SOCRATIC SEMINARS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

SOCRATIC SEMINARS

Description:

... School of Angel Fire, NM; the founding Director of Middle School Programs ... School in San Antonio, TX; and Paideia Teacher Trainer for School Districts ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:797
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: stephani212
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: SOCRATIC SEMINARS


1
SOCRATIC SEMINARS
  • Teaching Using Inquiry Based Learning

2
Who wrote a book about this idea?
  • Michael Strong
  • Michael Strong is Director of Education Programs.
    He joined the organization in 2004.
  • Michael has been the founding Director of Moreno
    Valley Charter School of Angel Fire, NM the
    founding Director of Middle School Programs for
    the Early Learning Institute of Palo Alto, CA
    founding Director of The Winston Academy of Ft.
    Lauderdale, FL (now closed) Director of Socratic
    Practice at The Judson Montessori School in San
    Antonio, TX and Paideia Teacher Trainer for
    School Districts in Homer and Anchorage, AK.

3
The Habit of Thought
  • Michael has provided educational consulting to
    hundreds of schools on Socratic Seminars,
    Socratic Practice, Paideia education, and
    Montessori secondary education. He is the author
    of "The Habit of Thought From Socratic Seminars
    to Socratic Practice." He is currently completing
    a manuscript, "Whole Lives The Creation of
    Conscious Culture Through Educational Innovation"
    based on his experience as the founder of
    innovative, humane schools to show why we need
    educational freedom in order to create a better
    world.

4
A Little Bit More About Michael
  • Prior to entering the field of education, Michael
    received a B.A. in Liberal Arts from St. John's
    College (Santa Fe) and an M.A. from the
    University of Chicago in the Committee on Social
    Thought. He began a dissertation on "Ideas and
    Culture as Human Capital" under the economist
    Gary Becker before concluding that the expected
    value of a career in academia was less than the
    expected value of a career as an educational
    innovator.

5
What are Socratic seminars?
  • A way to get students focused on questions, not
    answers.
  • Students are likely to retain knowledge,
    understanding, and ethical attitudes and
    behaviors when they are actively engaged in
    learning as a collaborative effort.
  • Seminars contribute to the development of
    critical thinking.
  • We model an inquiring, probing mind by
    continually probing into the subject with
    questions.

6
What are Socratic seminars?
  • Students are more likely to retain "knowledge,
    understanding, and ethical attitudes and
    behaviors" when they are actively engaged in
    learning as a collaborative effort.
  • Contribute to the development of vocabulary,
    listening skills, interpretive and comparative
    reading, textual analysis, synthesis, and
    evaluation - predominantly higher level thinking
    skills.
  • Reinforces the formation of the classroom as a
    learning community.

7
Whats so good about discussion?
  • Discussion is essentially a series of
    interruptions. If all in the group are involved,
    none need be left behind.
  • Discussion intrinsically guarantees
    understanding.
  • It allows students to share interpretations,
    insight, and vision.
  • Discussion can lead to critical thinking.

8
Dialogue or Debate?
  • In dialogue, one submits one's best thinking,
    expecting that other people's reflections will
    help improve it rather than threaten it.
  • In debate, one submits one's best thinking and
    defends it against challenge to show that it is
    right.
  • Dialogue calls for temporarily suspending one's
    beliefs.
  • Debate calls for investing wholeheartedly in
    one's beliefs.
  • In dialogue, one searches for strengths in all
    positions.
  • In debate, one searches for weaknesses in the
    other position.
  • Dialogue respects all the other participants and
    seeks not to alienate or offend.
  • Debate rebuts contrary positions and may belittle
    or deprecate other participants.
  • Dialogue assumes that many people have pieces of
    answers and that cooperation can lead to a
    greater understanding.
  • Debate assumes a single right answer that
    somebody already has.
  • Dialogue remains open-ended.
  • Debate demands a conclusion.

9
Heres the Bottom Line Difference!
  • Dialogue is collaborative multiple sides work
    toward shared understanding.
  • Debate is oppositional two opposing sides try to
    prove each other wrong.
  • In dialogue, one listens to understand, to make
    meaning, and to find common ground.
  • In debate, one listens to find flaws, to spot
    differences, and to counter arguments.
  • Dialogue enlarges and possibly changes a
    participant's point of view.
  • Debate defends assumptions as truth.
  • Dialogue creates an open-minded attitude an
    openness to being wrong and an openness to
    change.
  • Debate creates a close-minded attitude, a
    determination to be right.

