Chapter 6: Form - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 60
About This Presentation
Title:

Chapter 6: Form

Description:

lnQ = b1 b2 ln Pown b3ln Pother. Q is coffee consumption per day ... Pother is price of tea per pound. Jump to first page. dmacpher_at_coss.fsu.edu ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:280
Avg rating:5.0/5.0
Slides: 61
Provided by: davidmac
Category:
Tags: chapter | form | pother

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Chapter 6: Form


1
Chapter 6 Form Specification
2
  • 1. Log-Linear Models

3
Functional Form
  • OLS applies to models that are linear in the
    parameters.
  • Models do not have to be linear in the variables.
  • Up to now we have dealt with models linear in the
    variables.
  • Now look models are linear in the parameters, but
    not in the variables.

4
Cobb-Douglas Production Function
  • Y AK?L?
  • Y output
  • K capital input
  • L labor input
  • This is a nonlinear relationship, but we can
    transform it
  • lnK 2 is 2lnK
  • ln(KL) is lnK lnL

5
Cobb-Douglas Production Function
  • So lnY ln A ?lnK ?lnL
  • This is linear in the parameters but nonlinear in
    the variables
  • It is linear in the logs of the variables
  • It is called a log-log, double-log or log-linear
    model.

6
Cobb-Douglas Production Function
  • Estimating equation
  • lnY b1 b2lnK b3lnL e
  • So now it is a linear model
  • linear in the transformed variables so we can use
    OLS and get BLUE.

7
Elasticity
  • The slope coefficient of a log-linear model
    measures the elasticity of Y with respect to X.

So the coefficient is an elasticity.
8
Elasticity
  • This elasticity is constant over XY
  • The slope is not constant.
  • The slope coefficient varies according to X and
    Y.
  • In linear model, the slope is constant but the
    elasticity varies.
  • To get the elasticity, multiply the slope
    coefficient by X/Y.
  • Typically we do this at the means of X and Y

9
Interpretation
  • b2 is the partial elasticity of output with
    respect to the capital input, holding labor
    constant.
  • It measures the change in output for a given
    change in capital, holding labor constant.
  • b3 is the partial elasticity of output with
    respect to the labor input, holding capital
    constant.

10
Returns to Scale
  • b2 b3 measures returns to scale
  • The response of output to a proportionate change
    in inputs.
  • If b2 b3 1 constant returns
  • Doubling inputs doubles outputs.
  • If b2 b3 lt1 decreasing returns
  • If b2 b3 gt increasing returns

11
Cobb-Douglas Example
  • 1958-72 agricultural Taiwan data
  • lnY -3.34 0.49 lnK 1.50 lnL
  • t (-1.36) (4.80) (0.54)
  • R2 .89
  • Y is GNP in millions of
  • K is real capital in millions of
  • L is millions of man days

12
Cobb-Douglas Example
  • Output elasticity of capital is 0.49
  • Holding labor constant, a 1 increase in the
    capital input leads to a 0.49 increase in
    output.
  • Output elasticity of labor is1.50
  • Holding capital constant, a 1 increase in the
    labor input leads to a 1.5 increase in output.

13
Cobb-Douglas Example
  • Increasing returns to scale since b2 b3
    1.99.
  • Intercept (-3.34) is average value of ln Y when
    lnK and lnL are zero
  • Take antilog to get Y.04 million
  • R2 means that 89 of the variation in the log of
    output is explained by the logs of labor and
    capital.

14
Linear vs Log Linear
  • Cant choose model with highest R2 since our
    dependent variable is not the same
  • Y in one and ln Y in another.
  • Variation in Y is an absolute change, whereas
    variation in log Y is a proportional change.
  • Better to choose on basis of signs of
    coefficients, elasticities and if theory makes
    sense.

15
Demand Function
  • We can model demand as a log linear model and so
    estimate the elasticity of demand
  • lnQ b1 b2 ln Pown b3ln Pother
  • Q is coffee consumption per day
  • Pown is price of coffee per pound
  • Pother is price of tea per pound

16
Demand Function Results
  • Results
  • lnQ0.78 -0.25lnPown 0.38lnPother
  • t (51.1) (-5.12) (3.25)
  • Own price elasticity is -.25.
  • Holding other things constant, if the price
    increases by 1 the quantity demanded will
    decrease by 0.25.
  • This is inelastic - less than 1 in absolute
    value.

17
Demand Function Results
  • Cross-price elasticity is .38.
  • Holding other things constant, if the price of
    tea increases by 1, the quantity of coffee
    demanded increases by 0.38
  • If cross-price elasticity is positive, they are
    substitute products.
  • If cross-price elasticity is negative, then
    complementary products.

