Title: FeedbackFeed forward in Engineering Education
1Feedback/Feed forward in Engineering Education
- Jane Pritchard - Learning and Teaching Advisor
- Roger Penlington
- Alan Webb
- jane_at_engsc.ac.uk
2Outline of the day
- Welcome
- Staff and student perceptions of what makes for
'good ' or 'effective' feedback? - Good practice in feedback on formal reports,
assignments and dissertations - Easing the academics burden of giving rapid
return feedback - What is the Engineering Subject Centre
- Summary
3- One piece of good feedback you have received
- One piece of negative feedback you have received
4Questions about feedback
5Terminology
- Formative Assessment
- Assessment for providing feedback to learners in
order to help them learn and feedback to teachers
for deciding how a students learning should be
taken forward. - Summative Assessment
- Assessment which provides overall evidence of the
achievement of students and of what they know,
understand and can do, by assigning a value to
what the student achieves.
6Feedback AND Feed forward
- Feedback
- comments on a completed work that the student
cannot repeat. The comments are useful to inform
the student about strengths of their work and
areas for further development in future
assessments. - Feed forward
- mostly what has been called feedback where a
student has an opportunity to respond to the
comments, e.g. a formative hand in
constructive.
7VIDEO MOMENT
8Outline of SENLEF report
- Briefing Paper on formative assessment and
feedback and self-regulation of learning - Conceptual model
- 7 principles of good feedback practice
- Simple strategies
- 50 case studies of good practice
- Publication available on HEA website.
9How to conceptualise formative assessment
feedback?
- process that build up the students own skills
and capacity to self-evaluate and self-correct.
throughout u/g degree
10- SENLEF PROJECT - Student Enhanced Learning
through Effective Feedback - http//www.heacademy.ac.uk/ourwork/learning/assess
ment/senlef
11Sadlers argument
- For feedback to benefit learning students must
know - 1. What good performance is (goals, criteria)
- 2. How current performance relates to good
performance (compare) - 3. How to act to close the gap
-
- Implies that students must already possess some
of the same evaluative skills as the teacher
(Sadler, 1983).
12Key message
- Formative assessment and feedback by others can
only have an impact on learning when it
influences a students own self-regulatory
processes - whereby learners set goals (adapted
from Boud, 1995).
13The Seven Feedback Principles
- How can assessment and feedback help to build a
learners capacity to self-regulate? - Self-regulated learning is an active constructive
process whereby learners set goals for their
learning and monitor, regulate, and control their
cognition, motivation, and behaviour, guided and
constrained by their goals and the contextual
features of the environment. (Pintrich and Zusho,
p64)
141. Helps clarify what good performance is (goals,
standards, criteria)
- Difficult to use feedback to self-regulate if
students dont understand goals - Research
- Mismatches between tutors and students
conceptions of goals/criteria (Hounsell, 1984
Norton, 1990 Channock, 2000) - Strategies
- Exemplars of performance (Orsmond et al, 2002)
- Mock marking of assessments
- Engage students in criteria - classroom/tutorials
152. Facilitates development of self-assessment in
learning
- Key process in self-regulation is self-assessment
- Research
- Training in self-assessment improves exam
performance (McDonald and Boud, 2003) - SA integrated with external feedback improves
performance. (Taras, 2003) - Strategies
- Peer assessment, supporting reflection etc.
- Requesting feedback they would like
163. Delivers high quality information to students
about their learning
- External feedback should help students trouble
shoot and correct their own performance - Research
- Shows feedback might be delayed, not relevant,
overwhelming in quantity, focused on low level
goals (Sadler, 1983) - Strategies
- Offering corrective advice in terms of criteria
- Reader response theory (Lunsford, 1997) (3
points praise sandwich PIE)
174. Encourages teacher and peer dialogue around
learning.
- Students dont understand the feedback given by
tutors ( essay is not sufficiently analytical)
Channock, 2000 Hyland, 2000 - Research
- Ideal feedback two-way dialogical
teacher-student (Laurillard, 2003) not enough
teachers - Strategies
- Classroom technologies (Nicol Boyle, 2003)
- Peer processes (Gibbs, 1999)
- Bring examples of good feedback and why it was
useful
185. Encourages positive motivational beliefs and
self-esteem.
- Feedback has positive or negative effects
depending on type, delivery etc. - Research
- Feeback as marks versus comments (Butler,
19871988 Dweck, 2000). - Strategies
- More low stakes assessments
- Marks only after feedback used
196. Provides opportunities to close the gap
between current and desired performance.
- How do you ensure that students actually use the
feedback information to improve. - Research
- Little opportunity to resubmit (Boud, 2000)
- Strategies
- Feedback during the task (process)
- Action points and resubmissions.
207. Provides information to teachers that can be
used to shape teaching.
- Being sensitive to learner needs
- Research
- Teachers dont necessarily adapt teaching to
students needs (Ramsden, 1997) - Strategies
- Angelo Cross (1990) one minute paper
- Classroom Technology (Boyle Nicol, 2003.
- Student-requested feedback
21- Helps clarify what good performance is (goals,
standards, criteria) - Facilitates development of self-assessment in
learning - Delivers high quality information to students
about their learning - Encourages teacher and peer dialogue around
learning. - Encourages positive motivational beliefs and
self-esteem. - Provides opportunities to close the gap between
current and desired performance. - Provides information to teachers that can be
used to shape teaching.