Anterolateral Thigh Free Flap - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 85
About This Presentation
Title:

Anterolateral Thigh Free Flap

Description:

Anterolateral Thigh Free Flap – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:2490
Avg rating:5.0/5.0
Slides: 86
Provided by: haup
Category:
Tags: ace | anterolateral | drf | dub | dubb | flap | free | fud | haab | kaeb | liaw | lou1 | mu | nu | nu1 | ssoj | thigh | wej | whet

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Anterolateral Thigh Free Flap


1
Anterolateral Thigh Free Flap
  • Garrett Hauptman M.D.
  • Vicente A. Resto, M.D., Ph.D.
  • University of Texas Medical Branch
  • Department of Otolaryngology
  • Grand Rounds Presentation
  • April 2, 2008

2
Head Neck Reconstruction Goals
  • 1 Wound healing
  • 2 Function
  • 3 Cosmesis

3
Reconstructive Ladder
  • Secondary intention
  • Primary closure
  • Skin grafting
  • Local flaps
  • Distant pedicled flaps
  • Free tissue transfer

4
Overview
  • Anatomy
  • Flap Design
  • Literature Review
  • Comparisons
  • Complications
  • Applications

5
Anatomy of the Leg
6
Muscular Anatomy
7
Vascular Anatomy
8
Sensory Innervation
9
History and Emergence
10
Nomenclature Clarification
  • ALT
  • 1984 - Song
  • Anterolateral thigh skin
  • Lateral circumflex femoral ? Descending branch
  • No repositioning
  • Lateral Thigh
  • 1983 - Baek
  • Posterolateral thigh skin
  • Profunda femoris ? 3rd cutaneous perforator
  • Repositioning or flexed internally rotated hip
    with flexed knee

11
Emergence of the ALT
  • Very popular reconstructive flap in Asia
  • Limited reports of use in Western countries,
    particularly United States
  • Possible reasons
  • Vascular anatomy variations
  • Difficult dissection
  • Thick thigh fat

12
Creatures of Habitus
13
Workhorse Attributes
  • No repositioning
  • Remote from defect
  • Long pedicle

14
Flap Design
15
Tale of the Tape
  • Maximum size
  • From horizontal line at greater trochanter to
    horizontal line 3cm above patella
  • 25cm X 40cm
  • Vascular pedicle
  • Length 16cm
  • Diameter
  • Artery 2.1mm
  • Vein 2.6mm
  • Donor site defect can be closed primarily if
    width lt 8cm

16
Vascular Pedicle
  • Lateral circumflex femoral a. ? Descending branch
    ? Perforators
  • Descending branch
  • Runs superior to inferior in intramuscular space
    between rectus femoris and vastus lateralis
  • Terminates in vastus lateralis just above knee
  • Perforators 2 types
  • Septocutaneous run between rectus femoris and
    vastus lateralis and traverse the fascia lata to
    skin
  • Musculocutaneous traverse vastus lateralis and
    deep fascia to skin
  • Details
  • 8 16cm
  • 2 venae commitantes

17
Landmarks
  • Line drawn between anterior superior iliac spine
    (ASIS) and lateral border of patella
  • Approximates septum between rectus femoris and
    vastus lateralis
  • Skin perforators mapped by Doppler
  • Accuracy decreases as BMI increases

Yu P. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006
18
Perforator Mapping
70 pts.
Kimata Y. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998
19
Perforator Mapping
72 pts.
Yu P. Head Neck 2004
20
Perforator Mapping
  • Most consistently present perforator midway
    between ASIS and superolateral patella
  • Another perforator may be found more distally and
    more proximally
  • All within 5cm apart from each other
  • Perforators labeled A, B, and C
  • A most proximal
  • C most distal
  • Perforators range between 0 and 3 per patient
    with 2.04 being the mean per patient
  • 0 2
  • 1 22
  • 2 54
  • 3 22

Yu P. Head Neck 2004
21
Cutaneous Perforator Origin
  • 3 Different Origins
  • Type I descending branch of lateral circumflex
    femoris artery (90)
  • Type II single cutaneous perforator originates
    from the transverse branch of lateral circumflex
    femoris artery and travels longitudinally in
    vastus lateralis (4)
  • Type III single perforator from profundus
    femoris artery pierces through rectus femoris (4)

