Title: Assessment Centres and Simulations Reference Checking
1Assessment Centres and SimulationsReference
Checking
- Selection Tools and Techniques
- Part 2
2Outline
- Assessment Centres and Simulations
- Other Tools and Techniques
- Psychometric Testing
- Realistic Job Preview
- Reference Checking
3Assessment Centres
4The Recruitment Process
5Accuracy of Selection Techniques
(Robertson Smith, 2001)
6Frequency of the Use of Selection Methods in
Australia
(Dessler et al., 1999)
7Work Samples
- Ask applicant to complete a job activity,
behavioral or verbal, under structured testing
conditions. - Direct evidence of ability or skill.
- If well constructed are representative of job
tasks, equipment, etc - Not using verbal information to make inferences
(so you minimize impact of faking good and poor
verbal fluency). - So why doesnt everyone use them if they are so
good? - Are limited in the validity if they are not based
on good job analysis and if they are not
representative of job tasks (same for ACs) - Some do assume there is some knowledge, skills
and abilities to perform the job
(Gatewood and Feild, 1998)
8Simulations (AC)
- Exercises are designed so that participants have
several opportunities to demonstrate each of the
patterns of behaviour being evaluated - Assessors are trained and share their evaluations
- A group of simulations, work samples, interviews
and psych tests Assessment Centre
(Gatewood and Feild, 1998)
9(Gatewood and Feild, 1998 p. 606)
10(No Transcript)
11Developing Performance Tests
- Perform a job analysis
- Identify the tasks that are to be tested
- Develop the testing procedures
- consider time required, difficulty, resources
available, how you will score it, is the task
representative of the job - Score the test results
- set standards and rules
- Train judges
(Gatewood and Feild, 1998)
12Types of abilities to be developed in Training
Assessors
- Understanding the behavioural dimensions
- Observing the behaviour of participants
- Categorising participant behaviour as to
appropriate dimensions - Judging the quality of participant behaviour
- Determining the rating of participants on each
behavioural dimension across the exercises - Determining the overall evaluation of
participants across all behavioural dimensions - selection decisions are most accurate when
behavioural consistency is the major
characteristic of the selection program
(Wernimont and Campbell, 1968 cited in Gatewood
Field, 1998 p. 589)
(Gatewood and Feild, 1998)
13- Strengths
- demonstrated validity of these measures
- often are good at having low adverse impact
(especially non-verbal performance tests like
motor tests and ACs) - face validity for applicants
- can serve as realistic job previews
- AC results (when kept secret) have shown
predictive validity for career and managerial
success (promotions job perf) - managers used as assessors develop their
competence aswell
- Weaknesses
- cost to develop and run ACs can be prohibitive
- some studies have found verbal and paper pencil
intelligence tests have been just as predictive
of managerial performance as ACs (Tziner Dolan,
1982) - construct validity has not been there for ACs
- Convergent correlations between e.g. interview,
case study, intray are low .05-.15 are they not
being assessed reliable or are each behaviors
manifested differently in different exercises? - Lack of Discriminant Validity
- High correlations between behaviors on the same
exercise - They appear valid at predicting job performance
and career movement but we dont know why - self-fulfilling prophesy? probably not
(Gatewood and Feild, 1998)
14Video
15Questions?
16Other Selection Tools and Techniques
17Options are
- Application
- CV
- Application Form
- Biodata
- Psychological Testing
- Work samples
- Simulations (a group Assessment Centre)
- Interview
- Realistic Job Preview
- Reference Checking
Still to Cover
18Psychological Testing
- Ability
- mental cognitive abilities of applicant
- physical muscular strength, cardiovascular
endurance, movement quality - mechanical ability
- clerical ability
- Personality
- refers to the unique organisation of
characteristics that define the individual
(includes thoughts, feelings and behaviours) - identify job tasks and then identify traits that
are linked to the tasks - Measurement Methods
- Self report Questionnaires Neo PI-R, California
Personality Inventory, MBTI - Projective
- Interest Inventories test interest, still have
to assess capability to actually do it
(Gatewood and Feild, 1998)
19Examples of Cognitive Ability Tests
- Example of verbal test questions
- The relationship between WORD and SENTENCE is
best expressed similarly by which of the
following pairs of words - engine and car
- bible and book
- cell and organism
- sonnet and text
- stem and flower
- Examples of numerical test questions
- What is the following approximately equal to
5/93/45/7?
Examples of items in abstract and spatial
format which of the following completes the
series above? a b c
20Examples of Mechanical Ability
(Dessler et al., 1999 p. 273)
21Examples of Personality Test Items
- I tend to be reserved and keep my problems to
myself. - a. True
- b. ?
