Title: Budd,%20Jesse%20Shera
1Budd, Jesse Shera
2Jesse Shera, Sociologist of Knowledge?
- Jesse Hauk Shera (1903-1982)
- librarian / scholar / theoretician /philosopher /
educator - An early pioneer in the electronic organization
of information and library catalog - automation, Jesse Hauk Shera was born in Oxford,
Ohio, on December 8, 1903, the son of - a dairyman. He grew up in Oxford, graduating from
McGuffey High School in 1921. - While in high school, Shera was a member of the
debating team as well as a cheerleader. - Initially interested in a career in chemistry, a
visual impairment, poor eyesight, prevented - him from pursuing this goal. Instead, he remained
in Oxford and graduated with honors - with an A. B. in English from Miami University in
1925. He continued his educational - career at Yale University, graduating in 1927
with a master's degree in English. As - employment for English professors was scarce in
the pre-depression era, Shera was unable - to procure a teaching position and returned to
Ohio, where he joined the library staff at - Miami University. (From http//www2.msstate.edu/
jeg98/JShera.htm)
3Social Epistemology / Sociology of Knowledge
- knowledge justified true belief
- (social) epistemology the limits of knowing /
justification of belief examination of the
social dynamics of knowledge claims - sociology of knowledge primary focus is on the
social dynamics (including the creation and
maintenance of culture, the construction of
rules, tacit or otherwise, of action and
behavior, and the governance of group belief)
that influence human action (Budd, p. 425)
4Jesse Shera, Sociologist of Knowledge?
- LIS epistemological discipline (a body of new
knowledge about knowledge itself - Engagement with the social processes of knowledge
creation, distribution, and use - recorded knowledge graphic record (Shera) and
beyond
5Jesse Shera, Sociologist of Knowledge?
- underlying assumptions of SE (Shera Egan 1952
Budd 2003, p. - 426)
- DIRECT IMMEDIATE EXPERIENCE knowing based on
immediate environment or personal experience with
the environment - REMOTE AND VICARIOUS EXPERIENCE knowing
through instruments of communication developed by
society to assume knowing about the total
environment that is beyond personal experience
the symbols that enable such translation to
personal experience - SOCIAL KNOWING Coordinating the differing
knowledge of many individuals the society may
transcend the knowledge of the individual. - KNOWLEDGE AS INTEGRATED ACTION Social action,
reflecting integrated intellectual action,
transcends individual action.
6Geertz, Common Sense
7Common Sense as a Cultural System
- common sense
- Discuss Zande vs. Evans-Pritchards common
sense (what is the underlying system?). - Why is it useful to look at categories that cross
cultures (e.g. hermaphroditism)? - Give own examples of common sense systems
- that have shifted historically
- that demonstrate cultural relativity
8Common Sense as a Cultural System
- common sense
- How is common sense knowledge system built?
- What are transmission systems for common sense
knowledge systems? - Give examples of how common sense can regulate
activities of the society (e.g. economic,
agricultural, etc.). What are the limitations?
9Common Sense as a Cultural System
- common sense
- Give examples of how anomalies in the system of
commonsense thought can be explained away?
(Zande witchcraft) - Discuss each of the stylistic features
(quasi-qualities) of common sense - naturalness
- practicalness
- thinness
- immethodicality
- accessibleness
10Common Sense as a Cultural System
- traditional occupation of anthropologists to find
out about systematized knowledge in different
cultures - systematized knowledge found in the elementary
forms of religious life among the Australian
aborigines, native botanical systems in Africa,
spontaneous sense of design on the Northwest
Coast, concrete science in the Amazon - common sense ignored form of knowledge (not
systematized)
11Common Sense as a Cultural System
- Geertz seeks to understand roughcast shapes of
colloquial culture vs. worked-up shapes of
studied culture - Geertz claims that given the given, not
everything else follows -- common sense is not a
human universal
12Common Sense as a Cultural System
- common sense
- immediate deliverance of experience
- realm of the given and undeniable,
matter-of-fact, self-evident realities - just life with world as its authority
- if it rains it is common sense to step into the
house - what everyone with common sense knows
13Common Sense as a Cultural System
- common sense
- not a tightly integrated system but based on
conviction by those who have it on its validity
dimension of culture not usually conceived as
forming an ordered realm - frame for thought and a species of it
- as totalizing as any other frame of thought
- it is just an illusion to give truth to things as
they are
14Common Sense as a Cultural System
- common sense
- epistemology of common sense is external reality
contrasted to - religion -- revelation
- science -- method
- ideology -- moral passion
- common sense (problem of everyday experience,
how we construe the world we biographically
inhabit) - interpretation of experience constructed
cultural system what leads to what - system of thought based on pre-suppositions
15Common Sense as a Cultural System
- So What? skepticism, justification (regress
argument) - Formal statement of the Regress argument
- Assuming that knowledge is justified true belief
- (1) Suppose that P is some true belief. For it to
count as knowledge, it must be justified. - (2) That justification will be another statement
lets call it P' so P' justifies P. - (3) But if P' is to be a satisfactory
justification for P, then we must know that P' is
the case. - (4) But in order to know that P' is the case, it
must itself be justified. - (5) That justification will be another statement
lets call it P" so P" justifies P'. - (6) We are now back in the same position as in
(3), but in this case with P" in place of P'. - This presents us with three possibilities the
sequence never finishes or some statements do - not need justification or the chain of reasoning
loops back on itself. Therefore, we accept - some foundation and coherence for the world,
based in common sense.
16Common Sense as a Cultural System
- common sense justification
- common sense method why not assume what nobody
ever doubts? - provides solution to the regress argument
- do not need criteria in order to judge whether
proposition is true or not - can take some justifications for granted
according to common sense (acceptable
assumptions) - there is no infinite regress or circle of
reasoning because the buck stops with the
principles of common sense
17Common Sense as a Cultural System
- common sense / everyday experience
- contains categories organized by association
- transmitted body of knowledge
- natural symbols
- basis for formalized knowledge information
infrastructures - Why skepticism about common sense? moral order
creates meaning, justifies social order,
determines what is legitimate knowledge and what
is not
18Osborne, Locating Identity
19Locating Identity
- Explain the places of memory concept. Give
examples of such 'places' that you are familiar
with. How is memory organized around space and
time? - Why is memory related to identity of groups? Why
is it important for groups to have 'memory'
organized a certain way? What are the channels of
transmission for group memory (say, in a family,
an institution, a nation).
20Locating Identity
- Give examples of mnemonic devices (landscapes,
verse, objects, etc.). Which ones among them
could serve as collective markers, and which ones
organize personal memories. How do they differ? - Discuss how memory can be individual, collective,
and hegemonic.
21Locating Identity
- Why does the author say that systems of
remembering and forgetting are socially
constructed. How is 'forgetting' part of the
process of remembering?
22Locating Identity
- What, in your opinion, is the significance of
memory research for managing memory institutions
(libraries, archives, museums)? What do they have
in common as connection to building collective
identity? What are the pitfalls for these
institutions?