Title: ICAO ANNEX 14 HELIPORT DESIGN WORKSHOP
1ICAO ANNEX 14HELIPORT DESIGN WORKSHOP
Dr John Leverton HAI/AHS Heliport Design AC Focal
Point IFHA Representative to ICAO Aerodrome Panel
2 3ANGLE/SLOPE RELATIONSHIP
Angle ? - tan ? x/y Slope - Ratio -
(y/x)1 Slope - Percentage (x/y) x 100
4ANGLE/SLOPE RELATIONSHIP
US/FAA
ICAO
Angle ? - tan ? x/y Slope - Ratio -
(y/x)1 Slope - Percentage (x/y) x 100
5ANGLE/SLOPE RELATIONSHIP
US/FAA
Angle ? - tan ? x/y Slope - Ratio -
(y/x)1 Slope - Percentage (x/y) x 100
6ANGLE/SLOPE RELATIONSHIP
US/FAA
Angle ? - tan ? x/y Slope - Ratio -
(y/x)1 Slope - Percentage (x/y) x 100
ICAO
7AIRSPACE TERMINOLOGY
FAA AC-2B APROACH/DEPARTURE
SURFACE
FAA AC-2B 21 TRANSITIONAL SRFACE
ICAO ANNEX 14 APPROACH SURFACE TAKE-OFF SURFACE
Note Text of AC-2A (1994) refers to APPROACH/
TAKEOFF PATHS
8FAA AIRSPACE
- .
- NEW AC 150/5390-2B
- General Aviation Approach/Departure Surfaces
should be free of penetrationsany penetrations
of the Transitional Surface should be considered
hazard unless FAA study determines it is not a
hazard to air navigation. - i.e. penetrations of Transitional Surfaces ONLY
allowed if they are not a hazard. - NOTE FAA ALLOWS USE OF A LATERIAL
EXTENSION OF THE 81 SURFACE (DEFINED IN AC-2B)
FOR PPR and HOSPITAL HELIPORTS THISIS NOT
ADDRESSED IN THIS PRESNTATION. -
9GENERAL AVIATION HELIPORTS
APROACH/DEPARTURE SURFACE - 81
AC-2B Approach/Departure NO Penetrations Transiti
onal Penetrations if NOT an Hazard
TRANSITIONAL SURFACE 21
10GENERAL AVIATION HELIPORTS
AC-2B Approach/Departure Surface NO Penetrations
APROACHEPARTURE SURFACE - 81
AC-2B Transitional Surface Penetrations if NOT
an Hazard
TRANSITIONAL SURFACE 21
11AIRPSACE FAA AC 150/5390-2B
- SAME AIRSPACE REQUIREMENTS FOR ALL VMC/VFR
OPERATIONS. - TWO (2) APPROACH/DEPARTURE FLIGHT PATHS.
- PROTECTION ZONE UNDER APPROACH/ DEPARTURE
FLIGHT PATH. - AIRSPACE STARTS FROM FATO.
ICAO STARTS FROM SAFETY AREA - ONE (1) APPROACH/DEPARTURE FLIGHT PATH ALLOWED
FOR PPR AND HOSPITAL HELIPORTS. - OPTIONAL FOR PPR / NOT REQUIRED FOR HOSPITAL
HELIPORTS.
