Title: Dr' R' Rejikumar BHMS, MDHom
1Literature Review
- Dr. R. Rejikumar BHMS, MD(Hom)
- Lecturer, SKHMC
- State Joint Secretary, IHMA
- www.homoeopathyhome.com
2 tributes to pioneers of Homoeopathy
3ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
- Dr. Ravi. M. Nair , Former Advisor (Homoeo) ,
Govt. of India - Dr. V. M. Janakikutty, Principal Controlling
Officer, GHMCT - Dr. Mohan, Principal, SKHMC
- Dr. P. Muraleedharan, Rtd. Principal, GHMCC
- Dr. Nisha Paul, Superintendent, GHMCT
- Dr. S. Saveesh Kumar, Head, Dept. of Medicine,
GHMCT - Dr. Sajith Kumar, Asst. Prof, Dept. of Community
Medicine, MCT - Dr. Ravi Prasad Varma, Asst. Prof, Dept. of
Community Medicine, MCT
4 Why search medical
literature?
- Clarify your research idea and sharpen your
research question - Establish a theoretical framework for your study
- Find investigations similar to the one you are
contemplating - Learn from similar study designs
5Why search medical literature?
- Define your variables and terms clearly
- Identify useful methodologies and instruments
- Appreciate historical perspective
- To identify authorities or important contributors
in the field
6Sources of medical literature
- Primary Sources Journal articles that report
original work - Print
- Electronic
- Secondary Sources
- Textbooks
- Monographs
- Review Articles
- Alternative Sources
- Government publications
- Doctoral dissertations
- Unpublished data
7Textbooks and monographs
- Textbooks
- Useful only for getting to know a topic
- One or few authors restricted viewpoint
- Information at least two years old
- Monographs
- Authors are usually authorities in the field
- Dated information
8Review articles
- Information is more current
- Authors are specialists in the area of study
- References provided are good sources of more
reading material - Organized search for journal articles of original
research is a must
9 Search for medical literature
- Traditional
- Index Medicus
- Year books
- Excerpta medica
- Electronic databases
- Medline
- Others
- World Wide Web
10 The traditional library
- Browsing the shelves
- Catalogues or index cards
- Books have unique identity (ISBN)
- Books are permanent written records
11 The World Wide Web
- Two billion pages of information
- Lacks bibliographic control standards
- No equivalent to the ISBN
- No standard system of cataloguing or
classification - Most documents lack even the name of the author
and the date of publication - Person working in remote area with no good
library can access information
12Search Engine
- Huge databases
- Enable quick access to vast amounts of
information - Can perform searches on any keyword or subject
combination - Access is totally FREE
- But the things you seek may not always be at the
top of the retrieved page
13Search Engine
- Google (www.google.com)
- Largest database
- Best for ranking results
- Saves web pages
- Google scholar (www.scholar.google.com)
- Provides academic information only
- AllTheWeb (www.alltheweb.com)
- AltaVista (www.altavista.com)
14Specialty databases
- More effective at finding what you need than a
general search engine - Dedicated to collecting relevant sites for a
particular subject
15Medical databases
- MEDLINE
- database of NLM searchable by NLMs pubmed and
several other search engines - OMIM
- Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man The most
comprehensive database on genetic diseases. - CDC WONDER (http//wonder.cdc.gov/)
- provides a single point of access to a variety of
CDC reports, guidelines, and numeric public
health data
16Medical databases
- PDQ- (http//cancernet.nci.nih.gov/pdq.html )
- Physicians Data Query. By National Cancer
Institute. The best and current database on
cancer prevention, screening and treatment. - The Cochrane library
- For evidence based medicine
- National Guideline Clearinhouse
- For guidelines on various diseases.
- Medical Matrix
- OMNI
- UK gateway to quality biomedical and health
information
17Medline
- MEDLINE (Medical Literature Analysis and
Retrieval System Online) is the electronic
version of the Index Medicus - Over 10 million articles published in 4300
journals in 40 different languages from 75
countries - PubMed is a search interface from the National
Library of Medicine (NLM) It is free. - Other search software like Ovid
18Pubmed
- Coverage includes medicine, dentistry, nursing,
health care literature, veterinary medicine, and
the pre-clinical sciences - Covers 4,600 biomedical journals
- Contains over 14 million records dating back to
1950s - PubMed includes MEDLINE records, in-process
records, and out-of scope citations from
publisher-supplied records
19Basic PubMed Searching
- State what you want to find
- Find information on ocular complications of
diabetes - Identify keywords
- Find information on ocular complications of
diabetes
20Basic PubMed Searching
- Select synonyms and variant word forms
- Ocular, ophthalmic, eye
- Combine keywords, synonyms and variant word forms
- (ocular OR ophthalmic OR eye)
- Check your spelling
21Basic PubMed Searching
- Enter one or more terms in query box (terms are
automatically combined with AND) - Hit GO
- PubMed displays results in Summary format
22(No Transcript)
23(No Transcript)
24(No Transcript)
25Learn to use..