18
Demand Function With Income
  • Housing demand model
  • ln Q 4.17 -.25 ln P .96 ln Y se
    (.11) (.017) (.026)
  • Price elasticity is -.25 (inelastic)
  • Income elasticity ( change in Q/ change in
    income) is .96

19
Demand Function With Income
  • Can test whether income elasticity is
    significantly different from 1
  • Ho b3 1
  • t0.96-1/.026 -1.54
  • Critical t value at 5 is 1.96
  • We cannot reject the hypothesis that the income
    elasticity of demand is 1.

20
  • 2. Semi-Log Models

21
Semi-Log Model
  • Use this model when we are interested in the rate
    of growth of certain variables such as GNP or
    employment.

22
Compound Interest
  • Compound interest formula
  • Yt Yo (1 r)t
  • Yo is the initial value of Y
  • Yt is the value of Y at time t
  • r is the compound rate of growth of Y

23
Compound Interest Example
  • Suppose we have 1000 and we put it in the bank
    at 5 interest. After one year it will have
    grown to 1000(1.05) 1050
  • After two years it will have grown to
    1050(1.05) 1102.5
  • This is the same as 1000(1.05)2 1000 (1.1025)
    1102.5

24
Compound Interest
  • Take natural log of compound interest formula
  • ln Yt ln Yo t ln(1 r)
  • Let B1 ln Yo
  • Let B2 ln (1 r)
  • Rewrite and add error term
  • ln Yt B1 B2 t e
  • This is a semilog model since only one variable
    is in logarithmic form.

25

26
Semi-Log Model
  • The slope coefficient measures the relative
    change in Y for a given absolute change in the
    value of the explanatory variable (t).

27
Semi-Log Model
  • Using calculus

If we multiply the relative change in Y by 100,
we get the percentage change or growth rate in Y
for an absolute change in t.
28
Log (GDP) 1969-83
  • Log(Real GDP) 6.9636 0.0269t
  • se (.0151) (.0017)
  • R2 .95
  • GDP grew at the rate of .0269 per year, or at
    2.69 percent per year.
  • Take the antilog of 6.9636 to show that at the
    beginning of 1969 the estimated real GDP was
    about 1057 billions of dollars, i.e. at t 0

29
Compound Rate of Growth
  • The slope coefficient measures the instantaneous
    rate of growth
  • How do we get r --the compound growth rate?
  • b2 ln (1 r)
  • antilog (b2) (1 r)
  • So r antilog (b2) - 1
  • So r antilog(.0269) -1
  • r 1.0273 - 1 .0273

30
Linear-Trend Model
  • Trend model regresses Y on time.
  • Yt b1 b2t et
  • This model shows whether GNP is increasing or
    decreasing over time
  • The model does not give the rate of growth.
  • If b2 gt 0, then an upward trend.
  • If b2 lt 0 , then a downward trend.

31
Linear-Trend Example
  • GNP 1040.11 34.998t
  • se (18.85) (2.07) R2 .95
  • GNP is increasing at the absolute amount of 35
    billion per year.
  • There is a statistically significant upward
    trend.
  • Growth model measures relative performance
  • Trend model measures absolute performance

32
  • 3. Lin-Log Models

33
Lin-Log Model
  • The dependent variable is linear, but the
    explanatory variable is in log form.
  • Used in situations for example where the rate of
    growth of the money supply affects GNP.

34
Lin-Log Example
  • GNP b1 b2lnM e
  • The slope coefficient is dGNP/dlnM
  • It measures the absolute change in GNP for a
    relative change in M.
  • If b2 is 2000, a unit increase in the log of the
    money supply increases GNP by 2000 billion.
  • Alternatively, a 1 increase in the money supply
    increases GNP by 2000/100 20 billion.

35
Lin-Log Example
  • In this case, we need to divide by 100 since we
    are changing the money supply change from a
    relative change to a percentage change.

36
  • 4. Functional Form
  • Summary

37
Data
  • GNP and money supply over the period 1973-87 in
    the U.S.
  • GNP in billions of dollars Y
  • Mean 2791.47
  • M2 in billions of dollars X
  • Mean 1755.67

38
Log-linear model
  • lnY 0.5531 0.9882lnX
  • How interpret?
  • The slope coefficient is dlnY/dlnX
  • i.e. relative change in Y /
    relative change in X
  • For a 1 increase in the money supply, the
    average value of GNP increases by .9882 (almost
    1)

39
Log-linear model
  • The slope coefficient is also an elasticity
  • For intercept Y antilog b1.
  • This is the average GNP when lnX 0.

