Title: Lecture 1: Systematics and Taxonomy
1Lecture 1 Systematics and Taxonomy
- What is systematics? evolution of biological
diversity - Goals determine genealogy (phylogeny) and
properly constituted names (taxonomy) - Why do systematics? Predictive
- Taxol, cancer and yew
2OUTLINE
- How Are Phylogenetic Trees Reconstructed?
- Characters Used in Reconstructing Phylogenies
- Phylogenetic Trees Have Many Uses
- Why Classify Organisms?
- The Hierarchical Classification of Species
- Biological Classification and Evolutionary
Relationships - The Future of Systematics
3How Are Phylogenetic Trees Reconstructed?
- Phylogenetic trees display history of descent of
a group of organisms from their common ancestor.
4Figure 23.1
5How Are Phylogenetic Trees Reconstructed?
- Reconstruction based on analysis of evolutionary
changes in characters of organisms (eg. DNA
sequences, behavior anatomical feature). - Traits that are inherited from a common ancestor
are said to be homologous.
6Figure 23.2
7How Are Phylogenetic Trees Reconstructed?
- Characters that are similar as a result of
convergent evolution or evolutionary reversals
are said to be homoplastic.
8How Are Phylogenetic Trees Reconstructed?
- To determine true evolutionary relationships,
systematists must distinguish between homologous
and non-homologous (homoplastic) characters as
well as between ancestral and derived characters
within a lineage. - Derived character- one that differs from its
ancestral form. - e.g. fins (ancestral)-- limbs (derived)
9Ancestral -----------Derived
6 legs-------------------------- 3 legs
10Figure 23.5
11Traits Used in Reconstructing Phylogenies
- Systematists use fossils and the rich array of
morphological and molecular data available from
living organisms to determine evolutionary
relationships.
12Traits Used in Reconstructing Phylogenies
- The structures of proteins and the base sequences
of nucleic acids are important data.
13Figure 23.7
figure 23-07.jpg
14Phylogenetic Trees Have Many Uses
- Phylogenetic trees help biologists determine how
many times evolutionary traits have arisen and
when lineages diverged.
15Figure 23.8
figure 23-08.jpg
16Figure 23.9
figure 23-09.jpg
17 Taxonomy (science of classification) and
nomenclature (rules for naming organisms)
classification system developed by Carlos Linnaeus
18Why Classify Organisms?
- Classification systems improve our ability to
explain relationships among organisms and provide
unique, universally used names for organisms.
19The Hierarchical Classification of Species
- Biological nomenclature assigns each organism a
unique combination of a generic and specific
name. (binomial nomenclature) - Scientific name (unique) vs. common name
- Genus name species name always underlined or
written in italics. - e.g. Felis concolor
20Why not use common names? same common name
applied to different species e.g. gopher
refers to tortoises in Florida and pocket gopher
in western US bluebells
21The Hierarchical Classification of Species
- In the Linnaean classification system, species
are grouped into higher-level units called
genera, families, orders, classes, phyla, and
kingdoms.
22Figure 23.11
figure 23-11.jpg
23Biological Classification and Evolutionary
Relationships
- Problem- early classifications were
non-evolutionary - Systematists today agree that taxa should share a
common ancestor (monophyletic). Review Figure
23.12 - Monophyletic group (clades) contain common
ancestor and all descendants.
24Figure 23.12
figure 23-12.jpg
25Biological Classification and Evolutionary
Relationships
- Non-monophyletic taxa should be avoided because
they misrepresent evolution. - e.g. reptiles as traditionally defined do not
include birds
26Figure 23.13
figure 23-13.jpg
27The Future of Systematics
- Molecular methods and powerful computers have
revolutionized systematics. - Phylogenies are increasingly being used to answer
questions other than evolutionary relationships.
28RELATIVE TIMING CHARACTER CORRELATION
When and how did tail propulsion evolve in
cetaceans?
29RELATIVE TIMING CHARACTER CORRELATION
hind limbs vestigial
hind limbs reduced sacral
reduction/disassociation fluke
development lumbar elongation
cervical shortening sacral/caudal elongation
(after Buchholtz 1998, Hulbert 1998, Thewissen
1998)