Measuring the Effectiveness of Training - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

Measuring the Effectiveness of Training

Description:

From Running Training Like a Business, Trolley & van Adelsberg, page 4. 6 ... Trolley. Running Training like a Business. Book. 2000. Phillips & Stone ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:700
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: sre83
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Measuring the Effectiveness of Training


1
Measuring the Effectiveness of Training
ASQ Section 105 February 21, 2008 Presented
By Susan L. Reynolds CQE, CSSBB, CQA, CMQ/OE, CIA
2
What we will cover
  • Why training measurement systems may need to be
    changed.
  • Can it work? Says who?
  • Overview of best practices with an example of one
    set of tools techniques.
  • Next steps - where to go from this brief
    introduction.
  • References/sources of the information being
    presented.

Disclaimer
Attempting to cram a weeklong course into 1520
minutes could possibly mean that we have to skip
a detail or two
3
Historically training often is
  • Measured from the perspective of the participants
    (Happy Sheets)
  • Not required to demonstrate an effective transfer
    of learning to the work setting the impact on
    key measures
  • The sole responsibility of line-management or of
    the HR/training department
  • Costs accounted for in ways that contribute to
    indifference from management (true costs are
    often unknown)
  • Managed by staff who themselves believe that the
    business effects of training cannot be measured
    credibly

4
Is Credible Measurement Feasible? Selected
quotes from the references
  • The organizational impact of training can be
    measured with credibility and reasonable
    allocation of resources (How to Measure Training
    Results)
  • When organizations ask for my help in evaluating
    training, they usually want to know whether the
    training was efficient. This question can be
    quite simply answered by assessing the changes
    achieved during the training. (Evaluating
    Training Effectiveness)
  • This Six Sigma based model will help
    organizations forever answer the question, What
    value am I getting from my investment in
    training? (Developing and Measuring Training the
    6 Sigma Way)

5
Productivity Range by Job Complexity
From Running Training Like a Business, Trolley
van Adelsberg, page 4
6
Generally Accepted Best Practices Common
themes in each of the resources investigated
  • The overall training program must have goals
    aligned with the organizations business goals
  • Individual training modules must have goals and
    objects aligned with those of the overall program
  • Training goals must meet the stakeholders needs
  • Baseline or control data is needed to create the
    most valuable measurements
  • The difficulty of measuring increases with the
    increased value of the measure

7
Decide where youre going first
Would you tell me, please, which way I ought to
go from here? Alice speaks to Cheshire Cat
That depends a good deal on where you want to
get to,' said the Cat.
I don't much care where--' said Alice.
Then it doesn't matter which way you go,' said
the Cat.
8
Tools techniques from one reference source
  • The next several slides give an overview of the
    methods covered in How to Measure Training
    Results, by Phillips Stone. Though there are
    common themes, each reference book listed at the
    end, presents a unique approach.
  • Organizations have unique business needs and
    start from different points. This particular
    book and the specific techniques covered here,
    may not be the best choice for your organization.
    However they should give you an idea of where
    your own measurement system stands and some idea
    of where to start.

9
5 levels of evaluation
from How to Measure Training Results, Phillips
Stone
10
5 levels of evaluation - Level 1
  • Participants' reactions to the training, and its
    design and delivery are measured.
  • Most training programs are evaluated at Level 1,
    usually by means of generic questionnaires or
    surveys.
  • The value of Level-1 evaluation may be improved
    by asking participants how they plan to apply
    what they have learned
  • This level of evaluation is important as a
    measure of participant satisfaction, but it does
    not measure participants ability to implement
    facts, skills, etc on the job.

from How to Measure Training Results, Phillips
Stone
11
5 levels of evaluation - Level 2
  • Generally is a skills or knowledge test done
    during or directly after the training.
  • Focuses on what the participants learned during
    the training.
  • Helpful in determining whether participants have
    absorbed new knowledge and skills and know how to
    use them as a result of the training.
  • This level of evaluation is important as a
    measure of knowledge and skills in a classroom
    environment, but it does not measure participants
    long term ability to implement facts, skills, etc
    on the job.

from How to Measure Training Results, Phillips
Stone
12
5 levels of evaluation - Level 3
  • A variety of follow-up methods are used to
    determine whether participants apply the training
    to their work settings.
  • Frequency and effectiveness of their use of new
    skills are important measures at Level 3.
  • Although this level evaluation is important in
    determining the application of the training, it
    still does not guarantee that there will be a
    positive impact on the organization.

from How to Measure Training Results, Phillips
Stone
13
5 levels of evaluation - Level 4
  • Business Impact, measurement focuses on the
    actual business results achieved as a consequence
    of applying the knowledge and skills from the
    training.
  • Typical Level-4 measures are output, quality,
    cost, time, and customer satisfaction. .
  • However, although the training may produce a
    positive measurable business impact, there is
    still the question of whether the training may
    have cost too much, compared to what it achieved.

from How to Measure Training Results, Phillips
Stone
14
5 levels of evaluation - Level 5
  • Return on Investment - this measurement compares
    the monetary value of the benefits resulting from
    the training with the actual costs of the
    training program.
  • ROI usually is presented as a percentage or
    benefit-cost ratio.
  • At this level the stakeholders can get an
    understanding of the value of what they are
    paying for.

