What is left from the early psychosomatic movement - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

What is left from the early psychosomatic movement

Description:

What is left from the early psychosomatic movement – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:168
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: soellner
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: What is left from the early psychosomatic movement


1
What is left from the early psychosomatic
movement?
  • Wolfgang Söllner
  • Dept. of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy
  • General Hospital Nuremberg

2
The psychosomatic movement
  • The roots
  • The early movement
  • What is left?
  • Open questions
  • Pictures of psychosomatic researchers from
  • Kindlers Psychology of the 20th Century,
    Beltz, 1979,
  • or with personal consent.

3
The biomechanical paradigm
  • Machine-model of the body (Lhomme machine, de la
    Mettrie, 1709-1751) Each condition and process
    of the human body may (must) be explained by
    physical and chemical methods.
  • Liberation from spiritual and irrational thinking
    in medicine and biology Ist revolution in
    medicine (Foss Rothenberg 1987)
  • The fascination of the machine-model is based on
    ist capacity to provide a system of spacial order
    that allows to derive an action plan for manual
    interventions in the human body. (Uexküll 1980).

4
Consequences of the biomechanical paradigm
  • This modell allowed the development of modern
    technologies in medicine but reduced illness to
    an organ deficiency.
  • This model had to neglect the historical, social
    and psychological perspective of the patient
    (Sarasin 2001). It expelled the soul from the
    body.
  • The physician became a highly skilled mechanic
    and an interpersonal relationship with the
    patient was not regarded necessary for a
    successful treatment, any more.

5
Counter-movements I. Holistic movement in
internal medicine
  • Critique of the biomechanical paradigm
  • Social and psychological influences on the human
    body cannot be explained.
  • Machines cannot feel nor experience anything the
    patient is seen as an object.
  • Medicine is split into a soulless medicine for
    the body, and a bodyless medicine for the psyche
    (v.Uexküll)

Ludolf Krehl 1861-1937
Richard Siebeck 1883-1965
Other exponents of the holistic movement G
Jores, v. Bergmann, Christian USA Draper,
French, Putnam Other countries ........
Viktor v. Weizsäcker 1886-1957
6
Aims of the holistic movement in internal medicine
  • Recover the unity of body and soul
  • (Re-)Introduction of the subject into medicine
  • Combination of analytic-empirical science with a
    scientific approach to understand communication
    between patients and physicians.
  • V. v. Weizsäcker systematically applied
    biographical interviews in medically ill patients
    (biographic- anthropological method).
  • Taking time and history into account
  • Health is no capital that can be CONSUMED.
    Health is present only if it is constantly
    PRODUCED. If it is not produced any more the
    human being is allready sick. (V. von Weizsäcker
    1927).

7
Counter-movements II. Psychoanalytic movement in
psychiatry
  • Not all bodily processes can be explained by
    somatic and even not by cognitive methods
  • Freuds introduction of the psychic apparatus
    fit into the biomedical paradigm
  • However, instead of treating the patient he
    talked with the patient and recognized the
    importance of the doctor-patient relationship for
    treatment
  • By descibing the process of counter-transference
    he introduced the subject of the physician

8
Psychoanalysis meets anthropological medicine
  • Correspondence between Freud and von Weizsäcker
    (1932)
  • Freud I felt obliged to keep away
    psychoanalysts from such investigations of
    psychodynamic aspects of somatic diesease
    because vascular dilatation or innervation would
    have been too much a temptation for them. They
    had to learn to restrict themselves to
    psychological thinking. However, we should be
    very much obliged to the internist for such
    amplification of scientific insight.
  • Weizsäcker Psychoanalysis was created for
    psychoneuroses not for organic diseases. ..- It
    is not forseeabel which transformations of
    psychoanalysis will be necessary if it is applied
    to the medically ill.

9
Development of psychosomatic medicine in the
1950ies and 1960ies The early movement?
  • The holistic paradigm of medicine (Thure von
    Uexküll)
  • The bio-psycho-social paradigm (George L. Engel)
  • Paradigm of object relations in medicine (Michael
    Balint)

The Physician, the Patient, and his
Illness Michael Balint 1957
10
Development of PM in the 1950ies and 1960ies
Empirical research
  • F. Alexander

investigating the correlation of pychological
factors (intrapersonal conflicts) and organic
parameters in the context of social changes
I.A. Mirsky, H. Weiner
G. Engel A. Schmale
11
Psychosomatic Medicine in Germany
  • The Dührssen study (1964)
  • Reimbursement of psychotherapy by health
    insurances (1967),
  • Reception of psychosomatic medicine and
    psychotherapy in the curriculum of medical
    students (1972),
  • Specialisation Psychosomatic Medicine (1992)
  • Implementation of C-L services psychosomatic
    wards in the GH
  • The legacy of the crimes of national socialism
    The perversion of the biotechnological approach
    lead to Medicine without humanity(Alexander
    Mitscherlich)
  • Loss of empathy should be compensated.
  • Holistic, patient-centred approaches supported.

