CAPACITY BUILDING IN GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

CAPACITY BUILDING IN GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT

Description:

To some it is synonymous with workshops and training, to senior managers ... This lead to capacity building at policy level focus on bureaucracy/technocracy ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:334
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: rao48
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: CAPACITY BUILDING IN GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT


1
CAPACITY BUILDING IN GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT
  • Dr. P. S. Rao
  • Prof. Rajeshwar Mishra

2
What Capacity and Capacity Development means?
  • This is not as straightforward as it sounds.
  • To some it is synonymous with workshops and
    training, to senior managers - organizational
    development,
  • To non-governmental organizations (NGOs) it is
    associated with empowering individuals and
    grassroots organizations
  • To international agencies and donors it is about
    national institutions, governance and economic
    management (Horton 2002).

3
  • Clarifying the meaning of capacity development
    was one of the main issues addressed at the
  • ICID/FAO workshop in Montpellier (FAO 2004).
  • This workshop followed the work of UNDP (1997)

4
defined capacity development as
  • ...the sum of efforts needed to nurture, enhance
    and utilize the skills and capabilities of people
    and institutions at all levels locally,
    nationally, regionally and internationally so
    that they can better progress towards sustainable

5
..Definition.....
  • at the basic conceptual level, building capacity
    involves empowering people and organizations to
    solve their problems, rather than attempting to
    solve problems directly.
  • When capacity development is successful, the
    result is more effective people and institutions
    better able to provide products and services on a
    sustainable basis.

6
IPTRID/FAO defines
  • capacity building as the sum of efforts to
    increase the abilities of people and institutions
    to achieve more efficient and sustainable
    agricultural water management
  • It includes the strengthening of RD, technology
    transfer, training, demonstration, monitoring and
    strategic planning capacities

7
  • Capacity development is more than a complementary
    component of interventions to improve the
    performance
  • It is an integral part of a strategy for
    sustainable and integrated water management

8
  • In addition to the training of professionals,
    technicians and farmers, it must focus on
    developing effective organizations within which
    individuals work on establishing an enabling
    institutional environment in which organizations
    and individuals can flourish

9
  • Capacity is not something that can be built
    through a series of carefully planned and
    executed activities that follow a clear and
    detailed plan or blueprint with specific
    timeframes and strict budgets

10
  • It is an organic process of growth and
    development involving experimentation and
    learning as it proceeds.
  • Therefore, many people now speak of capacity
    development rather than capacity building, to
    emphasize that it is a process rather than a
    blueprint

11
Levels ?
  • Three generic levels
  • Level I, the enabling environment, represents the
    broad national and international context. It is
    concerned with policy at the highest levels in
    government, the socio-economic conditions that
    enable or constrain and the legal framework
  • Level II, the organizational level, which refers
    to the wide range of organizations involved such
    as water user organizations, research groups,
    government extension agencies and private
    companies that share common objectives
  • Level III, the individual level, is the most
    structured and familiar part of capacity
    development and includes education and training
    of the various stakeholders, from farmers to
    local professionals

12
Process Five Strategic Phases
  • First phase - assessment to define present
    capacity within the system. It establishes the
    baseline and addresses the basic question where
    are we now?
  • Second phase - the vision of what capacity is
    required in the future and asks the question
    where do we want to go?
  • Third phase - identifies the capacity gaps and
    plans strategies and actions designed to fill
    these gaps and achieve the desired goals how do
    we get there?
  • Fourth phase - implementation phase, fulfilling
    the strategies and undertaking the planned
    capacity development activities in order to meet
    the defined objectives what actions do we take?
  • Fifth phase - monitoring and evaluation to feed
    back experiences into the planning phase how do
    we stay there?

13
  • This is not a linear process
  • - the phases are interlinked and overlap
  • they form a continuing cycle of development and
    change as needed

14
Surface Water
  • Development of Irrigation Strategies Country
    focus largely for investments
  • Participatory Irrigation Management Farmers
    focused
  • Modernization of Irrigation Systems Engineers
    focused

15
Groundwater
  • Technology transfer to developing countries to
    increase the tapping of groundwater and utilize
    IHP focus on government agencies/staff
  • Improvement of technology for drilling to
    further increase the use of groundwater
  • Research and Development joint programs between
    developed (donor) and developing countries
    focus on scientists

16
  • Most of these efforts in groundwater lead to
    exploitation of groundwater resources
  • Problems of declining groundwater levels started
    showing up
  • Solutions were proposed like Watershed
    Management, Artificial Recharge, etc.

17
  • But situation continued to be complex
  • Then there is a major shift in philosophy from
    groundwater development to groundwater management
  • This lead to capacity building at policy level
    focus on bureaucracy/technocracy

18
What was grossly missing ?
  • Focus on farmers who actually are the main
    actors (investors direct users) of groundwater
  • Then came the emphasis of micro-irrigation
    techniques largely concentrating on supply of
    equipments to farming community on huge subsidies
    from governments
  • Despite all these efforts still groundwater
    sector problems have/are increased/ing

19
How to address?
  • Approaching the problem from the other side or
    turning the table upside down was to look at
    the DEMAND SIDE management
  • Have a more comprehensive and all inclusive
    approach

20
In Surface Water
  • FAO developed MASSCOTE approach to use in
    Modernizing irrigation management
  • Mapping System and Services for Canal Operation
    Techniques (FAO, 2007)
  • FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper Series No. 63

21
In Groundwater ??
  • Probably the answer lies in
  • the experiences from
  • APFAMGS project, India

22
APFAMGS Project
  • Demystifying (Hydro(geo)logy) Science to the
    farming community
  • this is now rated as an innovative approach in
    the world
  • nominated for Kyoto Water Prize in 2006

23
APFAMGS Project
  • Having full emphasis on capacity development
    of farming community
  • Hydrological data collection
  • Data storage
  • Data analysis
  • Data use

24
  • This was logical as changes or decisions for
    different ways are to be taken at individual
    farmers level

25
APFAMGS Project
  • Focus is exclusively on Demand Side Management
  • Approaches
  • Methodology
  • Tools

26
APFAMGS Project
  • Approaching various levels
  • Farming Community (Farmer Water Schools)
  • General population (Awareness Campaigns)
  • Professionals/Technicians (Sectoral Trainings)
  • Policy influence (Study tours, workshops)
  • Sharing the experiences globally (Iike this
    workshop)

27
  • More details left for you to discover in the
    next 7 to 8 days by learning from farmers
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com