Institutional Review Board Overview - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 36
About This Presentation
Title:

Institutional Review Board Overview

Description:

Institutional Review Board Overview & Process. The Office of ... Archeological dig. No living subjects or third parties. No risk to current living individuals ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:511
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 37
Provided by: georgi164
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Institutional Review Board Overview


1
Institutional Review Board Overview Process
  • The Office of Research Services and Sponsored
    Programs
  • P.O. Box 8005
  • Phone (912) 478-5465
  • Fax (912) 478-0719

2
Office for Human Research Protections
  • 45 CFR 46 The Common Rule
  • DHHS Policy for Protection of Human Research
    Subjects
  • Subparts A, B, C, D
  • http//www.hhs.gov/ohrp/

3
What is an Institutional Review Board?
  • Commonly known as an IRB, it is a committee who
    is responsible for reviewing research that
    involves human subjects.
  • makes a recommendation to approve the research or
    to revise the research to ensure protection of
    the participants.
  • An IRB must apply federal regulations for the
    protection of humans in research.

4
IRB Gate Keeper????
  • Investigators should not have sole
    responsibility for determining whether research
    involving human subjects fulfills ethical
    standards. Others who are independent of the
    research must share this responsibility.
  • National Commission Report on
  • Institutional Review Boards, 1978

5
Does all research have to follow PL 45CFR46?
  • To require IRB review, the project must be
    considered
  • Research and
  • Involve human subjects
  • according to the definitions in the federal
    guidelines.

6
Research
  • Systematic Investigation
  • Development
  • Testing
  • Evaluation
  • Generalizable knowledge

7
Human Subjects
  • Living Individuals
  • Unless medical data gathered (HIPPA applies to
    nonliving subjects)
  • Data gathered
  • Interaction with individual
  • Data from individual
  • Samples from individual

8
Third Parties as Human Subjects
  • Information gained from participants about a
    friend, spouse, relative or other.
  • YES data from or about an identifiable
    person
  • No general data not traceable to specific
    individual

9
Minimal Risk 45 CFR 46.102(i)
  • the probability and magnitude of harm or
    discomfort anticipated in the research are not
    greater in and of themselves than those
    ordinarily encountered in daily life or during
    the performance of routine physical or
    psychological examination or tests.

10
Types of Risk
  • Risk may include
  • Risk of criminal/civil liability,
  • Financial risk,
  • Employment risk,
  • Stigmatization,
  • Insurability,
  • Embarrassment
  • Look at all aspects when deciding if risk is
    minimal

11
High Risk Populations
  • Children
  • Prisoners
  • Pregnant women/fetus
  • Terminally ill
  • Comatose Patient
  • Students/Employees
  • Mentally ill
  • Language barrier
  • Illegal Immigrants
  • Illegal activity
  • Activity beyond Social Morays

Others who may be vulnerable to deception,
coercion or unrecognized injury through inquiry
12
IRB Training - Online
  • Meets the National Institutes of Health training
    for use of Human Subjects in research
  • http//phrp.nihtraining.com/users/login.php
  • Housed on the National Institute of Health Office
    of Extramural Research training web site.
  • Registration required but Free
  • Training is good for 3 years
  • Training was updated March, 2008

13
IRB Training - Online
  • Required for all applicants to the IRB
  • Faculty/Staff
  • Principal investigators
  • Co- investigators
  • Graduate students
  • Undergraduate students
  • External researchers
  • Required for all IRB members prior to service

14
Types of Review as Defined by 45 CFR 46
  • Three categories of review
  • Exempt
  • Expedited
  • Full Board
  • Categories based on level of potential risk
    versus benefits

15
Review Continuum
  • Exempt Expedited Full Board
  • Low Risk High

16
Full Board
  • Greater than minimal risk
  • Upon recommendation of 1 board member or ORSSP
  • High risk population
  • Sensitive or potentially harmful research method,
    strategy or content
  • Potential harm to institution
  • Decision returned one week after review

17
Full Board Process
18
Expedited Review
  • No risk greater than minimal
  • 2 board members review
  • Comments emailed to ORSSP with in 5 business days
    of receipt
  • ORSSP relays comments to applicants as board
    comments
  • Response reviewed by ORSSP
  • ORSSP may consult the reviewer for confirmation
    of acceptable response

19
Review Options
  • Request Additional information to clarify
  • Suggest modifications for enhanced protection of
    human subjects
  • Suggest modifications to enhance validity of
    research where flaws may impact fair use of human
    subjects
  • Approve conditionally Minor changes
  • Approve as read