- Boolean operators
- MeSH browser
- Limits
- Tags
- Citation matcher
- Related PubMed Articles Link
- Clipboard
- Bookshelf
26Boolean operators
- PubMed Boolean operators AND, OR, NOT (must be
typed in upper case!) - Terms are automatically combined with AND dont
have to type this! - AND retrieves what 2 or more sets have in common
27Boolean operators
- OR retrieves either term or set (synonyms)
- NOT excludes term or set
28(No Transcript)
29(No Transcript)
30(No Transcript)
31(No Transcript)
32(No Transcript)
33MeSH
- "concept-based" search methodology
- Medical Subject Heading (MeSH)
- Over 19,000 standardised medical terms constitute
the thesaurus of MeSH - MeSH is in the form of a tree where subject
headings are arranged under one another with
increasing specificity - 82 subheadings
- Trained indexers scan published articles,
interpret the findings, identify the thrust or
themes of these articles, and assign 10-12 MeSH
terms and subheadings to each article.
34MeSH searching
- When you type a word or phrase in the search box,
it is automatically matched for a MeSH term and
also simultaneously searched in all fields as a
text word - eg. Typing in olfactory neuroblastoma results
in search for - ("esthesioneuroblastoma, olfactory" MeSH Term
OR olfactory neuroblastoma Text Word).
35(No Transcript)
36(No Transcript)
37(No Transcript)
38MeSH searching
39LIMITS
40(No Transcript)
41(No Transcript)
42(No Transcript)
43(No Transcript)
44(No Transcript)
45Tags
- (AB) Abstract
- (AD) Affiliation
- (AU) Author
- (EDAT) Publication Date
- (MeSH) MeSH Terms
- (TI) Title
- (TA) Journal Title Abbreviation
46(No Transcript)
47(No Transcript)
48RELATED ARTICLES
49(No Transcript)
50CITATION MATCHER
51(No Transcript)
52(No Transcript)
53FULL TEXT ARTICLES
54(No Transcript)
55(No Transcript)
56(No Transcript)
57(No Transcript)
58Free Medical Journals
- NEJM
- BMJ group of journals 27 nos.
- BMJ
- Gut
- Heart
- J of Clin Pathol
- J of Medical Ethics
- Br J of Ophthalmology
- Homeopathy (BHJ)
- Links
- Homeotimes
- Hpathy
59(No Transcript)
60(No Transcript)
61(No Transcript)
62(No Transcript)
63(No Transcript)
64Clipboard
- Place to collect selected citations
- Citations can be saved or printed
- Upto 500 citations can be placed
65(No Transcript)
66(No Transcript)
67BOOK SHELF
68(No Transcript)
69(No Transcript)
70(No Transcript)
71LINKOUT
72(No Transcript)
73(No Transcript)
74(No Transcript)
75(No Transcript)
76(No Transcript)
77(No Transcript)
78(No Transcript)
79(No Transcript)
80 81(No Transcript)
82Images
- Books
- Bookshelf
- Atlas
- Google images
83(No Transcript)
84(No Transcript)
85(No Transcript)
86(No Transcript)
87SOUND VIDEO
88(No Transcript)
89(No Transcript)
90(No Transcript)
91(No Transcript)
92CRITICAL REVIEW-an overview
- What is critical review?
- What are the important steps?
93CRITICAL REVIEW
- An analytical approach to published work
- Looks at published work in a systematic manner,
evaluating the pluses and minuses - Helps in the learning process by giving a proper
weight to the information contained in a
published work, as well as informing our own work
94The background and rationale
- What circumstances led to this research?
- What are the socio-economic, biomedical or policy
questions that underly this question?
Task for group I Discuss the background of the
research question in the paper
95The Research Question
Task for group II Read the article given and
make a three-minute presentation on the research
question
- WHAT is/ are the objectives of the present work?
What is the research question involved? - Is it likely to add to the understanding about
the subject? Is it likely to answer operational
questions? Is it a locally specific question? - Is it a me too research?
96Population and sample
Task for group III Comment on this aspect of the
article
- What is the target population in which the study
was done? Is it an appropriate population? - What was the sample SIZE? Was it appropriate? Was
the selection process unbiased? - Was there an appropriate control group (in
relevant cases)?
97Methodology
Task for group IV Comment on whether methods
were appropriate
- HOW was the question approached? What was the
design? Is it appropriate? - How was information collected? What were the
opportunities for bias (systematic error) in
selection or collection of information? - In case of laboratory methods, were the
techniques relevant and appropriate? - In the case of human subjects, was informed
consent obtained? Was the conduct of the study
ethical?
98Analysis
Task for group V discuss the analysis of data in
the paper
- Was the analysis appropriate? Were the right
statistical tests done? - Is there any approach that could have been used
in the analysis that was unexplored by the
authors? - Are all the subjects in the study accounted for?
Is the response rate adequate?
99Conclusions
Task for group VI Comment on the conclusions in
the given article
- What are the main conclusions? Are they
applicable to general population? - Are the conclusions justifiable from the
findings? Do the findings allow for alternate
explanations that have not been considered by the
authors? - Have the authors discussed their limitations?
100Thank you
Dr. R. Rejikumar
Ph 98 95 98 15 30