12AIRSPACE ICAO ANNEX 14
- DIFFERENT REQUIREMENTS FOR
- PERFORMANCE CLASS
- APPROACH AND TAKE-OFF (DEPARTURE)
- DAY/NIGHT
- TWO (2) APPROACH AND TWO (2) DEPATURE FLIGHT
PATHS REQUIRED. - TAKE-OFF AND APPROACH SURFACES NO PENTRATIONS
ALLOWED. - TRANSITIONAL SURFACES NOT REQUIRED FOR VMC/VFR
i.e. ONLY required for IMC/IFR -NO PENTRATIONS
ALLOWED. - AIRSPACE STARTS FROM SAFETY AREA
-
13ANNEX 14/FAA AC DIFFERENCES
- ICAO SLOPE/LENGTH OF SLOPE CHOSEN TO ENABLE
HELICOPTER TO DECELERATE ON LANDING, ACCELERATE
AND CLIMB TO TAKEOFF (i.e. TAKES INTO ACCOUNT
ACTUAL PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS) AND AVOID
PENETRATION OF H-V DIAGRAM - FAA SINGLE SLOPE FOR APPROACH AND DEPARTURE
81 FOR VFR - FAAH-V IMPLICATIONS NOT REQUIRED TO BE
CONSIDERED FOR DEVELOPING VFR AIRPSACE RECENT
SOME FAA HAVE STATED THEY CAN NOT SUPPORT THIS
WHEN DISCUSSING ANNEX 14. - ICAO REQUIRES DIFFERENCES MAXIMUM WIDTH FOR DAY
AND NIGHT BASED ON DESIGN HELICOPTER 7 RD
DAY/10 RD NIGHT - FAA MAXIMUM WIDTH 500 FT (152 m)
14ANNEX 14/FAA AC DIFFERENCES
- FAA AC-2B
- SAME SURFACES FOR VFR APPROACH/DEPARTURE.
- SURFACES FOR NON-PRECISION IFR APPROACHES/DEPARTUR
E. AND PRECISION IFR SEPARATE NON-PRECISION GPS
P-in-S APPROACH AVAIABLE AND TAKEOFF SURFACES
BEING DEVELOPED. - FAA AC STATES VFR APPROACH/DEPARTURE PATHS MAY
CURVE IN ORDER TO AVOID OBJECTS OR NOISE SENSTIVE
AREAS. NO CURVED APPROACH/DEPARTURE GUIDANCE. - ICAO ANNEX 14
- NON-INSTRUMENT INSTRUMENT NON-PRECISION (IFR)
AND - PRECISION (IFR) TAKE-OFF AND APPROACH
SURFACES. - CRITERIA FOR CURVED NON-INSTRUMENT (VFR) TAKE-OFF
AND APPROACH SURFACES. MINIMUM RADIUS 270 m (
886 ft)
15ANNEX 14/FAA AC DIFFERRENCEAIRSPACE (VFR/VMC)
- FAA
- 81 BASED ON TYPICAL OPERATIONAL PROFILES,
EXPERIENCE, SAFETY RECORD - TRANSITION SURFACES REQUIRED.
- SAME SURFACE FOR APPROACH AND DEPARTURE
- SURFACES START FROM EDGE OF FATO
- STILL UNDER DISCUSSION FOR PPR AND HOSPITAL
HELIPORTS - ICAO
- 3 SEGMENT WITH INITIAL TWO SLOPES SHALLOWER
THAN 81 BASED ON H-V CHART AND MAX TOW FLIGHT
PROFILES - SURFACES START FROM EDGE OF SAFETY ZONE
- TRANSITION SURFACE NOT REQUIRED FOR
NON-INSTRUMENT (VMC/VFR) HELIPORTS - DIFFERENT SURFACES FOR APPROACH AND DEPARTURE
- SOME DIFFERENCE IN SURFACES FOR CLASS 1, 2 AND
3 - SEPARATE REQUIREMENTS FOR VFR DAY AND VFR NIGHT
16AIRSPACE ISSUES
- FAA AC-2B
- DOWNWIND (TAIL WIND) OPERATIONS SHOULD BE
AVOIDED - CROSS WIND OPERATION SHOULD BE KEPT TO A
MINIMUM - TWO APPROACHES SEPARATED BY ANGLE DEPENDENT ON
PREVAILNG WIND DIRECTIONS (OR IF NOT AVAIABLE
PREFERED FLIGHT PATH ON WIND DIRECTION AND OTHER
AT LEAST 135 DEGREES). - ICAO ANNEX 14
- PC 2 AND PC 3 APPROACH PATH TO BE SELECTED TO
PERMIT SAFE FORCED LANDING OR OEI LANDINGS
(JUDGEMENT REQUIRED) - MISSED APPROACH MUST BE CONSIDERED
17ICAO AIRSPACE
- TRANSITIONAL SURFACE
- REQUIRED FOR IMC (IFR)
- NOT REQUIRED FOR VISUAL (VFR) OPERATIONS
- CURVED FLIGHT PATH ALLOWED MINIMUM HEIGHT FOR