Yu P. Head Neck 2004
22
Cutaneous Perforator Origin
Yu P. Head Neck 2004
23
Type I
Right Thigh
Yu P. Head Neck 2004
24
Type II
Left Thigh
Yu P. Head Neck 2004
25
Type III
Right Thigh
Yu P. Head Neck 2004
26
Perforator Classification
  • Type 1 (50) extends perpendicularly to
    subdermal plexus
  • Type 2 (35) branch in adipose and extends to
    subdermal plexus
  • Type 3 (15) extend along deep fascia and
    gradually into adipose

Kimura N et al. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001
27
Flap Harvesting
  • Initial skin incision on medial flap aspect
  • Lateral dissection
  • Suprafascial technique for thin flap carried
    laterally until perforators identified
  • Fasciocutaneous flap (subfascial) involves
    incision through deep fascia with lateral
    dissection until perforators identified

28
Flap Harvesting
29
Flap Harvesting
30
Flap Harvesting
  • Skin incisions completed upon perforator
    identification
  • Retrograde dissection of pedicle to descending
    branch
  • May involve dissection of vastus lateralis- cuff
    of muscle may be left to protect perforating
    branches
  • Lateral femoral cutaneous nerve of thigh may be
    used for sensation
  • Thinning performed in deep fat layer to avoid
    pedicle injury

31
Sensory Innervation
  • Lateral femoral cutaneous nerve
  • Direct branch of lumbar plexus (L2-L3)
  • Enters thigh deep to lateral aspect of inguinal
    ligament near anterior superior iliac spine
  • Follows path of deep circumflex iliac artery and
    vein
  • Lies along line connecting ASIS to lateral
    patella
  • Travels in deep subcutaneous layer immediately
    superficial to deep fascia

32
Sensory Innervation
Yu P. Head Neck 2004
33
Flap Composition
  • Subcutaneous
  • Fasciocutaneous
  • Myocutaneous
  • Adipofascial

34
Modifications
35
Two Independent Flaps
Chou EK. Plast Recostr Surg 2006
36
Use of Tissue Expander to Allow Primary Closure
Hallock G. Ann Plast Surg 2004
37
The Survey Says
38
RFs Big Brother
  • 34 consecutive cases
  • 2 flaps with partial necrosis
  • No flap failures
  • No significant donor morbidity
  • Skin
  • Large 40cm X 25cm
  • Moderately thick
  • Uniform
  • Sensate potential
  • Multipaddle skin potential

Lueg E. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004
39
Largest Case Series
  • 672 ALTs in 660 pts.
  • 87 musculocutaneous perforators 13
    septocutaneous perforators
  • 439 flaps cutaneous/fasciocutaneous based on
    musculocutaneous perforators
  • Flap failure (15)
  • Total 1.8
  • Partial 2.5

Wei F. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002
40
Septocutaneous vs- Musculocutaneous
41
Septocutaneous vs- Musculocutaneous
42
ALT Versus
43
ALT vs- RF for Intraoral Defects
  • No functional difference with speech or swallow
    in
  • 20 pts. 10 ALT, 10 RF
  • RF
  • Potential tendon exposure
  • Sacrifice dominant distal forearm blood supply
  • Usually close with STSG
  • Potential dysfunction
  • Hand stiffness
  • Pain
  • Anesthesia/parasthesia
  • ALT
  • Increased learning curve
  • Primary closure
  • Morbidity related to vastus lateralis damage
  • Potential dysfunction
  • Quadriceps
  • Pain
  • Disto-lateral thigh anesthesia/parasthesia

Farace F. J Plast Reconstr Aesth Surg 2007
44
Advanced Tongue Cancer Reconstruction Functional
Outcome
Chien C. J Cancer Surg 2006
45
Advanced Tongue Cancer Reconstruction Functional
Outcome
Chien C. J Cancer Surg 2006
46
Reconstruction Trends Pharyngectomy
  • 153 pharyngectomy pts.
  • 85 partial
  • 68 circumferential