12
Models of integrated care
  • Germany and Switzerland
  • General medical wards organised according to
    psychosomatic principles (Ulm, Heidelberg, Bern)
  • experimental approach
  • Special focus on communication
  • Patient-centred organisation of ward rounds
  • Team-centred organisation of case-conferences
  • Dual education of physicians
  • Interdisciplinary co-operation
  • USA
  • Med-Psych units
  • collaborative approach (internists and
    psychiatrists)
  • Medical patients with (acute) psychiatric
    co-morbidity
  • Dual education of physicians
  • Interdisciplinary co-operation

13
What is left from the early PSM movement?
  • In medicine?
  • Advances in all medical specialties based on new
    biotechnological procedures (tissue engeneering,
    genetic biomechanics, microsurgery etc.)
  • General internal medicine vanishes
  • Family physicians reduced to disease managers
    and referees to specialists
  • Is the patient less an object? What about
    informed consent?
  • Is the physician less an object? What about
    decision-making?

In Psychiatry?
  • Neuroscience or psychiatry?

Did the biotechnological model finally succed?
14
What is left from the early PSM movement?
  • Theoretical foundation
  • Models of integrated care
  • Education of medical students, physicians and
    nurses
  • Research
  • Clinical and scientific expertise sub-/
    specialisation in some countries
  • Enthousiasm?

15
What is left? (1) Theoretical foundation
  • The synthesis of the holistic/systemic and the
    interactive/ralational theories (Uexküll
    Wesiack, Engel, Balint et al.) created a
    theoretical framework for the understanding of
    bio-psycho-social interdependencies in living
    systems.
  • It is a new paradigm including a relational model
    (relations between individuals and between
    individual and environment) besides the models of
    biotechnology and informatics.
  • As Kuhn (1973) pointed out, the change of a
    prevailing paradigm is a dialectic process
    including both
  • (a) that a new theoretical paradigm already
    exists, that means that two paradigms are
    existings simultaneously and are competing with
    each other and influencing thoughts and ideas in
    society and
  • (b) changes in society pointing into the same
    direction.

16
What is left? (2) Models of care based on the
new paradigm (focusing on communication and the
relational aspect)
  • Will they influence new integrative models?
  • Integrative bio-psycho-social assessment and
    treatment (INTERMED)?
  • Interdisciplinary units (e.g. in pain clinics,
    geriatric day hospitals)
  • Stepped-care models in ambulatory care
  • Integrative models
  • Psychosomatic wards in internal medicine
  • The bio-psycho-socially oriented family physician
  • Collaborative models
  • C-L services with a focus on LIAISON
  • Psych-Med units
  • Interdisciplinary work-groups (e.g. in oncology)

17
What is left? (3) Education of physicians and
nurses
  • Psychosocial medicine is mandatory part of the
    curriculum for med. students and nurses in many
    countries.
  • In Switzerland, communication skills training is
    mandatory for oncologists
  • In Austria and Germany, physicians of every
    specialisation can acquire a 2-year training in
    psychotherapeutic knowledge and skills (with a
    focus on the medically ill and somatisation).
  • In Germany, 8.000 physicians have completed this
    training (2.000 family doctors, 6.000
    specialists).
  • In Germany, since 2004 basic psychosomatic
    competence (30-80 hrs of seminars, communication
    skills, and supervised cases) is mandatory for
    every medical specialty.
  • 65.000/320.000 German physicians have completed
    this training already.

18
What is left? (5) Competence and sub-/ specialty
  • Psychsomatic medicine must be both
  • General basic knowledge, skills, and attitudes in
    bio-psycho-social care are needed for every
    physician
  • Special knowledge, skills, and attitudes are
    needed in the treatment of the medically ill with
    psychiatric co-morbidity
  • Specialty in Germany and Letvia
  • Subspecialty in the USA (intended in CDN, NL,
    Spain ...)
  • C-L psychiatrists are much more teachers than
    care-providers (Jim Strain, 2003)

19
What is left? (4) Research
  • Interdisciplinary research published in journals
    of different specialties
  • PSM Journals with growing impact
  • Scientific societies with regular meetings
    EACLPP, ECPR, APM, ICPM, DKPM et al.

58. Jahrestagung des Deutschen Kollegiums für
Psychosomatische Medizin (DKPM) und 15.
Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für
Psychosomatische Medizin und Ärztliche
Psychotherapie (DGPM)   Psycho-Somatik Medizin
zwischen Beziehung und Technik  21. 24. März
2007  Nürnberg/Erlangen   Nürnberg,
Strasse der Menschenrechte
20
We need a new psychosomatic movement in medicine
and, particularly, in psychiatry (Herbert
Weiner, 1989)
  • This is subversive in the dualistic system and
    prevents the physician from perceiving and
    treating the patient as an object and denying
    that own reactions as a physician influence
    treatment.
  • In this sense, both the patient and the physician
    become individual subjects and partners in the
    dyadic process of treatment.
  • C-L psychiatry and Psychosomatics may contribute
    to this development
  • if it does not succumb to the dualistic hydra
  • if it dedicates itself as an advocate of the
    subjective experience of the patient both in
    research and patient care.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com