Dr' R' Rejikumar BHMS, MDHom - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 100
About This Presentation
Title:

Dr' R' Rejikumar BHMS, MDHom

Description:

Dr. R. Rejikumar BHMS, MD(Hom) Lecturer, SKHMC. State Joint Secretary, IHMA ... M. Nair , Former Advisor (Homoeo) , Govt. of India ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:313
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 101
Provided by: Fer81
Category:
Tags: bhms | mdhom | nair | rejikumar

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Dr' R' Rejikumar BHMS, MDHom


1
Literature Review
  • Dr. R. Rejikumar BHMS, MD(Hom)
  • Lecturer, SKHMC
  • State Joint Secretary, IHMA
  • www.homoeopathyhome.com

2
tributes to pioneers of Homoeopathy
3
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
  • Dr. Ravi. M. Nair , Former Advisor (Homoeo) ,
    Govt. of India
  • Dr. V. M. Janakikutty, Principal Controlling
    Officer, GHMCT
  • Dr. Mohan, Principal, SKHMC
  • Dr. P. Muraleedharan, Rtd. Principal, GHMCC
  • Dr. Nisha Paul, Superintendent, GHMCT
  • Dr. S. Saveesh Kumar, Head, Dept. of Medicine,
    GHMCT
  • Dr. Sajith Kumar, Asst. Prof, Dept. of Community
    Medicine, MCT
  • Dr. Ravi Prasad Varma, Asst. Prof, Dept. of
    Community Medicine, MCT

4
Why search medical
literature?
  • Clarify your research idea and sharpen your
    research question
  • Establish a theoretical framework for your study
  • Find investigations similar to the one you are
    contemplating
  • Learn from similar study designs

5
Why search medical literature?
  • Define your variables and terms clearly
  • Identify useful methodologies and instruments
  • Appreciate historical perspective
  • To identify authorities or important contributors
    in the field

6
Sources of medical literature
  • Primary Sources Journal articles that report
    original work
  • Print
  • Electronic
  • Secondary Sources
  • Textbooks
  • Monographs
  • Review Articles
  • Alternative Sources
  • Government publications
  • Doctoral dissertations
  • Unpublished data

7
Textbooks and monographs
  • Textbooks
  • Useful only for getting to know a topic
  • One or few authors restricted viewpoint
  • Information at least two years old
  • Monographs
  • Authors are usually authorities in the field
  • Dated information

8
Review articles
  • Information is more current
  • Authors are specialists in the area of study
  • References provided are good sources of more
    reading material
  • Organized search for journal articles of original
    research is a must

9
Search for medical literature
  • Traditional
  • Index Medicus
  • Year books
  • Excerpta medica
  • Electronic databases
  • Medline
  • Others
  • World Wide Web

10
The traditional library
  • Browsing the shelves
  • Catalogues or index cards
  • Books have unique identity (ISBN)
  • Books are permanent written records

11
The World Wide Web
  • Two billion pages of information
  • Lacks bibliographic control standards
  • No equivalent to the ISBN
  • No standard system of cataloguing or
    classification
  • Most documents lack even the name of the author
    and the date of publication
  • Person working in remote area with no good
    library can access information

12
Search Engine
  • Huge databases
  • Enable quick access to vast amounts of
    information
  • Can perform searches on any keyword or subject
    combination
  • Access is totally FREE
  • But the things you seek may not always be at the
    top of the retrieved page

13
Search Engine
  • Google (www.google.com)
  • Largest database
  • Best for ranking results
  • Saves web pages
  • Google scholar (www.scholar.google.com)
  • Provides academic information only
  • AllTheWeb (www.alltheweb.com)
  • AltaVista (www.altavista.com)

14
Specialty databases
  • More effective at finding what you need than a
    general search engine
  • Dedicated to collecting relevant sites for a
    particular subject