Clark J. Laryngoscope 2006
47
Reconstruction Trends Pharyngectomy
Clark J. Laryngoscope 2006
48
Pharyngoesophageal Reconstruction ALT vs-
Jejunal Flaps
  • 57 circumferential reconstructions
  • 26 ALT 31 FJT
  • Results
  • Better function
  • Quicker recovery
  • More cost-effective
  • Similar complication rates

Yu P. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006
49
Complications ALT vs- FJT
Yu P. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006
50
TEP Speech ALT vs- FJT
  • ALT 89 FJT 22

Yu P. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006
51
Swallowing ALT vs- FJT
Yu P. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006
52
Hospital Course ALT vs- FJT
Yu P. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006
53
New Sensation
54
Implications of Sensory Innervation
Yu P. Head Neck 2004
55
Implications of Sensory Innervation
  • Superior sensory recovery in all testing
    modalities
  • 2 point discrimination
  • Monofilament testing
  • Pain
  • Temperature
  • Improves swallow function
  • Improves patient satisfaction
  • Post-op XRT may delay sensory recovery

Yu P. Head Neck 2004
56
Complications
57
ALT Failure Etiology
  • Inadvertent perforator division at fascial plane
  • Inadvertent perforator injury during
    intramuscular dissection
  • Pedicle twisting during inset
  • Vessel size mismatch

Celik N. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002
58
ALT Failure Rates
59
Donor-Site Morbidity
  • 37 pts. with free or pedicled ALT
  • 32 primary closure 5 STSG closure
  • Results
  • Primary closure
  • All normal ADLs
  • 87.5 appearance satisfaction
  • 1 pt. with ? ROM
  • STSG
  • 3/5 with ? ROM
  • Less appearance satisfaction
  • Sensation deficit in 87.5 of entire group

Kimata Y. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000
60
Donor-Site MorbidityALT vs- RF
  • 37 pts. 18 ALT, 19 RF
  • Telephone questionnaire
  • Results
  • Bothered by cold
  • RF 26 -vs- ALT 0
  • Shape difference bothersome
  • RF 32 -vs- ALT 11

Novak C. Microsurgery 2007
61
Complications
  • Necrosis of lower limb- case report
  • Obstructed superficial femoral artery by
    angiography
  • Lateral circumflex femoral artery supplied
    critical collaterals
  • Importance of checking popliteal pulsations
  • Absence necessitates angiography

Hage J. Ann Plast Surg 2004
62
Post-Operative Complications
23 patients
Mureau M. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005
63
Objective Functional and Aesthetic Follow-up
Recipient Site
14 patients
Mureau M. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005
64
Objective Functional and Aesthetic Follow-up
Donor Site
14 patients
Mureau M. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005
65
Post-Op Scar
66
Flap Smorgasbord
67
AVM
  • Pre-operative selective embolization
  • Resection ALT reconstruction 6 months
    post-embolization

Koshima I. Ann Plast Surg 2003
68
Buccal Mucosa Defects
  • Mouth opening and oral intake preserved

