Enhancing GEF National Coordination, Communications - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 10
About This Presentation
Title:

Enhancing GEF National Coordination, Communications

Description:

The OFP ensures that GEF projects are country driven & based on national priorities. ... collaboration for the synergetic implementation of the MEAs and acts as a ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:35
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: pak8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Enhancing GEF National Coordination, Communications


1
Enhancing GEF National Coordination,
Communications Outreach
  • Ugandas Experience
  • The National Convention Coordination Group (NCCG)
  • The National Operational Focal Point
  • Ministry of Finance, Planning Economic
    Development
  • Kampala UGANDA

2
Introduction
  • Ugandas National Political/Operational Focal is
    held by the DST in the MFPED.
  • The OFP ensures that GEF projects are country
    driven based on national priorities.
  • MFPED is responsible for overall national
    development planning and macro-economic
    framework.
  • OFP heads a GEF National Steering Committee
    comprised of representatives from MWE, MAAIF,
    NEMA, MUK, NCST, FPs for CBD, UNFCCC, UNCCD,
    POPs, SGP, GEF IAs and NGOs.
  • All Convention Focal Points GEF funded
    programmes are coordinated by the National
    Steering Committee under the OFP.

3
The National Steering Committees Mandate is to
  • Coordinate all GEF activities.
  • Review all GEF project proposals and ensures that
    the are in line with the Government set policies
    in the Poverty Eradication Action Plan (PEAP).
  • Prioritise projects for GEF funding.
  • Approve or reject project proposals for GEF
    funding.
  • Provide oversight monitoring of the
    implementation of on-going GEF funded projects
    including site visits.
  • Disseminate information on GEF to stakeholders.
  • The NSC meets on a quarterly basis and is
    supported by two technical staff in MFPED that
    form its Secretariat.

4
National Convention Coordination Group (NCCG)
  • Uganda is among 5 countries implementing a pilot
    project focusing on Capacity Building to
    Alleviate Poverty through Synergistic
    Implementation of Rio MEAs.
  • The NCCG was established in 2005 with the
    objective to provide a framework for the
    individual and institutional collaboration for
    the synergetic implementation of the MEAs and
    acts as a Steering Committee to the MEAs project.

5
Membership of the NCCG
  • Institutions actively involved in implementing
    various components of the MEAs, work through a
    collaborative network and facilitate coordination
    among the existing relevant ministries and
    stakeholders, these include
  • Focal points for the Multilateral Environment
    Agreements/Conventions CBD, UNCCD, UNFCCC,
    Convention on Wetlands and International Waters
    and
  • Relevant key ministries MWE, MAAIF MFPED.
  • MWE heads the NCCG.

6
Achievements
  • A multi-stakeholder NCCG established and steers
    the project and developed partnership among its
    members.
  • Ownership has been built through working together
    on 3-year work-plan, carrying out public
    awareness together. Resulted in shared vision.
  • Dissemination of information on MEAs through the
    media.
  • Dedicated project manager that provides
    backstopping to the NCCG.
  • Established cooperation with other stakeholders,
    UNDP/GEF-SGP, grantees- NGOs and Schools.
  • Plans sensitization of Parliamentary committee on
    Natural Resources.

7
Challenges
  • The members of the NCCG are committed on their
    own jobs and take the NCCG activities as
    secondary. Difficulty in getting members to
    participate fully in the NCCG activities
  • Proper communication strategy is still lacking.
  • Coordination with the local governments is still
    weak and they have low capacity to implement MEAs
    low awareness of MEAs.
  • Data and information on MEAs are lacking.

8
Lessons Learnt
  • Drawing broad participation of the key players
    through the NCCG has enhanced decision-making and
    implementation of MEAs.
  • Through collaboration with the SGP facilitated
    resource mobilisation for micro grants through
    co-funding and joint activities, impact was
    realised.
  • Some of the Communication programmes have been
    achieved through utilization of some of the
    existing programmes in the MWE.
  • The beneficiary through their activities created
    awareness of MEAs.

9
Conclusion
  • The Coordination of GEF programmes/ projects are
    streamlined within the existing Government
    institutions this has strengthened the ownership
    of the programmes/projects and are consistent
    with set national policies and priorities.

10
Thank You
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com