from How to Measure Training Results, Phillips
Stone
15
5 levels of evaluation (slide repeated)
from How to Measure Training Results, Phillips
Stone
16
Where are you starting from?
  • Define the who your training customers are
  • Distinguish participants from end customers
    whos paying who benefits vs. whos being
    trained
  • Evaluate what level you are currently using to
    measure training
  • Dont try to jump from level 1 to level 5
    immediately.
  • While implementing a higher level begin
    preparations for the next level (i.e. baseline
    measurements, and any other prerequisites)

17
The ROI Model Process from How to Measure
Training Results, Phillips Stone
18
Overview of the ROI Model and Process
  • The ROI Process has been used in hundreds of
    business and government organizations to
    demonstrate the impact and return on investment
    of training programs, human resource programs,
    major change initiatives, and performance-improvem
    ent programs.
  • The four features valued most by clients are
    simplicity, cost-effectiveness, flexibility, and
    robust feedback useful for informing senior
    management about performance on the job and
    impact on business measures.

from How to Measure Training Results, Phillips
Stone
19
Develop Objectives of Training ROI step 1
  • This initial step develops an understanding of
    the scope of the program and the business
    measures that it should influence. If the program
    is an existing program being evaluated, the
    objectives and content of the program are
    reviewed to guide the development of evaluation
    strategies.
  • If it is a new program, needs assessment data are
    used to develop objectives at levels 1 through 4.
    The purpose of the evaluation study is then
    determined.

from How to Measure Training Results, Phillips
Stone
20
Develop Evaluation Plans and Baseline Data - ROI
step 2
  • The Data Collection Plan is developed and
    measurements (4 levels), methods of data
    collection, sources of data, and timing of
    collection are identified to collect baseline and
    follow-up data.
  • The ROI Analysis Plan is developed and the
    methods of isolation, conversion of data to
    monetary values, cost categories, communication
    targets, and other steps are determined.
  • The nature of the training intervention and the
    rollout schedule will dictate the timing of the
    data gathering. The purpose of the study and
    appropriate evaluation strategies are verified
    before beginning the process.

from How to Measure Training Results, Phillips
Stone
21
Collect Data During Training ROI step 3
  • The training is implemented, and data is
    collected at level 1 and level 2.
  • The evaluator may not always be involved in
    collecting data at these two levels, but should
    require evidence from others (especially at level
    2) that provides sufficient data to satisfy the
    needs of the study at the level in question.

from How to Measure Training Results, Phillips
Stone
22
Collect Follow-up Data After Training ROI step
4
  • Applying the methods and timing from the Data
    Collection Plan described earlier, follow- up
    data is collected.
  • Depending on the program selected for evaluation
    as described in the Data Collection Plan, data
    collection may utilize questionnaires,
    interviews, data from company records, or other
    methods as appropriate.
  • The cost of the training (7) is tabulated per
    the guidelines on the ROI Analysis Plan and will
    be used later in the ROI calculation.

from How to Measure Training Results, Phillips
Stone
23
Isolate the Effects of the Training ROI step 5
  • One or more strategies are used to isolate the
    effects of the training. Examples are use of a
    control group arrangement, trend line analysis,
    estimates by participants, estimates by managers,
    and estimates by in-house experts.
  • If a control group arrangement is feasible,
    performance data will be collected on the trained
    group and on another group with similar
    characteristics that does not receive the
    training. The pre- and post-training performance
    of the two groups will be compared to determine
    the extent of improvement influenced by the
    training.
  • At least one isolation strategy will be used to
    determine the extent of influence the training
    intervention has on key business measures

from How to Measure Training Results, Phillips
Stone
24
Convert Data to Monetary Values ROI step 6 - 9
  • Certain business impact data influenced by the
    training will be converted to monetary values to
    allow comparison of training benefits to costs to
    determine the return on investment (calculate the
    ROI, 8).
  • Fully loaded costs (7) must be captured in order
    to complete the calculation. If some data cannot
    be converted to a monetary value, that data will
    be reported either as business impact results
    (e.g., improvements in customer or employee
    satisfaction) or as intangible benefits when the
    business impact cannot be expressed as a hard
    value ( 9).

from How to Measure Training Results, Phillips
Stone
25
Generate an Impact Study ROI step 10
  • At the conclusion of the study, two reports are
    usually developed for presentation.
  • One report is brief and intended for presentation
    to executive management. The other report is more
    detailed and is suitable for other stakeholders.

from How to Measure Training Results, Phillips
Stone
26
Closing the Corrective Action Training Loop
Problems with corrective action responses that
give a human error cause indicate that
Training is the corrective action which will
correct the error, include
  • The response may not get to a true root cause
    (topic for another session) the training is at
    best a containment action.
  • Without solid Level 3 measurement methods in
    place, the only way for you learn whether the
    training worked or not is by watching for another
    instance of the error
  • Lack of goals objectives for training that are
    tied back to business results means the
    training may be viewed as non value added and
    done on the cheap. It may be limited to specific
    individuals or work centers when the cause
    actually involves more of the work force.

27
References
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com