Chuang HC. Otolaryngol Head neck Surg 2007
69
Buccal Through-and-Through
70
Lower Lip
Yildirim S. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006
71
Pharyngoesophageal Reconstruction
Genden E. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005
72
Lateral Skull Base Defects
Malata C. Ann Plast Surg 2006
73
Tongue and FOM
Agostini V. Brit J Plast Surg 2003
74
Anterior Skull Base
75
Scalp
Calikapan G. Microsurgery 2006
76
Scalp
77
Combined with Fibula Free Flap
78
How About Us?
79
Were Doing em
80
Anterior Skull Base
81
Total Glossectomy-Total Laryngectomy
82
Total Glossectomy Total Laryngopharyngectomy
83
Questions
84
Bibliography
  • Hallock GG. The preexpanded anterolateral thigh
    free flap. Ann Plast Surg. 2004 Aug53(2)170-3.
  • Lueg EA. The anterolateral thigh flap radial
    forearm's "big brother" for extensive soft tissue
    head and neck defects. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck
    Surg. 2004 Jul130(7)813-8.
  • Lin DT, Coppit GL, Burkey BB. Use of the
    anterolateral thigh flap for reconstruction of
    the head and neck. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head
    Neck Surg. 2004 Aug12(4)300-4. Review.
  • Rodríguez-Vegas JM, Trillo Bohajar E, Ruiz Alonso
    E, Casado Pérez C. Refining the anterolateral
    thigh free flap to prevent orocervical fistula in
    head and neck reconstruction. Plast Reconstr
    Surg. 2004 Jul114(1)174-7. No abstract
    available.
  • Hage JJ, Woerdeman LA. Lower limb necrosis after
    use of the anterolateral thigh free flap is
    preoperative angiography indicated? Ann Plast
    Surg. 2004 Mar52(3)315-8.
  • Yu P. Reinnervated anterolateral thigh flap for
    tongue reconstruction. Head Neck. 2004
    Dec26(12)1038-44.
  • Yu P. Characteristics of the anterolateral thigh
    flap in a Western population and its application
    in head and neck reconstruction. Head Neck. 2004
    Sep26(9)759-69.
  • Mäkitie AA, Beasley NJ, Neligan PC, Lipa J,
    Gullane PJ, Gilbert RW. Head and neck
    reconstruction with anterolateral thigh flap.
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003
    Nov129(5)547-55.
  • Hsieh CH, Yang CC, Kuo YR, Tsai HH, Jeng SF. Free
    anterolateral thigh adipofascial perforator flap.
    Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003 Sep 15112(4)976-82.
  • Agostini V, Dini M, Mori A, Franchi A, Agostini
    T. Adipofascial anterolateral thigh free flap for
    tongue repair. Br J Plast Surg. 2003
    Sep56(6)614-8.
  • Koshima I, Nanba Y, Tsutsui T, Takahashi Y,
    Watanabe A, Ishii R. Free perforator flap for the
    treatment of defects after resection of huge
    arteriovenous malformations in the head and neck
    regions. Ann Plast Surg. 2003 Aug51(2)194-9.
  • Ross GL, Dunn R, Kirkpatrick J, Koshy CE,
    Alkureishi LW, Bennett N, Soutar DS, Camilleri
    IG. To thin or not to thin the use of the
    anterolateral thigh flap in the reconstruction of
    intraoral defects. Br J Plast Surg. 2003
    Jun56(4)409-13.
  • Baek CH, Kim BS, Son YI, Ha B. Pharyngoesophageal
    reconstruction with lateral thigh free flap. Head
    Neck. 2002 Nov24(11)975-81.
  • Lutz BS. Aesthetic and functional advantages of
    the anterolateral thigh flap in reconstruction of
    tumor-related scalp defects. Microsurgery.
    200222(6)258-64.
  • Wei FC, Jain V, Celik N, Chen HC, Chuang DC, Lin
    CH. Have we found an ideal soft-tissue flap? An
    experience with 672 anterolateral thigh flaps.
    Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002 Jun109(7)2219-26
    discussion 2227-30.
  • Celik N, Wei FC, Lin CH, Cheng MH, Chen HC, Jeng
    SF, Kuo YR. Technique and strategy in
    anterolateral thigh perforator flap surgery,
    based on an analysis of 15 complete and partial
    failures in 439 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002
    Jun109(7)2211-6 discussion 2217-8.
  • Rajacic N, Gang RK, Krishnan J, Lal Bang R. Thin
    anterolateral thigh free flap. Ann Plast Surg.
    2002 Mar48(3)252-7.
  • Cipriani R, Contedini F, Caliceti U, Cavina C.
    Three-dimensional reconstruction of the oral
    cavity using the free anterolateral thigh flap.
    Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002 Jan109(1)53-7.
  • Kimura N, Satoh K, Hasumi T, Ostuka T. Clinical
    application of the free thin anterolateral thigh
    flap in 31 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr
    Surg. 2001 Oct108(5)1197-208 discussion
    1209-10.