20
Expedited Process
21
Board Review Complete Submission (?)
  • Cover Page
  • Proposal Narrative
  • Informed Consent
  • Individual, parent, minor
  • Certificate of Investigator Responsibility
  • Investigator and Co-Investigator
  • Human Subjects Training Certificate
  • For each individual handling data
  • Survey or data collection instrument
  • If using..
  • permission from institutional authority to
    access institution subjects.
  • - Copy of recruitment flyer or email

22
Exempt from Full Board Review
  • Review by ORSSP or IRB Chair
  • Specific criteria for exemption in regulation
  • Exemptions do not apply to any high risk
    population except school children in normal
    educational settings under normal educational
    practice
  • Exemption status not to be determined by
    researcher
  • Decision returned in one week

23
Exemption Category
  • Exemption Categories are
  • Normal educational practice conducted in normal
    educational setting
  • Research involving the use of educational test
    (standardized), survey procedures, interview or
    observation of public behavior UNLESS
  • Recorded in a manner that subjects can be
    identified directly or indirectly and
  • Disclosure of responses could place participant
    at risk of criminal or civil liability or damage
    financial standing, employability or reputation

24
Exemption Category Cont.
  • Research involving the use of educational test
    (standardized), survey procedures, interview or
    observation of public behavior IF
  • Subject are elected or appointed public official
    or candidates for public office or
  • Federal statute requires without exception that
    the confidentiality of the personally
    identifiable information be maintained throughout
    the research and thereafter. (e.g., minor
    offense records)
  • Research involving the collection or study of
    publicly available data
  • Research designed to evaluate public health
    benefit or service programs and approved by
    Federal department or agency head
  • Taste and food- quality evaluation and consumer
    acceptance studies

25
Exempt Not Defined Research
  • Oral History
  • Story teller is aware of recording
  • No conclusion drawn
  • Market Survey
  • No use but for Program Evaluation
  • Not applied to a broader concept
  • Archeological dig
  • No living subjects or third parties
  • No risk to current living individuals

26
Exempt Complete Submission
  • Cover Page
  • Exempt Questionnaire
  • Survey or Data collection instrument
  • NIH training certificate

27
Exempt Process
28
Informed Consent (?)
  • A process, not just a document
  • If participants are under 18 years of age,
    informed consent must be obtained from
  • The childs parent(s) asking permission to ask
    child to participate
  • The child ask child to participate
  • Must be written at no higher than an 8th grade
    reading level, or the reading level of the
    participants

29
Informed Consent (?)
  • Must be written to the participant not the IRB.
  • Write as though you were explaining your project
    to a friend
  • How will this project impact the participant
  • How much time will this take?
  • What to I have to do?
  • Why should I spend my time?
  • What if I change my mind?
  • How can I be sure I am safe?

30
Informed Consent (?)
  • Must be written to the participant not the IRB.
  • Write as though you were explaining your project
    to a friend
  • How will this project impact the participant
  • How much time will this take?
  • What to I have to do?
  • Why should I spend my time?
  • What if I change my mind?
  • How can I be sure I am safe?

31
Essential Elements for Consent45 CFR 46.116
  • Invitation to participate
  • Purpose, duration, procedures
  • Foreseeable risks/benefits
  • Confidentiality conditions
  • Contact persons for questions
  • Voluntary nature of participation
  • Alternatives, if any
  • Compensation, if applicable
  • Provide copy

32
Informed Consent at GSU (?)
  • Must be on GSU letterhead (provided online)
  • Include PIs name and contact info and faculty
    advisors name and contact info, if a student
  • Include all sections included on optional
    template, unless not applicable to your project.
  • Process of obtaining informed consent from
    participants must be explained in methodology
    section of Proposal Narrative

33
Special Activities and Processes
  • Passive Consent anonymous survey can use
    passive consent rather than informed consent
    form.
  • Oral Consent may have to obtain from very young
    children. In this case, provide a copy of
    exactly what will be said in obtaining oral
    consent.
  • Classroom Projects research project required
    for completion of a course, but cannot involve
    minors, deception, videotaping, or
    presentation/publication.

34
Special Activities and Processes
  • Survey Research can be exempt only if anonymous
    no identifiers are used.
  • Deception if deception is involved, include a
    debriefing form to be given to participants upon
    conclusion of research.
  • Oral History if no conclusions are being made
    about oral histories, this does not fall under
    the purview of the IRB

35
Review Summary
  • Informed consent
  • Participant is aware and able to agree
  • Human subject protection from unnecessary risk
  • Realized and unrealized
  • Ethical research
  • Balance of risk/benefit
  • Valid research
  • Potential value balances risk to subject
  • Institution unharmed

36
In Conclusion
  • If you ever have questions or concerns, please
    feel free to contact
  • Eleanor Haynes at 478-0843
  • ehaynes_at_georgiasouthern.edu
  • Or visit
  • http//academics.georgiasouthern.edu/research/comp
    liance_irb.htm
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com