Title: Drawing Diagrams in an Online Examination
1Drawing Diagrams in an Online Examination
- Pete Thomas
- with help from
- Neil Smith Kevin Waugh
2Online Examinations
3Issues
- What features should a drawing tool provide?
- How familiar should students be with the tool
prior to the examination? - How should the tool be provided to students in
order to be used under examination conditions? - How should a diagram be represented for
transmission to the server? - How should a diagram be represented for grading
purposes? - How to grade a diagram?
- How to provide feedback on a students diagram?
4A typical exam question
Use the drawing tool to draw a diagram that
illustrates how the data hazard inherent in the
execution of the pair of instructions ADD
R2, R3, R1 SUB R1, R5, R4 by a 4-stage
pipeline, can be overcome.
5A simple drawing tool
6A typical student drawing
7Opinions of the Drawing Tool
8Student comments
- The scroll bars in the boxes I found offputting,
I started off drawing boxes that were too small -
I nearly didnt do this question because of
that. - Text boxes needed to be bigger so could see
whole answer at once without scrolling - The text boxes could be a bit bigger at least
big enough to contain the expected answers. It
was a bit disconcerting trying to scroll up and
down the boxes. - Very easy once I got the hang of it
9Opinions of the Online Examination
- Drawing tool not a drawback
10The second trial
- 15 students
- 12 attempted the drawing question
- 9 answered the question successfully (but not
necessarily correctly) - 3 tried to draw a diagram but gave up
- 3 did not attempt the question
11Discussion
- There is a definite reluctance on the part of
some students to attempt to use a software tool
under examination conditions, primarily due to
the anticipated length of time it would take to
complete a drawing. - The exam question, whilst in the compulsory part
of the paper, was of a low stakes variety. - Only 3 out of 15 students did not attempt the
question - but this could be because they did not
know the answer! - If the students had had experience of the tool
prior to the examination, this hesitancy would
have been reduced. - One would normally expect students to be exposed
to the tool during their normal studies.
12Imprecise diagrams
- Incomplete
- Contains extraneous material
- Malformed
- Typical student diagrams!
13A model answer
14A typical student drawing
15Understanding diagrams
- Segmentation and Assimilation
- Translate a raster-based image into a set of
diagrammatic primitives such as boxes, lines and
text - Identification
- Use domain knowledge to identify minimal
meaningful units (MMUs) - Aggregation
- Combines MMUs into higher level abstract features
- Interpretation
- Look for meaning in the diagram (e.g. comparing a
student diagram with a specimen solution)
16Marking diagrams
17Automatic marking (pipelines)
- 12 student answers to a drawing question
- Tutor mark x 2.78 (out of 5) s 1.05
- Auto mark x 2.73, s 1.09
- Spearmans rho 0.529, significant at the 0.05
level (2-tailed), N 12 - Pearsons r 0.763, significant at the 0.01
level (2-tailed), N 12 - But, N 12
-
-
18Current work
- Automatic marking of tutor marked assignments
- Entity-Relationship (ER) diagrams
- Feedback
- Building a tool for revision purposes
19The revised tool for E-R diagrams
20Automatic marking (ERDs)
- 26 student answers to a drawing question
- Tutor mark x 21.35, s 3.43 (range 13-25)
- Auto mark x 22.42, s 2.12 (range 18-25)
- Spearmans rho 0.957, significant at the 0.01
level (2-tailed), N 26 - Pearsons r 0.939, significant at the 0.01
level (2-tailed), N 26
-
-
21Marking ERDs
22Feedback student answer
23Feedback compare with specimen solution
24Conclusions
- Students seem to like online exams.
- Using a drawing tool under online exam conditions
does not seem to pose major problems,
particularly if the tool has been used prior to
the exam. - A simple drawing tool can be an effective
addition to an online exam. - Having some success in automatically marking
diagrams. - Making progress towards meaningful feedback.