15
Medical databases
  • MEDLINE
  • database of NLM searchable by NLMs pubmed and
    several other search engines
  • OMIM
  • Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man The most
    comprehensive database on genetic diseases.
  • CDC WONDER (http//wonder.cdc.gov/)
  • provides a single point of access to a variety of
    CDC reports, guidelines, and numeric public
    health data

16
Medical databases
  • PDQ- (http//cancernet.nci.nih.gov/pdq.html )
  • Physicians Data Query. By National Cancer
    Institute. The best and current database on
    cancer prevention, screening and treatment.
  • The Cochrane library
  • For evidence based medicine
  • National Guideline Clearinhouse
  • For guidelines on various diseases.
  • Medical Matrix
  • OMNI
  • UK gateway to quality biomedical and health
    information

17
Medline
  • MEDLINE (Medical Literature Analysis and
    Retrieval System Online) is the electronic
    version of the Index Medicus
  • Over 10 million articles published in 4300
    journals in 40 different languages from 75
    countries
  • PubMed is a search interface from the National
    Library of Medicine (NLM) It is free.
  • Other search software like Ovid

18
Pubmed
  • Coverage includes medicine, dentistry, nursing,
    health care literature, veterinary medicine, and
    the pre-clinical sciences
  • Covers 4,600 biomedical journals
  • Contains over 14 million records dating back to
    1950s
  • PubMed includes MEDLINE records, in-process
    records, and out-of scope citations from
    publisher-supplied records

19
Basic PubMed Searching
  • State what you want to find
  • Find information on ocular complications of
    diabetes
  • Identify keywords
  • Find information on ocular complications of
    diabetes

20
Basic PubMed Searching
  • Select synonyms and variant word forms
  • Ocular, ophthalmic, eye
  • Combine keywords, synonyms and variant word forms
  • (ocular OR ophthalmic OR eye)
  • Check your spelling

21
Basic PubMed Searching
  • Enter one or more terms in query box (terms are
    automatically combined with AND)
  • Hit GO
  • PubMed displays results in Summary format

22
(No Transcript)
23
(No Transcript)
24
(No Transcript)
25
Learn to use..
  • Boolean operators
  • MeSH browser
  • Limits
  • Tags
  • Citation matcher
  • Related PubMed Articles Link
  • Clipboard
  • Bookshelf

26
Boolean operators
  • PubMed Boolean operators AND, OR, NOT (must be
    typed in upper case!)
  • Terms are automatically combined with AND dont
    have to type this!
  • AND retrieves what 2 or more sets have in common

27
Boolean operators
  • OR retrieves either term or set (synonyms)
  • NOT excludes term or set

28
(No Transcript)
29
(No Transcript)
30
(No Transcript)
31
(No Transcript)
32
(No Transcript)
33
MeSH
  • "concept-based" search methodology
  • Medical Subject Heading (MeSH)
  • Over 19,000 standardised medical terms constitute
    the thesaurus of MeSH
  • MeSH is in the form of a tree where subject
    headings are arranged under one another with
    increasing specificity
  • 82 subheadings
  • Trained indexers scan published articles,
    interpret the findings, identify the thrust or
    themes of these articles, and assign 10-12 MeSH
    terms and subheadings to each article.

34
MeSH searching
  • When you type a word or phrase in the search box,
    it is automatically matched for a MeSH term and
    also simultaneously searched in all fields as a
    text word
  • eg. Typing in olfactory neuroblastoma results
    in search for
  • ("esthesioneuroblastoma, olfactory" MeSH Term
    OR olfactory neuroblastoma Text Word).

