The Leverhulme Trust - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

The Leverhulme Trust

Description:

Certain trade charities (grocers, commercial travellers and chemists) undergraduate bursaries. Trade Charities Trust ...but the bulk of the money allocated to ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:174
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: anne80
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Leverhulme Trust


1
The Trust and its schemes opportunities for
funding
Dr Anne Dean Assistant Director
2
from 1922 Lord Leverhulme of the Western
Isles (1851-1925)
William Hesketh Lever
The man behind Port Sunlight and Unilever
plc and The Leverhulme Trust
3
The Trust was established in 1925
  • A proportion of Lord Leverhulmes interest in
    Lever Brothers (which later became Unilever plc)
    left in trust for specific beneficiaries
  • Certain trade charities (grocers, commercial
    travellers and chemists) undergraduate
    bursaries
  • Trade Charities Trust
  • but the bulk of the money allocated to
  • Scholarships for the purposes of research and
    education

4
The Trustees
  • Five Trustees
  • All businessmen from diverse, international
    backgrounds
  • All drawn from senior management of Unilever plc
    (Chairman or Director level)
  • Extensive appraisal experience spotting
    potential and quality
  • Reliant on advice received by peer reviewers

5
Scholarships for the purposes of research and
education
  • support for the gifted individual excellence
    and originality of idea compelling ability of
    applicant to undertake project realising
    potential individual vision
  • normally postgraduate level
  • all subjects
  • PhD studentships not supported unless fully
    justified as part of a Research Project Grant
  • The Trust is an almost exclusively responsive
    mode organisation, the choice of topic always
    lying with the applicant

6
  • The Trust tends to avoid funding bids in those
    disciplines which other Trusts or agencies (such
    as Wellcome, the MRC, Department for Education
    and Skills, ESRC etc. are disposed to support).
    In particular
  • Medicine and general school education
  • .but might consider bids such as those which
    concentrate on the sociological, philosophical,
    economic, legal or psychological aspects of
    medicine or education

7
The suitability of the research for support by
the Trust
  • the originality of the proposed work
  • courageous research (avoidance of the incremental
    and the applicants ability to take informed
    risk/blue skies research)
  • a mixture of disciplines (blurring
    boundaries/lateral impact)
  • individual exploration (hesitation with data
    banks/cataloguing)
  • the impact of the research outcome on other
    fields of study and within the immediate field of
    research
  • the extent to which the research design
    transcends traditional boundaries
  • the extent to which a proposal represents a
    departure from the established working patterns
    either of the individual or of the discipline

8
Trusts view on bids rejected by research
councils
  • depends very much on reasons for rejection
  • Too blue skies/risky, multi-disciplinary or not
    within research councils current interests?
    Might be worth applying. Trustees welcome
    exciting and challenging proposals.
  • If proposal has been rejected on basis of lack of
    quality, then extremely unlikely to be considered
    by Trust.
  • With c. 50M available each year, the Trust
    cannot act as funder of last resort for a
    government system with
  • 4 billion p.a.

9
  • Under the terms of the Founders Will, the Trust
    is unable to engage in
  • FULL ECONOMIC COSTING
  • Therefore, overheads and similar costs cannot be
    supported. The Trust supports research, travel
    and subsistence costs, salaries and bursaries

10
  • All awards made to institutions (such as
    universities, arts training organisations,
    galleries and museums) are made via a 2-stage
    process which involve an Outline and Full
    Application stage. Three deadlines each year for
    successful Outlines 1 September, 1 December and
    21 March.
  • For awards made to individuals (such as most
    Fellowships and Studentships), a one-stage
    process applies.