40
Log-Lin Model
  • lnY 6.8616 0.00057X
  • How interpret?
  • The slope coefficient is dlnY/dX
  • i.e. relative change in Y / absolute
    change in X
  • For a billion dollars rise in the money supply,
    the log of GNP rises by .00057 per year.
  • To make a , multiply by 100 GNP rises by 0.057
    per year.

41
Log-Lin Model
  • How to convert to an elasticity?
  • The slope coefficient is

42
Lin-Log Model
  • Y -16329.0 2584.8lnX
  • How interpret?
  • The slope coefficient is dY/dlnX
  • i.e. absolute change in Y/ relative change
    in X
  • A unit increase in the log of the money supply
    increases GNP by 2584.8 billion dollars.
  • If money supply rises by 1, GNP rises by 26
    billion dollars.

43
Lin-Log Model
  • How to convert to an elasticity?
  • The slope coefficient is

44
Linear Model
  • Y 101.20 1.5323X
  • How interpret?
  • The slope coefficient is dY/dX
  • i.e. absolute change in Y/ absolute change in X
  • For a 1 billion increase in the money supply
    increases GNP by 1.5323 billion dollars.

45
Linear Model
  • How to convert to an elasticity?
  • The slope coefficient is dY/dX
  • Multiply this coefficient by Xbar/Ybar
  • 1.5323 (1755.67/2791.47) .9637
  • A 1 increase in the money supply leads to a
    .9637 increase in GNP

46
Monetarist Hypothesis
  • Can test the monetarist hypothesis with double
    log model
  • 1 increase in money supply leads to a 1
    increase in GNP
  • A t-test reveals that coefficient not different
    from 1.

47
Summary
  • Models are similar
  • Elasticities are similar.
  • R2 are similar
  • Can only compare same similar dependent variables
  • All t values are significant
  • Not much to choose among models.
  • Depends on issue-elasticity, growth, absolute
    change, etc.

48
  • 5. Reciprocal Model

49
Reciprocal Model
  • Y b1 b2(1/X) e
  • Model is linear in the parameters, but nonlinear
    in the variables
  • As X increases,
  • The term 1/X approaches 0
  • Y approaches the limiting value of b1.

50
Fixed Cost Example
  • Average fixed cost of production declines
    continuously as output increases
  • Fixed cost is spread over a larger and larger
    number of units and eventually becomes
    asymptotic.

51
Phillips Curve Example
  • Sometimes the Philips curve is expressed as a
    reciprocal model
  • Y b1 b2(1/X) e
  • Y rate of change of money wages (inflation)
  • X unemployment rate.

52
Phillips Curve Example
  • The curve is steeper above the natural
    unemployment rate than below.
  • Wages rise faster for a unit change in
    unemployment if the unemployment rate is below
    the natural rate of unemployment than if it is
    above.

53
Phillips Curve Example
  • Suppose we fit this model to data.
  • Using UK data 1950-66.
  • Y -1.4282 8.7243 1/X
  • se (2.068) (2.848)
  • This shows that the wage floor is -1.43
  • As the unemployment rate increases indefinitely,
    the decrease in wages will not be more than
    1.43 percent per year.

54
  • 6. Polynomial
  • Regression Models

55
Polynomial Model
  • These are models relating to cost and production
    functions
  • Ex Long run average cost and output
  • LRAC curve is a U-shaped curve.
  • Capture by a quadratic function (second degree
    polynomial)
  • LRAC b1 b2Q b3Q2

56
Polynomial Model
  • In stochastic form
  • LRAC b1 b2Q b3Q2 e
  • We can estimate LRAC by OLS.
  • Q and Q2 are correlated
  • They are not linearly correlated so do not
    violate the assumptions of CLRM.

57
S L Example
  • Use data for 86 SLs for 1975.
  • Output Q is measured as total assets
  • LRAC is measured as average operating expenses as
    of total assets
  • Results
  • LRAC 2.38 -.615Q .054 Q2

58
S L Example
  • This estimated function is U-shaped.
  • Its point of minimum average cost if reached when
    total assets reach 569 billions
  • dLAC/dQ -.615 2(.054) Q
  • Set equal to 0
  • -.615 .108 Q 0
  • Q .615/.108 569

59
S L Example
  • This is used by regulators to decide whether
    mergers are in the public interest and also by
    managers to decide on efficient scale.
  • It turns out that most SLs had substantially
    less than 74 in assets, so mergers or growth ok.

60
  • END OF CHAPTER 6
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com