TURN CLASS 2 3 30 m (100 ft) CLASS 1- 15 m
(50 ft) - AIRSPACE COMPLEX THREE (3) SEPARATE SEGMENTS
FOR EACH OPERATION CONSIDERED - AIRSPACE REQUIREMENTS FOR
- NON-INSTRUMENT (VISUAL)
- INSTRUMENT (PRECISION) APPROACH 3º AND 6
- STRAIGHT TAKEOFF
- DIFFERENT REQUIREMENTS FOR CLASS 1, 2 AND 3
18ICAO Annex 14 AIRSPACE
APPROACH SURFACE VMC/VFR
19ICAO Annex 14 AIRSPACE
Helicopter Performance Classification
20ICAO Annex 14 AIRSPACE
21APPROACH/DEPARTURE AIRSPACE ELEVATION
156.671/8.5
FAA - 8112.57.1
ICAO Annex 14 Approach
Distance - ft
0
2000
4000
0
Distance -m
245
434
1146
500 ft / 152 m
8 12.51/4.6
12.581/7.1
22APPROACH/DEPARTURE AIRSPACE ELEVATION
FAA Approach/Departure 81 12.5 / 7.1
23AIRSPACE DIFFERENCES
24 APPROACH/DEPARTURE AIRSPACE PLAN
25Example Airspace Approach
26Example Airspace Approach
27APPLICATION OF TRANSITIONAL SURFACES
HDSG AIRSPACE SUBGROUP PROPOSAL
28CURVED FLIGHT PATHS
AC 150/5390-1A Nov 1969 Shallow Bank Angle
radius 700ft (213 m) AC 150/5390-1B Aug
1977 AC 150/5390-2A 2B NO
Guidance ICAO Annex 14 Minimum Radius 270 m
(886 ft) Straight section
PC 1 305 m (1000 ft)
PC 2 3 370 m(1212 ft) Also Minimum
Height Requirements
29ICAO Annex 14 OBSTACLE LIMITATION SURFACES
30AIRSPACE STUDY
- HDSG/1 AGREED CURRENT ANNEX 14 AIRSPACE TOO
COMPLEX - HDSG/1 FORMED AIRSPACE SUBGROUP HEADED BY
CANADA - HDSG/1 AGREED THAT FOR PC1 VALUE CORRESPONDING TO
OEI TAKEOFF AND OBSTACLE CLEARANCE CRITERIA
SHOULD BE USED. - HDSG/1 PC2/PC3 NOT MUCH SUPPORT FOR 81
(12.5) USED IN US. FAA STRESSED NEED TO FIND
WAY TO ALLOW THIS SINCE US WOULD MOST LIKELY NOT
CHANGED ITS POSITION. IT WAS SUGGESTED IT COULD
BE USED FOR PC3
31AIRSPACE STUDY
- AIRSPACE SUBGROUP PROPOSALS ISSUES EARLIER THIS
MONTH (January 2005) - PROPOSALS
- - Single fight path allowed (but not
recommended) - - Three (3) segment replaced with two (2)
segment - - Single (combined) Approach and Take-off
Surface - - 12.5 (81) first segment slope for PC3 if
two (2) flight paths - - 16 (6.251) first segment for PC2 if
two (2) flight paths - - Slope set by performance and obstacle
clearance requirements for PC1 - - 21 Transitional Surfaces required for single
flight paths and if second flight path is at an
angle of 135 degrees or less. - - Addition information on criteria for curved
flight paths - For 245 m (803 ft) starting at the edge of
the safety area second segment 16(6.251) for
803 m ( 2634 ft) total length 1075 m (3527 ft). -
- NOT yet fully examined hence only limited
overview presented
32CURVED FLIGHT PATHS
HDWG AIRSPACE SUBGRUOP PROPOSAL Transport Canada
Heliport Design Standards Exception from
Paragraphs 302.03(1)(a), 302.03(2)(b) and
302.07(1)(a)(I) and (ii) of the Canadian Aviation
Regulations.
33CURVED FLIGHT PATHS
HDWG AIRSPACE SUBGRUOP PROPOSAL Transport Canada
Heliport Design Standards
34THANK YOU
Dr John W. Leverton, Leverton Associates,
Inc Tel 703-425-4236 / Email levai_at_verizon.net