11
The following provides a brief summary of all
awards offered by the Trust.
  • Research Project Grants (majority of awards made
    by the Trust)
  • Programme Grants (up to 1.75M for selected
    themes) for 2008, the topics are Tipping
    Points and Stress and Compromise.
  • Various Fellowships (Early Career, Research,
    Emeritus) and Study Abroad and Major Research
    Fellowships (MRFs) in the Humanities and Social
    Sciences
  • Study Abroad Studentships
  • Academic Collaboration International Networks,
    Visiting Professorships
  • Philip Leverhulme Prizes
  • and

12
  • Training and Professional Development in the
    Fine and Performing Arts

13
Training and Professional Development Scheme
These awards are mainly to permit (normally
young) people to obtain training or professional
development and are based upon a combination of
talent and need. Awards are made directly to
institutions for provision of bursaries or
scholarships for the maintenance of selected
groups of students. Applications from individual
students are not eligible. The Trust also
supports (to a far lesser degree) innovative
teaching activity, and research into various
aspects of the Arts. Among the organisations we
support are
14
(No Transcript)
15
We also offer residencies under our
Artist in Residence Scheme For artists of any
kind, including musicians usually for one
academic year up to 12,500 Contrasting
disciplines i.e. a poet in a university
chemistry department, a playwright in a museum, a
fine artist in a hospital environment
16
The application process
  • Institutional awards
  • Each year, the Trust receives c. 1,500 Outline
    proposals for Research Project Grant (including
    International Networks).
  • A small proportion are deemed ineligible i.e.
    they fall within those areas generally not
    supported by the Trust, or are received from
    ineligible institutions. The great majority go
    forward for peer review - the Leverhulme Advisory
    Panel (LAP).
  • Awards made to individuals
  • For these grants, a one-stage process is used,
    and responsibility is devolved to the Research
    Awards Advisory Committee (RAAC) who make
    recommendations for awards. Once a year rounds
    individual deadlines.
  • Decisions for all Trust awards are made on advice
    received from peer reviewers.

17
The process
Outline Application Form There are no closing
dates for the submission of Outline Applications
to the Trust
For awards made to institutions of any kind
Up to 12 weeks average 6 weeks
Outline Application undergoes initial review
Recommendation that applicant be invited to make
a Full Application
Outline Application rejected on grounds of
eligibility or quality
Applicant submits Full Application with two named
referees. Closing dates for Full Applications
21 March, 1 September, 1 December
Three deadlines each year 21 March, 1
September and 1 December
Independent referees and the applicants named
referees are consulted by the Trust
The proposal and the comments of referees are
submitted to the Trustees for decision
Application Rejected
Application Approved
18
Some recent Research Project and International
Network topics
  • Ubiquinated suppressors of plant immunity
  • Pads vs claws in arboreal locomotion mechanics
    of predator-prey relationships
  • Haida material culture in British museums
    generating new forms of knowledge
  • Dwarf galaxies in the Hubble Space Telescope Coma
    Cluster treasury survey
  • Engineering protein fibres with nucleic acids
  • Sustainable management of water in the Pantanal
    (South American wetland)
  • Interdisciplinary perspectives on African
    language publishing for children
  • Ecological services by ants in rehabilitated coal
    mine sites of Guajira, Colombia
  • Music and dance science optimising performance
    potential
  • Women and trade union leadership development in
    comparative context
  • Defects in 2D frustrated prototype spin ice
    systems
  • Networks, protests and students the politicising
    effects of campus connections
  • Dynamics of world cinema transnational channels
    of global film circulation
  • Transnational climate change governance
  • Regionalist vs Nationalist populists in power
    actions and reactions

19
To sum up
  • The excellence of the proposed project is of
    paramount importance.
  • Clarity of expression, a good methodology and an
    idea of anticipated outcomes and dissemination
    strategy are all essential.
  • Really think about WHY youre approaching the
    Trust could your project be more appropriately
    funded elsewhere?
  • The Trustees favour applications which
    demonstrate both the ability of the applicant to
    undertake the work, and their excitement at the
    challenge this presents.
  • Demonstrate WHY the work is important, and why it
    should be funded.
  • Trust encourages creativity and the development
    of original and risky research which blurs
    disciplinary boundaries.
  • Wholly within-discipline research projects are
    less likely to find favour, but might if they are
    of the highest quality.

20
Full details of all schemes can be found on our
website
  • www.leverhulme.ac.uk
  • or (in hard copy) in our Guide for Applicants,
    available upon request to
  • The Leverhulme Trust
  • 1 Pemberton Row
  • London EC4A 3BG
  • Tel 020 7822 5220
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com