Issues in P management for water quality protection - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

Issues in P management for water quality protection

Description:

The increase in concentration from Bray-P1 20 to 400 ppm is a 7 fold increase. ... The increase in Bray-P1 from 20 to 400 ppm caused a 3.2 fold increase in total P. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:43
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: charle421
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Issues in P management for water quality protection


1
Issues in P management for water quality
protection
  • Charles Wortmann
  • cwortmann2_at_unl.edu

2
Factors affecting P loss
  • Site/management factors
  • Soil P levels 
  • P application practices time, rate and method of
    application
  • Management practices such as tillage, cover
    crops, conservation practices, etc.
  • Transport factors
  • Runoff
  • Erosion rainfall, snowmelt and irrigation  
  • Distance from center of field to a stream,
    water body, etc.
  • Also, sub-surface drainage, percolation and
    under-ground movement of P to seepage areas

3
Main factors affecting P loss
  • Previous weighting erosionsoil test P manure
    P application gt runoff distance fertilizer P
    application
  • Current weighting erosion gtgt runoff soil test
    P gt distance to water body if within 300 ft gt P
    application (rate, time and method of application
    are somewhat important but P source is not of
    much importance.)

4
Much better information available today
  • Most available information on P loss is from the
    last 10 years
  • Much information is now available from medium to
    long term studies conducted in the field under
    natural precipitation as compared to information
    from micro-plot studies with simulated rainfall.

5
Medium to long term field studies 4 phases since
1998
  • Effects of manure application on water, sediment
    and nutrient loss during year of application.
  • Residual effect of previous applications for up
    to 6 yr
  • Effect of deep plowing to invert excessively high
    P surface layer.
  • Effect of vegetative filters at outlets.

6
Erosion and P loss
  • Total P loss is proportionally related to erosion
  • Dissolved P loss is less related

7
Sediment-P vs. dissolved P
  • How important is sediment-P relative to dissolved
    P entering water bodies?
  • Dissolved P is immediately available.
  • How much sediment P will eventually be available
    to aquatic vegetation?
  • Water P concentration
  • How much re-suspension of sediments occurs?
  • 70 eventually becomes available??

8
Soil test P and runoff P
Dissolved P concentration in runoff significant
at very low STP. The increase in concentration
from Bray-P1 20 to 400 ppm is a 7 fold increase.
9
Soil test P and runoff P
Sediment bound-P is the larger fraction. Total P
concentration in runoff is significant at very
low STP. The increase in Bray-P1 from 20 to 400
ppm caused a 3.2 fold increase in total P.
10
Manure P application and runoff P concentration
  • P runoff risk decreases quickly with time after
    application.

11
Manure P application and runoff P concentration
  • Similar event of time but less dramatic.

12
Manure application and sediment/ runoff loss
  • Runoff and sediment greatly reduced by compost
    application.
  • Residual benefit continued for several years.

13
Years 4 5 since last application
14
(No Transcript)
15
Manure application and runoff
  • Both erosion and runoff decreased by about 2 for
    every ton/ac dry matter applied annually

16
(No Transcript)
17
(No Transcript)
18
Fertilizer vs. manure P
  • For similar amounts applied, similar risk

19
P based application annual vs. once in 3-5 years
  • P based is when P applied P removed
  • P runoff risk is similar if P is applied annually
    as compared to at 4x rate once in 4 years (page
    10).
  • Applying once in 4 years at 4x rate will
  • Save time
  • Reduce compaction
  • Allow application of enough manure to fully meet
    N need for one year

20
(No Transcript)
21
Method of application
  • Incorporation/injection vs. surface applied
  • Surface application
  • Increased risk during days after application
  • Increased surface soil P, an on-going risk
  • N loss and odors
  • Incorporation effect on erosion risk?

22
Deep plowing to reduce P at the soil surface
  • Soil with very stratified P levels plowed in 2004
  • Mean P loss for 0405 was 54 less with plowing

23
P application to grazing lands
  • Results in excessively high STP at the soil
    surface (page 11)
  • Greatest runoff potential during the late spring
  • Infiltration rates are slow due to high soil
    water content.
  • A large proportion of the lost P is dissolved P

24
Cover crops
  • Reduce P loss by reducing runoff and erosion

25
Erosion control
  • Reduced sediment-P movement
  • Increased sediment-P trapping for reduced total P
    loss
  • Many conservation practices for sediment control
    may not have much effect on volume of runoff and
    dissolved P loss
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com