Kein Folientitel

1
EMEP / US EPA The First Workshop on Emissions and
Modelling of Atmospheric Transport Of Persistent
Organic Pollutants and Heavy Metals. Durham,
North Carolina, U.S.A., May 1993. EMEP /
RIVM Workshop on European Monitoring, Modelling
and Assesment of Heavy Metals and Persistent
Organic Pollutants. Beekbergen, The Netherlands,
May 1994. UN-ECE / MSC-E Workshop on Assessment
of EMEP Activities Concerning Heavy Metals and
Persistent Organic Pollutants and their Further
Development. Moscow, Russia, September 1996.
WMO/EMEP/UNEP Workshop on Modelling of
Atmospheric Transport and Deposition
of Persistent Organic Pollutants and Heavy
Metals. Geneva, Switzerland, November 1999.
2
The First Meeting of the EMEP Task Force
on Measurement and Modelling (TFMM) Vienna,
Austria, 2000. The Sixth Meeting of the EMEP
Task Force on Measurement and Modelling
(TFMM) Zagreb, Croatia, April 2005.
EMEP / TFMM Workshop on the review of the MSC-E
models on HMs and POPs Working Group on Heavy
Metals Moscow, Russia, October 2005. The main
aim of the review and evaluation of the HM and
POP models is to establish whether they are
state-of-the-art and fit for purpose of
evaluating the contribution of long-range
transport to the environmental impacts caused by
HMs and POPs (EMEP / TFMM, Zagreb, Croatia, April
2005)
3
Working Group on Heavy Metals Questions for
discussion in the Working Group (1)
The MSC-E Model formulation (THURSDAY,
OCT 13 1300 -1530) 1. Is the model
parameterization of the atmospheric transport
appropriate for the operational modelling of
heavy metal pollution at the regional scale?
2. Is description of dry and wet deposition
processes in the model relevant for the
reliable evaluation of heavy metal depositions at
the regional scale? 3. Is the model
chemical scheme appropriate for the description
of principal mercury transformations in the
atmosphere?
4
Working Group on Heavy Metals Questions for
discussion in the Working Group (2)
Intercomparison of heavy metal models
(Thursday OCT 13 1600 1800) 1. Is the
MSCE-HM model in good agreement with other
transport models when modeling heavy metal
air concentration and deposition levels in
Europe? 2. Do heavy metal transboundary fluxes
calculated with the MSCE-HM model correspond
well to those obtained with other transport
models? 3. Do other transport models confirm the
underestimation of Pb and Cd pollution
levels by modeling results when using the
official emission data only?
5
Working Group on Heavy Metals Questions for
discussion in the Working Group (3)
Evaluation of the model performance
(FRIDAY OCT 14 830 1200) against
measurements 1. Are the used selected monitoring
data and emission scenarios appropriate for
the model validation? 2. Does the model
satisfactory reflect spatial distribution of
heavy metal pollution levels in Europe based
on available measurements? 3. Does the model
adequately reproduce temporal variation of heavy
metal pollution levels in Europe characterized
by the observations?
6
Working Group on Heavy Metals Questions for
discussion in the Working Group (4)
Model compliance
(FRIDAY OCT 14 830 -1200) 1. Can the
model be applied for evaluation of heavy metal
long-range transport and depositions in
Europe? 2. What model developments could be
recommended in order to improve the model
performance?