Refactoring - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Refactoring

Description:

'Refactoring is a disciplined technique for restructuring an existing body of ... Borland JBuilder. NetBeans. RefactorIT plug-in for Eclipse, Borland JBuilder, ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:89
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: ltn
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Refactoring


1
Refactoring
2
What is Refactoring?
  • Refactoring is a disciplined technique for
    restructuring an existing body of code, altering
    its internal structure without changing its
    external behavior.
  • Its heart is a series of small behavior
    preserving trans-formations. Each transformation
    (called a 'refactoring') does little, but a
    sequence of transformations can produce a
    significant restructuring. Since each refactoring
    is small, it's less likely to go wrong. The
    system is also kept fully working after each
    small refactoring, reducing the chances that a
    system can get seriously broken during the
    restructuring.
  • http//refactoring.com

3
What Motivates Us to Refactor?
  • Make it easier to add new code
  • Improve the design of existing code
  • Gain a better understanding of code
  • Make coding less annoying
  • Kerievsky

4
What Alerts Us to Refactor?
  • Code Smells
  • Signs that there might be something ugly in the
    design waiting to be refactored away
  • Examples
  • Long Method
  • Long Parameter List
  • Duplicate Code
  • Large Class
  • Comments
  • Feature Envy
  • Middle Man
  • Message Chains
  • Shotgun Surgery

5
Something to think about
  • The longer you wait before paying your debt, the
    bigger the bill common sense
  • The bigger the mess, the less you want to clean
    it up Joshua Kerievsky
  • Perfection is reached not when there remains
    nothing to add, but when there remains nothing to
    remove Antoine de Saint-Exupéry, 1900-1944

6
Metaphor Clean As You Go
  • Mrs. Beeton The Book of Household Management

CLEAN AS YOU GO
Quoted by Kevlin Henney and James Newkirk at
JAOO 2004,featured in Joshua Kerievskys
Refactoring to Patterns
7
What is mercilessly?
  • The bigger the mess, the less you want to clean
    it up Joshua Kerievsky
  • Continuously.
  • Refactor as often as you possibly can
  • If you decide to leave a particular refactoring
    for later, know the cost of doing so!
  • Before or after. Not during.
  • Keep focused. Youll do less mistakes and its
    easier to keep your head around things that way.

8
Design Debt
  • What happens if you dont refactor?? you incur
    Design Debt
  • Design Debt refers to the unwanted consequences
    of letting sloppy design and programming exist in
    the codebase its the software design
    equivalent for Technical Debt? Workarounds
    instead of form fit additions
  • Over-engineering is Design Debt as well!
  • Cunningham

9
Design Income?
  • If theres Design Debt, then is there equivalent
    Design Income in the other end of the scale?
  • Up-front design could be considered Design
    Income. However, theres a big risk of the
    potential Design Income becoming Design Debt
    because of over-engineering and wrongful
    assumptions.? Due to this risk, up-front design
    should only be done for sure things. Then
    again, sure things are rarely big winners,
    so ? Up-front design is often a bad investment

10
Refactoring and Design Patterns
  • Design Patterns are closely related to
    Refactoring
  • Refactorings are transformations from one state
    to another
  • These states are often Design Patterns!
  • Alexander, GoF, Hillside

11
Preventing Regression
  • Unit tests
  • A good enough coverage lets us refactor with
    confidence that nothing was broken.
  • Automated tests get run. Manual tests dont.
  • Functional tests
  • For the random situations where unit tests arent
    sufficient for preventing regression
  • Automated tests get run. Manual tests dont.
  • Side-track Test-Driven Development

12
Rewriting vs. Refactoring
  • Rewriting ! Refactoring
  • The word refactoring is often used in the
    context of a plain rewrite of existing code,
    which is most often a blatant mistake
  • however
  • Refactoring Rewriting
  • Some refactorings can be thought of as controlled
    rewrites in well-defined, small steps
  • and sometimes
  • Refactoring Deleting
  • Deleting code can boost a teams performance

13
Metaphor John Thompson(from Refactoring to
Patterns)
John Thompson, hatter, makes and sells hats for
ready money.
14
Metaphor John Thompson (contd)
John Thompson
15
Next Up
  • a bunch of sample refactorings in Java

16
RefactoringsRename Method
  • Mechanics
  • Check to see whether the method signature is
    implemented by a super class or a subclass. If it
    is, these steps must be performed for each
    implementation.
  • Declare a new method with the new name. Copy the
    old body of code over to the new name and make
    any alterations to fit.
  • Compile.
  • Change the body of the old method so that it
    calls the new one.
  • Compile and test.
  • Find all references to the old method and change
    them to call the new one instead. Compile and
    test after each change.
  • Remove the old method.
  • Compile and test.

17
Exercise 1-4-1Rename Method
  • Task
  • Rename the setAmount(float) method in
    example.Money to setValue(float) without using
    Eclipses refactoring wizard, relying on the
    steps described in exercise-1.4-1.txt

18
RefactoringsRename Method (contd)
  • Observations
  • Lot of work for a small refactoring, and
  • Very mechanical work, but also
  • Easy to automate
  • which leads to this particular refactoring (and
    many others, of course) being well-supported by
    modern IDEs such as Eclipse.