35
(No Transcript)
36
(No Transcript)
37
(No Transcript)
38
MeSH searching
39
LIMITS
40
(No Transcript)
41
(No Transcript)
42
(No Transcript)
43
(No Transcript)
44
(No Transcript)
45
Tags
  • (AB) Abstract
  • (AD) Affiliation
  • (AU) Author
  • (EDAT) Publication Date
  • (MeSH) MeSH Terms
  • (TI) Title
  • (TA) Journal Title Abbreviation

46
(No Transcript)
47
(No Transcript)
48
RELATED ARTICLES
49
(No Transcript)
50
CITATION MATCHER
51
(No Transcript)
52
(No Transcript)
53
FULL TEXT ARTICLES
54
(No Transcript)
55
(No Transcript)
56
(No Transcript)
57
(No Transcript)
58
Free Medical Journals
  • NEJM
  • BMJ group of journals 27 nos.
  • BMJ
  • Gut
  • Heart
  • J of Clin Pathol
  • J of Medical Ethics
  • Br J of Ophthalmology
  • Homeopathy (BHJ)
  • Links
  • Homeotimes
  • Hpathy

59
(No Transcript)
60
(No Transcript)
61
(No Transcript)
62
(No Transcript)
63
(No Transcript)
64
Clipboard
  • Place to collect selected citations
  • Citations can be saved or printed
  • Upto 500 citations can be placed

65
(No Transcript)
66
(No Transcript)
67
BOOK SHELF
68
(No Transcript)
69
(No Transcript)
70
(No Transcript)
71
LINKOUT
72
(No Transcript)
73
(No Transcript)
74
(No Transcript)
75
(No Transcript)
76
(No Transcript)
77
(No Transcript)
78
(No Transcript)
79
(No Transcript)
80

81
(No Transcript)
82
Images
  • Books
  • Bookshelf
  • Atlas
  • Google images

83
(No Transcript)
84
(No Transcript)
85
(No Transcript)
86
(No Transcript)
87
SOUND VIDEO
88
(No Transcript)
89
(No Transcript)
90
(No Transcript)
91
(No Transcript)
92
CRITICAL REVIEW-an overview
  • What is critical review?
  • What are the important steps?

93
CRITICAL REVIEW
  • An analytical approach to published work
  • Looks at published work in a systematic manner,
    evaluating the pluses and minuses
  • Helps in the learning process by giving a proper
    weight to the information contained in a
    published work, as well as informing our own work

94
The background and rationale
  • What circumstances led to this research?
  • What are the socio-economic, biomedical or policy
    questions that underly this question?

Task for group I Discuss the background of the
research question in the paper
95
The Research Question
Task for group II Read the article given and
make a three-minute presentation on the research
question
  • WHAT is/ are the objectives of the present work?
    What is the research question involved?
  • Is it likely to add to the understanding about
    the subject? Is it likely to answer operational
    questions? Is it a locally specific question?
  • Is it a me too research?

96
Population and sample
Task for group III Comment on this aspect of the
article
  • What is the target population in which the study
    was done? Is it an appropriate population?
  • What was the sample SIZE? Was it appropriate? Was
    the selection process unbiased?
  • Was there an appropriate control group (in
    relevant cases)?

97
Methodology
Task for group IV Comment on whether methods
were appropriate
  • HOW was the question approached? What was the
    design? Is it appropriate?
  • How was information collected? What were the
    opportunities for bias (systematic error) in
    selection or collection of information?
  • In case of laboratory methods, were the
    techniques relevant and appropriate?
  • In the case of human subjects, was informed
    consent obtained? Was the conduct of the study
    ethical?

98
Analysis
Task for group V discuss the analysis of data in
the paper
  • Was the analysis appropriate? Were the right
    statistical tests done?
  • Is there any approach that could have been used
    in the analysis that was unexplored by the
    authors?
  • Are all the subjects in the study accounted for?
    Is the response rate adequate?

99
Conclusions
Task for group VI Comment on the conclusions in
the given article
  • What are the main conclusions? Are they
    applicable to general population?
  • Are the conclusions justifiable from the
    findings? Do the findings allow for alternate
    explanations that have not been considered by the
    authors?
  • Have the authors discussed their limitations?

100
Thank you
Dr. R. Rejikumar
Ph 98 95 98 15 30
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com