- c. False
- I believe I am self-disciplined
- Strongly agree
- Agree
- Neutral
- Disagree
- Strongly disagree
22- Strengths
- interesting
- user-friendly
- relate back to in-depth theories of personality
(content validity) - predictive validity has improved since 1991 and
the proliferation of Five Factor Models
- Weaknesses
- self-report - response distortion
- Ones et al., 1995 showed faking can increase
scores by nearly 1/2 SD - underestimate situational factors that can impact
on behaviour - criterion related validity can be less than other
tools - Barrick and Mount (1991) r0.24
(Gatewood and Feild, 1998)
23Examples of Interest Inventories
- For each group of 3 activities indicate your
choice for the most preferred activity and the
least preferred - Visit a museum of science
- Visit an advertising agency
- Visit a factory in which typewriters are made
- For the list of occupations,
- Mark (Y) if it interests or appeals
- Mark (N) if you dislike or find disinteresting
- Leave blank if you are undecided
- 1. Criminologist
- 2. Private Investigation
- 3. Restaurant Worker
- 4. Detective
- 5. Photoengraver
- 6. Truck Gardener
24- Strengths
- interesting
- user-friendly
- can relate back to career
- Are different ones for different age groups (e.g.
school leavers, employees) - Useful for predicting membership of an occupation
(so good for career guidance) not for predicting
success within it
- Weaknesses
- Often used inappropriately especially in
selection where there is little evidence - Often not used in concert with ability/aptitude
information so the career advice is limited
25Criteria for a good test
- Clear instructions for administration, scoring
and interpretation - Economy time, cost, resources
- Technical criteria
- Reliability
- Validity (including generalisability)
- Norms and standardisation
26Practical Value of Psych Tests
- Testee
- dishonest or uninformed answers to PQ
- anxiety
- practice effects for cognitive ability tests
- Informed consent
- Right to feedback
- Right to privacy and confidentiality
- Tester
- cost
- lack of norms to compare to
- culture bias - EEO
- lack of professionals to administer tests
- lack of professionals to interpret
- predictive validity
Issues to consider in practical setting
27Sources of Information about Tests
- Test manuals
- Test catalogues
- Reference volumes
- Mental Measurements Yearbook
- Tests in Print
- http//www.unl.edu/buros/
- APA Guide
- Finding Information about Psychological Tests
(1995) - Journal Articles
- About Tests
- Trends in testing and assessment
- Online Databases
- PsychINFO
- Educational Testing Service
- http//www.ets.org
- Suppliers
- ACER (Australian Council for Educational
Research) - The Psychological Corporation
- SHL (Saville and Holdsworth Limited)
- Psychological Assessments Australia
28Best-Practice guidelines to follow when you
choose and use psychometric tests
- Applications
- What is known of the role?
- Match test to job description
- Have tests been used successfully before?
- Norms - appropriate?
- Resources required
- Accessibility of results
- What other procedures will be used?
- Data protection
- When/How will the integration of results take
place? By who? - Who is responsible for feedback? What will be
provided?
29Realistic Job Preview
- Provision of positive and negative aspects of the
job aim is to portray the job realistically - RJP provides another method for self-selection
- job applicants remaining should have realistic
expectations of job demands and characteristics - Dugoni and Ilgen (1981)
- They lower expectations, increasing job
satisfaction - Enhance ability to cope with unpleasant job
circumstances - Perceive greater openness and honesty with a
company that candidly reveals to them what their
job is like - Booklet, video, on-site visit
(Muchinsky, 1997)
30Reference Checking
- How
- In person, Mail / Email, telephone, letters of
reference - Why use them
- Verify information provided
- To predict job success
- Uncover background information that may not have
been provided earlier or identified by the
selection techniques used - Often serves more as a basis for negative
selection - Issues
- Duty of care to prepare accurate references
- Defamation and discrimination
(Gatewood and Feild, 1998)
31Reference Checking - Checklist
- Obtain permission (preferably in writing) you can
contact them, at least at end of interview - Require applicants to give complete references
(previous employers and personal if relevant) - When contacting referees, ask questions dealing
with job-related issues - Do not ask for information from referees that
cannot legally be asked on an application - Train reference takers on how to solicit and
record reference information - Record and file responses (including refusals)
- Conduct criminal checks where relevant (child
care worker, armaguard, etc) - Conduct other checks are required (I.e. divers
license)
(Gatewood and Feild, 1998)
32Questions?
33Exercise