19
RefactoringsPull Up Method
  • A slightly more complex refactoring involving
    inheritance
  • Mechanics
  • Inspect the methods to ensure they are identical
    (yes, identical if they arent, use Substitute
    Algorithm to make them identical)
  • If the methods have different signatures, change
    the signatures to the one you want to use
    eventually in the super class
  • Create a new method in the super class, copy the
    body of one of the methods to it, adjust, and
    compile. (you might need to Pull Up Field, first)
  • Delete one subclass method.
  • Compile and test.
  • Keep deleting subclass methods one at a time,
    testing until only the super class method
    remains.
  • Check if you can change any callers to refer to
    the super type instead.

20
Exercise 1-4-2Pull Up Field Pull Up Method
  • Task
  • Pull Up Field name without using Eclipses
    refactoring wizard, relying on the steps
    described in exercise-1.4-2.txt
  • Pull Up Method getName() without using
    Eclipses refactoring wizard, relying on the
    steps described in exercise-1.4-2.txt

21
RefactoringsPull Up Method (contd)
  • Observations
  • Uses other, lower-level refactorings to
    accomplish a slightly bigger refactoring
  • Clearly more complex, but still feasible to
    automate

22
RefactoringsIntroduce Null Object
  • Again, a slightly more complex refactoring.
  • Mechanics
  • Create a subclass of the source class to act as a
    NullObject.
  • Create an isNull() method on the source class and
    the null class for the source class the method
    should return false, for the null class it should
    return true.
  • Compile.
  • Find all places that can return a null when asked
    for a source object. Replace them to give out an
    instance of the null class instead. Compile and
    test after each change.
  • Find all places that compare a variable of the
    source type with null and replace them with a
    call to isNull(). Compile and test after each
    change.
  • Look for cases in which client code invokes a
    method if not null and do some alternative
    behavior if null. For each of these cases
    override the method in question in the null class
    with the alternative behavior originally
    implemented in client code. Remove the condition
    check for those that use the overridden behavior.
  • Compile and test.

23
Exercise 1-4-3Introduce Null Object
  • Task
  • Introduce a Null Object to replace the null-check
    in the PricingMachine class, relying on the steps
    described in exercise-1.4-3.txt

24
RefactoringsIntroduce Null Object (contd)
  • Observations
  • Transformation towards a design pattern
  • Seems difficult to automate
  • Has the potential of cleaning up significant
    amounts of error-prone, distracting code

25
RefactoringsReplace Inheritance with Delegation
  • This doesnt look too difficult, does it?
  • Mechanics
  • Create a field in the subclass that refers to an
    instance of the super class. Initialize the field
    to this.
  • Change each method defined in the subclass to use
    the delegate field. Compile and test after
    changing each method.
  • Remove the subclass declaration and replace the
    delegate assignment with an assignment to a new
    object of the ex-super class type.
  • For each super class method, add a simple
    delegating method to the ex-subclass.
  • Compile and test.

26
Exercise 1-4-4Replace Inheritance with
Delegation
  • Task
  • Replace Inheritance with Delegation in the
    CollectionOfItems class, relying on the steps
    described in exercise-1.4-4.txt

27
RefactoringsReplace Inheritance with Delegation
(contd)
  • Observations
  • A relatively simple refactoring, clearly less
    complex than Introduce Null Objectso whats
    the big deal?

28
RefactoringsReplace Delegation with Inheritance
  • This is exactly the reverse of Replace
    Inheritance with Delegation!
  • Mechanics
  • Make the delegating object a subclass of the
    delegate.
  • Compile. Use Rename Method to fix any name
    clashes between the two classes methods.
  • Set the delegate field to be the object itself.
  • Remove the simple delegation methods.
  • Compile and test.
  • Replace all other delegations with calls to the
    object itself.
  • Remove the delegate field.

29
Exercise 1-4-5Replace Delegation with
Inheritance
  • Task
  • Replace Delegation with Inheritance in the
    CollectionOfItems class, relying on the steps
    described in exercise-1.4-5.txt

30
RefactoringsReplace Delegation with Inheritance
  • Observations
  • Exact reverse of Replace Inheritance with
    Delegation
  • Refactorings are often like this a nice
    side-effect of being well-defined

31
RefactoringsReplace Type Code
with Subclasses
with Strategy
Theres no one-to-one mapping between code smells
and solutions. Sometimes multiple refactorings
provide slightly varying ways to climb out of the
same hole
32
My Favorite Refactorings
  • There are some refactorings that one uses more
    than others. For me, the following are probably
    the ones I use the most
  • Rename Method
  • Extract Method
  • Move Method
  • Rename Class
  • Extract Class
  • Inline Temp
  • Extract Constant
  • Low-level refactorings thus encountered more
    often than e.g. Introduce Null Object and thus
    better supported by IDEs.

33
Tool Support
  • JAVA
  • Eclipse
  • IntelliJ IDEA
  • Borland JBuilder
  • NetBeans
  • RefactorIT plug-in for Eclipse, Borland JBuilder,
    NetBeans, Oracle JDeveloper
  • .NET
  • IntelliJ Resharper for Visual Studio .NET
  • Visual Studio .NET Team Studio 2005 (Forthcoming)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com