Title: Pension Analysis and the PER
1Pension Analysis and the PER
- Richard P. Hinz, Adviser, HDNSP
- Anita M. Schwarz, Lead Economist, ECSHD
- April 2007
2Objectives of a Pension System
- Reduce poverty among the elderly
- Smooth consumption between working years and
retirement years - Implication those who earn and consume more in
working years will consume and earn more in
retirement years - Very different from other public expenditure
programs which ideally would be designed to
allocate equal or greater share of expenditures
to the poor
3Pension Systems Usually Contributory
- Historically contributory part of the
compensation package - Government provides a mechanism whereby employers
and employees can save for old age in the absence
of secure market-based instruments - Also makes pension reforms extremely different
- People have acquired rights from the
contributions they have made - Raises problems for redistribution analysis
- Need to net out historical contributions from
current expenditures - Only those who contribute get pensions low
income individuals often dont contribute so
pension expenditure skewed toward higher income
individuals as is pension revenue
4Who is Covered Under the Pension System?
- Contributors to the pension system can range from
5 of the labor force to 95 - Percentage of the elderly covered can be
different from percentage of labor force covered - ECA, Brazil, Georgia
- What programs exist to provide assistance to
those not covered?
5Coverage is Fundamental in How to Evaluate the
Pension System
- High coverage systems
- Meaningful to include redistribution within
system - Low coverage systems
- Financing of the pension system should come from
those who are covered - Low coverage system running a deficit results in
highly regressive transfers from general revenues
broadly collected to the few who are covered and
generally have higher incomes - Redistribution within the pension system of
secondary importance
6Fiscal status of the pension system now and in
the future
- Is the system sustainable now and in the future?
- Note that the relevant future for pension systems
is usually 50-75 years into the future - Will promises being made to those beginning work
today be kept? - Do proposed reforms improve sustainability?
- Frequently do nothing in the short to medium term
- With move to a funded system, reform can actually
worsen the short and medium term position - Need measures like implicit pension debt
7Implicit Pension Debt
- What does the government owe pensioners and
contributors as of today? - Pensioners are owed the present value of the
current benefit (indexed as by law) for the
remainder of their expected lifespan - Contributors are owed some prorated benefit to be
received when they reach retirement age and to
extend throughout the duration of their expected
retirement period, prorated by the of working
career on which contributions have already been
paid
8Example of Fiscal Sustainability or Not in
Context of Turkish Pensions
- While Turkey starts out with a deficit, most
countries will eventually show a deficit in the
long run - Life expectancy increases while pension
parameters are usually not automatically adjusted
9Turkish Reform Proposal
10Benefit Structure Are Benefits Adequate?
- How do we define adequacy?
- Relative to poverty level
- Relative to average wage ideally net wage
- Workers pay pension contributions, health
insurance contributions - Note that inflation indexed pensions will result
in a drop in the value of the pension relative to
economy-wide average wage during ones retirement
period - Relative to pre-retirement wage
- Relative to final salary or relative to average
lifetime salary? - If average lifetime salary, how are salaries
revalued to make them comparable? - Different measures can give very different
results, but also provide different information
11Example of Slovak Benefits
12Benefit Structure (2)Are the Benefits Fair?
- Individuals are making contributions and
receiving pensions are they getting good value
for their money? - Benefits could be high, but costs could be high
too - Internal rate of return
- Fiscal link if benefits are not perceived as
fair, people stop contributing drop in revenue
13Internal Rate of Return for Different Individuals
in Slovak Republic
14Benefit Structure How Redistributive is the
Pension System?
- Pension systems have multiple objectives
- Poverty reduction in old age
- Consumption smoothing
- Countries choose to weight these two objectives
differently - Australia/New Zealand heavily weighted toward
poverty alleviation - Austria, Sweden strong link between
contributions and benefits - No correct answer, but important to know what the
system is actually achieving
15Example from OECD countries, Pensions at a Glance
16Pensions at a Glance
17Tools
- PROST model
- Fiscal analysis
- SR and LR sustainability
- Implicit pension debt
- Individual level social analysis
- Vary starting age, retirement age, starting wage,
wage growth, work history, and mortality
experience - Pensions as percentage of economy wide wage
- Pensions as percentage of own final salary
- Internal rate of return provided by pension system
18PROST
- Developed at the Bank has been used for more
than 85 countries - Available to all our client countries once
counterparts are trained - Training programs and manuals available
19Countries Using PROST
Countries with PROST licenses as of July 2005
20APEX methodology
- Simulates pension benefits for individuals
beginning work at age 20 and retiring at the
retirement age for all different income levels - Shows what different individuals get in relation
to what they earned, taking into account tax
treatment and ceilings and floors on
contributions and benefits
21APEX model
- Developed by Edward Whitehouse and AXIA Economics
- Now the model of the OECD
- In use for all OECD countries, Pensions at a
Glance - Preliminary work on many of our countries as well
22Benefit-Incidence Not That Useful