ENTITLE: objectives and workplan - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

ENTITLE: objectives and workplan

Description:

Multilateral project under LLP KA4 Dissemination and Exploitation ... Valorise and endorse through Final Conference for policy makers. 5. Who are we aiming at ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:51
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: entit
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ENTITLE: objectives and workplan


1
ENTITLE objectives and workplan
With support from the Lifelong learning programme
of the European Union
2
What is ENTITLE doing - broadly speaking?
  • Multilateral project under LLP KA4 Dissemination
    and Exploitation of Results
  • valorisation getting the most out of things
  • Support and extend progress made to date by
    Europes public libraries in supporting learning
  • for all age groups and sections of society
  • transversal i.e. across education sectors
    school, higher, vocational
  • Disseminating, consolidating, enhancing the work
    of key existing networks, projects and
    initiatives
  • Trying to develop ways to measure the impact of
    learning through (public) libraries
  • Focus on the contribution to be made through
    informal learning settings (libraries) to
    lifelong learning ,
  • combating digital illiteracy and social exclusion
  • special attention to role of ICT

3
ENTITLE 2 main objectives
  • Identify, describe and disseminate good practice
  • specific services, tools and approaches used for
    learning in public library settings
  • build on work conducted under different
    programmes
  • support multiplication and mainstreaming
  • enable fuller understanding of contribution to
    learning agendas, maximise consensus
  • recommendations to Member States/EU for
    supporting and extending contribution to lifelong
    learning policies and actions
  • Provide an evidence-based framework for
    comparison and exploitation of results within and
    between countries
  • impact on learners
  • potential for future use in comparative research
    studies

4
ENTITLE expected results
  • Guidelines and recommendations
  • Establish a web-based dissemination environment
  • Including case studies
  • Promotion innovation and consult via a series of
    national meetings
  • Establish an impact assessment framework
  • specific contributions of libraries to learning
  • provide a basis for future comparison, experience
    sharing and assessment of progress
  • Valorise and endorse through Final Conference for
    policy makers

5
Who are we aiming at
  • Policy makers, associations and networks in the
    cultural and educational sectors
  • regional, national, and European level
  • municipality and regional learning departments
    and decision-makers
  • library managers and practitioners in the
    provision of learning services
  • teachers/practitioners in the school,
    vocational and adult contexts and frameworks

6
WP 2 Review of existing results, initiatives and
progress (leader Cross Czech)
  • Structured survey, designed and co-ordinated by
    MDR
  • Completed for all participating countries
  • identify and document the policy background
  • good practice instances
  • dissemination and exploitation activities
  • Results of available data collection and
    evaluation activities
  • national and regional/local level
  • impact assessment activities and frameworks
  • Results consolidated and gaps identified
  • presented on web site
  • enable future moderated contributions (WIKI?)
  • baseline for gap analysis and future work
  • D2 Baseline survey results
  • A systematic structured baseline document with
    data on which to base development of the
    remaining project work and outputs

7
WP 3 Impact assessment framework design and
testing (leader - MLA )
  • Design a framework for impact assessment
  • build on work to date
  • range of quantitative and qualitative instruments
  • MLA working with MDR and EUN
  • Online document for test completion by 3
    countries
  • both institutional and national or regional level
    data completion
  • 4 month testing period
  • Multi-stakeholder meeting in Slovenia (M10)
  • experts review framework in light of preliminary
    results
  • Revise and extend framework to all participant
    countries
  • Review and produce final framework
  • conclusions and gaps in data availability
    highlighted
  • basis for full scale use in future comparative
    studies
  • D3 Finalised impact assessment framework
  • A portfolio document providing validated and
    tested instruments for conducting impact
    assessment and analysing the data collected

8
WP 4 Guidelines and recommendations (leader -
Aarhus)
  • Series of concise guidelines on e.g. effective
    policy provisions, learning management, use of
    ICT
  • draw on results of WP2
  • Define coverage of guidelines
  • link to good practice in service provision (e.g.
    CALIMERA)
  • working group of 5 partners, editing by EUN and
    MDR
  • dissemination and contributive comment on Web
  • integrate with impact assessment work
  • Draft recommendations for policy makers and
    professionals
  • in public libraries and wider related learning
    communities
  • Assess and review at multi-stakeholder workshop
    in Slovenia (M10)
  • modify as agreed
  • translate into national languages (nb limited
    funding)
  • D4 Guidelines with draft recommendations
  • A structured and navigable web tool for online
    browsing

9
WP6 Web environment (leader - MDR)
  • Basic site available by Month 3, ongoing
    development
  • Established and maintained by MDR
  • Based on a leading OS Content Management System
  • Integrate moderated contributor access (wiki
    format?)
  • All content and results disseminated through
    website
  • guidelines, recommendations and impact assessment
    framework
  • stakeholder database for distribution
  • RSS newsfeeds
  • newsletter
  • lightweight registration (to receive
    notifications)
  • Session later to discuss site sections and
    functionality
  • Cost limitations !
  • D6 ENTITLE web environment (WP6)
  • An attractive and user friendly interface to
    project outputs, a news dissemination facility
    and a means of developing and involving a
    sustainable community of practice

10
WP 5 Twelve National Meetings (leader - Veria)
  • Audience
  • policy makers, senior practitioners and partners
    from other learning sectors to disseminate
  • Discuss and promote adoption of emerging ENTITLE
    results
  • guidelines, recommendations and impact
    assessment framework
  • 60-150 people
  • Held in national languages
  • Common core agenda
  • flexibility to incorporate national perspectives
    and agendas
  • outcomes incorporated in guidelines,
    recommendations, impact assessment
  • WP 5 Reports from 12 national meetings
  • Compiled as a section within the ENTITLE web
    environment , structured according to template
    format for purposes of comparability in national
    languages with translated versions in English

11
WP7 Final Conference and Report (leader - Publika)
  • Hosted in Hungary (by Publika)
  • Target up to 150 policy makers and
    representatives of national and European
    associations in the learning sector
  • special focus on countries not directly
    represented in ENTITLE
  • additional, wider opportunity to validate,
    disseminate and promote exploitation of ENTITLE
    results
  • high-level political keynote speaker
  • issue a Declaration
  • Conference organisation committee
  • ENTITLE Final Report in English
  • editorial support of MDR
  • D7 Final Report and Conference Proceedings
  • A composite report on the ENTITLEs work,
    including the proceedings and resolutions of the
    Final Conference, available via the web
    environment and also in print format ,in English.
    Summary translations will be produced in
    participants national languages and encouraged
    in all major EU languages

12
WP8 Project Management (leader - MDR)
  • Project co-ordination, management and web
    dissemination infrastructure
  • communication and reporting to the Commission
  • day to day communications between partners
  • effective management of the projects finances
  • assuring quality of project outputs (peer review,
    through wiki?)
  • Project decisions will be taken by PMB
  • 6 partners (secretariat support provided by MDR)
  • Meets 5 times (combined with other events)
  • Quality of project outputs
  • Peer review e.g. through wiki
  • WP leaders have high level of responsibility for
    results

13
Workplan overview
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com