10
The Key
  • Allow the students to discuss a topic openly and
    freely.
  • Teacher is simply the facilitator, nothing more.
  • Teacher should give no response, negative or
    positive, to the students discussion.
  • Facilitator's sole responsibility is to ask well
    thought-out, open-ended questions.
  • Goal to create open-ended questions that create
    discussion that follows discussion.

11
The Socratic Questioner
  • Acts as the logical equivalent of the inner
    critical voice which the mind develops when it
    develops critical thinking abilities.
  • Contributions from the members of the class are
    like so many thoughts in the mind. All of the
    thoughts must be dealt with and they must be
    dealt with carefully and fairly.
  • By following up all answers with further
    questions, and by selecting questions which
    advance the discussion, the Socratic questioner
    forces the class to think in a disciplined,
    intellectually responsible manner, while yet
    continually aiding the students by posing
    facilitating questions.

12
The Socratic Questioner
  • A Socratic questioner should
  • keep the discussion focused
  • keep the discussion intellectually responsible
  • stimulate the discussion with probing questions
  • periodically summarize what has and what has not
    been dealt with and/or resolved
  • draw as many students as possible into the
    discussion.

13
Guidelines for Participants
  • Refer to the text when needed during the
    discussion. A seminar is not a test of memory.
    You are not "learning a subject" your goal is to
    understand the ideas, issues, and values
    reflected in the text.
  • It's OK to "pass" when asked to contribute.
  • Do not participate if you are not prepared. A
    seminar should not be a bull session.
  • Do not stay confused ask for clarification.
  • Stick to the point currently under discussion
    make notes about ideas you want to come back to.
  • Don't raise hands take turns speaking.
  • Listen carefully.
  • Speak up so that all can hear you.
  • Talk to each other, not just to the leader or
    teacher.
  • Discuss ideas rather than each other's opinions.
  • You are responsible for the seminar, even if you
    don't know it or admit it.

14
Socratic Seminar Guidelines
  • The group must sit in a circle that allows all of
    the participates to make eye contact.
  • Not reading the material before the seminar is
    not an option. A student may not participate in
    the discussion if they have not thoroughly read
    the material.
  • The outside circle is responsible for taking
    notes on the inner groups discussion.
  • Quiet is not bad, allow students adequate time to
    formulate their thoughts.
  • One of the greatest skills being developed in a
    Socratic Seminar is critical thinking.
  • Allow the discussion to flow on its own. You want
    discussion to follow discussion. Even if the
    topic derails a little, this can often provide
    valuable insist for the students.
  • To keep students on task with the discussion as
    the facilitator you may need to remind them to
    connect their discussion to the text.
  • A Socratic Seminar is not a two-way debate. If
    two students dominate the discussion, you as the
    facilitator may need to ask another open-ended
    question and directly ask other students to
    answer the question.

15
General Rules
  • Respect is another essential skill that the
    Socratic Seminar builds. You may want to consider
    a discussion or a short story that illustrates
    the concept of respect that you can use as
    pre-seminar material.
  • One students speaking at a time, and the other
    students actively listening in order to respond
    is the apex of a Socratic Seminar.
  • If students are still discussing items the
    following day or have additional questions that
    have risen overnight, then you will experience
    the fruit of a Socratic Seminar.

16
Responsibility of Participants
  • Being prepared for the seminar.
  • The flow of the discussion within the seminar.
  • Determining the meaning of the seminar
  • Constructing their own analysis of the seminar.
  • Utilizing critical thinking,listening, and
    communicating skills.

17
My Previous Experience with Socratic Seminars
  • Its crucial to model Socratic seminars, start
    off small.
  • Not all students were built to seminar. With
    some students you will need to draw them in.
  • Lay down the rules and address them often.
  • Dont give up. The rewards are too valuable.
  • Remember with this process you are also teaching
    concrete communication skills.
  • It is well worth the time you take.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com