Education: conclude 425 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Education: conclude 425

Description:

Many of the effects of privilege on resources, facilities, networks, quality of ... Nevertheless, much labeling in schools is probably pernicious. Implications ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:54
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: Peter9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Education: conclude 425


1
Education conclude (4/25)
  • Self-fulfilling prophecies
  • Leave no child behind
  • Markets and choices

2
Expectancy Effects
Yes, master
  • Students get labeled and sorted.
  • Many of the effects of privilege on resources,
    facilities, networks, quality of teachers,
    scholarships, etc. are well-understood.
  • Rosenthals Pygmalion in the Classroom (1968)
    demonstrated a more pervasive and subtle set of
    effects.
  • Teachers were given an expectation that randomly
    selected students would bloom.
  • The students bloomed.
  • Why?

3
Why do students conform to teacher expectations?
  • The finding has been replicated in many
    countries, at many ages, in many subjects.
  • Teachers who expect a student to succeed
    unintentionally and powerfully reinforce and
    encourage that student.
  • Thus, a great deal of the apparatus of tests,
    student records and tracking in American schools
    serves as a self-fulfilling prophecy

4
Feedbacks
  • All education involves cumulations e.g.

Identity, motivation, skills, life plans
How well a student performs
What the teacher expects and percieves
Biases, opportunities, stereotypes, tracking,
attention etc. affect what he or she does
5
Why isnt the expectation disconfirmed?
  • It is not simple bias.
  • Bias is created, but
  • the students really did do better on objective
    tests.
  • A teacher who believes that lower class students,
    African American Students, Hispanic students, or
    Mulsim students are unmotivated, unintelligent,
    undisciplined, etc. will find his or her
    expectations objectively confirmed.
  • Such a teacher will be very resistant to the idea
    that he or she had any role in the behavior.

6
Expectancy effects with rats
  • Rosenthal showed that even the minimal contact of
    an experimentor with a rat can produce powerful
    expectancy effects.
  • He hung the signs maze bright and maze dull
    on two cages of rats.
  • The maze bright rats, though they were no
    different, were liked better, handled more, and
    their measured intelligence increased.

7
Expectancy effects in psychological experiments.
  • When an experimenter expects subject to do
    something
  • Even if the experimentor is reading identical
    instructions,
  • And neither wishes nor intends to convey
    expectations
  • (e.g. to choose a certain kind of picture as more
    successful)
  • His or her expectancy is conveyed in many ways,
  • and subjects conform to it.

8
Double-blind experiments
  • One of the main implications of Rosenthals work
    is that psychological experiments must be
    double-blind
  • Not only is the subject not told the hypothesis,
  • But the experimenter must conceal from the person
    administering the experiment, whether the subject
    is a control.

9
Is it possible or desirable to eliminate teacher
expectancies?
  • In a school classroom, teachers have
    expectations.
  • Moreover, no-one believes that students would
    learn more from a TV screen
  • Some kinds of subtle communication are intrinsic
    to the teaching/learning process
  • Nevertheless, much labeling in schools is
    probably pernicious.

10
Implications
  • Merely changing expectations had a more powerful
    effect than immense investment in school plant.
  • There is great conflict over who can teach, and
    considerable increase in teacher academic
    proficiency requirements.
  • But may communities and teachers maintain that it
    is the teacher attitudes and biases that are most
    important.
  • Such biases are not a disaster if different
    teachers have different, counteracting biases
  • They are if the biases conform to institutional
    sexism, racism, etc. and are reinforced by other
    structures.

11
Is it possible for a school system to expect all
students to succeed
  • The tables at the end of ch. 17 (pp. 582-3) show
    that US students, on average, learn less,
    particularly less math and science, than many
    countries that spend less than ¼ or 1/10 as much
    on education,
  • Such as Taiwan, South Korea, and Switzerland.
  • Could our society expect everyone to succeed?
    Why or why not? How?

12
Change in the variation and change in the mean
  • We shall see that in the Asian school systems
    there is a reduction of the variation from school
    to school and from student to student over the
    educational process,
  • and there is a sharper increase in the mean
    performance.
  • What is the relation between these?

13
The Learning Gap
  • By Stevenson and Stigler
  • Analyzes the structure and assumptions of Asian
    education (Japan, Taiwan, Korea, China)
  • It is possible to assume that every child can
    learn algebra or calculus,
  • just as anyone can learn French or Latin,
  • and for the class to not go forward until every
    student has done so.

14
School and Society
  • In some ways, the school is never separate from
    the society, and the relative success of Chinese
    education and relative failure of East LA is
    evident and easy to explain.
  • The educational system of the middle class and
    the upper class in the US is still at least
    comparable to any in the world, but the education
    of the 1/5 to 1/3 of US children growing up in
    poverty is not.
  • Why?

15
Possible explanations
  • Culture and student/family attitudes
  • Failure of family and community
  • Segregation and concentrated poverty
  • Overloaded schools (e.g. Shootings)
  • Commitment (length of school year)
  • But what is the contribution of school policy to
    each of these?
  • Is the reality that we leave no student behind?

16
What is the effect of raising the floor on the
mean and the ceiling?
  • In the United States, the procedures of Asian
    education would be viewed as holding back the
    quick students for the slow ones.
  • But it is an empirical question what would be the
    effect of a less tracked and sorted system.
  • And the evidence is that it increases the score
    of the best students by raising the floor

17
(No Transcript)
18
Culture
  • Culture always reinforces social structures and
    vice versa.
  • In Japan, the parents of a student who goes to
    school 6 days a week, 45 weeks a year, doing
    well, will insist on math tutoring. Why?
  • That student needs the calculus to do well on the
    exam to get into university to get into the big
    firms. The US student does not.

19
Competition and Freedom
  • Is there greater freedom of choice in the US?
    For whom?
  • It is possible for someone outside of East LA to
    say, it is Ritas own fault but it feels more
    like a trap to her.
  • And if she leaves, what happens to those left
    behind?

20
21st century Issues
  • The main political and social issues of the 20th
    century involved the appropriate mixture in
    economy, health, education, housing and other
    social areas.
  • The end of the 20th century 1989-2000, saw a
    large increase in unfettered capitalist
    arrangements.
  • The balance between social and private provision
    is one of the key issues of the 21st c.

21
Markets and Choices
  • The notion that markets promote competition and
    freedom is central to proposals in education,
    health, etc.
  • But some institutional schemes purchase the
    increased choices of some are at the cost of
    decreased choices for others.

22
Vouchers
  • Allow Rita to take her funding with her to a
    private (often religious) school
  • Legal and constitutional issues
  • Public support of religious education
  • The erosion of the common school effect
  • Dismantling of the public school system or
    ghettoizing it.

23
Some arguments
  • PRO
  • It is cheap
  • It promotes competition
  • It gives poor students middle class advantages
  • CON
  • It increases segregation
  • It takes resources away from the neediest schools
  • Inequality and giving up would increase.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com