Title: Antifouling SystemsPort State Control Inspection
1Anti-fouling SystemsPort State Control
Inspection
- Huang Tianbing
- Marine Biosafety Section
- Bangkok, June 2009
Views expressed in this presentation are those of
the author and should not be construed as
necessarily reflecting the views of IMO or its
Secretariat.
2AFSPort State Control Inspection
- ARTICLE 11 - Inspections and detections of
violations - May be carried out in any Port, shipyard or
offshore terminal to determine compliance with
the Convention
3 AFSPort State Control Inspection
- ARTICLE 11 (continue)
- A brief sampling is included in the process of
initial inspection. - The time required to process the result of such
sampling shall not be used as a basis for
preventing the movement and departure of the ship
4AFSPort State Control Inspection
- ARTICLE 13 - Undue delay or detention of ships
- All possible efforts shall be made to avoid a
ship being unduly detained or delayed - When being unduly detained or delayed, it shall
be entitled to compensation for any loss or
damage suffered
5AFSPort State Control Inspection
-
- Guidelines for inspection of anti-fouling
systems on ships, adopted by resolution
MEPC.105(49) -
- Guidelines for brief sampling of anti-fouling
systems on ships, adopted by resolution
MEPC.104(49). -
6AFSPort State Control Inspection
-
- Reference should also be made to
- - Procedures for port State control
(resolution A.787(19), as amended by resolution
A.882(21)) - - Procedure developed by regional PSC MoUs
-
-
7AFSPort State Control Inspection
- MEPC.105 (49)
- Initial inspection
- Detailed inspection
- Violation detection
8AFSPort State Control Inspection
- Tokyo MoU
- Initial inspection
- Detailed inspection
- Violation detection
9AFSPort State Control Inspection
- Initial inspection
- - ships of Parties to the AFS Convention
- IAFS Certificate or
- Declaration on anti-fouling system
- - ships of Non-Parties
- Statement of compliance or
- other documentation
-
10AFSPort State Control Inspection
- PSCO should verify
- - the certificate is properly completed
- - initial survey matches the drydock period
- - only one tick-box in the IAFS is marked
- - Record of anti-fouling system is up-to date
11AFSPort State Control Inspection
- More Detailed inspection
-
- clear grounds warrant a detailed inspection
- - the ship is from a flag of a non-party to the
convention and there is no AFS documentation - - the ship is from a flag of a party to the
convention but there is no valid IAFS
Certificate - - the painting date shown on the IAFS
Certificate does not match the drydock period
of the ship - - the ships hull shows excessive patches of
different paints and - - the IAFS Certificate is not properly
completed.
12AFSPort State Control Inspection
- If the IAFS Certificate is not properly
completed the following questions may be
pertinent - - When was the ships anti-fouling system last
applied? - - If the anti-fouling system is controlled under
Annex 1 to AFS 2001 and was removed, what was
the name of the facility and date of the work
performed? - - If the anti-fouling system is controlled under
Annex 1 of AFS 2001 and has been covered by a
sealer coat, what was the name of the facility
and date applied? - .
13AFSPort State Control Inspection
- If the IAFS Certificate is not properly
completed the following questions may be
pertinent (continue) - - What is the name of the anti-fouling/sealer
products and the manufacturer or distributor
for the existing anti- fouling system? And - - If the current anti-fouling system was changed
from the previous system, what was the type of
anti-fouling system and name of the previous
manufacturer or distributor?
14AFSPort State Control Inspection
- More Detailed inspection
- - sampling and analysis may be included,
subject to practical feasibility or to
constraints relating to the safety of
persons, the ship or the port - - sample may be taken by contracted specialist
company or trained PSCO -
-
15AFSPort State Control Inspection
- More Detailed inspection
- sampling methodology
- The guidelines to the Convention allow that
any other scientifically recognized method of
sampling and analysis of AFS controlled by
the Convention than those described in the
appendix to the Guidelines may be used
(subject to the satisfaction of the
Administration or the port State).
16AFSPort State Control Inspection
- Sample analysis
- - It is to the discretion of the Authority to
choose which analysis methods are used - - a portable X-ray fluorescence analyzer or any
other scientifically justified method
allowing on-site analyses could be considered
best practice -
- - only make conclusions on compliance based on
the second stage (organotin) analysis of the
sample
17AFSDetention
- Detention could be appropriate in any of
following cases - .1 certificate is invalid or missing
- .2 ship admits it does not comply with
Convention - .3 sampling proves that it is non-compliant
18- Thank you for your attention