Please sit with your group - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 32
About This Presentation
Title:

Please sit with your group

Description:

(2) Anti-social behaviors. social pathology. aggression. unhelpfulness ... Anti-Social Behaviors ... Little expectation of auditory privacy. Japanese and Dutch ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:67
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: marcgol
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Please sit with your group


1
Please sit with your group
2
Group Discussion What makes us feel crowded?
  • Have each person in your group describe at
    least 2 situations where they were with a large
    number of people and did or did not feel crowded.
    What makes the difference?
  • (see handout for specific discussion questions
    and tasks)

3
(No Transcript)
4
Montano Adamopoulos (1984)The perception of
crowding in interpersonal situations Affective
and behavioral responses
See handout
How well did your groups conclusions match up
with their findings?
5
Key terminology regarding crowding
  • Crowding vs. density
  • Crowding the negative psychological reactions
    that occur when an individual experiences too
    many people around.
  • Density the objective measure of the number of
  • people per unit of space.

6
Terminology (contd)
Perceived density an individuals estimate of
the number of people per unit of
space. Affective density the emotional response
to perceived density. -----------------------
---------------------------------------------

negative

affect (crowding) Density ? perceived density
affective
density

positive
affect
(functional

density)
putting these terms together
7
More terminology Density can vary in 2 ways
  • Vary social density keep area the same
    (constant) but change the of people

(Social density doubled)
8
Or, we can . . .
  • Vary spacial density keep the of people the
    same (constant) but change the area

(Spatial density doubled)
9
More terminology Inside vs. outside density
  • Inside density ratio of people to space inside
    buildings (usually expressed as average of
    people per room)

(Ave inside density 1.5 people per room)
10
  • Outside density ratio of people to total area
    (often expressed as average of people per
    square mile)

Country 1990 population
Density City (in millions)
people per sq. mile USA
250.4
69 New York 14.6
11,473 France
56.4 267
Paris 8.7
20,123
11
Question Would you rather live in . . .
  • On a block of Manhattan that had an outside
    density of 12,500 people per square mile?
  • or
  • A building in Manhattan that had an inside
    density of 1.2 people per room?
  • WHY??

12
What are the effects of crowding?
Animal vs. human studies
What kinds of research can we do on animals if we
want to study crowding? How about on humans?
13
Animal Studies
  • Animal studies have suggested 2 kinds of negative
    outcomes
  • physiological stresses, e.g., evidence of
    organ
  • damage, changes in hormonal output.
  • behavioral stresses, e.g., evidence of
  • disruption of normal behavioral patterns.

14
Calhouns studies
  • Studied behavioral consequences of crowding on
    rats
  • In a controlled, natural environment (food, no
    predators), he found that the rat population
    stayed fairly constant

15
Calhoun created an artificial environment
Pens 1 4 1 entrance, dominant rat could
control Pens 2 3 2 entrances, dominant rat
could not control
16
Behavioral consequences
Pens 1 4 normal mating and pup-rearing
behavior Pens 2 3 behavior breakdown very
crowded conditions, females built poor nests,
many pups died, male rats exhibited
homosexuality, hyperactivity, and heightened
aggressiveness
17
Calhoun called the conditions in pens 2 and 3 a
behavioral sink
Behavioral sink occurs when high population
densities exceed the capacity of that species to
maintain normal social relations (usually caused
by non-natural conditions)
18
The term behavioral sink became very popular in
the media and was applied (indiscriminately) to
high-density human settings. But . . .
  • animal responses to crowding are more
    stereotyped they have less cognitive capacity.
  • humans usually have more opportunities
  • to leave high density situations and more
  • coping strategies.

19
Human Studies Some representative findings
  • Crowding has been linked with a large number of
    behavioral outcomes. Im going to discuss 2
    areas
  • (1) Psychological Stress Mental Health
  • (2) Anti-social behaviors
  • social pathology
  • aggression
  • unhelpfulness
  • social withdrawal

20
Psychological Stress Mental Health
  • Expectation high density leads to poorer
  • mental health.
  • Results Studies have linked both high
  • and low density with decreased mental
  • health.
  • mediating role of social support?

21
Anti-Social Behaviors
  • Social Pathology Early research suggested a
    clear density social pathology (crime, divorce,
    suicide) relationship.
  • Later research suggests this relationship (in
    the U.S.) is less strong, once the effects of
    population size, poverty, education have been
    controlled.

22
Anti-Social Behaviors (contd)
  • Aggression research evidence suggest that males
    in high density situations are likely to display
    more aggression.
  • One possible reason increases in social
  • density (as opposed to social density)
  • may lead to increased competition for
  • resources.

23
Anti-Social Behaviors (contd)
  • Unhelpfulness research indicates that high
    density tends to create negative attitudes toward
    others which leads people to be less helpful/more
    competitive in their interactions with others.

24
Anti-Social Behaviors (contd)
  • Social withdrawal research indicates that
    individuals in high density situations often
    withdraw from social interaction.
  • Examples of withdrawal behavior
  • reading newspaper on crowded bus/train
  • avoidance of eye contact
  • adopting defensive posture

25
Some factors that mediate between density,
crowding and behavioral consequences
Culture
Consequences emotions behaviors stress
?
Density
Crowding
Personal influences Social influences Physical/arc
hitectural influences
26
Personal Influences
  • Affiliation people who like to be with
  • others have higher tolerance for dense
  • situations.
  • Gender which gender responds more
  • negatively to high density?

or
?
27
Social Influences
  • Behavior of others we feel more crowded
  • if we dislike the behavior of those around
    us.
  • Provision of Information giving people
  • accurate, objective information about
  • impending delays seems to reduce stress.

28
Physical Influences
  • Which of each of the following pairs do you
    think would contribute to feelings of crowding?
  • Dorms with long hallways vs. dorms with short
    hallways or suites?
  • High ceilings vs. low ceilings?
  • Rooms with curved walls vs. rooms with straight
    walls?

29
Physical Influences
  • Which of each of the following pairs do you
    think would contribute to feelings of crowding?
  • Dorms with long hallways vs. dorms with short
    hallways or suites?
  • High ceilings vs. low ceilings?
  • Rooms with curved walls vs. rooms with straight
    walls?

30
Culture as a mediator between crowding and its
behavioral effects
  • Research across cultures suggests that high
    density, per se, does not cause personal or
    social pathology
  • Example Hong Kong has 4 times the density of
    downtown Toronto but ¼ the
  • crime rate.

31
Age of culture
  • High density social breakdown
  • relationship seems highest in younger
  • cultures, e.g., American.
  • Older cultures may have developed better coping
    strategies for high density situations.

32
Examples of cultural coping strategies
  • Chinese
  • Firm rules about access to others personal
    space.
  • Lower level of emotional involvement with
    others.
  • Little expectation of auditory privacy.
  • Japanese and Dutch
  • Hobbies/interests that take up little
    space, e.g., bonsai,
  • miniature paintings.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com