compensation for any risk factor
other than the systematic market risk.
26CAPM Critique
- Roll (1977) points out that the CAPM is not
directly testable - It is a one period model
- The market portfolio cannot be identified
- To test the model, we need the market portfolio
to be on the efficient frontier (proxies wont
work) - Indirect tests fail to support the CAPM
- Other risk factors are compensated (size,
book-to-market ratio), but there is no
theoretical explanation for these risk factors.
27The Efficient Market Hypothesis
- The Efficient Markets Hypothesis (EMH) specifies
three forms of efficiency - Weak form market efficiency
- Semi-Strong form market efficiency
- Strong form market efficiency
- Note that EMH is an Hypothesis
- We should look for evidence that reject the
hypothesis - We should look for evidence to decide which form
of EMH is more likely
28Weak Form Efficiency
- Definition
- A market is weak form efficient if the current
asset prices reflect all historical price
information - Implication
- Trading strategies based on the analysis of
historical prices should not yield abnormal
returns (on average!)
29Normal and Abnormal Returns
- Normal returns
- Fair or equilibrium returns given by a
theoretical model like the CAPM - Abnormal returns
- Returns that are systematically higher than the
normal returns
30Normal and Abnormal Returns
- For each asset i the CAPM predicts a normal,
risk-adjusted rate of return (expected return) - E(Ri) rf ßi E(Rm) rf
- We observe asset i over time, and compare the
realized return Ri to the expected CAPM return - ait Rit E(Ri) Rit rf ßi E(Rmt) rf
- If asset i is systematically beating the CAPM
expected return, we say that the return of asset
i is abnormal. - Abnormal return Average ait 1/T ai1
ai2 aiT gt 0
31Semi-Strong Form Efficiency
- Definition
- A market is semi-strong form efficient if the
current asset price reflects all publicly
available information - Implication
- Trading strategies based on the analysis of
publicly available information (fundamental
analysis such as analyst reports) should not
yield abnormal returns (on average!)
32Strong Form Efficiency
- Definition
- A market is strong form efficient if the current
asset price reflects all information (including
private / insider information) - Implication
- There is no (legal) trading strategy that yields
abnormal returns (on average!). One cannot make
money even by following the trades of insider
information.
33Nesting
- Information
- Information about past prices is included in the
set of publicly available information, which is
included in the complete set of information. - Market efficiency
- The strong form of market efficiency implies the
semi-strong, which implies the weak form. Note
that the strongest form of the MEH is the
strongest and the most restricting assumption.
34Evidence of Weak Form MEH
- Consistent evidence
- Technical trading rules, based on past price
patterns, do not appear to be profitable. - Contradicting evidence
- The January effect almost every January,
stock returns (usually for small stocks) are
positive.
35Evidence ofSemi-Strong Form MEH
- Consistent evidence
- New publicly available information (such as
earnings release) affects prices quickly. - Contradicting evidence
- Small stocks and stocks with high ratio of
book-value to market-value have, on average,
higher returns. - Some portfolio managers consistently outperform
the market (Peter Lynch, Warren Buffet, John
Templeton and John Neff are in Paul Samuelsons
hall of fame, 1989).
36Evidence of Strong Form MEH
- Consistent evidence
- Insiders of corporations appear able to earn
abnormal returns from their trades. On average,
price increases just after insiders purchase the
stock and decreases just after a they sell the
stock. - Contradicting evidence
- Prices react to public information that had been
private. For example, prices react to earning
announcements even though someone must have know
their contents before the official announcement
day.
37Market Efficiency and Equilibrium
- An efficient market is a market in equilibrium
- Inefficient markets occur when asset prices are
different from their equilibrium prices - In theory, traders who exploit market
inefficiencies should move the market back to
equilibrium
38The Joint Hypothesis Problem
- A test of market efficiency can only be conducted
by using a theoretical model to define normal
(fair) returns (prices) - Finding an abnormal average return can be
interpreted in more than one way - Reject the Market Efficiency Hypothesis (MEH)
- Reject the theoretical model of normal returns
- Reject both
39MEH Are Markets Efficient?
- Grossman and Stigliz (1980) the logical question
must always be to what extent markets are
efficient - Empirical evidence
- Implications for trading strategies?
- Technical analysis
- Fundamental analysis
- Trading on insider information (SEC regulations)
- Is there a portfolio manager who systematically
outperforms the market? - Is a small abnormal return detectable?
- Will they tell us about their winning strategy
(selection bias)? - How can we distinguish between luck and talent?
40Practice Problems
- BKM Ch. 9 1-2, 4-17, 21-28
- BKM Ch. 12 1-9, 14, 16-18, 25, 27-28