Delusions and Belief Formation: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

Delusions and Belief Formation:

Description:

From the anomalous to the psychotic. What underlies the psychosis continuum? ... Initial PCA suggested 7 factors, with clear break in scree plot after 3. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:287
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: A108
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Delusions and Belief Formation:


1
Delusions and Belief Formation
A Cognitive Neuropsychiatric Approach
Vaughan Bell1,2, Peter Halligan2, Hadyn Ellis2
1Institute of Psychiatry, Kings College London
2School of Psychology, Cardiff University
2
Outline
  • From the anomalous to the psychotic
  • What underlies the psychosis continuum?
  • Cardiff Anomalous Perceptions Scale (CAPS)
  • Link with delusions
  • Factors underlying anomalous perceptual
    experience
  • Conclusions

3
Outline
  • Conrad (1958) describes apophenia as
  • unmotivated seeing of connections
  • specific experience of an abnormal
    meaningfulness
  • There is now evidence that this tendency is
    linked to anomalous experience
  • whether it occurs in healthy individuals or
    people with severe mental illness.
  • Anomalous experience and unusual beliefs seem to
    be distributed as a continuum throughout the
    population.

4
What underlies the continuum?
  • Multiple contributory factors have been proposed,
    but are largely unidentified (Johns and van Os,
    2001).
  • We were interested in identifying some of the
    factors underlying anomalous perceptual
    experience.
  • Particularly as anomalous experience has been
    closely linked to delusion formation.

5
Anomalous Experience in Delusions
  • Various theories suggest that anomalous
    perceptual experience is necessary for delusion
    formation
  • One-stage theories (Maher, 1974 1999)
  • Two-stage theories (Ellis and Young, 1990
    Langdon and Coltheart, 2000)

6
Search for a measure
  • We wanted to research this is more detail
  • but found current psychometric scales lacking.
  • Perhaps because they are derived from the
    assumptions of clinical psychiatry.

7
Limitations of Existing Scales
  • Limited sensory range
  • Often focus on visual and auditory experiences.
  • Assumption of how experience will present
  • OLIFE When in the dark, do you often see shapes
    and forms even though theres nothing there?
  • Focus on hallucinatory experience, excluding
    changes in intensity, sensory flooding etc

8
Limitations of Existing Scales
  • Ignore sensory anomalies associated with
    temporal lobe disturbance.
  • These have been linked to every stage on the
    psychosis continuum
  • Anomalous experiences in general population
    (Persinger and Makarec, 1987)
  • People with high levels of paranormal beliefs
    (Makarec and Persinger, 1985)
  • Frank psychosis (Trimble, 1991)

9
Cardiff Anomalous Perception Scale
  • 32 item self-report scale based on reviews of the
    perceptual anomaly literature.
  • Covers a range of sensory modalities, including
    proprioception, time perception, somatosensory,
    sensory flooding, changes in intensity etc.
  • Uses PDI-inspired ratings for distress,
    intrusiveness and frequency.
  • Ask about experiences from a number of angles
    and does not assume experiences are strange or
    unusual.

10
Insight angles of CAPS
  • A sensory experience with no obvious source.
  • A sensory experience which seems strange or
    unusual.
  • A non-shared sensory experience.

11
(No Transcript)
12
(No Transcript)
13
CAPS Psychometric Properties
  • Reliability
  • Internal a 0.87
  • Test-retest 0.77 0.79
  • Convergent validity (non-clinical sample)

14
Criterion and Discriminant Validity
N 337
N 20




diff by at least p lt 0.0005 on two-tailed
t-test from nonclinical
15
Frequency Distribution
16
Anomalous Experience in Delusions
  • Various theories suggest that anomalous
    perceptual experience is necessary for delusion
    formation
  • One-stage theories (Maher, 1974 1999)
  • Two-stage theories (Ellis and Young, 1990
    Langdon and Coltheart, 2000)
  • The CAPS allows us to test this in deluded
    patients.

17
Bell et al. (in press)
N 337
N 24
N 24
N 20








Significantly different from non-clinical sample
at least p lt 0.05

Additional data from Nichola Smedley and
Emmanuelle Peters
18
Principal Components Analysis
  • Oblimin rotation on non-clinical population only.
  • Initial PCA suggested 7 factors, with clear break
    in scree plot after 3.
  • A three-factor, non-overlapping solution,
    interpreted as
  • Chemosensation (largely olfactory, gustatory)
  • Clinical psychosis (first-rank symptoms)
  • Temporal lobe related (TLE, microseizures)

19
Clinical Psychosis Factor
  • Schneiderian first-rank symptoms.
  • May reflect the threshold of pathology.
  • See Serper et al. (2005)

20
Temporal Lobe Factor
  • Gloor (1990) TLE visual phenomena, music or
    sounds (usually without clear semantic content),
    relative lack of gustatory / olfactory
    experiences, distortion of time.

21
Temporal Lobe Factor
  • Items pre-selected as relevant experiences from
    the non-clinical TL literature.

22
TL Factor Validation
  • Work by Caroline Dietrich
  • Standard linear regression, N39
  • DV TL Scale (Markarec and Persinger, 1985)
  • IVs CAPS Factors minus identical shared items.

23
TL Factor Validation
  • However, this is purely correlative and we wanted
    to look at the causative role of the temporal
    cortices in anomalous experience.
  • Used a paradigm from Brugger et al. (1993)

24
TMS Study
Detect the hidden pictures
25
Bell et al. (2007)
  • In reality, all patterns were completely random.
  • Brugger et al. (1993) found that healthy
    participants professing a belief in ESP were more
    likely to see meaningful information in visual
    noise.
  • We did the same experiment, but controlled for
    schizotypy-like experience in the 12 participants.

26
Bell et al. (2007)
  • Applied TMS to the vertex, and left and right
    lateral temporal cortices just before stimulus
    onset.
  • TMS caused no significant effect on reaction time.

27
Effect on detect responses

Sig main effect plt 0.05 Sig diff from left at
p lt 0.05
28
Role of Temporal Lobes
  • Lack of effect on RT suggests no general
    cognitive slowing or response inhibition.
  • Effect on detect responses suggest temporal
    lobe function is involved in anomalous perceptual
    experiences.
  • Provides some evidence for validation of TL CAPS
    factor
  • and therefore for multiple factors underlying
    anomalous experience continuum.

29
Conclusions
  • The CAPS is a valid, reliable scale for measuring
    anomalous perceptual experience.
  • There may be a number of factors underlying the
    psychosis continuum.
  • Temporal lobe disturbance is a likely candidate
    for one of the factors.
  • Anomalous perceptual experience, as measured but
    the CAPS, is not necessary for delusions.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com