Pension Analysis and the PER - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

Pension Analysis and the PER

Description:

Implication: those who earn and consume more in working years ... Very different from other public expenditure programs which ... Pension Systems Usually ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:39
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: WB1673
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Pension Analysis and the PER


1
Pension Analysis and the PER
  • Richard P. Hinz, Adviser, HDNSP
  • Anita M. Schwarz, Lead Economist, ECSHD
  • April 2007

2
Objectives of a Pension System
  • Reduce poverty among the elderly
  • Smooth consumption between working years and
    retirement years
  • Implication those who earn and consume more in
    working years will consume and earn more in
    retirement years
  • Very different from other public expenditure
    programs which ideally would be designed to
    allocate equal or greater share of expenditures
    to the poor

3
Pension Systems Usually Contributory
  • Historically contributory part of the
    compensation package
  • Government provides a mechanism whereby employers
    and employees can save for old age in the absence
    of secure market-based instruments
  • Also makes pension reforms extremely different
  • People have acquired rights from the
    contributions they have made
  • Raises problems for redistribution analysis
  • Need to net out historical contributions from
    current expenditures
  • Only those who contribute get pensions low
    income individuals often dont contribute so
    pension expenditure skewed toward higher income
    individuals as is pension revenue

4
Who is Covered Under the Pension System?
  • Contributors to the pension system can range from
    5 of the labor force to 95
  • Percentage of the elderly covered can be
    different from percentage of labor force covered
  • ECA, Brazil, Georgia
  • What programs exist to provide assistance to
    those not covered?

5
Coverage is Fundamental in How to Evaluate the
Pension System
  • High coverage systems
  • Meaningful to include redistribution within
    system
  • Low coverage systems
  • Financing of the pension system should come from
    those who are covered
  • Low coverage system running a deficit results in
    highly regressive transfers from general revenues
    broadly collected to the few who are covered and
    generally have higher incomes
  • Redistribution within the pension system of
    secondary importance

6
Fiscal status of the pension system now and in
the future
  • Is the system sustainable now and in the future?
  • Note that the relevant future for pension systems
    is usually 50-75 years into the future
  • Will promises being made to those beginning work
    today be kept?
  • Do proposed reforms improve sustainability?
  • Frequently do nothing in the short to medium term
  • With move to a funded system, reform can actually
    worsen the short and medium term position
  • Need measures like implicit pension debt

7
Implicit Pension Debt
  • What does the government owe pensioners and
    contributors as of today?
  • Pensioners are owed the present value of the
    current benefit (indexed as by law) for the
    remainder of their expected lifespan
  • Contributors are owed some prorated benefit to be
    received when they reach retirement age and to
    extend throughout the duration of their expected
    retirement period, prorated by the of working
    career on which contributions have already been
    paid

8
Example of Fiscal Sustainability or Not in
Context of Turkish Pensions
  • While Turkey starts out with a deficit, most
    countries will eventually show a deficit in the
    long run
  • Life expectancy increases while pension
    parameters are usually not automatically adjusted

9
Turkish Reform Proposal
10
Benefit Structure Are Benefits Adequate?
  • How do we define adequacy?
  • Relative to poverty level
  • Relative to average wage ideally net wage
  • Workers pay pension contributions, health
    insurance contributions
  • Note that inflation indexed pensions will result
    in a drop in the value of the pension relative to
    economy-wide average wage during ones retirement
    period
  • Relative to pre-retirement wage
  • Relative to final salary or relative to average
    lifetime salary?
  • If average lifetime salary, how are salaries
    revalued to make them comparable?
  • Different measures can give very different
    results, but also provide different information

11
Example of Slovak Benefits
12
Benefit Structure (2)Are the Benefits Fair?
  • Individuals are making contributions and
    receiving pensions are they getting good value
    for their money?
  • Benefits could be high, but costs could be high
    too
  • Internal rate of return
  • Fiscal link if benefits are not perceived as
    fair, people stop contributing drop in revenue

13
Internal Rate of Return for Different Individuals
in Slovak Republic
14
Benefit Structure How Redistributive is the
Pension System?
  • Pension systems have multiple objectives
  • Poverty reduction in old age
  • Consumption smoothing
  • Countries choose to weight these two objectives
    differently
  • Australia/New Zealand heavily weighted toward
    poverty alleviation
  • Austria, Sweden strong link between
    contributions and benefits
  • No correct answer, but important to know what the
    system is actually achieving

15
Example from OECD countries, Pensions at a Glance
16
Pensions at a Glance
17
Tools
  • PROST model
  • Fiscal analysis
  • SR and LR sustainability
  • Implicit pension debt
  • Individual level social analysis
  • Vary starting age, retirement age, starting wage,
    wage growth, work history, and mortality
    experience
  • Pensions as percentage of economy wide wage
  • Pensions as percentage of own final salary
  • Internal rate of return provided by pension system

18
PROST
  • Developed at the Bank has been used for more
    than 85 countries
  • Available to all our client countries once
    counterparts are trained
  • Training programs and manuals available

19
Countries Using PROST
Countries with PROST licenses as of July 2005
20
APEX methodology
  • Simulates pension benefits for individuals
    beginning work at age 20 and retiring at the
    retirement age for all different income levels
  • Shows what different individuals get in relation
    to what they earned, taking into account tax
    treatment and ceilings and floors on
    contributions and benefits

21
APEX model
  • Developed by Edward Whitehouse and AXIA Economics
  • Now the model of the OECD
  • In use for all OECD countries, Pensions at a
    Glance
  • Preliminary work on many of our countries as well

22
Benefit-Incidence Not That Useful
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com