Iraq War - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

Iraq War

Description:

e.g. threatens lives of innocent people, self-defense, etc. Our view: There was a just cause to go to war. ... The rationale for the war by the Bush ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1217
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: OEMS3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Iraq War


1
Iraq War
  • Just War or a War of Injustice?

2
What makes a war just?
  • Principles
  • Just Cause
  • Legitimate Authority
  • Comparative Justice
  • Right Intention
  • Probability of Success
  • Proportionality
  • Last Resort

3
Just Cause
  • A real, lasting grave and certain damage
    inflicted by an aggressor on a nation
  • e.g. threatens lives of innocent people,
    self-defense, etc.
  • Our view
  • There was a just cause to go to war. The
    rationale for the war by the Bush administration
    was that Iraq possessed an arsenal of weapons of
    mass destruction, which posed a growing threat to
    the US and the world. Bush stated that the US
    must not wait until the threat is imminent
    because they did not know Saddams intentions.
    No evidence was found of such weapons programs,
    but the US needed to defend themselves if there
    were such weapons. Other reasons were that
    Saddam Hussein could have connections to Al-Qaeda
    and human rights abuse in Iraq.
  • . Score

4
Legitimate Authority
  • The right to declare a war of defense belongs to
    those who have the legitimate responsibility to
    represent the people and are entrusted with the
    common good.
  • Our view
  • Bush was voted as President by the people of his
    country. This shows that people trust him to do
    the right thing in a time of conflict. Though
    people may question Bush and his motives, we
    believe that Bush fits the description of
    legitimate authority because of his rank as
    President.
  • Score

5
Comparative Justice
  • The rights and values in the conflict must be so
    important that they justify killing.
  • Our view
  • The reasons for war was weapons of mass
    destruction, Saddam Hussein could have
    connections to Al-Qaeda and human rights abuse in
    Iraq. After the invasion no evidence of weapons
    of mass destruction were found, and in order to
    help human rights abuse in Iraq, other human
    rights abuse tactics, such as torture were used.
    If critics oil theory is partly correct, we
    feel that financial reasons are not justifiable.
    This makes us conclude that there was not
    comparative justice.
  • Score

6
Right Intention
  • War must be waged for the best reasons and
    commitment to postwar reconciliation with the
    enemy. Needless destruction, cruelty to
    prisoners, and other harsh measures cannot be
    tolerated. Peace and justice is the only reason
    to use arms. Mass extermination of people is
    sinful.
  • Our view
  • Though there was just reason to go to war, cruel
    and harsh measures are being used. There is human
    rights abuse that it going on.
  • Some allegations included torture and abuse of
    prisoners at Abu Ghraih, the murder of 24
    civilians in Haditha, including women and
    children, etc.
  • Many acts of injustice, needless destruction, and
    cruelty have been taken.
  • Score

7
Probability of Success
  • The odds of success should be weighed against the
    human cost of the war.
  • Our view
  • When the war started, the goal was to overthrow
    Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein, and occupied Iraq in
    an attempt to establish a new governmental
    regime. The attempt to restore order to the
    entire country was unsuccessful, and the number
    of deaths of innocent lives continues to
    increase. The war started March 2003, and now,
    over 4 years later, the war continues.
  • Score

8
Proportionality
  • The damage to be inflicted and the costs of the
    war must be proportionate to the good expected.
    Minimum force necessary to obtain military
    objectives should be used.
  • Our view
  • Though we are sure that when the war started, it
    was not predicted that so many lives would be
    lost and that the war would last this long, in
    our opinion the Iraq war has failed the principle
    of proportionality. Though some gains have been
    made, the cost of this war has been high. More
    than minimum force has been used, and innocent
    lives have been lost.
  • Score

9
Last Resort
  • War must be a last resort. All peaceful efforts
    should have been tried prior. There are no other
    alternatives.
  • Our View
  • The war was not a last resort. The United
    Nations weapons inspectors wanted a few more
    weeks to come up with peaceful alternatives.
    Hans Blix, the head of the UN inspectors
    commented about the possibility of there being
    chemical and biological weapons in Iraq, saying
    One must not jump to conclusion that they
    exist.
  • Bush said the U.S. must not wait until imminent
    threat of weapons of mass destruction, but after
    the invasion, no evidence was found of such
    weapons.
  • Other peaceful measures, and more research could
    have been done before the invasion.
  • Score

10
The Score
2
5
Therefore, we believe the war is a war of
injustice!
11
Moral Standard Now That There Is An Armed
Conflict?
  • Immunity of noncombatants
  • Proportionality
  • Right Intention

12
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com