85
Bibliography
  • Novak CB, Lipa JE, Noria S, Allison K, Neligan
    PC, Gilbert RW. Comparison of anterolateral thigh
    and radial forearm free flap donor site
    morbidity. Microsurgery. 200727(8)651-4.
  • Chuang HC, Su CY, Jeng SF, Chien CY. Anterior
    lateral thigh flap for buccal mucosal defect
    after resection of buccal cancer. Otolaryngol
    Head Neck Surg. 2007 Oct137(4)632-5.
  • Posch NA, Mureau MA, Dumans AG, Hofer SO.
    Functional and aesthetic outcome and survival
    after double free flap reconstruction in advanced
    head and neck cancer patients. Plast Reconstr
    Surg. 2007 Jul120(1)124-9.
  • Farace F, Fois VE, Manconi A, Puddu A, Stomeo F,
    Tullio A, Meloni F, Pisanu G, Rubino C. Free
    anterolateral thigh flap versus free forearm
    flap Functional results in oral reconstruction.
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 200760(6)583-7.
    Epub 2007 Jan 24.
  • Hurvitz KA, Kobayashi M, Evans GR. Current
    options in head and neck reconstruction. Plast
    Reconstr Surg. 2006 Oct118(5)122e-133e. Review.
  • Yu P, Youssef A. Efficacy of the handheld Doppler
    in preoperative identification of the cutaneous
    perforators in the anterolateral thigh flap.
    Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006 Sep 15118(4)928-33
    discussion 934-5.
  • Malata CM, Tehrani H, Kumiponjera D, Hardy DG,
    Moffat DA. Use of anterolateral thigh and lateral
    arm fasciocutaneous free flaps in lateral skull
    base reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2006
    Aug57(2)169-75 discussion 176.
  • Calderón W, Borel C, Roco H, Piñeros JL, Olguin
    F. Primary closure of donor site in anterolateral
    cutaneous thigh free flap. Plast Reconstr Surg.
    2006 Jun117(7)2528-9. No abstract available.
  • Chou EK, Ulusal B, Ulusal A, Wei FC, Lin CH, Tsao
    CK. Using the descending branch of the lateral
    femoral circumflex vessel as a source of two
    independent flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006
    May117(6)2059-63.
  • Yildirim S, Gideroglu K, Aydogdu E, Avci G, Akan
    M, Aköz T. Composite anterolateral thigh-fascia
    lata flap a good alternative to radial
    forearm-palmaris longus flap for total lower lip
    reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006
    May117(6)2033-41.
  • Spyriounis PK. The extended approach to the
    vascular pedicle of the anterolateral thigh
    perforator flap anatomical and clinical study.
    Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006 Mar117(3)997-1001
    discussion 1002-3.
  • Yu P, Lewin JS, Reece GP, Robb GL. Comparison of
    clinical and functional outcomes and hospital
    costs following pharyngoesophageal reconstruction
    with the anterolateral thigh free flap versus the
    jejunal flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006
    Mar117(3)968-74.
  • Calikapan GT, Yildirim S, Aköz T. One-stage
    reconstruction of large scalp defects
    anterolateral thigh flap. Microsurgery.
    200626(3)155-9.
  • Ozkan O, Mardini S, Chen HC, Cigna E, Tang WR,
    Liu YT. Repair of buccal defects with
    anterolateral thigh flaps. Microsurgery.
    200626(3)182-9.
  • Clark JR, Gilbert R, Irish J, Brown D, Neligan P,
    Gullane PJ. Morbidity after flap reconstruction
    of hypopharyngeal defects. Laryngoscope. 2006
    Feb116(2)173-81.
  • Chien CY, Su CY, Hwang CF, Chuang HC, Jeng SF,
    Chen YC. Ablation of advanced tongue or base of
    tongue cancer and reconstruction with free flap
    functional outcomes. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2006
    Apr32(3)353-7. Epub 2006 Feb 7.
  • Lyons AJ. Perforator flaps in head and neck
    surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006
    Mar35(3)199-207. Epub 2005 Nov 15. Review.
  • Genden EM, Jacobson AS. The role of the
    anterolateral thigh flap for pharyngoesophageal
    reconstruction. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.
    2005 Sep131(9)796-9.
  • Posch NA, Mureau MA, Flood SJ, Hofer SO. The
    combined free partial vastus lateralis with
    anterolateral thigh perforator flap
    reconstruction of extensive composite defects. Br
    J Plast Surg. 2005 Dec58(8)1095-103. Epub 2005
    Jul 25.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com